UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22437
Guggenheim
Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
227
West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Amy J. Lee
227
West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 827-0100
Date of fiscal year end: May 31
Date of reporting period: June 1, 2025 – November 30, 2025
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
The registrant's semi-annual report transmitted to shareholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), is as follows:
Guggenheim Funds Semi-Annual Report
11.30.2025 (Unaudited)
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
| GuggenheimInvestments.com | CEF-GBAB-SAR-1125 |
GUGGENHEIMINVESTMENTS.COM/GBAB
... YOUR LINK TO THE LATEST, MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ABOUT THE GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST
The shareholder report you are reading right now is just the beginning of the story.
Online at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab, you will find:
| • | Daily, weekly and monthly data on share prices, net asset values, distributions and more |
| • | Monthly portfolio overviews and performance analyses |
| • | Announcements, press releases and special notices |
| • | Trust and adviser contact information |
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC and Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC are continually updating and expanding shareholder information services on the Trust’s website in an ongoing effort to provide you with the most current information about how your Trust’s assets are managed and the results of our efforts. It is just one more small way we are working to keep you better informed about your investment in the Trust.
| DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
We thank you for your investment in the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”). This report covers the Trust’s performance for the six-month period ended November 30, 2025 (the “Reporting Period”).
To learn more about the Trust’s performance and investment strategy, we encourage you to read the Economic and Market Overview and the Management’s Discussion of Trust Performance, which begin on page 5. There you will find information on Guggenheim’s views on the economy and market environment, and information about the factors that materially impacted the Trust’s performance during the Reporting Period.
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation.
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value (“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the Reporting Period, the Trust provided a total return based on market price of 7.92% and a total return based on NAV of 7.41%. At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s market price of $15.33 per share represented a premium of 1.12% to its NAV of $15.16 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s shares fluctuates from time to time, and it may be higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
During the Reporting Period, the Trust paid a monthly distribution of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized distribution rate of 9.84% based on the Trust’s closing market price of $15.33 per share at the end of the Reporting Period.
The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount of distributions, when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change. There is no guarantee of any future distribution or that the current returns and distribution rate will be maintained. Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution Rate table on page 33, and Note 2(g) on page 79 for more information on distributions for the period.
We encourage shareholders to consider the opportunity to reinvest their distributions from the Trust through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”), which is described on page 104 of this report. When shares trade at a discount to NAV, the DRIP takes advantage of the discount by reinvesting the monthly dividend distribution in common shares of the Trust purchased in the market at a price less than NAV. Conversely, when the market price of the Trust’s common shares is at a premium above NAV, the DRIP reinvests participants’ dividends in newly issued common shares at the greater of NAV per share or 95%
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 3
| DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
of the market price per share. The DRIP provides a cost-effective means to accumulate additional shares and enjoy the benefits of compounding returns over time. The DRIP effectively provides an income averaging technique for shareholders to accumulate a larger number of Trust shares when the market price is depressed than when the price is higher.
We appreciate your investment and look forward to serving your investment needs in the future. For the most up-to-date information on your investment, please visit the Trust’s website at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab.
Sincerely,
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
December 31, 2025
4 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| ECONOMIC AND MARKET OVERVIEW (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
The U.S. Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed”) recent 25 basis point (one basis point represents 0.01 percent) rate cut reflected a shift toward a more measured pace of monetary easing, with Chair Powell emphasizing downside risks to the labor market and adopting a balanced stance on inflation. Updated projections for 2026 indicated optimism, with real gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth revised upward to 2.3 percent, driven by supply-side improvements and structural productivity gains, including advancements in artificial intelligence. The Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) signaled reduced urgency for further rate cuts, reinstating language on the “extent and timing” of adjustments, which historically suggests a pause. Current rates are now considered within a broad range of neutral estimates, supporting a “wait-and-see” approach.
Labor market conditions appear to have softened, with unemployment expected to rise gradually through year-end, though Chair Powell highlighted potential contractions in true employment levels, warranting close monitoring. Core inflation remained elevated due to tariff pass-through effects but is anticipated to ease by late 2026 as shelter inflation moderates. Additionally, the Fed announced reserve management purchases to expand its balance sheet in line with reserve demand, exceeding expectations in size while aligning with forecasts on timing and monthly purchase amounts.
Equity markets responded positively to the Fed’s third consecutive rate cut, with small-cap stocks outperforming as the Russell 2000 Index reached record highs having already gained 21.81% for the period. Broader market participation was evident, as the equal-weight S&P 500 Index outpaced its market-cap-weighted counterpart. Meanwhile, U.S. front-end yields declined, reflecting dovish Federal Reserve communications, while global rates generally rose due to divergent monetary policy expectations. Following the Fed’s third consecutive rate cut the U.S. dollar weakened by 1.0% as markets priced in a relatively dovish Fed stance compared to other major central banks, reinforcing expectations of a cautious approach to future rate adjustments.
The opinions and forecasts expressed may not actually come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time, based on market and other conditions, and should not be construed as a recommendation of any specific security or strategy.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 5
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
MANAGEMENT TEAM
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC serves as the investment adviser to Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust is managed by a team of seasoned professionals at Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM”) the Trust’s investment sub-adviser.
This team includes Anne B. Walsh, CFA, JD, Managing Partner, Chief Investment Officer of GPIM and Portfolio Manager; Steven H. Brown, CFA, Chief Investment Officer - Fixed Income, Senior Managing Director, and Portfolio Manager; Allen Li, CFA, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager; Adam J. Bloch, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager; and Evan L. Serdensky, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager.
Discuss the Trust’s return and return of comparative Indices
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value (“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the Reporting Period, the Trust provided a total return based on market price of 7.92% and a total return based on NAV of 7.41%. At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s market price of $15.33 per share represented a premium of to its NAV of $15.16 per share. At the beginning of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s market price of $14.93 per share represented a premium of 0.61% to its NAV of $14.84 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s shares fluctuates from time to time and may be higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
Please refer to the graphs and tables included within the Trust Summary, beginning on page 30 for additional information about the Trust’s performance.
The returns for the Reporting Period of indices tracking performance of the asset classes to which the Trust allocates the largest of its investments were:
| Index*,1 | Total Return for the Reporting Period | |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index | 5.16% | |
| Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index | 6.53% | |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 4.89% | |
| Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index | 5.19% | |
| S&P UBS Leveraged Loan Index | 3.02% | |
| ICE Bank of America (“BofA”) Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA Index | 3.36% | |
| ICE Bank of America (“BofA”) Build America Bond Index | 6.42% | |
| Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index | 16.57% | |
| *See page 10 for Index definitions | ||
6 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Discuss the Trust’s distributions
During the Reporting Period, the Trust paid a monthly distribution of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized distribution rate of 9.84% based on the Trust’s closing market price of $15.33 per share at the end of the Reporting Period.
The distributions paid consisted of (i) investment company taxable income taxed as ordinary income, which includes, among other things, short-term capital gain and income from certain hedging and interest rate transactions and (ii) return of capital.
There is no guarantee of any future distribution or that the current returns and distribution rate will be maintained. The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount of distributions, when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change.
Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution Rate table on page 33, and Note 2(g) on page 79 for more information on distributions for the period.
| Payable Date | Amount |
| June 30, 2025 | $0.12573 |
| July 31, 2025 | $0.12573 |
| August 29, 2025 | $0.12573 |
| September 30, 2025 | $0.12573 |
| October 31, 2025 | $0.12573 |
| November 28, 2025 | $0.12573 |
| Total | $0.75438 |
What factors materially contributed to or detracted from the Trust’s Performance during the Reporting Period?
During the Reporting Period, the Trust saw positive absolute performance and relative performance at NAV versus the Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index. Earned income contributed the most to both absolute and relative performance as the Trust continued to prioritize higher-quality credits with attractive income/yield profiles. Duration contributed both to absolute return and was the second largest contributor to relative return due to the Trust’s overweight duration positioning combined with the yield curve bull steepening over the reporting period, with 2-year Treasury yields declining by 41 basis points and 30-year Treasury yields declining by 27 basis points. Credit spreads also contributed to both absolute and relative performance as spreads on the Bloomberg Taxable Municipal and Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Bond Indices tightened by 24 basis points and 8 basis points, respectively. Relative performance was driven by outperformance in the Trust’s modest out-of-benchmark allocations to sectors like investment-grade corporates, high-yield corporates, and asset-backed securities.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 7
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Discuss the Trust’s Use of Leverage
At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s leverage was approximately 31% of Managed Assets, compared with approximately 27% at the beginning of the Reporting Period.
One purpose of leverage is to fund the purchase of additional securities that may provide increased income and potentially greater appreciation to common shareholders than could be achieved from an unlevered portfolio. Leverage may result in greater NAV volatility and entails more downside risk than an unleveraged portfolio.
Given positive total returns over the Reporting Period, the Trust’s use of leverage benefited performance.
Investments in Investment Funds (as defined in the Risks and Other Considerations section, which begins on page 11) frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of financial leverage and the associated risks, such as the magnified effect of any losses.
How did the Trust use derivatives during the Reporting Period?
The Trust had minimal exposure to derivatives during the Reporting Period. The Trust continued to utilize modestly sized credit default swaps to hedge broader credit markets. These credit hedges slightly detracted from performance during the Reporting Period. The Trust also employed interest rate derivative strategies to protect against rate movements. These interest rate hedges slightly detracted from performance during the reporting period. Additionally, the Trust held interest rate futures for yield curve positioning; in aggregate, those positions had a nominal impact to performance during the Reporting Period. Foreign currency forwards used to hedge non-USD exposures slightly contributed to overall performance.
How was the Trust positioned at the end of the Reporting Period?
Risk-on sentiment dominated the Reporting Period following a brief spike in volatility after “Liberation Day,” fueled by easing trade tensions, stronger-than-expected economic data, accelerating AI investment, and Fed rate cuts. Credit spreads compressed to historic levels across sectors, while the yield curve steepened significantly as front-end rates declined. Yet this rally unfolded against contradictory fundamentals—persistent inflation, weakening labor markets, and stretched valuations—raising questions about its sustainability.
Due to the combination of tight spreads and economic uncertainty, we continue to believe this environment calls for significant diversification and scrutiny in sector allocations, particularly at the issuer level. Throughout the Reporting period, the Trust increased its exposure to Municipals, specifically in areas within the sector with the best relative value. Outside of municipals, the Trust
8 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
modestly rotated out of corporate credit sectors like investment-grade, high yield, and bank loans and into structured credit sectors like non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), and asset-backed securities. These sectors are attractive on a relative-value basis because credit spreads within these sectors are wider compared to their historical trading ranges and offer attractive risk-adjusted yields, supporting a high level of carry (or earned) income while preserving total return potential if spreads normalize. Despite the Fed’s commencement of its easing cycle, we continue to view the forward-looking valuation proposition of credit as attractive, given above-average yields across high-quality segments.
Sources:
1 Morningstar 6-month total return as of November 30, 2025
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 9
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Index Definitions
Indices are unmanaged and reflect no expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
The Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index is considered representative of the broad market for investment grade, tax-exempt municipal bonds with a maturity of at least one year.
The Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index tracks performance of investment-grade fixed income securities issued by state and local governments whose income is not exempt from tax, issued generally to finance a project or activity that does not meet certain “public purpose/use” requirements.
The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including U.S. Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities or “MBS” (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage, or “ARM”, pass-throughs), ABS, and commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) (agency and non-agency).
The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index measures the U.S. dollar-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB +/BB + or below.
The S&P UBS Leveraged Loan Index is designed to mirror the investable universe of the USD-denominated leveraged loan market.
The ICE Bank of America (“BofA”) Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA Index is a subset of the ICE Bank of America U.S. Fixed Rate Asset Backed Securities Index including all securities rated AA1 through BBB3, inclusive.
The ICE Bank of America (“BofA”) Build America Bond Index is designed to track the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated Build America Bonds publicly issued by U.S. states and territories, and their political subdivisions, in the U.S. market.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure the performance of the broad economy, representing all major industries and is considered a representation of U.S. stock market.
10 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Risks and Other Considerations
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio managers only through the report period as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time, based on market and other conditions, and should not be construed as a recommendation of any kind. The material may also include forward looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass.
There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its investment objectives. The net asset value and market price of the Trust’s shares will fluctuate, sometimes independently, based on market, economic, issuer-specific and other factors affecting the Trust and its investments. The market price of Trust shares will either be above (premium) or below (discount) their net asset value. Although the net asset value of Trust shares is often considered in determining whether to purchase or sell Trust shares, whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of Trust shares will depend upon whether the market price of Trust shares at the time of sale is above or below the investor’s purchase price, taking into account transaction costs for the shares, and is not directly dependent upon the Trust’s net asset value. Market price movements of Trust shares are thus material to investors and may result in losses, even when net asset value has increased. The Trust is designed for long-term investors; investors should not view the Trust as a vehicle for trading purposes.
Risk is inherent in all investing, including the loss of your entire principal. Therefore, before investing you should consider the risks carefully. Investors should be aware that the Trust’s investments and a shareholder’s investment in the Trust are subject to various risk factors, including investment risk, which could result in the loss of the entire principal amount that you invest, reduced yield and/or income and sudden and substantial losses. Certain of these risk factors are described below. Please see the Trust’s Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information (SAI), most recent annual report on Form N-CSR and guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab for a more detailed description of the risks of investing in the Trust. Shareholders also may access the Trust’s Prospectus, SAI and most recent annual report on the EDGAR Database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
The fact that a particular risk below is not specifically identified as being heightened under current conditions does not mean that the risk is not greater than under normal conditions.
