Exhibit 1.01

INTERLINK ELECTRONICS, INC.

Conflict Minerals Report

For the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2024

This Conflict Minerals Report (“Report”) of Interlink Electronics, Inc. has been prepared in accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Rule 13p-1”) for the reporting period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. As used in this Report and unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, all references to “Interlink,” “we,” “our,” “Company” and similar references are references to Interlink Electronics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Final Conflict Minerals Rule (“SEC Final Rule”)¹ requires a three-step compliance process: the first step is determining the applicability of the rule; the second step is conducting a “reasonable country of origin inquiry” (“RCOI”) to determine whether or not there is reason to believe that tin, tungsten, tantalum or gold (“3TG”), also referred to as conflict minerals, from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries (collectively, the “Covered Countries”) are present in the company’s products or are from recycled or scrap sources; and if so, the third step is conducting due diligence to determine the source and origin of those conflict minerals based on the facilities (smelter or refiners, “SORs”) in which they were processed. Companies requiring due diligence must use a nationally or internationally recognized standard such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas² to meet the SEC regulatory requirements. The sections below describe Interlink’s approach as part of our internal regulatory compliance program activities to meet each of the three steps in the SEC Final Rule compliance process; these activities were completed by our sourcing team.

The first step in SEC Final Rule compliance is examining the rule’s applicability to Interlink’s activities. According to the Final Rule, there are four decision criteria:

Interlink’s sourcing team carried out an analysis of our supply chain about the presence and sourcing of conflict minerals used in the products and components supplied to us. We prepared a list of Tier 1 suppliers determined to be in-scope. Based on Interlink’s influence over the manufacturing process (i.e., meeting the manufacture or contract to manufacture definitions in Rule 13p-1) and potential use of 3TG these suppliers were engaged following the RCOI process described in section 4.1 below.

1 Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 240 and 249b, http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf.

2 OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/GuidanceEdition2.pdf.

3 Conflict minerals are considered “outside the supply chain” if they were smelted or refined or were outside of a covered country prior to January 31, 2013.

Interlink Electronics, Inc. is a leading provider of sensors and printed electronics used extensively in Human-Machine Interface (“HMI”) devices and Internet-of-Things (“IoT”) solutions. Our broad product and technology portfolio encompasses force, piezo-electric, rugged HMI, wearable sensors for textiles and fabrics, gas sensors, instruments, and systems. Our blue-chip customers trust our products and solutions which span various markets, including industrial, medical, automotive, consumer, wearables, and IoT. Our technical and engineering expertise in materials science, manufacturing, embedded electronics, firmware, and software enables us to create and deliver high-quality, cost-effective custom solutions tailored to our customers’ unique requirements.

Our force-sensing products and solutions include sensor components, subassemblies, modules and products that support effective, efficient cursor control and novel three-dimensional user inputs. Our membrane keypads, graphic overlays, printed electronics and industrial label products are applicable for use in a wide range of fields, from industrial automation, process control and monitoring to medical and diagnostic devices and defense systems. Our innovative conductive transfer technology enables the integration of electronics and sensors into fabrics and textiles enabling smart fabric and textile applications in the wearables, consumer, medical and automotive markets. Our electrochemical gas-sensing technology instruments, products and solutions are deployed in industry, community, health and home settings, with uses in fields such as carbon monoxide and ozone detection and air quality monitoring.

In December 2024, Interlink acquired (through a wholly owned subsidiary) the assets of Conductive Transfers Limited and Global Print Solutions Limited (collectively, “Conductive Transfers”), located in Barnsley, South Yorkshire, UK. Conductive Transfers had developed a proprietary transfer printing technology used in the integration of electrical circuits and sensors enabling the manufacture of smart fabrics, textiles and related products. Conductive Transfers has successfully brought to market smart products incorporating their technology in products such as Innovo™, a smart wearable used in the treatment of urinary incontinence.

The Conflict Minerals reporting rule permits a reporting company which acquires another company that manufactures or contracts for the manufacture of products which potentially contain conflict minerals and which previously had not been required to file a Form SD report for those minerals, to delay the reporting on the acquired company’s products until the end of the first calendar year that begins no sooner than eight months after the closing date of the acquisition. As such this current report does not include the supply chain of Conductive Transfers. These will be included in the next reporting period.

We have adopted a Conflict Minerals Policy that states our commitment to ethical business conduct and the responsible sourcing of minerals throughout our global supply chain. The Conflict Minerals Policy is available on our website at www.interlinkelectronics.com under “About Us - Environment and Sustainability” and can be directly accessed using the following link - https://www.interlinkelectronics.com/hubfs/Conflict_Minerals_Policy_January_2020.pdf

We determined that certain conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality of one or more of our products that we manufactured or had manufactured during the Reporting Period, and thus conducted a reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) to determine whether any conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of such products originated in the Covered Countries or are from recycled or scrap sources. We established an internal team responsible for the reasonable country of origin inquiry, which included employees involved with material procurement. We then reached out to our supply chain partners to ascertain the sources of any conflict minerals included in the raw materials supplied by these suppliers.

We contract with numerous suppliers that contribute to the manufacture of our products and are several levels removed from the smelters or refiners (“SORs”) that process the minerals used in our products and from the mines of origin for those minerals. Interlink does not purchase raw ore or unrefined conflict minerals, and we made no purchases in the Covered Countries. As a result, in conducting our RCOI, we relied upon our suppliers to provide conflict minerals sourcing information and identify those SORs that represent the sources of conflict minerals in our supply chain.

