Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.

The Exchange

On January 23, 2023, the Company consummated the Exchange. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, the ICUMO Shareholders have transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of ICUMO to the Company in exchange for 182,240,000 of Exchange Shares, which number was based on a 1.34 exchange ratio. As a result of the Exchange, ICUMO is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, as described in more detail in Item 1.01 above, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Description Of Business and Properties

Prior to the Closing, the Company was a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) with no operations. At the Closing and as a result of the Exchange, the business of ICUMO became the business of the Company.

Overview

The Company, through ICUMO, owns or controls the mining claims and related rights to the CuMo Project, a large molybdenum-copper-silver deposit in Idaho. The Company is currently engaged in exploration and feasibility work to determine the future development plan of the CuMo Project. No production has yet occurred on the CuMo Project.

ICUMO was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 15, 2004, under the name of Mosquito Mining Corporation by, and as a wholly owned subsidiary of, Multi-Metal Development Company (TSX-V: MLY), previously named Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. and American CuMo Mining Corporation, (“MMDC” or “American CuMo”). In February 2013, MMDC reincorporated ICUMO as Idaho CuMo Mining Corp. in the State of Idaho. In 2013, ICUMO acquired title to all the patented lode mining claims in the CuMo Project and in 2017, MMDC arranged contractually for ICUMO to acquire all of the rights, titles, and interests in and to the remaining CuMo Project mining claims, such claims as further described below. The CuMo Project is the only mining project in which ICUMO has any interests. On January 6, 2021, Idaho CuMo Mining Corp. changed its name to International CuMo Mining Corporation.

The CuMo Project

Project Ownership History

The CuMo Project is situated in an historic placer gold mining camp with a recorded production of 2.8 million ounces of gold. Molybdenite (MoS2) mineralization was not discovered in this area until 1963. Historic drilling at the site was done between 1969 and 1982 for a total of 10,981m (36,026 ft) in twenty-three (23) diamond drill holes and three reverse circulation holes.

In 1998, the property was re-staked as unpatented federal lode mining claims by CuMo Molybdenum Mining Inc. who then optioned these claims to American CuMo in October 2004 (the “2004 Option Agreement”).

In 2005, American CuMo optioned these same mining claims to Kobex Resources Ltd. (“Kobex”) who commenced drilling in 2006. Kobex drilled one complete hole and 50% of a second hole 1,087m (3,565 ft), and in 2006 withdrew from their option agreement with American CuMo, surrendering all rights and interests in the optioned property back to American CuMo. After resuming control, between 2006 to 2011, American CuMo completed several exploration drilling programs and, during 2012, American CuMo drilled nine additional holes totaling 4,713m (15,464 ft), aimed at improving the resource categorization and gaining a better understanding of the extent of the deposit.

In 2010, the CuMo Project’s footprint was expanded by the purchase of additional patented mineral claims by American CuMo adjacent to the unpatented claims they already owned. In February 2017, ICUMO purchased an additional twenty (20) unpatented lode mining claims in the area around the CuMo Project from a group of local prospectors. See the “Properties” section below for more information regarding the patented and unpatented mining claims.

The Company, through ICUMO, owns or has the right to acquire a 100% interest in the CuMo Project properties pursuant to the terms of the agreements described below.

2004 Option Agreement and Related Agreements

The 2004 Option Agreement, as amended in 2005, grant American CuMo exclusive rights to explore, develop and process minerals and metals on the related mining claims and an option to purchase 100% of the mining claims. The consideration for the exclusive rights was a combination of advance and actual royalty payments, the issuance of American CuMo shares, and yearly work requirements. The advance royalty payments are ongoing and are currently payable at $15,000 every six (6) months. The advance royalty payments are credited against a 1.5% net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty, based on sale proceeds for minerals and metals, which reduces to a 0.5% NSR after cumulative payments of $3,000,000 in advance and NSR royalties. The work requirements are also ongoing and currently require $50,000 worth of work on the property each year. The option to purchase, granted in the 2005 amendment, was exercisable within four years or upon payment of the $3,000,000 in advance royalties. This summary of the 2004 Option Agreement and related amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.3 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

In July 2017, the 2004 Option Agreement and related 2005 amendment were to be superseded by a Mining Claims Agreement entered into by and among American CuMo, ICUMO, CuMo Molybdenum Mining Inc., Western Geoscience Inc., and Thomas Evans. Under the terms of this purchase agreement, ICUMO was granted the right to purchase 100% of the mining claims and American CuMo retained the right to all royalties. This summary of the Mining Claims Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.4 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

This purchase transaction was expected to close by July 30, 2017, however, due to ongoing legal challenges regarding to governmental permits related to the CuMo Project that qualify as a force majeure event under the terms of the purchase agreement, the purchase transaction has been suspended until such time as the required permits are granted to ICUMO by the US Forest Service (the “USFS”). Until such time as the transactions contemplated under the purchase agreement can be consummated, the 2004 Options Agreement, as amended, remains in effect. See the “Permitting for Drilling and Exploration Activities; Legal Challenges” section below for more information.

Additional Agreements

In 2010, American CuMo expanded the CuMo Project footprint by entering into an option agreement, amended in 2011, to purchase six (6) patented lode mineral claims located in Section 13, 18 and 24 Township 8 North, Range 5 East, Boise Meridian, Boise County, Idaho, as depicted on Mineral Survey 1706: Blackbird, Red Flag, Enterprise, Enterprise Fraction, Commonwealth, and Baby Mine. These patented lode mining claims comprise 99.419 acres, are adjacent to the unpatented claims described herein and provide access to the CuMo Project. All option payments were completed, and these patented mining claims became part of the overall CuMo Project in 2013. On July 31, 2013, American CuMo transferred these patented mining claims to ICUMO by way of a Special Warranty Deed, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.5

In February 2017, ICUMO purchased an additional twenty (20) unpatented lode mining claims in the area around the CuMo Project from a group of local prospectors for an aggregate of $1,250,000 paid in $250,000 silver units, plus one million shares of American CuMo. The silver units are a seven (7) year debenture that can be converted into the right to buy silver for $5 per ounce from any future production at the CuMo Project. The debenture pays 8.5% interest per annum and is secured by ICUMO’s property and assets, excluding the patented lode mining claims. ICUMO has made all the interest payments due under such debentures. This summary of the 8.5% Secured Non-Convertible Note does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of such agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 4.7 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

Properties

Mining Property

To determine material mining operations in accordance with subpart 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K, management considered both quantitative and qualitative factors, assessed in the context of the Company’s overall business and financial condition. The Company concluded that, as of the date of the filing of this Report, its sole material mining operation is the CuMo Project. The Company will update its assessment of individually material mines on an annual basis.

The information relating to such sole material mining operation is contained in the technical report summary (“TRS”) relating to the CuMo Project prepared in compliance with the Item 601(b)(96) and subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K. Reference should be made to the full text of the TRS, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 96.1 and incorporated herein by reference. A glossary of terms used herein can be found in the TRS.

Pursuant to Item 1302(b)(5) of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. §229.1302(b)(5)), the Company states that the TRS was prepared by Shaun M. Dykes, M. Sc. (Eng), P.Geo of Geologic Systems, Ltd. Mr. Dykes is also serving as a director of the registrant and is also the registrant’s Director, Vice President, Exploration. Mr. Dykes meets the qualifications specified under the definition of “qualified person” under Item 1300 of Regulation S-K.