Below-Investment Grade Securities Risk. The Trust may invest in Income Securities (as defined below) rated below-investment grade or, if unrated, determined by GPIM to be of comparable credit quality, which are commonly referred to as “high-yield” or “junk” bonds. Investment in securities of below-investment grade quality involves substantial risk of loss and increased volatility, the risk of which is particularly acute under adverse market or economic conditions. Income Securities of below-investment grade quality are predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing capacity to pay interest and repay principal when due and therefore involve additional and heightened risks compared to investment grade bonds, including a greater risk of default or decline in market
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 11
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
value or income due to adverse economic and issuer-specific developments, such as financial condition, operating results and outlook and real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions. Accordingly, the performance of the Trust and a shareholder’s investment in the Trust may be adversely affected if an issuer is unable to pay interest and repay principal, either on time or at all. Issuers of below-investment grade securities are not perceived to be as strong financially as those with higher credit ratings. Securities of below-investment grade quality may experience greater price volatility than higher-rated securities of similar maturity. Generally, the risks associated with below-investment grade securities are heightened during times of weakening economic conditions or rising interest rates (particularly for issuers that are highly leveraged).
Build America Bonds (“BABs”) Risk. BABs were an alternative form of financing to state and local governments whose primary means for accessing the capital markets had been through issuance of tax-free municipal bonds. The BABs market is smaller and less diverse than the broader municipal securities market. In addition, because the relevant provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were not extended, bonds issued after December 31, 2010 cannot qualify as BABs. It is uncertain whether Congress will renew the program to permit issuance of new Build America Bonds. As a result, the number of available BABs is limited, which may negatively affect the value of BABs. In addition, there can be no assurance that BABs will continue to be actively traded. It is difficult to predict the extent to which a market for such bonds will continue, meaning that BABs may experience greater illiquidity than other municipal obligations.
Corporate Bond Risk. Corporate bonds are debt obligations issued by corporations and other business entities. Corporate bonds may be either secured or unsecured. Corporate bonds contain elements of both interest-rate risk and credit risk and are subject to the risks associated with other debt securities, among other risks. The market value of a corporate bond generally is expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates. The market value of a corporate bond is affected by factors directly related to the issuer, such as its credit rating, investors’ perceptions of the creditworthiness of the issuer, the issuer’s financial condition and performance, perceptions of the issuer in the marketplace, performance of management of the issuer, the issuer’s capital structure and use of financial leverage and demand for the issuer’s goods and services, as well as general market and economic conditions. There is a risk that the issuers of corporate bonds may not be able to meet their obligations on interest or principal payments at the time called for by an instrument or at all. Depending on the nature of the seniority provisions, a senior corporate bond may be junior to other credit securities of the issuer, which increases risks associated with the bond. Corporate bonds of below-investment grade quality are often high risk and have speculative characteristics and may be particularly susceptible to adverse issuer-specific and other developments.
Credit Risk. The Trust could lose money if the issuer or guarantor of a debt instrument, a counterparty to a derivatives transaction or other transaction (such as a repurchase agreement or a loan of portfolio securities or other instruments) or other obligor to the Trust is unable or unwilling, or perceived (whether by market participants, rating agencies, pricing services or otherwise) to be
12 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
unable or unwilling, to pay interest or repay principal on time or defaults or otherwise fails to meet obligations. This risk is heightened during adverse economic conditions and in market environments where interest rates are changing, notably when rates are rising or when refinancing obligations becomes more challenging. Also, the issuer, guarantor or counterparty may suffer adverse changes in its financial condition, the value of its assets, prospective earnings, demands for its goods and services or be adversely affected by economic, political or social conditions that could lower the financial condition or credit quality (or the market’s perception of the financial condition or credit quality) of the issuer, instrument, guarantor or counterparty, leading to greater volatility in the price of the instrument and in shares of the Trust. Although credit quality may not accurately reflect the true credit risk of an instrument, credit quality (and credit risks) are subject to change and a change in the credit quality rating of an instrument or an issuer can have a rapid, adverse effect on the instrument’s value, price volatility and liquidity and make it more difficult for the Trust to sell at an advantageous price or time. The risk of the occurrence of these types of events is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing, notably when rates are rising. High yield or below-investment grade securities are particularly subject to credit risk.
Current Fixed-Income and Debt Market Conditions. Fixed-income and debt market conditions are highly unpredictable and some parts of the market are subject to dislocations. In response to market and economic conditions, such as the inflation rates in recent periods, governmental authorities may implement significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including changing interest rates and implementation of quantitative tightening or easing. These and other fiscal and monetary policy actions present heightened risks, particularly to fixed-income and debt instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes or are quickly reversed. It is difficult to accurately predict changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (“Federal Reserve”) monetary policies and the effect of any such changes or policies. Certain economic conditions and market environments will expose fixed-income and debt instruments to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity, which can impact the Trust’s investments and may negatively impact the Trust’s characteristics, which in turn would impact performance.
Debt Instruments Risk. The value of the Trust’s investments in debt instruments (including bonds issued by non-profit entities, municipal conduits and project finance corporations) depends on the continuing ability of the debt issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal when due. The ability of debt issuers to make timely payments of interest and principal can be affected by a variety of developments and changes in legal, political, market, economic and other conditions. Investments in debt instruments present certain risks, including credit, interest rate, liquidity and prepayment and extension risks and may include risks associated with below-investment grade investments. Issuers that rely directly or indirectly on government funding mechanisms or non-profit statutes, may be negatively affected by actions of the government, including reductions in government spending or support, increases in tax rates, and changes in fiscal policy. The value of a debt instrument may decline for many reasons that directly relate to the issuer, such as a change in
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 13
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
the demand for the issuer’s goods or services, or a decline in the issuer’s performance, earnings or assets. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual issuer can affect the value and overall market for such instruments. The risk of the occurrence of these types of unfavorable events is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing, notably when they are rising. The income generated by debt instruments can also be adversely affected as a result of the occurrence of these types of events or conditions.
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income and other debt instruments are subject to the possibility that interest rates could change (or are expected to change). Changes in interest rates (or the expectation of such changes) can be sudden, significant and frequent and may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in these instruments, such as the value or liquidity of, and income generated by, the investments or increase risks associated with such investments, such as credit or default risks. In addition, changes in interest rates can have unpredictable effects on markets and can adversely affect the Trust’s yield, income and performance. Generally, when interest rates increase, the values of fixed-income and other debt instruments decline, and when interest rates decrease, the values of fixed-income and other debt instruments rise. Changes in interest rates may also adversely affect the yield generated by certain fixed-income and other debt securities (“Income Securities”) or result in the issuance of lower yielding Income Securities. The Federal Reserve has changed interest rates recently in response to economic conditions, including inflation rates. The Federal Reserve’s actions present heightened risks to fixed-income and debt instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are unexpectedly or suddenly reversed or are ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes. It is difficult to accurately predict how long, and whether, the Federal Reserve’s current stance on interest rates will persist and the impact these actions will have on the economy and the Trust’s investments and the markets where they trade. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy is subject to change at any time and potentially frequently based on a variety of market and economic conditions.
Investment and Market Risk. An investment in the common shares is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. During periods of adverse economic, financial, market, geopolitical, labor and public health conditions, the risks associated with an investment in common shares may be heightened. An investment in the common shares represents an indirect investment in the securities and other assets owned by the Trust. The value of, or income generated by, the investments held by the Trust are subject to the possibility of frequent, significant, rapid and/or unpredictable fluctuation and loss. The value of certain investments (e.g., equity securities) tends to fluctuate more dramatically over the shorter term than do the values of other asset classes. These movements may result from factors affecting (or perceived to affect) individual companies or issuers or particular industries, or from broader influences, including real or perceived changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in inflation rates or expectations about inflation rates, adverse investor confidence or sentiment, general outlook for corporate earnings, changing economic, political (including geopolitical), social or financial market conditions, bank failures, the actual or threatened imposition of tariffs and trade disruptions, recession, changes in
14 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
currency rates, increased instability or general uncertainty, environmental, natural or other disasters, extreme weather or geological events, governmental or quasi-governmental actions, cyber attacks, public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics), debt crises, terrorism, actual or threatened wars or other armed conflicts (such as the escalated conflict in the Middle East and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and the risk of expansion or collateral economic and other effects) or ratings downgrades, and other similar types of events, each of which may be temporary or last for extended periods.
Many economies and markets may experience, and have experienced in recent periods, high inflation rates. In response to such inflation and other economic conditions, governmental and quasi-governmental authorities have implemented significant fiscal and monetary policies such as changing interest rates and quantitative tightening (reduction of money available in the market), and could take these or other measures in the future. Such interventions (or their reversal) may not be effective and could lead to increased market volatility and adverse economic conditions, which could negatively impact the Trust’s performance.
Administrative changes, policy reform and/or changes in law or governmental regulations can result in expropriation or nationalization of the investments of a company in which the Trust invests. In addition, adverse changes in one sector or industry or with respect to a particular company could negatively impact companies in other sectors or industries or increase market volatility as a result of the interconnected nature of economies and markets and thus negatively affect the Trust’s performance. For example, developments in the banking or financial services sectors (or one or more companies operating in these sectors) could adversely impact a wide range of companies and issuers. These types of adverse developments could negatively affect the Trust’s performance or operations.
Different sectors, industries and security types may react differently to such developments and, when the market performs well, there is no assurance that the Trust’s investments will increase in value along with the broader markets and the Trust’s investments may underperform general securities markets or other investments. Volatility of financial markets, including potentially extreme volatility caused by the events described above or other events, can expose the Trust to greater market risk than normal, possibly resulting in greatly reduced liquidity, increased volatility and valuation risks and longer than usual trade settlement periods. Moreover, changing economic, political, social, geopolitical, financial market, or other conditions in one country or geographic region could adversely affect the value, yield and return of the investments held by the Trust in a different country or geographic region because of the increasingly interconnected global economies and financial markets.
At any point in time, your common shares may be worth less than your original investment, even after including the reinvestment of Trust dividends and distributions.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 15
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Investment Funds Risk. As an alternative to holding investments directly, the Trust may also obtain investment exposure to securities in which it may invest directly by investing in other investment companies, including U.S. registered investment companies and/or other U.S. or foreign pooled investment vehicles (collectively, “Investment Funds”). Investments in Investment Funds present certain special considerations and risks not present in making direct investments in securities in which the Trust may invest. Investments in Investment Funds subject the Trust to the risks affecting such Investment Funds and involve operating expenses and fees that are in addition to the expenses and fees borne by the Trust. Such expenses and fees attributable to the Trust’s investment in another Investment Fund are borne indirectly by common shareholders. Accordingly, investment in such entities involves expenses and fees at both levels. To the extent management fees of Investment Funds are based on total gross assets, it may create an incentive for such entities’ managers to employ financial leverage, thereby adding additional expense and increasing volatility and risk (including the Trust’s overall exposure to leverage risk). A performance-based fee arrangement may create incentives for an adviser or manager to take greater investment risks in the hope of earning a higher profit participation. Investments in Investment Funds frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of financial leverage and, thus, increase the Trust’s exposure to leverage risk and costs. From time to time, the Trust may invest a significant portion of its assets in Investment Funds that employ leverage. The use of leverage by Investment Funds may cause these Investment Funds’ market price of common shares and/or NAV to be more volatile and can magnify the effect of any losses and cause similar effects on the Trust.
Investment in Loans Risk. The Trust may purchase loans on a direct assignment basis from a participant in the original syndicate of lenders or from subsequent assignees of such interests. Loans may offer a fixed or floating interest rate. Loans are often below-investment grade and may be unrated. The Trust’s investments in loans can also be difficult to value accurately because of, among other factors, limited public information regarding the loans or the borrowers and may be more susceptible to liquidity risk than fixed income instruments of similar credit quality and/or maturity. Risks associated with investments in loans are increased if the loans are secured by a single asset. Loans may decline in value if their interest rates do not rise as much or as fast as interest rates in general. Participations in loans may subject the Trust to the credit risk of both the borrower and the seller of the participation and may make enforcement of loan covenants, if any, more difficult for the Trust as legal action may have to go through the seller of the participation (or an agent acting on its behalf). Covenants contained in loan documentation are intended to protect lenders and investors by imposing certain restrictions and other limitations on a borrower’s operations or assets and by providing certain information and consent rights to lenders.
Senior Loans Risk. The Trust may invest in senior secured floating rate loans made to corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers (“Senior Loans”). Senior Loans typically hold the most senior position in the capital structure of the issuing entity, are typically secured with specific collateral and typically have a claim on the assets of the borrower, including stock owned by the
16 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
borrower in its subsidiaries, that is senior to that held by junior lien creditors, subordinated debt holders and stockholders of the borrower. The Trust’s investments in Senior Loans are typically below-investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of the applicable issuer. The risks associated with Senior Loans of below-investment grade quality are similar to the risks of other lower grade securities, although Senior Loans are typically senior in payment priority and secured on a senior priority basis in contrast to subordinated and unsecured securities. An investment in Senior Loans involves the risk that the borrowers under Senior Loans may default on their obligations to pay principal and/or interest when due. In the event a borrower fails to pay scheduled interest or principal payments on a Senior Loan held by the Trust, the Trust will experience a reduction in its income and a decline in the market value of the Senior Loan, which will likely reduce dividends and lead to a decline in the Trust’s NAV.