The RCOI began with an evaluation of our suppliers who provided materials, components or products that became part of products we manufactured or contracted to be manufactured in 2024 which contained or were likely to contain conflict minerals necessary to the production or functionality of those products. To complete the RCOI required by the SEC Final Rule, we engaged our suppliers to collect information about the presence and sourcing of tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold (“3TG”) used in the products and components supplied to Interlink. The program utilized the Responsible Minerals Initiative’s (“RMI”) Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”). Only CMRTs version 6.22 or higher were accepted. Suppliers were requested to submit the required information by providing the CMRT in MS Excel format for review and analysis by our sourcing team.

We used our supplier contact information from our purchasing history which is contained in our ERP system to identify which suppliers should be included on our Tier 1 list. We then reached out to our primary contacts at these suppliers by at least one method of contact for each Tier 1 supplier designated as in-scope (email address, telephone number, fax number, or mailing address). Email was the preferred and primary method of communication.

The RCOI began with an email to our suppliers describing the Conflict Minerals Compliance Program (“CMCP”) requirements and our expectations from our supply partners. Following that introductory email, a subsequent email was sent to suppliers requesting they complete the CMRT. Following the initial introductions to the program and information request, reminder emails were sent to each non-responsive supplier requesting survey completion.

If, after these efforts, a given supplier still did provide the information requested, an escalation process was initiated. The escalation process consisted of direct follow-up by Interlink’s sourcing team.

In recognition that the information requested can take time to collect and aggregate, suppliers were given a final deadline of May 3, 2025 to provide information about the metal processors present in their supply chains for the 2024 reporting year.

Suppliers were asked to provide information regarding the sourcing of their materials with the goal of identifying the 3TG SORs and associated mine countries of origin. Many of our suppliers are long-term suppliers who supply the same material and do not change from year to year. In some cases, we relied on the previous year’s CMRT data where appropriate. Suppliers who had already performed a RCOI using the CMRT provided this document to us for inclusion in our supply chain analysis and reporting.

We chose to give our suppliers the ability to share information at a level with which they were most comfortable, i.e. company, product or user-defined, but the declaration scope had to be specified.

Supplier responses were evaluated for plausibility, consistency, and gaps. If any of the following quality control flags were raised, suppliers were requested to check their response and resubmit.

We identified a total of 125 Tier 1 suppliers as in-scope for conflict mineral regulatory purposes and contacted as part of our Conflict Minerals investigation. This number is higher than in previous years due to the inclusion of suppliers from recent acquisitions. The response rate among these suppliers was 33%.

The response rate was lower than in previous years, as this year’s outreach was managed internally rather than through a third-party firm, as had been done in the past. Additionally, we believe the inclusion of new suppliers with early-stage relationships from our recent acquisitions contributed to the lower response rate. Despite our good faith efforts, we were less successful in obtaining responses. However, we expect response rates to improve in future years as we establish longer-term relationships with these new suppliers. Of these responding suppliers, 27% indicated one or more of the regulated metals (3TG) as necessary to the functionality or production of the products they supply to Interlink.

Based on the smelter/refiner database, and as shown in the attached Data Summaries, there was an indication of sourcing from Covered Countries for only 42 out of 241 verified smelters/refiners.

The 241 SORs along with the specific metals they refine are listed in Annex I. The 42 SORs identified as potentially sourcing from covered countries are listed in Annex II of this report. All 42 of these SORs are RMI certified Conflict Free by either RMAP (Responsible Minerals Assurance Process) or LBMA (London Bullion Market Association) and are certified Conflict Free.

In addition, there were also seven SORs in our supply chain where the source of the covered metals was unknown. Six of these have an RMI Risk Level of 1 (little to no risk) and one was rated with an RMI Risk Level of 2 (low to medium risk).

We collected the results of our RCOI campaign. We have prepared the necessary information for this report and it is provided in the attached Annexes.

Based on our best efforts, Interlink has concluded that certain of its products in calendar year 2024 may contain conflict minerals that may have originated in the Covered Countries and were not from scrap or recycled sources.

For those supply chains with 42 SORs that are known or thought to be sourcing conflict minerals in the Covered Countries, additional investigation is needed to determine the source and chain-of-custody of the conflict minerals. In addition, there are seven SORs that have unknown sources of conflict minerals. For these reasons, and because only 33% of the Identified Suppliers responded to our RCOI request for information, we are unable to determine whether any conflict minerals in products that we manufactured or had manufactured in 2024 financed or benefited armed groups in a Covered Country. However, of the 42 SORs that have been identified, all have been certified Conflict Free by Third Party audit.

In response to our RCOI, our responding suppliers identified 241 SORs in their CMRTs which may have processed conflict minerals contained in materials, components or products provided to us. A list of these SORs is set forth in Annex I. We cross-referenced these SORs against the list of facilities that have received a “conflict free” designation from the Conflict-Free Smelter Program (“CFSP”) and its cross-recognized programs (e.g. the Responsible Jewellery Council and the London Bullion Market Association), whose designations provide country of origin and additional due diligence information on the conflict minerals sourced by such facilities. Of these 241 identified SORs 42 SORs were identified as sourcing from Covered Countries, as of May 3, 2025. A list of these is set forth in Annex II:

Interlink believes that the Subject Minerals contained in our products originate from the countries listed in Annex III below, as well as from recycled and scrap sources.

Interlink intends to undertake the following additional steps to continue to mitigate any potential risk that the necessary conflict minerals in our products could benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries:

Our reports used in the preparation of this Conflict Mineral Report contained data regarding the certification status and the types of certifications that each SOR has obtained. These are not reported here but below is a list of some of the definitions that are used to support this report.