The CuMo Project currently consists of one hundred and twenty-six (126) federal unpatented lode mining claims, and six (6) patented mining claims. In total, the project comprises approximately 2,640 acres. The unpatented lode mining claims and patented claims are situated in an unorganized mining district, in Boise County, Idaho, spanning Sections in Township 7N and 8N, Range 5E and 6E, Boise Meridian. The names of the unpatented claims, and the place of record of the location notices thereof in the official records of the Boise County recorder, and the authorized office of the Bureau of Land Management are as follows:

Table 1

The following table lists the unpatented mining claims currently a part of the CuMo Project:

On August 24, 2021, ICUMO and Computershare Trust Company of Canada entered into a 7.5% Secured Note Indenture under which the aggregate principal amount of notes authorized to be issued is $15,000,00, with a maturity date of May 31, 2028. The 7.5% Secured Note Indenture is secured by all of the mining claims of ICUMO that represent the CuMo Project, other than the patented lode mining claims located in Section 13, Township 8 North, Range 5 East, Boise Meridian, Boise County, Idaho, as depicted on Mineral Survey 1706: (i) Blackbird; (ii) Red Flag; (iii) Enterprise; (iv) Enterprise Fraction; (v) Commonwealth; and (vi) Baby Mine. In connection with this security interest, ICUMO and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Mortgagee, signed a Real Property Mortgage under which the Mortgagee has the right upon default by the mortgagor to choose to sell the real property constituting the unpatented claims set out above. This summary of the 7.5% Secured Note Indenture does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 4.8 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

Table 2

The following table lists the patented mining claims currently a part of the CuMo Project:

On October 31, 2014, as subsequently amended March 26, 2015, and January 29, 2016, ICUMO entered into a Loan Agreement with La Familia II, LLC, evidenced by a secured promissory note, in the amount of $500,000. The promissory note accrues annual interest at 8.5%, has a maturity date of December 31, 2025, and is secured by a first priority deed of trust over the patented mining claims listed above. This summary of the Loan Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.6 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

Location, Access, Climate, Infrastructure and Topography

The CuMo Project is situated in the mountains of south-central Idaho, in the Boise National Forest, in Boise County, Idaho, approximately 15 miles northeast of the town of Idaho City, near the unincorporated community of Centerville, roughly 37 miles on a straight line, and 60 miles by road, from the city of Boise. Good all-weather highways, and USFS logging roads provide access to the project from Idaho City and Centerville. The trip from Boise takes approximately 1.5 hours. Access is limited during some winter months when significant snow cover can impede passage via the Forest Service roads.

The property is accessed by road from Boise by taking US State Highway 55 northerly for approximately 40 miles (65 km) to the town of Banks, Idaho, and then east on the Banks Lowman Road towards the town of Garden Valley for approximately 10 miles (16 km). One mile east of Garden Valley is a secondary road heading south across the Payette River. Following this secondary road, the western most edge of the CuMo claim block is approximately 10 miles (16 km) from Garden Valley. Alternatively, access can be gained by traveling northeast from Boise along Highway 21 past the towns of Idaho City and Centerville, along Grimes Creek, and then over the Grimes Pass.

The elevation of the CuMo project ranges between 5,100 feet and 7,200 feet. The project site features a mountain top which contains the bulk of the mineral deposit, deep ravines adjacent, and is largely forested, except for sections that have been cleared by several fires which occurred in 2014 and 2016.

The climate is defined by summer temperatures to a maximum of 100° F (38°C) and cold, windy winters with lows to -10° F (-23°C). Precipitation is moderately light with an average rainfall of 30 inches (<1 meter) and an average snowfall of approximately 140 inches (3.6 m). Vegetation in the project area consists of cedar, lodgepole pine, mountain mahogany, and juniper.

The area is serviced by the Idaho Power Company which supplies electricity to residents of Garden Valley, Lowman and Pioneerville. The nearest rail line is the Idaho Northern & Pacific line formerly operated by Union Pacific that runs through the town of Banks, approximately 20 road miles (32 km) to the west of the property. Equipment, supplies, and services for exploration and mining development projects are available at Boise. There is also a trained mining-industrial workforce available in Boise.

Exploration and mining activities at the property can be conducted year-round, due to the established road system and its proximity to other infrastructure. The property is large enough to accommodate exploration within the current CuMo deposit property footprint.

Geology and Mineralization

The regional tectonic setting consists of a basement of amalgamated Archean and Paleoproterozoic crystalline terrains that were joined during the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Montana orogeny, and are overlain discontinuously by sedimentary rocks of Mesoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic, and Paleozoic ages; and volcanic and sedimentary rocks of Eocene and Miocene ages. Voluminous tonalite to granite bodies of the Idaho batholith and later granitic plutons of Eocene age intrude the older rocks. Major deformational episodes superimposed on the Precambrian basement include the Cretaceous Sevier orogeny, which mainly involved east-vergent “thin-skinned” thrusting; Eocene extensional deformation, which resulted in development of metamorphic core complexes; and basin and range type faulting.

The CuMo deposit is situated within the Idaho batholith and is part of a regional scale belt of porphyry and related deposits identified as the Idaho-Montana Porphyry Belt. Igneous complexes in this belt are interpreted to be related to an Eocene, intra-arc rift, and are characterized by alkalic rocks in the northeast, mixed alkalic and calc-alkalic rocks in the middle, and calc-alkaline rocks in the southwest. The CuMo deposit is located at the southwestern end of this belt and is associated with a calc-alkalic monzogranite, reported as 45-52Ma age that intrudes Cretaceous equigranular intrusive rocks of the Atlanta Lobe of the Idaho Batholith. The CuMo area is underlain by biotite granodiorite, the most common rock type of the Atlanta lobe of the Idaho batholith. All of the felsic intrusive phases contain molybdenite (MoS2) mineralization.

The CuMo deposit is located in an historic gold mining camp. Gold was discovered in the Boise Basin in 1862 and lode mining began within a year. As of 1940, total gold production amounted 2.8 million ounces of which 74% was from placer operations. More gold has been produced from the Boise Basin than any other mining locality in Idaho. Although they are primarily gold deposits, considerable silver and minor copper, lead and zinc were produced as byproducts from the lodes.

The area features two separate mineralizing events that are referred to as early Tertiary and early Miocene. The first event consists of gold-quartz veins containing minor sulfide minerals that occur within the Idaho batholith and are associated with weak wall rock alteration. Associated sulfide minerals include pyrite, arsenopyrite, sphalerite, tetrahedrite, chalcopyrite, galena, and stibnite. The second mineralizing event occurs within porphyry dikes and stocks as well as in the batholith, and is characterized by relatively abundant sulfide mineralization, subordinate quartz and widespread wall rock alteration. Base metal mineralization consists of pyrite, sphalerite, galena, tetrahedrite, chalcopyrite, minor quartz, and siderite with local occurrences of pyrrhotite and enargite.

Molybdenum mineralization was discovered at CuMo in 1963. Mineralization on the property occurs in veins and veinlets developed within various intrusive bodies. Molybdenite (MoS2) occurs within quartz veins, veinlets, and vein stockworks. Individual veinlets vary in size from tiny fractures to veinlets five centimeters in width, with an overall thickness averaging 0.3- 0.4 cm. Pyrite and/or chalcopyrite are commonly associated with molybdenite although molybdenite can occur alone without other metallic mineralization.

The CuMo deposit has been classified as a porphyry copper molybdenum deposit. But more specifically, it is a stockwork-type deposit where the principal mineralization, as described immediately above, is found in thin veins and veinlets, whereas a typical porphyry deposit features disseminated mineralized areas throughout the orebody.

The CuMo deposit is typical of large, dispersed, lower grade copper-molybdenum deposits that are associated with hybrid magmas typified by fluorine-poor, differentiated monzogranite igneous complexes. Due to their large size, the total contained economic molybdenum in these types of deposits can be equivalent to or exceed that of high-grade molybdenum deposits.

History of CuMo Project Exploration

The Boise Basin was first explored following the discovery of placer gold deposits in 1862. Several lode gold deposits were discovered and developed immediately following the initial alluvial gold rush, with significant production occurring in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. No production has occurred on the CuMo Project itself.