There is less readily-available, reliable information about most Senior Loans than is the case for many other types of securities. In addition, there is rarely a minimum rating or other independent evaluation of a borrower or its securities, and GPIM relies primarily on its own evaluation of a borrower’s credit quality rather than on any available independent sources. As a result, the Trust is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of GPIM with respect to investments in Senior Loans. GPIM’s judgment about the credit quality of a borrower may be wrong. Loans and other debt instruments are also subject to the risk of price declines due to increases in prevailing interest rates, although floating-rate debt instruments are less exposed to this risk than fixed-rate debt instruments. Interest rate changes may also increase prepayments of debt obligations and require the Trust to invest assets at lower yields, particularly during periods of declining rates. In addition, extension risk (the risk that payments on principal will occur at a slower rate or later than expected) is heightened in market environments where interest rates are higher or rising. During periods of deteriorating economic conditions, such as recessions or periods of rising unemployment, or changing interest rates (notably increases), delinquencies and losses generally increase, sometimes dramatically, with respect to obligations under such loans. An economic downturn or individual corporate developments could adversely affect the value and market for these instruments and reduce the Trust’s ability to sell these instruments at an advantageous time or price. An economic downturn would generally lead to a higher non-payment rate, and a Senior Loan may lose significant market value before a default occurs.
Second Lien Loans Risk. The Trust may invest in “second lien” secured floating rate loans made by public and private corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers for a variety of purposes (“Second Lien Loans”). Second Lien Loans are typically second in right of payment and/ or second in right of priority with respect to collateral remedies to one or more Senior Loans of the related borrower. Second Lien Loans are subject to the same risks associated with investment in Senior Loans and other lower grade Income Securities. However, Second Lien Loans are second in right of payment and/or second in right of priority with respect to collateral remedies to Senior Loans and therefore are subject to the additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower and/or the value of any property securing the Loan may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments or
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 17
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
otherwise be available to repay the Loan after giving effect to payments in respect of a Senior Loan, including payments made with the proceeds of any property securing the Loan and any senior secured obligations of the borrower. Second Lien Loans are expected to have greater price volatility and exposure to losses upon default than Senior Loans and may be less liquid. There is also a possibility that originators will not be able to sell participations in Second Lien Loans, which would create greater credit risk exposure.
Subordinated Secured Loans Risk. Subordinated secured loans generally are subject to similar risks as those associated with investment in Senior Loans, Second Lien Loans and below-investment grade securities. However, such loans may rank lower in right of payment than any outstanding Senior Loans, Second Lien Loans or other debt instruments with higher priority of the borrower and therefore are subject to additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower and any property securing the loan may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments and repayment of principal in the event of default or bankruptcy after giving effect to the higher ranking secured obligations of the borrower. Subordinated secured loans are expected to have greater price volatility than Senior Loans and Second Lien Loans and may be less liquid.
Unsecured Loans Risk. Unsecured loans generally are subject to similar risks as those associated with investment in Senior Loans, Second Lien Loans, subordinated secured loans and below-investment grade securities. However, because unsecured loans have lower priority in right of payment to any higher ranking obligations of the borrower and are not backed by a security interest in any specific collateral, they are subject to additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower and available assets may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments and repayment of principal after giving effect to any higher ranking obligations of the borrower. Unsecured loans are expected to have greater price volatility than Senior Loans, Second Lien Loans and subordinated secured loans and may be less liquid.
Loans and Loan Participations and Assignments Risk. The Trust may invest in loans directly or through participations or assignments. The Trust may purchase loans on a direct assignment basis from a participant in the original syndicate of lenders or from subsequent assignees of such interests. The Trust may also purchase, without limitation, participations in loans. The purchaser of an assignment typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations of the assigning institution and becomes a lender under the credit agreement with respect to the debt obligation; however, the purchaser’s rights can be more restricted than those of the assigning institution, and, in any event, the Trust may not be able to unilaterally enforce all rights and remedies under the loan and with regard to any associated collateral. The Trust’s interest in a particular loan and/or in particular collateral securing a loan may be subordinate to the interests of other creditors of the obligor, which leads to the risk of subordination to other creditors. A participation typically results in a contractual relationship only with the institution participating out the interest, not with the borrower. In purchasing participations, the Trust generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement against the borrower, and the Trust may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting
18 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Trust will be exposed to the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation. Further, in purchasing participations in lending syndicates, the Trust may not be able to conduct the same due diligence on the borrower with respect to a Senior Loan that the Trust would otherwise conduct. In addition, as a holder of the participations, the Trust may not have voting rights or inspection rights that the Trust would otherwise have if it were investing directly in the loan, which may result in the Trust being exposed to greater credit or fraud risk with respect to the borrower or the loan. Lenders selling a participation and other persons inter-positioned between the lender and the Trust with respect to a participation will likely conduct their principal business activities in the banking, finance and financial services industries. Because the Trust may invest in participations, the Trust may be more susceptible to economic, political or regulatory occurrences affecting such industries.
Loans are especially vulnerable to the financial health, or perceived financial health, of the borrower but are also particularly susceptible to economic and market sentiment such that changes in these conditions or the occurrence of other economic or market events may reduce the demand for loans, increase the risks associated with such investments and cause their value to decline rapidly and unpredictably. Many loans and loan interests are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on transfer, resale or assignment that may limit the ability of the Trust to sell its interest in a loan at an advantageous time or price. Transactions in loans are often subject to long settlement periods. The Trust thus is subject to the risk of selling other investments at disadvantageous times or prices or taking other actions necessary to raise cash to meet its obligations such as borrowing from a bank or holding additional cash, particularly during periods of unusual market or economic conditions or financial stress. Investments in loans can also be difficult to value accurately because of, among other factors, limited public information regarding the loans or the borrowers. Risks associated with investments in loans are increased if the loans are secured by a single asset. Loans may offer a fixed rate or floating rate of interest. Loans may decline in value if their interest rates do not rise as much or as fast as interest rates in general. For example, the interest rates on floating rate loans typically adjust only periodically and therefore the interest rate payable under such loans may significantly trail market interest rates.
The Trust invests in or is exposed to loans and other similar debt obligations that are sometimes referred to as “covenant-lite” loans or obligations (“covenant-lite obligations”), which are loans or other similar debt obligations that lack financial maintenance covenants or possess fewer or contingent financial maintenance covenants and other financial protections for lenders and investors. Exposure may also be obtained to covenant-lite obligations through investment in securitization vehicles and other structured products. Covenant-lite obligations may carry more risk than traditional loans as they allow borrowers to engage in activities that would otherwise be difficult or impossible under an agreement that is not covenant-lite. The Trust may have fewer rights with respect to covenant-lite obligations, including fewer protections against the possibility of default and fewer remedies in the event of default as the lender may not have the opportunity to negotiate with the
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 19
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
borrower prior to default. As a result, investments in (or exposure to) covenant-lite obligations are subject to more risk than investments in (or exposure to) certain other types of obligations. In the event of default, covenant-lite obligations may exhibit diminished recovery values as the lender may not have the opportunity to negotiate with the borrower prior to default. In addition, the Trust may receive less or less frequent financial reporting from a borrower under a covenant-lite obligation, which may result in more limited access to financial information, difficulty evaluating the borrower’s financial performance over time and delays in exercising rights and remedies in the event of a significant financial decline.
The Trust is subject to other risks associated with investments in (or exposure to) Loans and other similar obligations, including that such Loans or obligations may not be considered “securities” under federal securities laws and, as a result, the Trust may not be entitled to rely on the anti-fraud protections under the federal securities laws and instead may have to resort to state law and direct claims.
Mezzanine Investments Risk. The Trust may invest in certain lower grade securities known as “Mezzanine Investments,” which are subordinated debt securities that are generally issued in private placements in connection with an equity security (e.g., with attached warrants) or may be convertible into equity securities. Mezzanine Investments are subject to the same risks associated with investment in Senior Loans, Second Lien Loans and other lower grade Income Securities. However, Mezzanine Investments may rank lower in right of payment than any outstanding Senior Loans and Second Lien Loans of the borrower, or may be unsecured (i.e., not backed by a security interest in any specific collateral), and are subject to the additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower and available assets may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments after giving effect to any higher-ranking obligations of the borrower. Mezzanine Investments are expected to have greater price volatility and exposure to losses upon default than Senior Loans and Second Lien Loans and may be less liquid.
Leverage Risk. The Trust’s use of leverage, through borrowings or instruments such as derivatives, causes the Trust to be more volatile and riskier than if it had not been leveraged. Although the use of leverage by the Trust may create an opportunity for increased return, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the effect of any losses and may be subject to increased borrowing rates. The effect of leverage in a declining market is likely to cause a greater decline in the net asset value of the Trust than if the Trust were not leveraged, which may result in a greater decline in the market price of the Trust shares. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be implemented or that it will be successful during any period during which it is employed. When the cost of leverage is no longer favorable, or when the Trust is otherwise required to reduce its leverage, the Trust may not be able to maintain distributions at historical levels and common shareholders will bear any costs associated with selling portfolio securities. The Trust’s total leverage, and associated borrowing costs, may vary significantly over time. To the extent the Trust increases its amount of leverage outstanding, it will be more exposed to these risks and pay greater borrowing costs. Investments in Investment Funds
20 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
and certain other pooled and structured finance vehicles, such as collateralized loan obligations, frequently expose the Fund to an additional layer of financial leverage and, thus, increase the Trust’s exposure to leverage risk.
Liquidity Risk. The Trust may invest in municipal securities and other investments that are, at the time of investment, illiquid or become illiquid. Illiquid investments are securities that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the ordinary course of business at approximately the value that the Trust values the securities. Illiquid investments may trade at a discount from comparable, more liquid securities and may be subject to wide fluctuations in market value. The Trust may be subject to significant delays in disposing of illiquid investments. Accordingly, the Trust may be forced to sell these investments at less than fair market value or may not be able to sell them when GPIM believes it is desirable to do so. If the Trust is unable to sell an investment at its desired time, the Trust may miss other investment opportunities while it holds investments it would prefer to sell, which could adversely affect the Trust’s performance. Illiquid investments also may entail registration expenses and other transaction costs that are higher than those for liquid investments. Dislocations or unfavorable conditions in certain parts of markets may result in reduced liquidity for certain investments. Liquidity of financial markets may also be affected by government intervention, such as the legal restrictions on certain financial instruments’ resale. In addition, the liquidity of any Trust investment may change significantly as a result of market, economic, trading, issuer-specific and other factors.
Management Risk. The Trust is subject to management risk because it has an actively managed portfolio. GPIM will apply investment techniques and risk analysis in making investment decisions for the Trust, but there can be no guarantee that these will produce the desired results or expected returns, causing the Trust to fail to meet its investment objective or underperform its benchmark index or funds with similar investment objectives and strategies. The Trust’s allocation of its investments across various asset classes and sectors may vary significantly over time based on GPIM’s analysis and judgment. As a result, the particular risks most relevant to an investment in the Trust, as well as the overall risk profile of the Trust’s portfolio, may vary over time. The ability of the Trust to achieve its investment objective depends, in part, on GPIM’s investment decisions and the ability of GPIM to allocate effectively the Trust’s assets among multiple investment strategies, underlying funds and investments and asset classes. Although GPIM considers several factors when making investment decisions, GPIM may not evaluate every factor prior to investing in an issuer or security or disposing of an investment, and GPIM may determine that certain factors are more significant than others. There can be no assurance that the actual allocations will be effective in achieving the Trust’s investment objective or that an investment strategy or underlying fund or investment will achieve its particular investment objective.
Municipal Conduit Bond Risk. Municipal conduit bonds, also referred to as private activity bonds or industrial revenue bonds, are bonds issued by state and local governments or other entities for the purpose of financing the projects of certain private enterprises. Unlike municipal bonds, municipal conduit bonds are not backed by the full faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 21
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
governmental entity. Rather, issuances of municipal conduit bonds are backed solely by revenues of the private enterprise involved. Therefore, in addition to being subject to the general risks associated with municipal securities, municipal conduit bonds are subject to heightened credit risk, as the private enterprise involved can have a different credit profile than the issuing governmental entity. Municipal conduit bonds may be negatively impacted by conditions affecting either the general credit of the private enterprise or the project itself. Factors such as competitive pricing, construction delays, or lack of demand for or use of the project could cause project revenues to fall short of projections, and defaults could occur. Municipal conduit bonds tend to have longer terms and thus are more susceptible to interest rate risk.
