Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – General

Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. (“RMHB” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. On July 17, 2014, the Company changed its name from Republic of Texas Brands Incorporated to Totally Hemp Crazy, Inc and on October 23, 2015, the Company changed its name to Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.

RMHB currently operates through its parent company, three wholly-owned subsidiaries and one minority-owned subsidiary, which the Company controls. All subsidiaries are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

RMHB is a consumer goods company that specializes in developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing high-quality, health conscious, cannabidiol (“CBD”) and hemp- infused products that span various categories including beverage, food, fitness, skin care and more. RMHB also markets a naturally high alkaline spring water and a water-based whey protein and energy drink as part of our brand portfolio.

In March 2018, the Company launched the HEMPd brand with tinctures, gummies, water soluble drops, capsules, lotions, salves, and E-juice liquids. In October 2018, the Company introduced CBD-infused waters in four flavors and plans to introduce additional HEMPd product offerings in the future. HEMPd products are marketed through the Company’s Rocky Mountain Hemp Company subsidiary. In November 2018, the Company discontinued sales of its vape-related products.

On July 25, 2018 the Company acquired the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC (“BFIT”), an Arizona limited liability company. These assets include the cash, accounts receivable, inventory, FitWhey trademark, recipes and formulas of BFIT’s FitWhey branded water-based protein drinks containing caffeine and a vitamin-B pack.

The Company continues to market its naturally flavored hemp-infused functional beverage, Mango Energy. RMHB also bottles and distributes its naturally high alkaline spring water under the name Eagle Spirit Spring Water.

NOTE 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not contain all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all the adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) to present the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2018 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s form 10-KT for the transition period ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on April 2, 2018.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to its industry, and general economic conditions. It is possible that these external factors could have an effect on the Company’s estimates that could cause actual results to differ from its estimates. The Company re-evaluates all of its accounting estimates at least quarterly based on these conditions and record adjustments when necessary.

Cash

The Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows the guidance of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” as amended. It records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred, the selling price to the customer is fixed or determinable and collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured. The Company has not experienced any significant returns from customers and accordingly, in management’s opinion, no reserve for returns has been provided. Payments received prior to shipment of goods are recorded as deferred revenue.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

The Company has a policy of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We extend credit to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable and perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and maintain an allowance for potential bad debts if required.

It is determined whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates the customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases, we use assumptions and judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those customers against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information is received. The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance. The Company may also record a general allowance as necessary.

Direct write-offs are taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate other circumstances that indicate the collectability of receivables.

Inventories

Inventories, which consist only of the Company’s finished products held for resale, are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out, and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price, in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to dispose of the product.

If the Company identifies excess, obsolete or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to their realizable value in the period in which the impairment is first identified. Shipping and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and product shipments are recorded in cost of sales in the Company’s statements of operations.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.

The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our short- and long-term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances of warrants and/or embedded conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

The derivative liability, which relates to the conversion feature of convertible debt and common stock warrants and options, is classified as a Level 3 liability, and is the only financial liability measure at fair value on a recurring basis.

The change in the Level 3 financial instrument is as follows:

The estimated fair value of the derivative instruments was valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following assumptions as of September 30, 2018:

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized; repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Capitalized Software

Direct costs related to software development, including coding, website application development, infrastructure development and graphics development, are capitalized and included in other assets. Amortization is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software. Costs related to planning, content development, and operating and maintaining software are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow and recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset plus the net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When the Company identifies an impairment, it reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. No impairment charges were recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Share-based Payments

Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). The Company had no common stock options or common stock equivalents granted or outstanding for all periods presented.

The Company issued restricted stock to consultants and employees for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is to be measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.

Convertible Instruments

The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging Activities.” Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as freestanding derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.

Preferred Stock

We apply the guidance enumerated in ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” when determining the classification and measurement of preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. We classify conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within our control, as temporary equity. At all other times, we classified our preferred shares in stockholders’ equity. Our preferred shares do not feature any redemption rights within the holders’ control or conditional redemption features not within our control. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted, all issuances of preferred stock are presented as a component of consolidated shareholders’ deficit.

Advertising

Advertising and marketing expenses are charged to operations as incurred.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and (ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

ASC Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has no material uncertain tax positions.

NOTE 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has a shareholders’ deficit of $764,655, an accumulated deficit of $36,364,245, and a working capital deficit of $990,329 as of September 30, 2018 and has generated operating losses since inception. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate revenues and its ability to continue raising capital.