The first interest in the CuMo property was shown during aerial reconnaissance by Amax Exploration (“Amax”) in 1963. Follow-up geochemical rock and soil sampling indicated anomalous molybdenum and copper values. Forty claims were then staked, and three previously existing claims were optioned. A 2.5 mile (4 km) rough access road was constructed in 1964 to facilitate collection of rock samples and geological mapping. Amax completed detailed bedrock mapping on the CuMo property between 1964 and 1981. Earlier periods of mapping outlined five general rock types, including quartz monzonite of the Idaho Batholith, rhyolite porphyry, lamprophyre, dacite and diabase dykes. The property was subsequently relinquished due to the combination of contemporary economic conditions and initial sample grades.

In 1968, Curwood Mining Company staked 12 claims and undertook detailed mapping and geochemical rock sampling. This work indicated roughly coincident anomalies in copper, molybdenum, and silver. Several trenches were excavated, and one line of dipole-dipole array induced polarization (“IP”) geophysical survey was conducted.

In 1969, Midwest Oil Corp. optioned the property and conducted exploration drilling through 1972 (four short rotary holes (less than 100 ft) initially, which were later deepened using diamond drilling, followed by six cored holes). Midwest also performed an IP survey in 1971 and an airborne magnetic survey in 1973. The IP survey indicated a pyrite halo on the north side of the deposit, although an alternative interpretation concluded that the combined IP data may indicate a halo effect but more probably shows an east-west trend to the rock types and mineralization. The CuMo deposit did not have a strong magnetic signature, being somewhat of a plateau with surrounding highs.

In 1973, Midwest formed a joint venture with Amax and then subsequently Midwest was merged with Amoco Minerals Company (“AMOCO”) resulting in an Amax-AMOCO joint venture with AMOCO as operator. During the period 1973 to 1981, the Amax-AMOCO joint venture completed 30,822 ft of drilling, surface geological mapping, re-logging of the core, road construction, an aerial topographic survey, and age dating. In 1980, Amax Exploration Inc. transferred its interest to Climax Molybdenum Company (“Climax”), also a subsidiary of Amax Inc. In 1982, Climax collected more than 300 soil geochemical samples from three different grids.

A total of twenty-three (23) diamond holes and three RC holes were drilled on the property during this timeframe. Most RC holes were pre-collars to diamond drill holes with only the diamond drill component of the holes being used for resource modelling and sampling. The historic holes were sampled mostly at a 20ft sample interval. A Skelton core representation of the historic drill holes (one four-inch piece of core for each 10-foot interval), and all the sample rejects were delivered directly from Climax’s secure facility in Colorado and are stored in the project secure warehouse facility for use by the project.

The drilling efforts from 1969 to 1982 were the only actual drilling done on the property until ICUMO in 2006, who under option from American CuMo completed one diamond drillhole and partially completed another before relinquishing the project back to American CuMo in late 2006. Thereafter, American CuMo between 2006 and 2012 drilled a total of 25,486.82m in forty-two (42) holes. All American CuMo drilling programs were directly supervised by onsite geology staff located in Garden Valley, Idaho. Drilling consisted of both HQ and NQ diameter core with holes being started with HQ diameter and then reducing at a major fault intersection or at 1000ft which ever was less. Core recoveries were monitored and were excellent (90%+). All holes were surveyed down-the-hole at regular intervals (100 feet) using a Reflex survey instrument. All core was collected at the drill site by the diamond drillers under supervision of onsite geology staff and delivered to a secure warehouse facility in Garden Valley where they were logged, analyzed and samples collected. All drill sites were surveyed using a total field station in order to accurately locate the holes.

The 2006 through 2012 results confirmed the extent and grade of mineralization on the property as indicated by previous drilling and demonstrated continuity of mineralization between the original wide-spaced holes.

American CuMo’s work resulted in the interpretation and modelling of three distinct mineralized zones within the deposit. These zones were previously interpreted by Amax as distinct shells that were produced by separate intrusions. Re-interpretation of down-hole histograms for copper (Cu), silver (Ag) and molybdenite (MoS2) suggests the mineralized zones are part of a single, large, concentrically zoned system with an upper copper-silver zone, underlain by a transitional copper-molybdenum zone, in turn underlain by a lower molybdenum-rich zone. Three-dimensional modeling of the above zonation indicates the current area being drilled is located on the north side of a large system extending 4.5km (15,000ft) in diameter, of which 1.5km (3,000ft) has been drilled.

Resource Reports and Preliminary Economic Assessments

A geologically inferred historic resource of 1.36 billion tonnes at 0.092% MoS2 (non-compliant with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 or US Regulation SK-1300) was calculated by block modeling in 1983 by Climax.

In 2008, an initial Resource Estimate compliant with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 was commissioned by American CuMo under its former name, Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. This estimate was based on information from 31 diamond drillholes completed through 2007. The deposit was subdivided into three mineral domains based on the drill hole data: a Cu-Ag zone, a Cu-Mo zone, and a Mo zone. Within each mineral domain 20 ft. composites were formed. Blocks 50 x 50 x 50 ft. were estimated for MoS2, Cu, Ag and W by ordinary kriging. At a 0.10 % Cu cutoff there was reported 293 million tons averaging 0.016 % MoS2 and 0.14 % Cu classified as inferred. Within the Cu-Mo and Mo Zones at a 0.04 % MoS2 cutoff there were 1.72 billion tons averaging 0.091 % MoS2 and 0.075 % Cu classified as inferred.

In May 2009, the authors of the 2008 report provided an updated Resource Estimate based on a total of 42 diamond drill holes totaling 76,436 ft, including 11 completed during 2008. Using a Recoverable Metal Value (the “RCV”) cutoff at various US dollar values per ton, and at certain assumed metal recoveries and metal prices, the authors presented tonnages, metal grades, and contained metal for indicated and inferred resource calculations in all 3 mineralized zones.

In November 2009, Ausenco Canada Inc. (“Ausenco”), an independent, third-party engineering firm employed by American CuMo, published a NI 43-101 compliant Preliminary Economic Assessment, throughput Scoping Study Report based on the same 42 diamond drillholes. In a manner similar to the May 2009 report, Ausenco reported tonnages, metal grades and contained metal for indicated and inferred resource calculations in all 3 mineralized zones. Ausenco went further and proposed a mining and processing operational design at various mining rates, from 50,000 to 200,000 tons per day of ore to mill throughput. This firm also included provisions and estimated capital and operating costs for a conceptual open pit mine, waste dumps, tailings storage facility, plant/concentrator, molybdenum roaster, and ancillary facilities. Initial capital costs ranged from $1.6 to $3.4 billion (in 2009 dollars). Based on this data, Ausenco was able to perform a Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA) of the CuMo project, at various throughput rates, which yielded numeric results for Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Payback, and cash operating costs per pound of molybdenum equivalent. They concluded that higher throughputs yield a higher NPV and higher IRR, although at a greater capital cost.

In 2011, a new technical study for a NI 43-101 compliant Resource update was commissioned with Snowden Mining Consultants. The resource estimate update was based on a total of 54 diamond drillholes totaling 99,404 ft. Of these, 12 diamond drillholes were completed in 2009 and 2010. Again, using assumed metal recoveries and selected RCV cut-off grades, Snowden reported updated global Indicated Resources of over 2 billion tons, and global Inferred Resources of over 5 billion tons. Snowden adopted most of the other design parameters and assumptions offered by Ausenco.

In August 2015, Gary Giroux of Giroux Consultants Ltd. (one of the authors of the 2008 and 2009 Reports) was employed by American CuMo to publish a NI 43-101 compliant, updated resource estimate. This update was based on a total of 65 diamond drill holes totaling 120,685 feet (36,784.9 meters). Nine (9) of the sixty-five (65) diamond drill holes were completed in 2012 since the previous resource calculation. Using low, medium, and high metal price assumptions, and different cutoff grades for RCV, Giroux calculated Measured, Indicated, and Inferred mineral resource numbers for ore contained within a conceptual pit shell. The maximum case reported here was a combined Measured, Indicated, and Inferred resource of over 6 billion tons.