Municipal Securities Risk. The Trust’s holdings of municipal securities could be significantly affected by events that affect the municipal bond market, which could include unfavorable legislative, tax, political or other developments, adverse changes in the financial conditions of issuers of municipal securities, or other actual or perceived changes in economic, social, or public health conditions. The amount of public information available about municipal securities is generally less than that for corporate equities or bonds. The secondary market for municipal securities also tends to be less well-developed or liquid than many other securities markets, which may adversely affect the Trust’s ability to sell such securities at prices approximating those at which the Trust may currently value them. In addition, municipal securities are subject to credit and interest rate risks and state and municipal governments that issue such securities are subject to experiencing significant economic and financial stress and may not be able to satisfy their obligations. Issuers of municipal securities might seek protection under bankruptcy laws. In the event of bankruptcy of such an issuer, holders of municipal securities could experience delays in collecting principal and interest and such holders may not be able to collect all principal and interest to which they are entitled. Legislative developments may result in changes to the laws relating to municipal bankruptcies. The income, value and/or risk of municipal securities is often correlated to specific project or other revenue sources, which may be insufficient to satisfy the obligations. Municipal securities can be negatively affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining rents or property values resulting from legal, cultural, technological, global or local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties, revenues, goods or services. Municipalities and municipal projects that rely directly or indirectly on federal funding mechanisms may be negatively affected by constraints of the federal government budget. Each of the foregoing may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in municipal securities. To the extent that the Trust invests a significant portion of its assets in securities or other obligations of particular municipalities or states, the Trust will be more sensitive to adverse economic, business or political developments affecting such municipalities or states.
Project Finance Risk. Project finance is a type of financing commonly used for infrastructure, industry, and public service projects. In a project finance arrangement, the cash flow generated by the project is used to repay lenders while the project’s assets, rights and interest are held as secondary collateral. Investors involved in project finance face heightened technology risk, operational risk, and market risk
22 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
because the cash flow generated by the project, rather than the revenues of the company behind the project, will repay investors. In addition, because of the project-specific nature of such arrangements, the Trust face the risk of loss of investment if the company behind the project determines not to complete it. To the extent that the Trust invests a significant portion of its assets in securities that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education or schools, healthcare or hospitals, housing, utilities, or water and sewers, the Trust will be more sensitive to adverse economic, business or political developments affecting such particular project or similar projects, such as economic, political and business conditions.
Risks of Investing in Debt Issued by Non-Profit Institutions. Investing in debt issued by non-profit institutions, including foundations, museums, cultural institutions, colleges, universities, hospitals and healthcare systems, involves different risks than investing in municipal bonds. Many non-profit entities are tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and risk losing their tax-exempt status if they do not comply with the requirements of that section. There is a risk that Congress or the IRS could pass new laws or regulations changing the requirements for tax-exempt status, which could result in a non-profit institution losing such status. Additionally, non-profit institutions that receive federal and state appropriations face the risk of a decrease in or loss of such appropriations. Hospitals and healthcare systems are highly regulated at the federal and state levels and face burdensome state licensing requirements. There is a risk that a state could refuse to renew a hospital’s license or that the passage of new laws or regulations, especially changes to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, could inhibit a hospital from growing its revenues. Hospitals and healthcare systems also face risks related to increased competition from other health care providers; increased costs of inpatient and outpatient care; changes in healthcare services provided over time or during specific periods; increased pressures from managed care organizations, insurers, and patients to cut the costs of medical care; and public health emergencies. There is a risk that non¬profit institutions relying on philanthropy and donations to maintain their operations will receive less funding during economic downturns or other periods of adverse market, economic or political conditions.
Short Sales Risk. The Trust may make short sales of securities. Short selling a security involves selling a borrowed security with the expectation that the value of that security will decline, so that the security may be purchased at a lower price when returning the borrowed security. If the price of the security sold short increases between the time of the short sale and the time the Trust replaces the borrowed security, the Trust will incur a loss; conversely, if the price declines, the Trust will realize a capital gain. Any gain will be decreased, and any loss will be increased, by the transaction costs incurred by the Trust, including the costs associated with providing collateral to the broker-dealer (usually cash and liquid securities) and the maintenance of collateral with its custodian. Although the Trust’s gain is limited to the price at which it sold the security short, its potential loss is theoretically unlimited and may be greater than a direct investment in the security itself because the price of the borrowed or reference security may rise. The Trust may not always be able to close out a short position at a
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 23
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
particular time or at an acceptable price. A lender may request that borrowed securities be returned to it on short notice, and the Trust may have to buy the borrowed securities at an unfavorable price, resulting in a loss. Short sales also subject the Trust to risks related to the lender (such as bankruptcy risks) or the general risk that the lender does not comply with its obligations.
Special Risks Related to Certain Municipal Securities. The Trust may invest in municipal leases and certificates of participation in such leases, which involve special risks not normally associated with general obligations or revenue bonds. Leases and installment purchase or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title to the leased asset to pass eventually to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. The debt issuance limitations are deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases or contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that relieve the governmental issuer of any obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purpose by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. In addition, such leases or contracts may be subject to the temporary abatement of payments in the event the governmental issuer is prevented from maintaining occupancy of the leased premises or utilizing the leased equipment.
Structured Finance Investments Risk. The Trust’s structured finance investments may include residential and commercial mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities (“ABS”) issued by governmental entities and private issuers. Holders of structured finance investments bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty and other risks. The Trust generally has the right to receive payments only from the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against the issuer or the entity that sold the assets to be securitized. While certain structured finance investments enable the investor to acquire interests in a pool of securities without the brokerage and other expenses associated with directly holding the same securities, investors in structured finance investments generally pay their share of the structured product’s administrative and other expenses. Although it is difficult to accurately predict whether the prices of indices and securities underlying structured finance investments will rise or fall, these prices (and, therefore, the prices of structured finance investments) will be influenced by the same types of political, economic and other events that affect issuers of securities and capital markets generally. Moreover, other types of events, domestic or international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets, such as pandemics, armed conflicts, energy supply or price disruptions, natural disasters and man-made disasters, which may have a significant effect on the underlying assets. If the issuer of a structured product uses shorter term financing to purchase longer term securities, the issuer may be forced to sell its securities at below market prices if it experiences difficulty in obtaining short-term financing, which may adversely affect the value of the structured finance investment owned by the Trust.
24 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Mortgage-Backed Securities (“MBS”) Risk. MBS represent an interest in a pool of mortgages. MBS are subject to certain risks, such as: credit risk associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties and of the borrowers owning these properties; risks associated with their structure and execution (including the collateral, the process by which principal and interest payments are allocated and distributed to investors and how credit losses affect the return to investors in such MBS); risks associated with the servicer of the underlying mortgages; adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, which are more likely to have an adverse impact on MBS secured by loans on certain types of commercial properties than on those secured by loans on residential properties; prepayment and extension risks associated with the underlying assets of certain MBS, which can shorten the weighted average maturity and lower the return of the MBS, or lengthen the expected maturity, respectively, leading to significant fluctuations in the value of and income generated by the MBS; loss of all or part of the premium, if any, paid; and decline in the market value of the security, whether resulting from changes in interest rates, prepayments on the underlying mortgage collateral or perceptions of the credit risk associated with the underlying mortgage collateral. The value of MBS may be substantially dependent on the servicing of the underlying pool of mortgages. In addition, the Trust’s level of investment in MBS of a particular type or in MBS issued or guaranteed by affiliated obligors, serviced by the same servicer or backed by underlying collateral located in a specific geographic region, may subject the Trust to additional risk.
Non-agency MBS (i.e., MBS issued by commercial banks, savings and loans institutions, mortgage bankers, private mortgage insurance companies and other non-governmental issuers) are subject to the risk that the value of such securities will decline because, among other things, the securities are not guaranteed as to principal or interest by the U.S. government or a government sponsored enterprise. Non-agency MBS typically have less favorable underwriting characteristics (such as credit and default risk and collateral) and a wider range in terms (such as interest rate, term and borrower characteristics) than agency MBS. When issued in different tranches, individual tranches of nonagency MBS may subject to increased (and sometimes different) credit, prepayment and liquidity and valuation risks as compared to other tranches. Non-agency MBS are often subject to greater credit, prepayment and liquidity and valuation risks than agency MBS, and they are generally subject to greater price fluctuation and likelihood of reduced income than agency MBS, especially during periods of weakness or perceived weakness in the mortgage and real estate sectors.
The general effects of inflation on the U.S. economy can be wide-ranging, as evidenced by rising interest rates, wages and costs of consumer goods and necessities. The long-term effects of inflation on the general economy and on any individual mortgagor are unclear, and in certain cases, rising inflation and costs may affect a mortgagor’s ability to repay its related mortgage loan, thereby reducing the amount received by the holders of MBS with respect to such mortgage loan. Additionally, increased rates of inflation may negatively affect the value of certain MBS in the secondary market. MBS are particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates. During periods of declining economic conditions, losses on mortgages underlying MBS generally increase. In addition, MBS, such as CMBS
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 25
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
and RMBS, are subject to the risks of asset-backed securities generally and are particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates and developments in the commercial or residential real estate markets, which may adversely affect the Trust’s holdings of MBS. For example, rising interest rates generally result in a decline in the value of mortgage-related securities, such as CMBS and RMBS. MBS are also subject to risks similar to those associated with investing in real estate, such as the possible decline in the value of (or income generated by) the real estate, variations in rental income, fluctuations in occupancy levels and demand for properties or real estate-related services, changes in interest rates and changes in the availability or terms of mortgages and other financing that may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or unattractive.
MBS generally are classified as either CMBS or residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), each of which are subject to certain specific risks.
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. CMBS are subject to particular risks, such as those associated with lack of standardized terms, shorter maturities than residential mortgage loans and payment of all or substantially all of the principal only at maturity rather than regular amortization of principal. In addition, commercial lending generally is viewed as exposing the lender to a greater risk of loss than residential lending. Commercial lending typically involves larger loans to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers than residential mortgage loans. In addition, the repayment of loans secured by income producing properties typically is dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate project and the cash flow generated therefrom. Moreover, economic decline in the businesses operated by the tenants of office properties may increase the likelihood that the tenants may be unable to pay their rents or that properties may be unable to attract or retain tenants. Moreover, other types of events, domestic or international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets, such as pandemics, armed conflicts, energy supply or price disruptions, natural disasters and man-made disasters, which may have a significant effect on the underlying commercial mortgage loans.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. Home mortgage loans are typically grouped together into pools by banks and other lending institutions, and interests in these pools are then sold to investors, allowing the bank or other lending institution to have more money available to loan to home buyers. RMBS are particularly subject to the credit risk of the borrower. Credit-related risk on RMBS primarily arises from losses due to delinquencies and defaults by the borrowers in payments on the underlying mortgage loans and breaches by originators and servicers of their obligations under the underlying documentation pursuant to which the RMBS are issued. RMBS are also subject to the risks of MBS generally and the residential real estate markets. The rate of delinquencies and defaults on residential mortgage loans and the aggregate amount of the resulting losses will be affected by a number of factors, including general economic conditions, particularly those in the area where the related mortgaged property is located, the level of the borrower’s equity in the mortgaged property and the individual financial circumstances of the borrower. The risk of non-payment is greater for RMBS that are backed
26 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
by loans that were originated under weak underwriting standards, including loans made to borrowers with limited means to make repayment. RMBS are also subject to risks associated with the actions of mortgage lenders in the marketplace, which may reduce the availability of mortgage credit to prospective mortgagors. This may result in limited financing alternatives for mortgagors seeking to refinance their existing loans, which may in turn result in higher rates of delinquencies, defaults and losses on mortgages.
Income from and values of RMBS and CMBS also may be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining rents resulting from legal, cultural technological, global or local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties and public health conditions.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk. ABS are a form of structured debt obligation. In addition to the general risks associated with credit securities discussed herein, ABS are subject to additional risks, and are particularly subject to interest rate and credit risks. During periods of declining interest rates, prepayment of borrowings underlying asset-backed securities can be expected to accelerate. Accordingly, the Trust’s ability to reinvest the returns of principal at comparable yields is subject to generally prevailing interest rates at that time. ABS are also subject to liquidity and valuation risk and, therefore, may be difficult to value accurately or sell at an advantageous time or price and involve greater transaction costs and wider bid/ask spreads than certain other instruments. While traditional fixed-income securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest until maturity, when the entire principal amount is due, an ABS represents an interest in a pool of assets that has been securitized and typically provides for monthly or other periodic payments of interest, at a fixed or floating rate, and may provide for payments of principal from the cash flow of these assets. This pool of assets (and any related assets of the issuing entity) is often the only source of payment for the ABS. The ability of an ABS issuer to make payments on the ABS, and the timing of such payments, is therefore dependent on collections on these underlying assets, which may be insufficient to make interest and principal payments. The recoveries on the underlying collateral may not, in some cases, be sufficient to support payments on these securities, or may be unavailable in the event of a default and enforcing rights with respect to these assets or collateral may be difficult and costly, which may result in losses to investors in an ABS. The collateral underlying ABS may constitute assets related to a wide range of industries such as credit card and automobile receivables or other assets derived from consumer, commercial or corporate sectors, and these underlying assets may be secured or unsecured. ABS are particularly subject to interest rate risk and credit risk.