On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with GHS Investments, LLC (“GHS”), which provides for GHS to purchase up to $15,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over a 24-month period based on a contractually agreed upon market discount. The SPA replaces the Equity Financing Agreement the Company entered into with GHS on October 12, 2017. On August 8, 2018, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register up to 320,000,000 shares of our common stock to be purchased by GHS under the SPA. The registration statement became effective on October 10, 2018. Management believes the SPA will provide sufficient cash flows until cash flows from operations become consistently positive.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, depreciation expense was $4,367 and $4,584, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, depreciation expense was $14,496 and $16,679, respectively.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes, including amortization of the discount, was $308,239 and $124,584, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes, including amortization of the discount, was $1,048,765 and $219,435, respectively.

The Company has determined that the conversion feature embedded in certain of the notes referred to above that contain a potential variable conversion amount constitutes a derivative which has been bifurcated from the note and recorded as a derivative liability, with a corresponding discount recorded to the associated debt. The excess of the derivative value over the face amount of the note is recorded immediately to interest expense at inception. The Company recorded no interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the excess of derivative value over the face amount of convertible notes payable.

The Company recorded $268,021 and $0, interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, at the inception of certain convertible notes payable relating to the excess of the derivative over the face amount of the related convertible notes payable. The Company recorded $2,700,930 and $0 interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, at the inception of certain convertible notes payable relating to the excess of the derivative over the face amount of the related convertible notes payable.

On September 1, 2016, the Company purchased used office furniture and equipment from its landlord. The Company executed a note payable in the amount of $40,122 at an interest rate of 0% and with monthly payments of $1,114. The Company imputed interest on the note and recorded a discounted note balance of $36,634 on September 1, 2016. The term of the note is three years.

On November 30, 2017 the Company amended two notes payable to GHS in the aggregate principal amount of $500,000. The notes, which were originally made on October 12 and November 2, 2017 and included conversion prices at a 20% discount off market price, as defined in the agreements. The amendments removed the conversion features in the notes. Upon amendment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of these notes of $15,256. As of December 31, 2017 the notes, which were previously included in Convertible Notes Payable are included in Notes Payable. On January 9, 2018 the notes were again amended to reinstate the conversion feature. These notes are included in Convertible Notes Payable as of September 30, 2018.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes was $559 and $416, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes was $1,779 and $1,461, respectively.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes, including amortization of the discount, was $0 and $121,199, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes, including amortization of the discount, was $8,043 and $529,678, respectively.

The Company has determined that the conversion feature embedded in certain of the notes referred to above that contain a potential variable conversion amount constitutes a derivative which has been bifurcated from the note and recorded as a derivative liability, with a corresponding discount recorded to the associated debt. The excess of the derivative value over the face amount of the note is recorded immediately to interest expense at inception. The Company recorded no interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, at the inception of the notes relating to the excess of derivative value over the face of the notes.

The balance of these notes was reclassified to convertible notes payable as of April 5, 2018 upon the termination of the Company’s Executive Vice President, Lily Li, who is the Managing Member of LSW Holdings, LLC (“LSW”), the holder of these notes.

NOTE 11 – Shareholders’ Deficit

Common Stock

As of September 30, 2018, the Company has 4,000,000,000 shares of common stock authorized.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the Company issued 551,074,370 shares of common stock, including 244,267,280 shares for convertible notes payable conversions, 250,000,000 shares for cash, 29,096,402 shares for option exercises, 20,248,000 shares for services rendered, and 7,462,688 for the FitWhey acquisition. In September 2018, the Company also cancelled 1,818,180 shares as part of a legal settlement.

Preferred Stock

The Company has 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized as of September 30, 2018, of which 12,789,474 are specifically designated to a series of preferred stock and 7,210,526 remain undesignated.

Series A Preferred Stock

The Company has 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock designated and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. LSW is the holder of these shares. Lily Li, who was the Company’s Executive Vice President until April 5, 2018, is the Managing Member of LSW and, in that capacity, has the authority to direct voting and investment decisions with regard to its holdings in the Company. On October 26, 2018 these shares were ruled void ab initio by a District Court in Dallas County, Texas. The Company cancelled these shares effective that date.

Series B Preferred Stock

The Company has 7,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Series C Preferred Stock

The Company has 2,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Series C Preferred Stock is 12% interest bearing, cumulative, exchangeable, non-voting, convertible preferred stock of the Company. Each Series C Preferred share is convertible to 50 shares of common stock.

Series D Preferred Stock

The Company has 2,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Series D Preferred Stock is a non-voting, non-interest bearing convertible preferred stock. Each Series D preferred share is convertible to 100 shares of common stock.