Finally, in 2020 SRK authored a NI 43-101 compliant Preliminary Economic Assessment and Technical Report for the CuMo project. This document, relying on the previously published 2015 resource estimate, proposed an open pit mine and concentrator combination at a milling rate of 150,000 tons per day, and an initial mine life of 30 years. It also incorporated particle-based ore sorting technology to remove 28% of the mining waste from the ore stream, prior to entering the concentrator. SRK projected that operations would produce (yearly Life of Mine average) of 43 million pounds of molybdenum, 84 million pounds of copper, and 3.7 million ounces of silver. The capital cost estimate prepared by SRK was $3.1 billion, with a cash cost per pound of molybdenum (after by-product credits) of $4.67, a post-tax Net Present Value (at 5% discount) of $1.7 billion, and an Internal Rate of Return of 9%.

The mineral resource estimates contained in the TRS are based on drilling completed through 2012. As no additional drilling has been completed since the 2015 resource was estimated, the mineral resource estimates are considered current and have not been updated since that time. The mineral resource was classified on the basis of the quality and uncertainty of the sample data and sample spacing, in accordance with the definitions of “inferred mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource” and “measured mineral resource” under the SEC Mining Rules.

For a detailed summary of mineral resource estimates current as of ICUMO’s most recent fiscal year, including tabular disclosure of measured, indicated, and inferred resources, please refer to Section 1.5 of the attached TRS.

The mineral resource estimates contained in the TRS were estimated in conformity with Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) “International Reporting Template for the public reporting of Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” as adopted by the International Council on Mining & Metals November 2019. The mineral resources are reported in in accordance with §§229.1300 through 229.1305 (subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K).

The resource estimate was based on a total of 65 diamond drill holes totaling 36,166 m (118,654 ft). Note that the three reverse circulation holes were not used in the resource estimate. Nine of the 65 diamond drill holes were completed in 2012.

Internal Controls and Data Verification

Shaun M. Dykes (the “Qualified Person”) has reviewed the procedures used by ICUMO and produced a description and an analysis of the results as contained in Section 8 of the TRS. These are standard data verifications with no limitations.

All assay results used in the verification process by the Qualified Person were obtained from fully certified analytical laboratories with signed assay certificates.

The Qualified Person has reviewed the data collection and verification procedures followed by ICUMO and by third parties on behalf of ICUMO, and believes these procedures are consistent with industry best practices and acceptable for use in geological and resource modelling.

These procedures have also been verified by several independent qualified people over the years.

For more information about quality control/quality assurance and data verification, see Section 8 and Section 9 of the TRS.

The mineral resources estimated may ultimately be affected by a broad range of environmental, permitting, socio-economic (as discussed in Section 17 of the TRS), legal, title (as discussed in Section 3 of the TRS), marketing and political factors (as discussed in Section 22 of the TRS). At this time the authors are unaware of any of these factors that could materially affect the mineral resource estimate. Of course, going forward, relevant factors that could influence the resource estimate include changes to the geological, geotechnical or geometallurgical models, infill drilling to convert mineral resources to a higher classification, drilling to test for extensions to known resources, collection of additional bulk density data and significant changes to commodity prices. It should be noted that all these factors pose potential risk and opportunities to the current mineral resource.

Permitting for Drilling and Exploration Activities; Legal Challenges

Exploration on federal lands requires a permit to conduct exploration except for sampling of rocks and soils by hand and other activities that create no land disturbance. There are three levels of permits reflecting increasing disturbance:

ICUMO’s predecessor, Mosquito Mining Corporation, submitted an exploration plan of operations (the “POO”) in 2007 to the USFS for exploration activities which would result in about twenty (20) miles of drill road, of which 4.7 miles were existing unauthorized drill roads from previous operators and 13.3 miles of new temporary roads. An environmental assessment for these activities was prepared by the USFS. On June 14, 2010, the Environmental Assessment was completed and submitted for public review and hearing during a mandated 90-day period. On February 14, 2011, a Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSI”) was delivered by the USFS. During the mandated 45-day appeal period, an environmental group, the Idaho Conservation League (the “ICL”) submitted an appeal of the USFS decision.

On May 17, 2011, the USFS denied the appeal allowing American CuMo to begin work under the new exploration permit following a mandatory fifteen (15) day stay period which ended on June 7, 2011. The ICL filed a challenge to this denial in United States District Court for the District of Idaho on December 15, 2011. ICL and other non-governmental organizations sought summary judgment reversing and remanding the Forest Service’s February 2011 issuance of the FONSI.

On August 29, 2012, the judge in the case dismissed four of the five claims of the opponents but remanded the section on groundwater for further study. As a result, on February 7, 2013, the USFS initiated a Supplemental Environmental Assessment (2015 SEA) in order to address the judge’s concerns regarding groundwater and, as needed, consider new information or changed circumstances since the 2011 FONSI was issued, including a proposed change in status of the wolverine from a regional sensitive species to an Endangered Species Act proposed listed species.

Based on the 2015 SEA, a supplemental FONSI addressing the 2011 court order and other changes summarized above was issued on September 30, 2015. Plaintiffs from the 2011 lawsuit again filed a lawsuit challenging the 2015 FONSI in January 2016. The lawsuit challenged the analysis of potential effects of exploration activities to groundwater and Sacajawea’s bitterroot, a sensitive plant species. The court issued a memorandum decision and order in this lawsuit on July 11, 2016. The court upheld the 2015 FONSI as to the NEPA challenges related to groundwater, so no further analysis was required. The court found, however, that the USFS analysis and conclusions concerning Sacajawea’s bitterroot to be arbitrary and capricious because it failed to reexamine the baseline Sacajawea’s bitterroot population in the project area following the 2014 Grimes Fire and subsequent 2016 Pioneer Fire.

Each resource area addressed in the 2015 SEA was affected differently. Similar to the updates made in response to the 2014 Grimes Fire, updates were made in a document produced by the FS entitled “2018 Supplemental Redline Environmental Assessment CuMo Exploration Project” (2018 SREA) to address the change in baseline conditions caused by the 2016 Pioneer Fire. The 2018 SREA focused on the re-evaluation of the Sacajawea’s bitterroot baseline, as well as other resources addressed in the 2015 SEA that were affected by the 2016 Pioneer Fire, to determine whether the conclusions reached in the 2015 SEA that supported the 2015 FONSI were different or changed. The 2018 SREA focused only on these topics because the Court determined that other concerns raised during the 2012 and 2015 lawsuits were properly addressed and the evidence and analysis in the 2015 SEA project record supported the determination that no significant impacts would occur to other resources from proposed management activities.

Numerous environmental studies were undertaken for the 2011 Environmental Assessment and subsequently revised in 2015 and 2018. The 2018 SREA incorporated habitat changes and resulting impacts related to the 2014 Grimes Fire and the 2016 Pioneer Fire. A number of reports supported the preparation of the 2018 SREA. Some of these updated reports and some earlier reports can be accessed at https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=52875.

The USFS is currently in process of preparing the final decision on the proposed exploration POO which is expected sometime before the end of calendar year 2023.

Current Planned Working Programs

Ore Sorting and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment

ICUMO presently is investigating the potential to utilize additional ore sorting scanning technologies to optimize the separation of waste from ore post-mining and increase the head grade of ICUMO ore being fed to a concentrator. The thin-veined, stockwork nature of the CuMo deposit lends itself nicely to ore sorting, as noted above, since these darker colored veins largely carry the metals of interest and are much different from waste in appearance. A visual scanning exercise of all of the core recovered from the drilling activities described herein shows that on average, 84% of the waste mined can be theoretically separated through application of ore sorting, versus the 28% waste removal that SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) conservatively used in its 2020 Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”). There are over 90 active mines in the world today which utilize some form of ore sorting.