CLO, CDO and CBO Risk. In addition to the general risks (such as interest rate risk, prepayment risk, extension risk, market risk, credit risk and liquidity and valuation risk) associated with debt securities discussed herein, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), and collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”) are subject to additional risks due to their complex structure and highly leveraged nature, such as higher risk of volatility and magnified financial losses. CLOs, CDOs and CBOs are subject to risks associated with the possibility that
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 27
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
distributions from collateral securities may not be adequate to make interest or other payments. The value of and income from securities issued by CLOs, CDOs and CBOs also may decrease because of, among other developments, changes in market value; underlying loan, debt or bond defaults or delinquencies; changes in the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the servicer of the assets, the originator of an asset in the pool, or the financial institution or fund providing the credit support or enhancement; loan performance and prices; broader market sentiment, including expectations regarding future loan defaults; liquidity conditions; and supply and demand for structured products. Additionally, the indirect investment structure of CLOs, CDOs and CBOs presents certain risks to the Trust such as less liquidity compared with holding the underlying assets directly. CLOs, CDOs and CBOs normally charge management fees and administrative expenses, which would be borne by the Trust. The terms of many structured finance investments, including CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, are tied to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) or other reference rates based on SOFR. These relatively new and developing rates may not match the reference rate applicable to the underlying assets related to these investments.
Taxable Municipal Securities Risk. Taxable municipal securities are subject to the general risks associated with municipal securities. While interest earned on municipal securities is generally not subject to federal tax, any interest earned on taxable municipal securities is fully taxable at the federal level and may be subject state and/or local income tax. Additionally, litigation, legislation or other political events, local business or economic conditions or the bankruptcy of the issuer could have a significant effect on the ability of an issuer of municipal securities to make payments of principal and/ or interest. Political changes and uncertainties in the municipal market related to taxation, legislative changes or the rights of municipal security holders can significantly affect municipal securities. Because many securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can adversely affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can adversely affect the overall municipal market.
Valuation Risk. GPIM may use the fair value method to value investments if market quotations for them are not readily available or are deemed unreliable. The Trust may also fair value securities and assets when a significant event is deemed to have occurred after the time of a market quotation, including for securities and assets traded on foreign markets and securities and assets for which market quotations are provided by independent third party pricing services as of a time that is prior to the time when the Trust determines its NAV. Because the secondary markets for certain investments may be limited, they may be particularly difficult to value. Where market quotations are not readily available, valuation may require more research than for more liquid investments. In addition, elements of judgment may play a greater role in valuation in such cases than for investments with a more active secondary market because there is less reliable objective data available. A security that is fair valued may be valued at a price higher or lower than the value determined by other funds using
28 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF | |
| TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
their own fair valuation procedures. Prices obtained by the Trust upon the sales of such securities may not equal the value at which the Trust carried the investment on its books, which would adversely affect the net asset value of the Trust.
In addition to the foregoing risks, investors should note that the Trust reserves the right to merge or reorganize with another fund, liquidate or convert into an open-end fund, in each case subject to applicable approvals by shareholders and the Trust’s Board of Trustees as required by law and the Trust’s governing documents.
This material is not intended as a recommendation or as investment advice of any kind, including in connection with rollovers, transfers, and distributions. Such material is not provided in a fiduciary capacity, may not be relied upon for or in connection with the making of investment decisions, and does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. All content has been provided for informational or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Always consult a financial, tax and/or legal professional regarding your specific situation.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 29
| TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
| Trust Statistics | |
| Market Price | $15.33 |
| Net Asset Value | $15.16 |
| Premium to NAV | 1.12% |
| Net Assets ($000) | $417,735 |
| AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS FOR | |||||
| THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2025 | |||||
| Six month | One | Three | Five | Ten | |
| (non-annualized) | Year | Year | Year | Year | |
| Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment | |||||
| Grade Debt Trust | |||||
| NAV | 7.41% | 6.79% | 7.58% | 0.36% | 3.72% |
| Market | 7.92% | 6.48% | 6.71% | (0.73%) | 4.27% |
| Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index | 6.53% | 5.61% | 6.02% | 0.00% | 3.30% |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be lower or higher than the figures shown. All NAV returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses and all other Trust expenses. The deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Trust distributions or the sale of Trust shares is not reflected in the total returns. For the most recent month-end performance figures, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate with changes in market conditions and other factors so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
The referenced index is an unmanaged index and not available for direct investment. Index performance does not reflect transaction costs, fees or expenses.
30 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Ten Largest Holdings1 | % of Net Assets |
| State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds, | |
| Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 2010, 7.65% | 2.8% |
| Dallas, Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, Hotel Revenue | |
| Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds, 7.09% | 2.7% |
| School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A, | |
| Qualified School Construction Bonds - (Federally Taxable – Direct Subsidy), 6.00% | 2.7% |
| Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, 5.45% | 2.6% |
| Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General | |
| Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction Bonds, | |
| Series 2012B, 6.88% | 2.4% |
| Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build | |
| America Bonds, 8.57% | 2.3% |
| Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Federal Taxable | |
| Build America Bonds, 7.10% | 2.1% |
| Evansville-Vanderburgh School Building Corp. Revenue Bonds, 6.50% | 2.1% |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds, 6.85% | 1.8% |
| LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC, 3.80% | 1.8% |
| Top Ten Total | 23.3% |
1 “Ten Largest Holdings (as a % of Net Assets)” excludes any temporary cash or derivative investments.
Portfolio breakdown and holdings are subject to change daily. For more information, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/ gbab. The above summaries are provided for informational purposes only and should not be viewed as recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 31
| TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Portfolio Composition by Quality Rating1 | |
| % of Total | |
| Rating | Investments |
| Fixed Income Instruments | |
| AAA | 3.3% |
| AA | 31.5% |
| A | 21.7% |
| BBB | 20.1% |
| BB | 7.4% |
| B | 5.5% |
| CCC | 0.6% |
| NR2 | 7.6% |
| Other Instruments | 2.3% |
| Total Investments | 100.0% |
| 1 | Source: BlackRock Solutions. Credit quality ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). All securities except for those labeled “NR” have been rated by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), or Fitch, each of which is a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). For purposes of this presentation, when ratings are available from more than one agency, the highest rating is used. Guggenheim investments has converted Moody’s and Fitch ratings to the equivalent S&P rating. |
| 2 | NR (not rated) securities do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. |
32 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Market Price & NAV History
Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution Rate
All or a portion of the above distributions may be characterized as a return of capital. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2025, 56.6% of the distributions were characterized as ordinary income, and 43.4% of the distributions were characterized as return of capital. The final determination of the tax character of the distributions paid by the Trust in 2025 will be reported to shareholders in January 2026.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 33
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
| Shares | Value | |
| COMMON STOCKS† – 0.4% | ||
| Transport-Aircraft – 0.3% | ||
| FTAI Aircraft Leasing Offshore SPV (2025), LP*,††† | 1,500,000 | $ 1,160,505 |
| Financial – 0.1% | ||
| Contra Mallinckro*,†† | 2,561 | 258,502 |
| Finance Co I SARL / Endo US, Inc.,*,†††,1 | 350,000 | 35 |
| Total Financial | 258,537 | |
| Communications – 0.0% | ||
| Altice France Lux 3*,†† | 5,658 | 102,038 |
| Figs, Inc. — Class A* | 3,754 | 36,752 |
| Total Communications | 138,790 | |
| Industrial – 0.0% | ||
| BP Holdco LLC*,†††,2 | 15,619 | 12,768 |
| YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† | 5,183 | 4,378 |
| YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† | 4,791 | 4,047 |
| Targus, Inc.*,††† | 17,838 | 316 |
| Targus, Inc.*,††† | 17,838 | 2 |
| Vector Phoenix Holdings, LP*,††† | 15,619 | 1 |
| Total Industrial | 21,512 | |
| Consumer, Cyclical – 0.0% | ||
| Accuride Corp*,†††,2 | 403,435 | 40 |
| Accuride Liquidating Trust*,†††,2 | 25 | – |
| Total Consumer, Cyclical | 40 | |
| Total Common Stocks | ||
| (Cost $1,573,192) | 1,579,384 | |
| PREFERRED STOCKS† – 2.4% | ||
| Financial – 2.2% | ||
| Equitable Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 4.30% | 140,000 | 2,259,600 |
| Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.†† | ||
| 6.85% | 1,150,000 | 1,192,824 |
| 7.50% | 1,000,000 | 1,055,499 |
| W R Berkley Corp. | ||
| 4.13% due 03/30/61 | 95,975 | 1,612,380 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co.†† | ||
| 6.50% | 1,000,000 | 1,032,816 |
| PartnerRe Ltd.†† | ||
| 4.88% | 46,000 | 782,000 |
| American National Group, Inc. | ||
| 7.38% | 19,000 | 483,550 |
| Selective Insurance Group, Inc. | ||
| 4.60% | 20,000 | 342,600 |
See notes to financial statements.
34 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Shares | Value | |
| PREFERRED STOCKS† – 2.4% (continued) | ||
| Financial – 2.2% (continued) | ||
| Kuvare US Holdings, Inc.†† | ||
| 7.00% due 02/17/513 | 341,000 | $ 340,147 |
| First Republic Bank†† | ||
| 4.25%* | 31,650 | 63 |
| 4.50%* | 17,750 | 2 |
| Total Financial | 9,101,481 | |
| Utilities – 0.1% | ||
| NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 6.50% due 06/01/85 | 12,550 | 316,009 |
| Energy – 0.1% | ||
| Venture Global LNG, Inc.†† | ||
| 9.00%3 | 350,000 | 297,950 |
| Government – 0.0% | ||
| CoBank ACB†† | ||
| 7.13% | 250,000 | 258,925 |
| Consumer, Non-cyclical – 0.0% | ||
| Keenova Therapeutics plc*,††† | 116,689,404 | 1 |
| Total Preferred Stocks | ||
| (Cost $13,664,323) | 9,974,366 | |
| WARRANTS† – 0.0% | ||
| Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. | ||
| Expiring 09/16/26* | 9,372 | 131 |
| Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd. | ||
| Expiring 07/24/25*,†††,4 | 23,730 | 3 |
| Pershing Square SPARC Holdings, Ltd. | ||
| Expiring 12/31/49*,†††,4 | 11,865 | 1 |
| Total Warrants | ||
| (Cost $21,703) | 135 | |
| MONEY MARKET FUNDS***,† – 0.6% | ||
| Dreyfus Treasury Obligations Cash Management Fund — Institutional Shares, 3.84%5 | 1,469,125 | 1,469,125 |
| Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management Fund — Institutional Shares, 3.81%5 | 858,039 | 858,039 |
| Total Money Market Funds | ||
| (Cost $2,327,164) | 2,327,164 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 35
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% | ||
| California – 9.6% | ||
| Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Federal | ||
| Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 7.10% due 08/01/40 | 7,785,000 | $ 8,936,883 |
| 6.80% due 08/01/30 | 2,245,000 | 2,444,955 |
| Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General | ||
| Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction | ||
| Bonds, Series 2012B | ||
| 6.88% due 08/01/336 | 10,000,000 | 10,063,742 |
| California Public Finance Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.27% due 10/15/43 | 4,800,000 | 3,559,934 |
| California Statewide Communities Development Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 7.14% due 08/15/47 | 3,335,000 | 3,538,672 |
| Marin Community College District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 4.03% due 08/01/38 | 2,000,000 | 1,889,666 |
| Moreno Valley Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 3.82% due 08/01/44 | 2,000,000 | 1,680,493 |
| Oxnard School District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 2.76% due 08/01/44 | 1,990,000 | 1,417,874 |
| San Jose Evergreen Community College District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 3.06% due 09/01/45 | 1,500,000 | 1,136,147 |
| Manteca Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation | ||
| 3.21% due 10/01/42 | 1,400,000 | 1,127,053 |
| Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (Orange County, California), | ||
| General Obligation Bonds, Federally Taxable Direct-Pay Qualified School | ||
| Construction Bonds, Election of 2008 | ||
| 5.40% due 02/01/26 | 1,000,000 | 1,002,380 |
| City of El Monte California Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.77% due 08/01/45 | 1,000,000 | 814,774 |
| Monrovia Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, Election of 2006 | ||
| General Obligation Bonds, Build America Bonds, Federally Taxable14 | ||
| 7.25% due 08/01/28 | 610,000 | 637,456 |
| Alhambra Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 6.70% due 02/01/26 | 500,000 | 502,338 |
| California State University Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.90% due 11/01/47 | 500,000 | 418,687 |
| Fremont Unified School District/Alameda County California General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 2.75% due 08/01/41 | 400,000 | 309,998 |
| Norman Y Mineta San Jose International Airport SJC Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.27% due 03/01/40 | 250,000 | 204,617 |
| 3.29% due 03/01/41 | 70,000 | 56,248 |
| Hillsborough City School District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| due 09/01/407 | 500,000 | 239,793 |
| Riverside County Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation | ||
| 3.88% due 10/01/37 | 250,000 | 230,190 |
| Total California | 40,211,900 |
See notes to financial statements.