Series E Preferred Stock

On September 19, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a new Series E Preferred Stock. Holders of Series E Preferred Stock are entitled to cast 2,000 votes per share of Series E Preferred Stock on any proposal to increase our authorized capital stock, with no other voting rights. Series E Preferred Stock is convertible to common stock on a 1:1 basis. On the same day, the Board granted our Chairman 789,474 shares of Series E Preferred stock as payment for his deferred compensation. On October 31, 2017, Mr. Welch converted his 789,474 shares of Series E Preferred Stock to 789,474 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 there were no shares outstanding.

Warrants

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the Company granted no common stock warrants, none were exercised, and none were cancelled.

Options

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the Company granted 11,469,613 options to purchase common stock with terms ranging from two to five years and exercise prices of $.003, holders exercised 23,607,193 options, and none were cancelled.

NOTE 12– Concentrations

During the three months ended September 30, 2018 the Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately 12% and 3% of sales, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately 10% and 5% of sales, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately 6% and 6% of sales, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately 23% and 14% of sales, respectively.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax liability as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:

As of September 30, 2018 the Company had approximately $14,000,000 of federal and state net operating loss carryovers (“NOLs”), which begin to expire in 2028. Utilization of the NOLs may be subject to limitation under the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 should there be a greater than 50% ownership change as determined under regulations.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the assessment, management has established a full valuation allowance against the entire deferred tax asset relating to NOLs for every period because it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. We have estimated our provision for income taxes in accordance with the Tax Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing but have kept the full valuation allowance. As a result the Company has recorded no income tax expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 34% to 21%, resulting in a deferred tax expense of approximately $2,000,000 in 2017 that is still fully valued against as of September 30, 2018. This expense is attributable to the Company being in a net deferred tax asset position at the time of remeasurement. As the company maintains fully valuation allowance, this amount can be seen on the rate reconciliation as an adjustment to deferred tax asset and corresponding valuation allowance.

On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) was issued to address the application of US GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. The deferred tax expense recorded in connection with the remeasurement of deferred tax assets is a provisional amount and a reasonable estimate at December 31, 2017 based upon the best information currently available. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions the Company may take as a result of the Tax Act. Any subsequent adjustment to these amounts will be recorded to current tax expense in the quarter of 2018 when the analysis is complete. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.

NOTE 14 – Commitments

Office Leases

The Company has a three-year lease for corporate office space. The lease commenced on September 1, 2016 with monthly payments of $7,715 in year one, $7,972 in year two and $8,229 in year three. The lease is being accounted for on a straight-line basis over its term.

On January 18, 2018, the RMHC entered into a 12-month office use agreement for office space in Denver, Colorado. Monthly payments are $91.

Other Leases

The Company rents storage space from various third parties on a month-to-month basis.

NOTE 15 – Legal Proceedings

Please refer to our Transition Report on Form 10-KT filed April 2, 2018 for information regarding our pending legal proceedings. The following represents an update to the items disclosed in that filing:

Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. v Lyonpride Music, LLC, United States District Court Northern District of Texas, 3:18-cv-00045-C

The Company filed suit against Lyonpride Music, LLC (“Lyonpride”) for fraud and for declaratory relief with respect to a contract between the parties. The Company is seeking monetary damages against Lyonpride. The case has been referred to binding arbitration.

Los Angeles Superior Court, BC669367, filed July 24, 2017. Statewide Beverage Company, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.

Statewide Beverage Company, Inc. (“Statewide”) filed a breach of contract claim, and the Company has filed counterclaims for breach of contract, common law fraud and declaratory relief. The parties have settled this matter.  Under the settlement, the Company was not required to pay damages to Statewide and canceled 1,818,180 shares of common stock previously issued to affiliates of Statewide.

Dallas County Texas, Case Number DC-17-15441 filed November 8, 2017. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Jerry Grisaffi, Joe Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe, Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC, and Universal Consulting, LLC.

The Company is seeking the return of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”) issued to Jerry Grisaffi (“Grisaffi”), RMHB’s former Chairman of the Board, and common stock issued to certain other defendants or later obtained by certain other defendants for little or no consideration paid to the Company. The Company alleges, among other things, that Grisaffi breached his fiduciary duty to the Company by issuing these Series A shares to himself and common stock to himself and others. RMHB is also seeking to void the Indemnification and Release Agreement (“Indemnification”) between the Company and Grisaffi that was executed in June 2017.

Grisaffi filed a counterclaim against the Company seeking payment for two promissory notes allegedly owed to him, as well as relief under the Indemnification.  Those notes have been accounted for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Those counterclaim matters have been proactively addressed in the Company’s original suit, seeking to void the Indemnification and the two notes based on, among other things, fraud of Grisaffi.  Grisaffi has also filed a derivative suit within the main lawsuit. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the derivative suit and is awaiting a ruling on that motion.