In September 2022, ICUMO signed an agreement to test CuMo material with MineSense, Technologies Ltd., using their ShovelSense scanning systems, which employ X-ray fluorescence (the “XRF”) surface scanning technology. These systems are installed directly on shovel buckets and scan the blasted material as the shovel scoops it up, allowing the mine operator to begin to differentiate ore from waste at the mining face. ShovelSense is currently being used successfully by at least three large producing copper open pit mines (Highland Valley BC, Copper Mountain BC, and Carmen de Andacollo Chile). Contemporaneously with this test work, the Company plans to scan all of the existing drill cores with portable XRF scanners. The all-in cost of this exercise is anticipated to be less than $200,000, and the Company believes that the ShovelSense results can be attained by Q1 2023. This summary of the MineSense agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.7 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

ICUMO’s sorting examination is designed to not just rely on a single sorting pass, but to possibly integrate multiple sorting technologies, such as combining surface XRF scanning at the face with downstream penetrative prompt gamma neutron activation analysis (PGNAA) or pulsed fast thermal neutron activation (PFTNA) scanners installed on the material conveyors, and potentially particle scanners to finish. The potential combination of different ore sorting technologies and equipment is intended to enable the Company to optimize the separation of ore from waste, substantially increasing the head grade of mill feed, and thereby reducing the size of the concentrator which then will only be concerned with the processing of ore. Consequently, this will in theory allow the Company to design and build a smaller concentrator, significantly reducing capital and operating costs. As an example, the Company believes that if ore sorting can remove 75% of waste pre-mill feed, this result will reduce the size of the mill to around 30,000 tons per day to produce the same amount of metal as the SRK 2020 PEA mill design of 150,000 tons per day, and thereby save over $1.5 billion in projected capital expenditures. The Company has just commenced initial discussions with consultants, and mining equipment providers who design and fabricate penetrative scanning systems for testing of CuMo material.

At the conclusion of all of ICUMO’s ore sorting investigations, the Company intends to contract with an independent third-party engineering firm to publish an updated PEA, utilizing ore sorting results to revise the technical and economic sections of the document. The expected budget for this work is roughly $750,000.

Additional Exploration and Metallurgical Studies; Pre-Feasibility Study

Following completion of the updated PEA, and pending issuance of a new FONSI by the USFS relating to the “2018 Supplemental Redline Environmental Assessment CuMo Exploration Project” issued by the USFS (the “2018 SREA”), the Company intends to resume its plans for additional exploration including infill, expansion, and geotechnical pit wall drilling. The infill work is intended to enable the Company to reclassify resources currently labeled as Inferred, to the level of Indicated, or Measured and Indicated. The expansion drilling should allow the Company to add more resources to at least the Inferred category. The Company has tentatively budgeted $8 million for this drilling work.

The Company also plans to initiate additional metallurgical studies to (1) determine the optimal concentrator design for both copper-silver, and molybdenum concentrate circuits, and (2) investigate the potential to recover copper and molybdenum via heap leaching of lower grade ore that is stockpiled and not immediately processed at the concentrator. The Company has identified a number of outside consultants that can be engaged for both of these studies. In total, the Company expects that these studies will cost approximately $1,000,000 and will take on the order of four (4) months to complete.

These undertakings are part of the Company’s plan to develop an independent, third-party Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for the CuMo Project. In addition to the exploration and metallurgical work, explained above, the PFS will include expenditures for infrastructure and road improvements, environmental and permitting work, preliminary engineering, community, and public/governmental relations work, and potentially costs for expansion of the current land position. All-in, the Company has budgeted a range of $25 to $30 million to reach the PFS stage and estimates that the PFS can be completed within two years of the release of the updated PEA.

Competitive Position in the Industry

The mineral exploration, development, and production industry are largely un-integrated. The Company competes with other exploration companies looking to acquire and obtain financing for the exploration and development of mineral resource properties. While the Company competes with other exploration companies to locate and acquire mineral resource properties, it may also compete with them for the removal or sales of mineral products from its properties if it should eventually discover their presence in quantities sufficient to make production economically feasible. Readily available markets for the sale of mineral products only sometimes exist for all mineral commodities; however, the principal CuMo Project commodities of copper, silver and molybdenum are traded on international exchanges and therefore, at a minimum a terminal market exists for which these commodities can be delivered and sold.

Competition

ICUMO’s competition includes large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities and more significant financial and technical resources than it. As a result of this competition, it may have to compete for financing and may need help to acquire the funding on terms it considers acceptable. ICUMO may also have to compete with other mining companies to recruit and retain qualified managerial and technical employees. If ICUMO cannot compete successfully for financing or qualified employees, its exploration programs may be slowed down or suspended, which may cause it to cease operations as a company.

Employees

As of the date of this Report, other than certain executives, ICUMO has no employees. ICUMO does not have or maintain any employee benefit plans or similar plans under any applicable laws.

RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors apply to the business and operations of the Company. These risk factors are not exhaustive. Investors are encouraged to perform their own investigation with respect to the business, financial condition and prospects of the Company. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information included in this Report. In particular, please refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” The Company may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to IT, or that IT currently deem immaterial, which may also impair the business. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements included herein.

If any of the following or other risks materialize, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected which, in turn, could adversely impact the value of Common Stock. In such a case, investors in Common Stock could lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Related to Capital Structure

The Common Stock is currently quoted on the Pink tier of OTC Markets Group Inc., an over-the-counter quotation system, under the symbol “GTVI.” There is, however, currently no trading market for the Common Stock and there is no assurance that a regular trading market will ever develop. The trading price of the Company’s securities could be subject to wide fluctuations, in response to quarterly variations in its operating results, announcements by the Company or others, developments affecting it, and other events or factors. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations in recent years. These fluctuations have had a substantial effect on the market prices for many companies, often unrelated to the operating performance of such companies, and may adversely affect the market prices of the securities Such risks could have an adverse effect on the stock’s future liquidity.

If our business plan is not successful, the Company may not be able to continue operations as a going concern and shareholders may lose their entire investment in the Company.

As discussed in the notes to the Company’s financial statements included in this Report, as of September 30, 2022, since inception the Company has incurred cumulative losses of $23,370,325 and as of September 30, 2022, had a working capital deficiency of $4,994,515 which may cast significant doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company does not generate material cash flows from operations and accordingly, the Company will need to raise additional funds through future issuance of securities. Although the Company has been successful in raising funds in the past, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to raise sufficient funds in the future, in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations as they come due in the normal course of business. The Company has not determined whether any of its properties contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable. It is not possible to predict whether financing efforts will be successful or if the Company will attain a profitable level of operations. Should the Company be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts on the statement of financial position.

If the Company fails to raise sufficient capital, it will have to explore other financing activities to provide it with the liquidity and capital resources to meet its working capital requirements and to make capital investments in connection with ongoing operations. The Company cannot give assurance that it will be able to secure the necessary capital when needed. The Company’s independent auditor included an explanatory paragraph on the financial statements emphasizing to the readers of the audit report that there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon it being able to generate cash flow sufficient to fund operations and reducing operating expenses. The Company’s business plans may not be successful in addressing cash flow issues. If the Company cannot continue as a going concern, its shareholders may lose their entire investment in it.

You may experience dilution of your ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of Common Stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock or preferred stock.

In the future, the Company may issue authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of present stockholders.  The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Additional shares of Common Stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock may be issued in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes.  The future issuance of any such additional shares of Common Stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of Common Stock. 

The Company does not have a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. Until it does, or the Company becomes subject to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, it will be a “voluntary filer.”