36 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% (continued) | ||
| Texas – 8.9% | ||
| Dallas, Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, Hotel | ||
| Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 7.09% due 01/01/426 | 10,020,000 | $ 11,367,649 |
| Dallas Fort Worth International Airport Revenue Bonds | ||
| 4.51% due 11/01/516 | 7,200,000 | 6,371,091 |
| Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.42% due 09/01/506 | 8,000,000 | 5,876,823 |
| Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.29% due 01/01/42 | 5,250,000 | 4,335,273 |
| 3.27% due 01/01/45 | 1,150,000 | 874,881 |
| Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Revenue Bonds | ||
| 2.92% due 11/01/506 | 6,500,000 | 4,683,687 |
| City of Austin Texas Rental Car Special Facility Revenue Bonds | ||
| 2.86% due 11/15/42 | 2,200,000 | 1,691,206 |
| City of Garland Texas Electric Utility System Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.15% due 03/01/51 | 2,400,000 | 1,686,164 |
| Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.05% due 07/01/45 | 250,000 | 254,376 |
| Total Texas | 37,141,150 | |
| Washington – 5.6% | ||
| Central Washington University Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.95% due 05/01/40 | 5,000,000 | 5,555,294 |
| Central Washington University, System Revenue Bonds, 2010, | ||
| Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 6.50% due 05/01/30 | 5,000,000 | 5,196,360 |
| Washington State Convention Center Public Facilities District, Lodging Tax Bonds, | ||
| Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 6.79% due 07/01/406 | 4,220,000 | 4,581,277 |
| Washington State University, Housing and Dining System Revenue Bonds, | ||
| Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 7.10% due 04/01/32 | 3,325,000 | 3,572,244 |
| County of Pierce Washington Sewer Revenue Bonds | ||
| 2.87% due 08/01/42 | 4,300,000 | 3,352,638 |
| King County Public Hospital District No. 2 General Obligation LImited | ||
| 3.11% due 12/01/44 | 1,100,000 | 827,665 |
| Total Washington | 23,085,478 | |
| Pennsylvania – 5.2% | ||
| School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, | ||
| Series 2011A, Qualified School Construction Bonds – (Federally | ||
| Taxable – Direct Subsidy) | ||
| 6.00% due 09/01/306 | 10,330,000 | 11,049,245 |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds | ||
| 6.85% due 09/01/296 | 6,895,000 | 7,498,398 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 37
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% (continued) | ||
| Pennsylvania – 5.2% (continued) | ||
| Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.78% due 04/01/54 | 3,000,000 | $ 3,004,171 |
| Total Pennsylvania | 21,551,814 | |
| New York – 4.2% | ||
| Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build | ||
| America Bonds | ||
| 8.57% due 11/01/40 | 10,010,000 | 9,618,270 |
| City of New York New York General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 6.39% due 02/01/556 | 4,000,000 | 4,275,964 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.14% due 02/15/516 | 5,000,000 | 3,692,175 |
| Total New York | 17,586,409 | |
| Illinois – 4.1% | ||
| Chicago, Illinois, Second Lien Wastewater Transmission Revenue Project Bonds, | ||
| Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 6.90% due 01/01/406 | 5,100,000 | 5,714,177 |
| Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 7.35% due 07/01/356 | 3,571,429 | 3,896,532 |
| Chicago, Illinois, Second Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 6.74% due 11/01/40 | 2,990,000 | 3,303,554 |
| Illinois Housing Development Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.10% due 10/01/496 | 1,855,000 | 1,880,909 |
| 6.05% due 10/01/44 | 730,000 | 748,972 |
| State of Illinois General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 6.63% due 02/01/35 | 715,385 | 755,909 |
| 6.73% due 04/01/35 | 153,846 | 163,306 |
| Chicago Board of Education General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 6.14% due 12/01/39 | 195,000 | 185,547 |
| Total Illinois | 16,648,906 | |
| Oklahoma – 3.7% | ||
| Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.45% due 08/15/28 | 10,950,000 | 10,881,931 |
| Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.10% due 06/01/45 | 3,700,000 | 2,811,105 |
| University of Oklahoma Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.95% due 07/01/49 | 1,465,000 | 1,512,889 |
| Oklahoma State University Revenue Bonds | ||
| 4.13% due 08/01/48 | 150,000 | 125,099 |
| Total Oklahoma | 15,331,024 | |
| Ohio – 3.3% | ||
| County of Franklin Ohio Revenue Bonds | ||
| 2.88% due 11/01/506 | 8,900,000 | 5,895,288 |
See notes to financial statements.
38 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% (continued) | ||
| Ohio – 3.3% (continued) | ||
| American Municipal Power, Inc., Combined Hydroelectric Projects Revenue | ||
| Bonds, New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds | ||
| 7.33% due 02/15/286 | 3,840,000 | $ 3,978,368 |
| Madison Local School District, Richland County, Ohio, School Improvement, | ||
| Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds | ||
| 6.65% due 12/01/29 | 2,500,000 | 2,505,055 |
| Ohio Housing Finance Agency Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.23% due 09/01/55 | 810,000 | 841,518 |
| Toronto City School District, Ohio, Qualified School Construction Bonds | ||
| General Obligation Bonds | ||
| 7.00% due 12/01/28 | 425,000 | 425,943 |
| Total Ohio | 13,646,172 | |
| West Virginia – 2.8% | ||
| State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds, | ||
| Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 201014 | ||
| 7.65% due 04/01/406 | 10,000,000 | 11,722,080 |
| Indiana – 2.8% | ||
| Evansville-Vanderburgh School Building Corp. Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.50% due 01/15/30 | 8,690,000 | 8,708,866 |
| County of Knox Indiana Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.90% due 04/01/34 | 2,920,000 | 2,945,597 |
| Total Indiana | 11,654,463 | |
| Idaho – 2.0% | ||
| Idaho Housing & Finance Association Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.72% due 07/01/49 | 4,155,000 | 4,140,114 |
| 5.55% due 07/01/49 | 1,735,000 | 1,718,371 |
| 6.03% due 07/01/50 | 1,200,000 | 1,223,100 |
| 6.14% due 07/01/45 | 1,000,000 | 1,026,482 |
| Total Idaho | 8,108,067 | |
| Michigan – 1.8% | ||
| Detroit, Michigan, School District, School Building and Site Bonds, Unlimited Tax | ||
| General Obligation Bonds, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds | ||
| 6.65% due 05/01/29 | 2,640,000 | 2,824,984 |
| Detroit City School District General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 7.75% due 05/01/39 | 2,400,000 | 2,811,847 |
| Wayne State University Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.47% due 11/15/49 | 1,030,000 | 791,063 |
| Fraser Public School District, Macomb County, Michigan, General Obligation Federally | ||
| Taxable School Construction Bonds, 2011 School Building and Site Bonds | ||
| 6.05% due 05/01/26 | 505,000 | 505,836 |
| Oakridge, Michigan, Public Schools, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds | ||
| 6.75% due 05/01/26 | 345,000 | 345,740 |
| See notes to financial statements. |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 39
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% (continued) | ||
| Michigan – 1.8% (continued) | ||
| Comstock Park Public Schools General Obligation Unlimited | ||
| 6.30% due 05/01/26 | 210,000 | $ 210,388 |
| Total Michigan | 7,489,858 | |
| South Carolina – 1.4% | ||
| County of Horry South Carolina Airport Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds14 | ||
| 7.33% due 07/01/406 | 5,000,000 | 5,888,818 |
| Colorado – 1.3% | ||
| Colorado Housing and Finance Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.60% due 11/01/43 | 1,620,000 | 1,619,520 |
| 5.50% due 11/01/39 | 1,250,000 | 1,257,027 |
| Colorado, Building Excellent Schools Today, Certificates of Participation, Taxable | ||
| Qualified School Construction | ||
| 6.82% due 03/15/28 | 2,500,000 | 2,646,923 |
| Total Colorado | 5,523,470 | |
| Massachusetts – 1.1% | ||
| Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 2.72% due 07/01/426 | 3,400,000 | 2,622,720 |
| 2.87% due 07/01/51 | 750,000 | 505,175 |
| Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.52% due 10/01/46 | 2,250,000 | 1,594,986 |
| Total Massachusetts | 4,722,881 | |
| Nevada – 1.1% | ||
| Nevada Housing Division Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.73% due 10/01/50 | 4,000,000 | 3,979,572 |
| 5.84% due 10/01/49 | 250,000 | 250,577 |
| Total Nevada | 4,230,149 | |
| Georgia – 1.0% | ||
| City of Atlanta Georgia Airport Customer Facility Charge Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.71% due 07/01/44 | 4,000,000 | 4,105,647 |
| Mississippi – 0.9% | ||
| Medical Center Educational Building Corp. Revenue Bonds | ||
| 2.92% due 06/01/416 | 4,500,000 | 3,562,883 |
| Maryland – 0.8% | ||
| Maryland Department of Housing & Community Development Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.04% due 09/01/49 | 2,500,000 | 2,535,435 |
| 6.20% due 09/01/45 | 1,000,000 | 1,023,741 |
| Total Maryland | 3,559,176 | |
| New Hampshire – 0.8% | ||
| New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.27% due 05/01/51 | 4,800,000 | 3,313,221 |
See notes to financial statements.
40 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% (continued) | ||
| Missouri – 0.7% | ||
| Curators of the University of Missouri Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.79% due 11/01/41 | 1,745,000 | $ 1,831,702 |
| Missouri Housing Development Commission Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.87% due 11/01/55 | 1,250,000 | 1,258,666 |
| Total Missouri | 3,090,368 | |
| Virginia – 0.6% | ||
| Virginia Housing Development Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.57% due 10/01/496 | 1,700,000 | 1,682,715 |
| 5.95% due 10/01/54 | 1,000,000 | 1,011,337 |
| Total Virginia | 2,694,052 | |
| Connecticut – 0.4% | ||
| Connecticut Housing Finance Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.96% due 11/15/40 | 1,000,000 | 1,031,924 |
| 6.09% due 11/15/49 | 800,000 | 816,397 |
| Total Connecticut | 1,848,321 | |
| Tennessee – 0.3% | ||
| Tennessee Housing Development Agency Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.98% due 07/01/54 | 500,000 | 503,527 |
| 5.97% due 07/01/54 | 500,000 | 500,174 |
| 5.95% due 07/01/50 | 500,000 | 499,508 |
| Total Tennessee | 1,503,209 | |
| District of Columbia – 0.3% | ||
| District of Columbia Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.73% due 09/01/473 | 1,200,000 | 1,356,889 |
| Washington Convention & Sports Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 4.31% due 10/01/40 | 100,000 | 93,319 |
| Total District of Columbia | 1,450,208 | |
| Kentucky – 0.3% | ||
| Kentucky Housing Corp. Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.21% due 07/01/50 | 500,000 | 510,789 |
| 5.90% due 01/01/55 | 490,000 | 493,728 |
| 6.07% due 07/01/45 | 250,000 | 255,110 |
| Total Kentucky | 1,259,627 | |
| Florida – 0.3% | ||
| Florida Housing Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.25% due 07/01/38 | 1,150,000 | 1,205,875 |
| Iowa – 0.1% | ||
| Iowa Finance Authority Revenue Bonds | ||
| 5.92% due 07/01/49 | 500,000 | 505,778 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 41
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 65.4% (continued) | ||
| Wisconsin – 0.0% | ||
| County of Fond Du Lac Wisconsin Revenue Bonds | ||
| 6.20% due 05/01/543 | 200,000 | $ 202,310 |
| Arkansas – 0.0% | ||
| University of Arkansas Revenue Bonds | ||
| 3.10% due 12/01/41 | 250,000 | 200,309 |
| Total Municipal Bonds | ||
| (Cost $282,207,274) | 273,043,623 | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% | ||
| Financial – 13.9% | ||
| AmFam Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 3.83% due 03/11/513,6 | 3,197,000 | 2,164,289 |
| Insured Lending 1 Ltd. | ||
| 6.50% due 02/04/32†††,3 | EUR 1,800,000 | 2,088,652 |
| Lazard Group LLC | ||
| 5.63% due 08/01/356 | 1,325,000 | 1,354,842 |
| 6.00% due 03/15/316 | 660,000 | 700,212 |
| Blue Owl Finance LLC | ||
| 4.38% due 02/15/326 | 2,150,000 | 2,053,274 |
| Intact Financial Corp. | ||
| 5.46% due 09/22/323,6 | 1,900,000 | 1,966,830 |
| Wilton RE Ltd. | ||
| 6.00%3,8,9 | 1,924,000 | 1,906,534 |
| Ares Finance Company IV LLC | ||
| 3.65% due 02/01/523,6 | 2,650,000 | 1,864,189 |
| Maple Grove Funding Trust I | ||
| 4.16% due 08/15/513,6 | 2,500,000 | 1,788,875 |
| Accident Fund Insurance Company of America | ||
| 8.50% due 08/01/323,6 | 1,750,000 | 1,756,779 |
| Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. | ||
| 4.30% due 02/01/613 | 2,700,000 | 1,741,564 |
| American National Group, Inc. | ||
| 7.00% due 12/01/559 | 675,000 | 678,999 |
| 5.75% due 10/01/296 | 550,000 | 569,176 |
| 6.00% due 07/15/356 | 450,000 | 455,580 |
| Jefferies Finance LLC / JFIN Company-Issuer Corp. | ||
| 5.00% due 08/15/283,6 | 1,500,000 | 1,424,800 |
| Global Atlantic Finance Co. | ||
| 7.25% due 03/01/563,9 | 1,155,000 | 1,151,855 |
| 6.75% due 03/15/543,6 | 260,000 | 266,330 |
| National Life Insurance Co. | ||
| 10.50% due 09/15/393 | 900,000 | 1,228,233 |
| Prudential Financial, Inc. | ||
| 5.13% due 03/01/529 | 1,200,000 | 1,189,662 |
| Henneman Trust | ||
| 6.58% due 05/15/553,6 | 1,050,000 | 1,105,149 |
See notes to financial statements.