In June 2018 LSW and Li filed counterclaims against the Company, generally seeking an increase of voting rights of the Series A shares to 1200:1, a declaration that the Series A shares were validly issued to Grisaffi, challenging the authorized share increase of the Company, claiming securities fraud by the Company with respect to the Series A Shares purchased from Grisaffi and other common stock allegedly purchased by LSW and Li, as well as fraud, breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation by the Company. LSW seeks $10,000,000 in damages from the Company, for the $3,500,000 which was paid to Grisaffi for said Series A shares and for which LSW claims to somehow be the responsibility of the Company to cover, and the remaining $6,500,000 for money allegedly spent by LSW in “developing a distribution system in China” and other alleged “investments” of Li and LSW in the Company. LSW and Li also seek exemplary damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend these counterclaims.

On August 30, 2018, the Trial Court entered a final judgment and order in our favor and against Grisaffi. On August 29, 2018, after a show cause hearing, the Trial Court entered an order sanctioning Grisaffi for his repeated and unexcused refusals to make discovery in the case. As a sanction, the Trial Court struck Grisaffi’s pleadings in the case and, on August 30, 2018, entered a Default Judgment against him. Under the Trial Court’s Default Judgment:

Finally, the Court ruled that our continuing claims against the other defendants in the case are to be severed and docketed under a separate cause of action and case number. The judgment and order entered August 30, 2018 concludes our litigation in district court as against Grisaffi. On September 4, 2018, Mr. Grisaffi filed a Notice of Appeal in the case against him. We will continue to pursue our claims against the other defendants in the below referenced case.

Dallas County Texas, Case Number DC-18-13491. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Joe Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe, Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC, and Universal Consulting, LLC.

This is the surviving case of the above case, having been severed on September 12, 2018.

In this case, on October 26, 2018 the Court granted our Motion For Summary Judgment, per a Summary Judgment Order, against LSW Holdings, LLC, holding that all Series A Preferred Shares in Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc, including the shares issued to Jerry Grisaffi and later sold by him to LSW Holdings, LLC evidenced by Stock Certificate N0. 604 issued by Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., to LSW Holdings LLC in the amount of 1,000,000 shares, were void ab initio , and any potential rights thereunder were terminated as of July 11, 2014, when the bankruptcy court signed the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended Plan Of Reorganization. The Series A Preferred Shares have no legal force or effect. The Court also granted a take nothing judgment against LSW on counterclaim Counts 1, 2 and 3. The Company’s transfer agent has cancelled the Series A Preferred Shares. The Company is pursuing its claims against LSW Holdings, LLC and Lily Li, and is defending against the remaining counterclaims.

NOTE 16 – Gain on Lawsuit Judgment and Legal Settlement

In August 2018, the Company recorded a $654,289 gain related to the lawsuit judgment the Company received against Jerry Grisaffi, our former Chairman of the Board. The Company de-recognized two notes payable to Mr. Grisaffi, plus accrued interest, in the amount of $418,865, and de-recognized the related derivative liability of $235,424. The 1,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares that were ruled void ab initio will be de-recognized upon legal cancellation, which is expected to occur later in 2018.

In September 2018, the Company executed a settlement with Statewide Beverage and recorded a gain on legal settlement of $34,435. As part of the settlement, the Company received 1,818,180 of its common shares that had previously been issued to the owners of Statewide Beverage and cancelled them. The Company also recorded the extinguishment of liabilities that had been recorded at the time of the sale of product to Statewide Beverage in 2016.

NOTE 17 – Acquisition

On July 25, 2018 the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC (“BFIT”), which was accounted for as a business combination. The acquired assets include the cash, accounts receivable, inventory, FitWhey trademark, recipes and formulas of BFIT’s FitWhey branded water-based protein drinks containing caffeine and a vitamin-B pack. The Company paid $230,438 including common stock issued to the owners of BFIT of $75,000, forgiveness of a note receivable of $80,000 plus accrued interest of $438, and $75,000 to be paid to the owners of BFIT over time based on 5% of net sales of FitWhey products. The Company recorded the preliminary fair value of the assets which includes $98,297 of assets including cash, accounts receivable, inventory, and prepaid production costs and $132,141 of intangible assets, including the FitWhey trademark, recipes, formulas, and goodwill. The Company plans to obtain an outside valuation of these assets.

The following table provides unaudited pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 as if the acquisitions had been consummated as of the beginning of each period presented. Pro forma results do not include any anticipated cost savings or other effects of the planned integration of the companies. Accordingly, such amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results if the acquisition has occurred on the dates indicated, or which may occur in the future.