The Company is not currently required under Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act to file periodic reports with the SEC. It has in the past voluntarily elected to file some or all of these reports to ensure that sufficient information about it is publicly available to its stockholders and potential investors. Until the Company becomes subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act, it is a “voluntary filer” and is currently considered a non-reporting issuer under the Exchange Act. The Company will not be required to file reports under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until the earlier to occur of: (i) the registration of a class of securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, which would be required if the Company lists a class of securities on a national securities exchange or if it meets the size requirements set forth in Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or which it may voluntarily elect to undertake at an earlier date; or (ii) the effectiveness of a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to Common Stock. Until the Company becomes subject to the reporting requirements under either Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, it is not subject to the SEC’s proxy rules, and large holders of its capital stock will not be subject to beneficial ownership reporting requirements under Sections 13 or 16 of the Exchange Act and their related rules. As a result, the Company’s stockholders and potential investors may not have available to them as much or as robust information as they may have if and when it becomes subject to those requirements. In addition, if the Company does not register under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, and remain a “voluntary filer”, it could cease filing annual, quarterly or current reports under the Exchange Act.

Share of Common Stock are subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC, and the trading market in the Company’s securities is limited, which makes transactions in its stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in its stock.

Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to the Company, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and (b) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (a) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (b) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of shares of Common Stock and may cause a decline in the market value of the Company’s stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Because the Company does not intend to pay any cash dividends on share of Common Stock, its stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.

The Company intends to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of its business. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on share of Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Unless the Company pays dividends, its stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. The Company cannot assure its stockholders that they will be able to sell shares when they desire to do so.

The Company’s principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of Common Stock and will be able to exercise significant influence over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of January 23, 2023, the Company’s executive officers, directors and principal stockholders, together with its other affiliates, owned approximately 85.9% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock. Accordingly, these stockholders will be able to exert a significant degree of influence over the management and affairs of the Company and over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of the directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership could have the effect of entrenching Company management or the Board, delaying or preventing a change in control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of the Company, which in turn could have a material and adverse effect on the fair market value of Common Stock.

Risks Associated with Mining Business

It is uncertain that the Company’s mineral properties contain any proven or probable reserve, nor can the Company provide such assurance, but its business is highly dependent on the existence of the mineral property. 

As all the Company’s mineral properties are in the exploration stage, there is no assurance that it can establish the existence of any mineral reserves on any of its properties in commercially exploitable quantities. Until the Company can do so, it cannot earn any revenues from operations and if it does not do so, it will lose all of the funds that were expended on exploration. If the Company does not discover any mineral reserves in a commercially exploitable quantity, its business could fail.

The Company has not established that its mineral properties contain any proven or probable reserves, nor can there be any assurance that it will be able to do so. If the Company fails to establish any proven or probable reserve, the business could fail.

Due to the speculative characteristics of the mine exploration business, there is substantial risk that the Company will not find sufficient commercially exploitable minerals and fail in its business.

The Company cannot evaluate its success rate on the CuMo Project. The search for valuable minerals as a business is perilous. The Company may not find commercially exploitable mineral reserves or other valuable minerals in its mineral property. Exploration for minerals is a speculative venture necessarily involving substantial risk. The expenditure to be made by the Company on exploration programs may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of ore. The likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays encountered in the exploration of the mineral properties the Company plans to undertake. Issues such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. In such a case, the Company would need help to complete its business plan. Due to the inherent dangers involved in mineral exploration, the business may incur liability or damages.

Even if the Company does eventually discover a mineral reserve on one or more of its properties, there can be no assurance that it will be able to develop such properties into producing mines and extract those resources. Both mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk and few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.

The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on several factors, including, by way of example, the size, grade, and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the resource to infrastructures such as a smelter or processing facilities, power, and water, roads and a point for shipping, available workforce, government regulation, successful permitting, proximity to markets and consumers, and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond the Company’s control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral resource unprofitable.

The Company cannot provide any assurance about financing for additional exploration. If its exploration costs are higher than anticipated, the Company may only be able to complete the exploration program with additional financing.

The Company is proceeding with exploration on its CuMo property. The exploration program outlines the budget for completion of the program but there is no assurance that actual costs will not exceed the budgeted costs. Factors that could cause actual costs to exceed budgeted costs include increased prices due to competition for personnel and supplies during the exploration season, unanticipated problems in completing the exploration program and delays due to weather or other factors experienced in completing the exploration program. Increases in exploration costs could result in the Company not being able to carry out its exploration program without additional financing. There is no assurance that the Company would be able to obtain additional financing in this event.

If the Company cannot raise sufficient capital after it establishes the existence of a mineral resource on any of its properties in a commercially exploitable quantity, it will not be able to exploit the resource, thus the business could fail.

If the Company discovers mineral resources in commercially exploitable quantities on any of its properties, it will then be required to expend substantial sums of money to explore and fully establish the extent of the resources and reserves, develop processes to extract it, and develop extraction and processing facilities and infrastructure. Although the Company may derive substantial benefits from the discovery of a significant deposit, there can be no assurance that such a resource or reserve will be large enough to justify commercial operations, nor can there be any assurance that the Company will be able to raise the funds required for the development on a timely basis. The business may not succeed if the Company cannot extend the necessary capital or complete the required facilities and infrastructure.

Mineral exploration and development are subject to extraordinary operating risks. The Company does not currently insure against these risks. In the event of a cave-in or similar occurrence, its liability may exceed its resources, which would have an adverse impact on the business.

Mineral exploration, development, and production involve many risks that even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may be unable to overcome. The Company’s operations will be subject to all the geological, technical, and operating hazards and risks in exploring mineral resources. If the Company discovers a mineral resource in commercially exploitable quantity, its operations would be subject to the hazards and risks inherent in the development and production of resources, including liability for pollution, cave-ins, or similar dangers against which it cannot fully insure or against which it may elect not to insure. Any such event could result in work stoppages and property damage, including damage to the environment. The Company does not currently maintain any insurance coverage against these operating hazards. The payment of any liabilities arising from such occurrences may have a material adverse impact on the business.

Mineral prices are subject to dramatic and unpredictable fluctuations.

The Company expects to derive revenues from the sale of its mineral resource properties or from the extraction and sale of molybdenum, silver, copper, and rhenium, and associated minerals. The price of those commodities has fluctuated widely in recent years. It is affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including international, economic, and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global or regional consumptive patterns, speculative activities, and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production methods. The effect of these factors on the price of base and precious metals, and therefore the economic viability of any of the Company’s exploration properties and projects, cannot accurately be predicted.

The unpredictable inclement weather may restrict mineral exploration and cause delay or impact on the Company’s mining progress.

Access to the mineral property may be restricted between November and April of each year because the period between these months can sometimes feature heavy snow cover, extreme cold, and high winds, which makes it difficult, if not impossible, to carry out exploration and other activities. Visits, tests, and explorations of the mineral property can only be attempted when weather permits such activities. These limitations can result in significant delays in the exploration, mining, and production of commercial minerals. Such delays can cause the business to fail.

Risks Related to Regulatory and Permitting Requirements in the Industry the Company Operates

Mineral operations are subject to applicable law and government regulation. Even if the Company discovers a mineral resource in a commercially exploitable quantity, applicable laws and regulations could restrict or prohibit the exploitation of that mineral resource.

Both mineral exploration and extraction require permits from various federal, state, provincial and local governmental authorities and are governed by laws and regulations, including those with respect to prospecting, mine development, mineral production, transport, export, taxation, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain any of the permits or bonds required for the continued exploration of its mineral properties or for the construction and operation of a mine on its properties at economically viable costs.

The Company cannot ensure that all its business activities will continue to comply with all material laws and regulations because there may be changes to applicable laws and regulations, and it may not be able to comply with such changes. Further, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain all permits or bonds necessary for its future operations or that it will be able to obtain them on reasonable terms. To the extent such approvals are required and are not accepted, the Company may be delayed or prohibited from proceeding with the planned exploration or development of its mineral properties. If the Company is prevented from exploiting any mineral resource that it discovers by a failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or obtain or to maintain any required permits, the business could fail.