42 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 43
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Financial – 13.9% (continued) | ||
| Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance Co. | ||
| 6.10% due 06/11/553,9 | 700,000 | $ 727,278 |
| Belrose Funding Trust II | ||
| 6.79% due 05/15/553,6 | 650,000 | 678,027 |
| Nationwide Building Society | ||
| 5.54% due 07/14/363,9 | 650,000 | 674,508 |
| Dyal IV Issuer A | ||
| 3.65% due 02/22/41††† | 650,000 | 603,106 |
| Bank of Nova Scotia | ||
| 8.63% due 10/27/826,9 | 550,000 | 583,138 |
| Dyal Capital Partners III (A), LP | ||
| 6.55% due 06/15/44††† | 560,000 | 578,124 |
| Enstar Group Ltd. | ||
| 7.50% due 04/01/453,9 | 500,000 | 520,843 |
| Belvoir Land LLC | ||
| 5.60% due 12/15/353 | 500,000 | 503,076 |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | ||
| 5.93% due 03/14/463,6,9 | 450,000 | 467,083 |
| Dyal Capital Partners III (B), LP | ||
| 6.55% due 06/15/44††† | 440,000 | 454,201 |
| VFH Parent LLC / Valor Company-Issuer, Inc. | ||
| 7.50% due 06/15/313,6 | 400,000 | 419,807 |
| Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company Ltd. | ||
| 6.20%3,8,9 | 400,000 | 418,653 |
| Ascot Group Ltd. | ||
| 6.35% due 06/15/353,9 | 350,000 | 364,681 |
| Nassau Companies of New York | ||
| 7.88% due 07/15/303 | 350,000 | 341,025 |
| Dyal IV Issuer B | ||
| 3.65% due 02/22/41††† | 350,000 | 324,750 |
| Iron Mountain Information Management Services, Inc. | ||
| 5.00% due 07/15/323 | 300,000 | 288,773 |
| Fortitude Group Holdings LLC | ||
| 6.25% due 04/01/303 | 250,000 | 260,153 |
| Beacon Funding Trust | ||
| 6.27% due 08/15/543 | 250,000 | 255,870 |
| GLP Capital Limited Partnership / GLP Financing II, Inc. | ||
| 5.75% due 11/01/37 | 250,000 | 249,750 |
| Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. | ||
| 6.65% due 09/15/559 | 200,000 | 206,376 |
| Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. | ||
| 2.57% due 11/25/353,9 | 200,000 | 180,183 |
| Symetra Life Insurance Co. | ||
| 6.55% due 10/01/553 | 150,000 | 157,582 |
| Rocket Companies, Inc. | ||
| 6.38% due 08/01/333 | 150,000 | 157,075 |
See notes to financial statements.
44 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Financial – 13.9% (continued) | ||
| Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. | ||
| 5.75% due 07/01/30 | 125,000 | $ 130,876 |
| Total Financial | 58,081,646 | |
| Consumer, Non-cyclical – 9.2% | ||
| Children’s Hospital Corp. | ||
| 4.12% due 01/01/476 | 8,000,000 | 6,778,313 |
| Orlando Health Obligated Group | ||
| 5.48% due 10/01/35 | 4,000,000 | 4,196,705 |
| Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. | ||
| 3.08% due 07/01/516 | 4,500,000 | 2,952,435 |
| OhioHealth Corp. | ||
| 3.04% due 11/15/50 | 3,465,000 | 2,399,464 |
| 2.83% due 11/15/41 | 300,000 | 224,602 |
| Providence St. Joseph Health Obligated Group | ||
| 5.37% due 10/01/32 | 2,500,000 | 2,600,801 |
| Flowers Foods, Inc. | ||
| 6.20% due 03/15/556 | 2,050,000 | 1,976,028 |
| JBS USA Holding Lux SARL/ JBS USA Food Company/ JBS Lux Co SARL | ||
| 4.38% due 02/02/526 | 1,200,000 | 945,787 |
| 5.75% due 04/01/336 | 763,000 | 799,620 |
| Tufts Medical Center, Inc. | ||
| 7.00% due 01/01/38 | 1,500,000 | 1,644,448 |
| Lifespan Corp. | ||
| 5.05% due 02/15/30 | 1,250,000 | 1,273,260 |
| Post Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 4.50% due 09/15/313,6 | 1,300,000 | 1,225,854 |
| Universal Health Services, Inc. | ||
| 2.65% due 01/15/326 | 1,300,000 | 1,146,708 |
| Reynolds American, Inc. | ||
| 5.70% due 08/15/356 | 1,050,000 | 1,105,233 |
| GXO Logistics, Inc. | ||
| 6.50% due 05/06/346 | 1,000,000 | 1,076,139 |
| HCA, Inc. | ||
| 4.63% due 03/15/526 | 1,200,000 | 1,002,855 |
| Sotheby’s | ||
| 7.38% due 10/15/273 | 1,000,000 | 991,684 |
| Amgen, Inc. | ||
| 4.40% due 02/22/626 | 1,200,000 | 962,165 |
| BCP V Modular Services Finance II plc | ||
| 6.13% due 11/30/283 | GBP 750,000 | 933,227 |
| BAT Capital Corp. | ||
| 7.08% due 08/02/436 | 800,000 | 905,896 |
| AZ Battery Property LLC | ||
| 6.73% due 02/20/46††† | 680,000 | 678,101 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 45
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Consumer, Non-cyclical – 9.2% (continued) | ||
| Triton Container International Ltd. | ||
| 3.15% due 06/15/313 | 650,000 | $ 587,733 |
| Baylor College of Medicine | ||
| 5.26% due 11/15/46 | 600,000 | 570,197 |
| Medline Borrower, LP | ||
| 5.25% due 10/01/293 | 450,000 | 451,051 |
| CVS Health Corp. | ||
| 7.00% due 03/10/559 | 400,000 | 420,546 |
| Upbound Group, Inc. | ||
| 6.38% due 02/15/293 | 250,000 | 244,119 |
| Becle, SAB de CV | ||
| 2.50% due 10/14/313 | 200,000 | 174,419 |
| Grifols S.A. | ||
| 3.88% due 10/15/28 | EUR 100,000 | 114,496 |
| Total Consumer, Non-cyclical | 38,381,886 | |
| Industrial – 4.6% | ||
| LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC | ||
| 3.80% due 12/31/573,6 | 10,285,000 | 7,313,114 |
| AP Grange Holdings LLC | ||
| 6.50% due 03/20/45††† | 2,400,000 | 2,538,000 |
| 5.00% due 03/20/45††† | 300,000 | 312,000 |
| Terminal Investment Limited Holding | ||
| 6.23% due 10/01/40††† | 2,000,000 | 2,049,372 |
| Boeing Co. | ||
| 6.53% due 05/01/346 | 510,000 | 567,109 |
| 6.86% due 05/01/54 | 225,000 | 256,336 |
| 3.75% due 02/01/50 | 329,000 | 244,084 |
| Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. | ||
| 4.50% due 03/25/526 | 1,300,000 | 1,064,046 |
| Homestead Spe Issuer LLC | ||
| 7.21% due 04/01/55††† | 1,000,000 | 1,037,149 |
| TD SYNNEX Corp. | ||
| 6.10% due 04/12/346 | 850,000 | 902,900 |
| AITX Finco LLC | ||
| 6.00% due 10/23/35††† | 900,000 | 902,684 |
| GrafTech Global Enterprises, Inc. | ||
| 9.88% due 12/23/293 | 1,000,000 | 874,007 |
| New Enterprise Stone & Lime Company, Inc. | ||
| 9.75% due 07/15/283 | 575,000 | 575,577 |
| ALLETE, Inc. | ||
| 5.79% due 07/09/37††† | 350,000 | 361,127 |
| AP Grange Holdings LLC Deferral | ||
| 6.50% due 03/20/45††† | 156,231 | 156,231 |
| FedEx Corp. | ||
| 4.10% due 02/01/45 | 70,000 | 55,828 |
See notes to financial statements.
46 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Industrial – 4.6% (continued) | ||
| Amsted Industries, Inc. | ||
| 6.38% due 03/15/333 | 50,000 | $ 51,728 |
| Total Industrial | 19,261,292 | |
| Utilities – 4.0% | ||
| Central Storage Safety Project Trust | ||
| 4.82% due 02/01/381 | 5,978,656 | 5,756,629 |
| Brooklyn Union Gas Co. | ||
| 6.39% due 09/15/333,6 | 2,000,000 | 2,172,126 |
| QTS Corp. | ||
| 5.42% due 08/21/32††† | 1,925,000 | 1,941,748 |
| PacifiCorp | ||
| 7.38% due 09/15/559 | 1,050,000 | 1,067,683 |
| Ohio Edison Co. | ||
| 5.50% due 01/15/333,6 | 950,000 | 995,612 |
| Alexander Funding Trust II | ||
| 7.47% due 07/31/283,6 | 900,000 | 960,675 |
| Keenan Fort Detrick Energy LLC | ||
| 4.17% due 11/15/483 | 1,000,000 | 804,257 |
| Southwestern Public Service Co. | ||
| 3.70% due 08/15/476 | 1,000,000 | 760,492 |
| NRG Energy, Inc. | ||
| 7.00% due 03/15/333,6 | 450,000 | 499,173 |
| Dominion Energy, Inc. | ||
| 6.20% due 02/15/569 | 250,000 | 252,473 |
| 6.00% due 02/15/569 | 200,000 | 202,356 |
| CMS Energy Corp. | ||
| 6.50% due 06/01/559 | 340,000 | 351,941 |
| NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 6.38% due 08/15/559 | 336,000 | 348,743 |
| Sierra Pacific Power Co. | ||
| 6.20% due 12/15/559 | 275,000 | 272,609 |
| Spire, Inc. | ||
| 6.25% due 06/01/569 | 250,000 | 248,072 |
| Black Hills Corp. | ||
| 5.95% due 03/15/28 | 200,000 | 207,390 |
| Southern Co. | ||
| 3.75% due 09/15/519 | 58,000 | 57,243 |
| Total Utilities | 16,899,222 | |
| Energy – 4.0% | ||
| Occidental Petroleum Corp. | ||
| 7.00% due 11/15/27 | 2,000,000 | 2,089,912 |
| ONEOK, Inc. | ||
| 5.85% due 11/01/646 | 1,050,000 | 1,002,896 |
| 6.25% due 10/15/556 | 925,000 | 938,741 |
| 5.60% due 04/01/44 | 150,000 | 143,034 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 47
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Energy – 4.0% (continued) | ||
| MPLX, LP | ||
| 6.20% due 09/15/556 | 1,600,000 | $ 1,618,009 |
| 5.95% due 04/01/55 | 400,000 | 392,034 |
| 5.65% due 03/01/53 | 50,000 | 46,909 |
| Valero Energy Corp. | ||
| 4.00% due 06/01/526 | 2,450,000 | 1,839,774 |
| BP Capital Markets plc | ||
| 6.13%6,8,9 | 1,300,000 | 1,340,717 |
| ITT Holdings LLC | ||
| 6.50% due 08/01/293,6 | 1,250,000 | 1,211,590 |
| HF Sinclair Corp. | ||
| 6.25% due 01/15/356 | 1,000,000 | 1,053,084 |
| NuStar Logistics, LP | ||
| 6.38% due 10/01/306 | 1,000,000 | 1,047,581 |
| Targa Resources Partners Limited Partnership / Targa Resources Partners Finance Corp. | ||
| 4.88% due 02/01/316 | 1,000,000 | 1,004,755 |
| Venture Global LNG, Inc. | ||
| 9.88% due 02/01/323 | 750,000 | 780,849 |
| Greensaif Pipelines Bidco SARL | ||
| 6.10% due 08/23/423 | 300,000 | 312,291 |
| 6.51% due 02/23/423 | 200,000 | 218,160 |
| Global Partners Limited Partnership / GLP Finance Corp. | ||
| 8.25% due 01/15/323 | 450,000 | 471,833 |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. | ||
| 5.20% due 06/01/33 | 400,000 | 412,995 |
| Sunoco, LP | ||
| 4.63% due 05/01/303 | 300,000 | 292,451 |
| Venture Global Calcasieu Pass LLC | ||
| 6.25% due 01/15/303 | 200,000 | 201,951 |
| Phillips 66 Co. | ||
| 6.20% due 03/15/569 | 162,000 | 162,222 |
| CVR Energy, Inc. | ||
| 5.75% due 02/15/283 | 125,000 | 123,212 |
| Plains All American Pipeline Limited Partnership / PAA Finance Corp. | ||
| 4.70% due 06/15/44 | 100,000 | 86,092 |
| Total Energy | 16,791,092 | |
| Consumer, Cyclical – 2.7% | ||
| United Airlines, Inc. | ||
| 4.63% due 04/15/293,6 | 2,200,000 | 2,188,870 |
| Hyatt Hotels Corp. | ||
| 5.75% due 04/23/306 | 1,100,000 | 1,150,529 |
| Flutter Treasury Designated Activity Co. | ||
| 6.38% due 04/29/293 | 1,000,000 | 1,031,394 |
| LKQ Corp. | ||
| 6.25% due 06/15/336 | 950,000 | 1,016,657 |
See notes to financial statements.