Exploration development and exploitation activities are subject to comprehensive regulation and permitting, which may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of what is currently anticipated, causing a material adverse effect on the business.

Exploration, development, and exploitation activities are subject to federal, provincial, state, and local laws, regulations, and policies, including laws regulating permitting, bonding, and the removal of natural resources from the ground and the discharge of materials into the environment. Exploration, development, and exploitation activities are also subject to federal, provincial, state, and local laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of drilling methods and equipment and other operational activities.

Environmental and other legal standards imposed by federal, provincial, state, or local authorities may be changed, and any such changes may prevent the Company from conducting planned activities or increase its costs of doing so, which could have material adverse effects on the business. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those currently anticipated, thus causing a material adverse effect on the business. Additionally, the Company may be subject to liability for pollution or other environmental damages that it may not be able to, or elect not to, insure against due to prohibitive premium costs and other reasons. Any laws, regulations, or policies of any government body or regulatory agency may be changed, applied, or interpreted that could materially alter and negatively affect the Company’s ability to carry on the business.

The Company depends on its senior management team, and the loss of one or more key employees or an inability to attract and retain highly skilled employees could adversely affect the business.

The Company’s success depends on the skills, experience, and performance of its Chief Executive Officer, Steven Rudofsky, and other key employees. The effort of the Chief Executive Officer will be important as the Company continues to develop and expand its commercial activities. The loss or incapacity of existing members of the executive management team could negatively impact the Company’s operations if it experiences difficulties in hiring qualified successors. Qualified employees periodically are in great demand and may be unavailable in the time frame required to satisfy business requirements. Expansion of the business could require the Company to employ additional personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to attract and retain sufficient numbers of skilled employees in the future. The loss of personnel or inability to hire or retain sufficient personnel at competitive rates could impair the growth of the business.

The Company also relies on its leadership team in the areas of finance, marketing, services, and general and administrative functions, and on sales. From time to time, there may be changes in the executive management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives, which could disrupt the business.

In addition, in making employment decision, job candidates often consider the value of the equity awards they are to receive in connection with their employment. Volatility in the price of Common Stock might, therefore, adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract or retain highly skilled personnel. Furthermore, the requirement to expense certain stock awards might discourage the Company from granting the size or type of stock awards that job candidates require to join. If the Company fails to attract new personnel or fail to retain and motivate its current personnel, the business and its future growth prospects could be severely harmed.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION / MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As the result of the Exchange and the change in business and operations of the Company, a discussion of the past financial results of the Company is not pertinent, and under applicable accounting principles the historical financial results of ICUMO, the accounting acquirer, prior to the transaction are considered the historical financial results of the Company. Audited financial statements and the accompanying notes for ICUMO for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 (compared to the same period ending June 30, 2021), as well as unaudited financial statement and notes for the quarter ending September 30, 2022, are attached as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.

The following discussion highlights the results of operations and the principal factors that have affected our financial condition, as well as the liquidity and capital resources for the periods described and provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of the statements of financial condition and results of operations presented herein. The following discussion and analysis are based on the audited financial statements contained in this Report, which have prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. This the discussion and analysis should be read together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto. 

Overview

Basis of Presentation

The audited financial statements of ICUMO for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2021 and 2022 and the unaudited financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, include a summary of significant accounting policies and should be read in conjunction with the financial notes as well as the discussion below. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of operations for such periods have been included in these audited financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Net Loss

For the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, we incurred a net loss of $118,356 and $129,500, respectively. These net losses are attributable primarily to the fact that the company is in the pre-production phase of developing its mining properties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of the three months ended September 30, 2022, we have $20,809 in current assets and $5,015,324 in current liabilities, as compared to $127,016 in current assets and $5,003,180 in current liabilities as of the year ended June 30, 2022. As of the three months ended September 30, 2022, we had $20,804 cash on hand and our working capital deficit was $4,994,515.

Operating Activities

During the three months ended September 30, 2022, operating activities used net cash of $106,212 primarily resulting from a net loss of $118,356.

For year ended June 30, 2022 compared to the year ended June 30, 2021

The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the fiscal years indicated. This information should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Report. The operating results in any year are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.

Net Loss

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we incurred a net loss of $1,158,094. Included in the loss of 1,158,094 are non-cash items including $623,000 of non-cash stock-based compensation and $106,932 of impairment of fixed assets. The net loss is attributable primarily to the fact that the Company is in the process of exploring its mineral right interests in the United States. As of the date of this Report, the Company has not yet determined whether any of its mineral properties contain economically recoverable mineral reserves. Accordingly, the carrying amount of mineral right interests represents cumulative expenditures incurred to date and does not necessarily reflect present or future values. The recovery of these costs is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable mineral reserves and the ability of ICMC to obtain the necessary financing to complete their exploration and development and to resolve any environmental, regulatory, or other constraints. Uncertainty also exists with respect to the recoverability of the carrying value of certain mineral right interests. The ability of the Company to realize on its investment in resource properties is contingent upon resolution of the uncertainties and confirmation of the Company’s title to the mineral properties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In order to assess our liquidity needs, we constantly monitor working capital needs. Our operating capital comes primarily from the periodic issuance of investment securities.

As of June 30, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents amounted to $127,016. Our current liabilities were $5,003,180 and our shareholders’ deficit totaled $4,000,247. We had a net loss of $1,158,094 and $207,324 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We believe the company will continue to generate operating losses until one or more of our mineral assets moves into production. In the meanwhile, we believe working capital is sufficient to support our operations for the next twelve months.

The following chart summarizes the key components of our cash flows for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:

Operating Activities

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, net cash used in operating activities increased to $125,734 compared to net cash used of $86,010 in the 2021 period. The increase of $39,724 in the 2022 period compared to 2021 is attributable to an increase in net loss, net of non-cash items of $220,838 in the 2022 period partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $181,314.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, was $-0-, compared to $107,117 used in the period ended June 30, 2021. Cash used in the 2021 period was used to purchase fixed assets,

Financing Activities

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, was $252,105 compared to $193,184 during the same period ended June 30, 2021. The difference is primarily attributable to loan proceeds of $1,079,000, proceeds of $285,000 from private placements, payments to the former parent company in the 2022 period; compared to proceed of $242,714 from the former parent company and loan payments in the 2021 period.

Going Concern

Because it does not currently generate material cash flows from operations, the Company will need to raise additional funds through the future issuance of securities. Although the Company has been successful in raising funds in the past, there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future, in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations as they come due in the normal course of business. The Company has not determined whether any of its properties contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable. Should the Company be unable to develop its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts on the statement of financial position. 

Anticipated Capital Requirements

We will require significant capital to fully develop our mining assets. The next major milestone for the CuMo project is the completion of a pre-feasibility study (PFS), which we estimate will take two years and require a capital investment of $25-30 million. With a completed PFS in hand we will move on to a bankable feasibility study (BFS), which will require an additional $100 million capital investment. In addition to these major capital expenditures, we expect the company to incur ongoing G&A expense of approximately $1 million per annum.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K as of September 30, 2022 that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We are obligated to pay principal and interest on outstanding bonds. The total par value of the bonds is $3,349,000, $2,260,000 of which accrue interest at 8.5%, and $1,089,000 of which accrue interest at 7.5%. The bonds mature in the following years and amounts: 2023: $500,000; 2024: $1,510,000; 2025: $250,000; 2028: $1,089,000.

In addition, the Company rents a warehouse facility for storage of core drilling samples at a cost of $3,500/month. The space is leased on a month-to-month basis and is terminable at any time.

The Company has management agreements in place with its senior officers including Steven Rudofsky, Shaun Dykes, Andrew Brodkey and Robert Scannell. The management agreements are for a one-year term and renew annually unless otherwise terminated. In 2023, these four management agreements, each of which stipulates annual compensation of $250,000, will total $1 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements and accompanying notes requires ICUMO to make estimates and assumptions about the future that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual experience may differ from these estimates and assumptions. The effect of a change in an accounting estimate is recognized prospectively by including it in comprehensive income in the period of the change, if the change affects that period only, or in the period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.

Information about critical accounting estimates and judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized in the financial statements are more fully described in Note 3 to the financial statements attached hereto, but they believe that the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of their financial statements.

Unproven mineral right interests

The application of ICUMO’s accounting policy for unproven mineral right interests requires judgment in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flow to ICUMO, which may be based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and assumptions may change if new information becomes available. If, after expenditures are capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of the expenditures is unlikely, the amount capitalized is impaired with a corresponding charge to profit or loss in the period in which the new information becomes available.

Title to unproven mineral right interests

Although ICUMO has taken steps to verify title to its unproven mineral right interests, these procedures do not guarantee ICUMO title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.

Convertible debentures

The Company presents convertible debentures separately in its debt and equity components on the statement of financial position. The fair value of a compound instrument at issuance is assigned to its respective debt and equity components. The fair value of the debt component is established first with the equity component being determined by the residual amount.

Going concern

Critical judgement and estimates are applied for the determination that the Company will continue as a going concern for the next year.

Share-based payments

The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date in which they are granted. Estimating fair values for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. The estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model, including the expected life of the share option, volatility, and dividend yield, and making assumptions about them.

Income taxes

The calculation of income taxes requires judgment in applying tax laws and regulations, estimating the timing of the reversals of temporary differences, and estimating the reliability of deferred tax assets. These estimates impact current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and current and deferred income tax expense.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, shares of Common Stock which may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within sixty (60) days of the date of the applicable table below are deemed beneficially owned by the holders of such options and warrants and are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of any other person. Subject to community property laws, where applicable, the persons or entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of January 23, 2023, by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of Common Stock (the Company’s only class of voting securities), (ii) each of the directors and executive officers, and (iii) all of the directors and executive officers as a group. To the best knowledge of the Company, except as otherwise indicated, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such person, except to the extent such power may be shared with a spouse. To the knowledge of the Company, none of the shares listed below are held under a voting trust or similar agreement, except as noted. Other than the Exchange, to the knowledge of the Company, there is no arrangement, including any pledge by any person of securities of the Company or any of its parents, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

Directors are elected to serve until the earlier of the election and qualification of their successors, their removal for cause by the shareholders, or their resignation. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting of stockholders and hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected and until a successor has been elected and qualified.

 A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the Board for the transaction of business. The directors must be present at the meeting to constitute a quorum. Any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board individually or collectively consent in writing to the action.

Executive officers are appointed by the Board and serve at its pleasure.

The principal occupation and business experience during the past five years for the Company’s executive officers and directors is as follows:

Biographies

The biographies of the individuals appointed as directors and officers as discussed above follow:

Steven Rudofsky

Mr. Rudofsky, age 60, has been CEO of ICUMO since January 2022. He has been working in upstream and midstream natural resources for over 30 years. After beginning his career at Glencore (then Marc Rich and Co), he held senior and CEO positions at TransCanada Pipeline Ltd, Credit Agricole Investment Bank and Alfa Group of Russia. He is the founder of Talex Commodities, which works with private equity and debt providers, including family offices, to implement innovative financing for the junior mining and oil & gas sectors, including streaming, convertible debt, and royalties. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Clark University and a Juris Doctor degree from Emory University School of Law.

Andrew Brodkey

Mr. Brodkey, age 66, has been the COO of ICUMO since January 2022. He has more than 30 years of experience working with public companies in the mining and metals sector, including roles as VP, General Counsel at Magma Copper; VP of Business Development at BHP Copper; CEO of Pan American Lithium/First Potash Corp; CEO of Zoro Mining Corp; and CEO of Pacific Copper Corp. He was also the Managing Director of the International Mining Group at CB Richard Ellis, where he represented a number of major mining companies in the valuation, marketing and sales of mining projects. He currently acts as a Principal with both Critical Metals Ventures, LLC and Energy Metals Discovery Group LLC, private enterprises dedicated to finding and incubating early-stage copper, lithium, cobalt, vanadium, and titanium projects. He received a Bachelor of Science degree (with distinction) in Mining Engineering from the University of Arizona, and a Juris Doctor degree (cum laude) from Creighton University.

Robert Scannell

Mr. Scannell, age 64, has been the Chief Financial Officer of ICUMO since January 2022. Since 2015 he has been the Managing Partner of Feehan Partners, LP, a private family office. Previously he spent nine years at Merrill Lynch & Co. as a Vice President of Institutional Fixed-Income Sales. Thereafter, he founded Tradewinds Investment Management, LP, which from 1994 to 2015 managed numerous funds investing in emerging markets, natural resources, and distressed assets. Mr. Scannell holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and Master of Business Administration degree from Penn State University, a Master of Science degree from the University of Washington, a Juris Doctor degree from Purdue University, and has been a Chartered Financial Analyst since 1993.

Shaun Dykes

Mr. Dykes, age 70, has been Vice President - Exploration of ICUMO since January 2022. He has been instrumental in the development of the Idaho Copper project, acting as CEO of a predecessor company and as a champion of the project since 1994. He has over 35 years of experience in the management, exploration, and analysis of mineral properties, and has been directly involved in, or responsible for, the discovery of numerous mineral deposits, five of which have been placed into commercial production. Previously, Mr. Dykes spent 15 years as a project geologist with Westmin Resources Ltd., where he managed a variety of early-stage and pre-production projects. He also played a major role in the discovery and development of the Premier open pit deposit (at one time North America's largest gold mine), which required analysis and computerization of an extensive historical database. Mr. Dykes is also the founder of Geologic Systems Ltd, which supplies geological expertise to the mining and exploration community. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Geology and a Master of Science degree in Geological Engineering from Queen's University.

Dr. John Moeller

Dr. Moeller, age 76, has served as a director of ICUMO since 2013. He is an environmental engineer with broad experience in the permitting, development, and regulatory infrastructure of mining projects in Idaho. Since 2010 Dr. Moeller has represented the Idaho Copper project before state, local, and federal agency officials, and has led the project's highly visible environmental assessment process. Previously, he managed water quality and hazardous materials programs at the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality and was awarded an EPA Bronze Medal for his work with hazardous waste and pollution prevention programs. Later in his career he was a Principal at Forsgren Associates, a civil and environmental engineering firm in the western US and served on the board of directors for the Idaho Conservation league. Dr. Moeller earned a PhD in Water Quality/Limnology from Idaho State University, and both a Master of Science (MS) degree in Zoology/Water Quality and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering in from the University of Kentucky. From 2005-2017 he was on the Adjunct Faculty at Boise State University, where he taught Water Quality Management.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of the Company’s directors or executive officers have been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among the Company’s directors or executive officers.

Significant Employees

While the Company has engaged various consultants, other than management, it currently has no significant employees.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Officer Compensation

The following is a summary of all compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers for the last two completed fiscal years. The summary is broken out into two tables below, the first of which is for the Company prior to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement (“Pre-Closing”) because the Company’s last two completed fiscal years ended on December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The second summary is for the Company subsequent to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement (“Post-Closing”) and the acquisition of ICUMO because ICUMO’s last two completed fiscal years ended on June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2022.

Information in the Pre-Closing table pertains to Jinghe Zhang who was the principal executive officer of the Company until his resignation on February 3, 2022, when Crystal Globe Limited sold 83% of the issued and outstanding shares to JHP Holdings, Inc. Subsequently, Ramon Lata became the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, serving in such capacity without compensation until the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement. Simultaneous with the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, Messrs. Rudofsky, Scannell, Brodkey, and Dykes were appointed as officers of the Company.