48 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Consumer, Cyclical – 2.7% (continued) | ||
| Intralot Capital Luxembourg S.A. | ||
| 6.50% (3 Month EURIBOR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) due 10/15/31◊,3 | EUR 500,000 | $ 568,002 |
| 6.75% due 10/15/313 | EUR 250,000 | 281,823 |
| LG Energy Solution Ltd. | ||
| 5.38% due 04/02/303,6 | 800,000 | 824,930 |
| Air Canada | ||
| 4.63% due 08/15/293 | CAD 1,050,000 | 749,683 |
| AS Mileage Plan IP Ltd. | ||
| 5.31% due 10/20/313,6 | 600,000 | 601,823 |
| Polaris, Inc. | ||
| 6.95% due 03/15/29 | 450,000 | 478,433 |
| Wabash National Corp. | ||
| 4.50% due 10/15/283,6 | 500,000 | 457,671 |
| Hanesbrands, Inc. | ||
| 9.00% due 02/15/313 | 400,000 | 421,376 |
| Hasbro, Inc. | ||
| 6.05% due 05/14/34 | 350,000 | 371,186 |
| Suburban Propane Partners Limited Partnership/Suburban Energy Finance Corp. | ||
| 5.00% due 06/01/313 | 300,000 | 287,958 |
| Whirlpool Corp. | ||
| 4.50% due 06/01/46 | 200,000 | 153,864 |
| 4.70% due 05/14/32 | 100,000 | 92,962 |
| 4.60% due 05/15/50 | 50,000 | 38,218 |
| Superior Plus Limited Partnership / Superior General Partner, Inc. | ||
| 4.50% due 03/15/293 | 250,000 | 241,801 |
| Station Casinos LLC | ||
| 4.63% due 12/01/313 | 200,000 | 189,255 |
| Warnermedia Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 5.14% due 03/15/52 | 161,000 | 120,428 |
| New Flyer Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 9.25% due 07/01/303 | 100,000 | 107,102 |
| Total Consumer, Cyclical | 11,373,965 | |
| Communications – 2.1% | ||
| British Telecommunications plc | ||
| 4.88% due 11/23/813,9 | 1,700,000 | 1,633,179 |
| McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. | ||
| 8.00% due 08/01/293 | 850,000 | 860,592 |
| 5.75% due 08/01/283 | 300,000 | 300,246 |
| AMC Networks, Inc. | ||
| 10.50% due 07/15/323,6 | 950,000 | 1,017,695 |
| Rogers Communications, Inc. | ||
| 4.50% due 03/15/426 | 1,150,000 | 995,665 |
| Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital | ||
| 5.25% due 04/01/53 | 1,200,000 | 972,556 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 49
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Communications – 2.1% (continued) | ||
| Altice France S.A. | ||
| 6.88% due 07/15/323 | 693,090 | $ 675,565 |
| 6.50% due 04/15/323 | 269,535 | 262,238 |
| Vodafone Group plc | ||
| 5.13% due 06/04/819 | 1,100,000 | 872,966 |
| Sunrise FinCo I B.V. | ||
| 4.88% due 07/15/313 | 700,000 | 668,822 |
| Telenet Finance Luxembourg Notes SARL | ||
| 5.50% due 03/01/281 | 200,000 | 198,002 |
| CSC Holdings LLC | ||
| 11.25% due 05/15/283 | 250,000 | 193,920 |
| Cox Communications, Inc. | ||
| 2.95% due 10/01/503 | 185,000 | 104,758 |
| 5.80% due 12/15/533 | 100,000 | 86,831 |
| Total Communications | 8,843,035 | |
| Technology – 1.2% | ||
| Broadcom, Inc. | ||
| 3.19% due 11/15/363,6 | 1,300,000 | 1,122,672 |
| Foundry JV Holdco LLC | ||
| 6.40% due 01/25/383,6 | 550,000 | 594,648 |
| 5.88% due 01/25/343 | 400,000 | 414,676 |
| TeamSystem SpA | ||
| 5.53% (3 Month EURIBOR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 07/31/31◊,3 | EUR 700,000 | 816,401 |
| CDW LLC / CDW Finance Corp. | ||
| 3.57% due 12/01/316 | 800,000 | 748,103 |
| Oracle Corp. | ||
| 5.20% due 09/26/356 | 250,000 | 244,973 |
| 5.95% due 09/26/55 | 175,000 | 163,981 |
| 4.80% due 09/26/32 | 100,000 | 98,310 |
| 5.88% due 09/26/45 | 75,000 | 70,719 |
| 6.10% due 09/26/65 | 50,000 | 46,564 |
| Xerox Corp. | ||
| 10.25% due 10/15/303 | 450,000 | 461,384 |
| Dye & Durham Ltd. | ||
| 8.63% due 04/15/293 | 310,000 | 284,316 |
| Total Technology | 5,066,747 | |
| Basic Materials – 0.8% | ||
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. | ||
| 5.75% due 05/15/556 | 1,000,000 | 1,015,505 |
| ArcelorMittal S.A. | ||
| 6.55% due 11/29/276 | 900,000 | 936,800 |
| SK Invictus Intermediate II SARL | ||
| 5.00% due 10/30/293 | 700,000 | 688,938 |
| Corporation Nacional del Cobre de Chile | ||
| 6.78% due 01/13/553 | 300,000 | 323,490 |
See notes to financial statements.
50 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| CORPORATE BONDS†† – 43.0% (continued) | ||
| Basic Materials – 0.8% (continued) | ||
| Dow Chemical Co. | ||
| 6.90% due 05/15/53 | 200,000 | $ 209,822 |
| Mirabela Nickel Ltd. | ||
| due 06/24/19†††,1,15 | 96,316 | 241 |
| Total Basic Materials | 3,174,796 | |
| Government – 0.3% | ||
| Amazon Conservation DAC | ||
| 6.03% due 01/16/423 | 1,000,000 | 1,044,800 |
| Financial Institutions – 0.1% | ||
| MN8 Portfolio IV LLC | ||
| 6.31% due 07/30/45††† | 400,000 | 408,094 |
| Transportation – 0.1% | ||
| Stolthaven Houston, Inc. | ||
| 5.98% due 07/17/34††† | 392,000 | 400,964 |
| Total Corporate Bonds | ||
| (Cost $181,077,277) | 179,727,539 | |
| ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 18.2% | ||
| Financial – 5.5% | ||
| Thunderbird A | ||
| 5.50% due 03/01/37††† | 7,000,000 | 6,654,340 |
| Lightning A | ||
| 5.50% due 03/01/37††† | 7,000,000 | 6,654,341 |
| HV Eight LLC | ||
| 5.50% (3 Month EURIBOR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 12/31/27◊,††† | EUR 1,336,145 | 1,547,587 |
| Project Onyx | ||
| 6.58% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.60%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) due 06/26/30◊,††† | 1,030,046 | 1,028,745 |
| 6.60% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.60%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) due 06/15/30◊,††† | 266,381 | 266,370 |
| KKR Core Holding Company LLC | ||
| 4.00% due 08/12/31††† | 1,327,804 | 1,242,187 |
| Endo Luxembourg Finance Co I SARL / Endo US, Inc. | ||
| 7.40% due 09/30/45††† | 1,000,000 | 1,051,268 |
| Ceamer Finance LLC | ||
| 6.92% due 11/15/37††† | 700,658 | 731,768 |
| 6.79% due 11/15/39††† | 268,999 | 278,580 |
| Metis Issuer, LLC | ||
| 6.89% due 05/15/55††† | 900,000 | 917,493 |
| HarbourVest Partners LLC | ||
| 6.85% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.55%, Rate Floor: 2.55%) due 09/15/30◊,††† | 900,000 | 893,443 |
| LVNV Funding LLC | ||
| 7.80% due 11/05/28††† | 650,000 | 683,200 |
| 6.84% due 06/12/29††† | 200,000 | 205,714 |
| Obsidian Issuer LLC | ||
| 2025-1A, 6.93% due 05/15/55†††,3 | 850,000 | 865,347 |
| Total Financial | 23,020,383 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 51
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 18.2% (continued) | ||
| Collateralized Loan Obligations – 5.2% | ||
| Golub Capital Partners CLO 69M | ||
| 2025-69A DR, 6.92% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.05%, Rate Floor: 3.05%) due 11/09/38◊,3 | 1,650,000 | $ 1,666,097 |
| Cerberus Loan Funding XLIV LLC | ||
| 2024-5A C, 8.11% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.20%, Rate Floor: 4.20%) due 01/15/36◊,3 | 1,400,000 | 1,412,632 |
| Cerberus Loan Funding 52 LLC | ||
| 2025-3A C, 6.17% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.20%, Rate Floor: 2.20%) due 10/15/37◊,3 | 1,250,000 | 1,256,366 |
| Cerberus Loan Funding XLVII LLC | ||
| 2024-3A C, 6.46% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.55%, Rate Floor: 2.55%) due 07/15/36◊,3 | 1,200,000 | 1,205,879 |
| Owl Rock CLO I LLC | ||
| 2024-1A C, 8.45% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 02/20/36◊,3 | 1,050,000 | 1,059,461 |
| Cerberus Loan Funding XLV LLC | ||
| 2024-1A C, 7.06% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.15%, Rate Floor: 3.15%) due 04/15/36◊,3 | 1,000,000 | 1,006,931 |
| Owl Rock CLO XXII LLC | ||
| 2025-22A C, 6.15% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.20%, Rate Floor: 2.20%) due 10/20/37◊,3 | 1,000,000 | 1,004,952 |
| JCP Direct Lending CLO 2023-1 LLC | ||
| 2025-1A BR, 5.83% (3 Month Term SOFR + 1.95%, Rate Floor: 1.95%) due 07/20/37◊,3 | 1,000,000 | 1,003,276 |
| Ares Direct Lending CLO 6 LLC | ||
| 2025-2A D, 7.05% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.30%, Rate Floor: 3.30%) due 10/16/37◊,3 | 1,000,000 | 996,243 |
| Cerberus Loan Funding XLVI, LP | ||
| 2024-2A C, 6.96% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.05%, Rate Floor: 3.05%) due 07/15/36◊,3 | 950,000 | 956,440 |
| TRTX Issuer Ltd. | ||
| 2025-FL6 B, 6.01% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.05%, Rate Floor: 2.05%) due 09/18/42◊,3 | 900,000 | 890,781 |
| Carlyle Direct Lending CLO LLC | ||
| 2024-1A BR, 6.66% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.75%, Rate Floor: 2.75%) due 07/15/36◊,3 | 800,000 | 804,780 |
| GoldenTree Loan Management US CLO 1 Ltd. | ||
| 2024-9A DR, 7.23% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.35%, Rate Floor: 3.35%) due 04/20/37◊,3 | 800,000 | 801,644 |
| Cerberus Loan Funding XL LLC | ||
| 2023-1A C, 8.31% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.40%, Rate Floor: 4.40%) due 03/22/35◊,3 | 750,000 | 756,917 |
| BDS 2025-FL16 LLC | ||
| 2025-FL16 C, due 07/19/43◊,3 | 700,000 | 700,000 |
| Fortress Credit BSL XV Ltd. | ||
| 2024-2A CR, 6.48% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.60%, Rate Floor: 2.60%) due 10/18/33◊,3 | 650,000 | 651,685 |
| KREF Ltd. | ||
| 2021-FL2 AS, 5.38% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.41%, Rate Floor: 1.30%) due 02/15/39◊,3 | 650,000 | 638,009 |
| Owl Rock CLO XVI LLC | ||
| 2024-16A C, 7.18% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.30%, Rate Floor: 3.30%) due 04/20/36◊,3 | 600,000 | 604,476 |
| Owl Rock CLO XXI LLC | ||
| 2025-21A C, 6.27% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.40%, Rate Floor: 2.40%) due 07/24/34◊,3 | 600,000 | 603,158 |
| FS Rialto Issuer LLC | ||
| 2024-FL9 C, 6.60% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.64%, Rate Floor: 2.65%) due 10/19/39◊,3 | 600,000 | 599,184 |
| Golub Capital Partners CLO 46M Ltd. | ||
| 2024-46A CR, 6.93% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.05%, Rate Floor: 3.05%) due 04/20/37◊,3 | 500,000 | 503,319 |
| BDS LLC | ||
| 2025-FL15 C, 6.11% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.15%, Rate Floor: 2.15%) due 03/19/43◊,3 | 500,000 | 500,621 |
| GoldenTree Loan Management US CLO 24 Ltd. | ||
| 2025-24A E, 8.48% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.60%, Rate Floor: 4.60%) due 10/20/38◊,3 | 450,000 | 434,358 |
See notes to financial statements.
52 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 18.2% (continued) | ||
| Collateralized Loan Obligations – 5.2% (continued) | ||
| Madison Park Funding LVIII Ltd. | ||
| 2024-58A D, 7.51% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.65%, Rate Floor: 3.65%) due 04/25/37◊,3 | 400,000 | $ 402,791 |
| BSPRT Issuer LLC | ||
| 2025-FL12 C, 6.16% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.20%, Rate Floor: 2.20%) due 01/17/43◊,3 | 350,000 | 350,112 |
| OHA Credit Partners VII Ltd. | ||
| 2025-7A ER4, 8.39% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 02/20/38◊,3 | 300,000 | 297,845 |
| Ares Direct Lending CLO 1 LLC | ||
| 2024-1A B, 6.06% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.20%, Rate Floor: 2.20%) due 04/25/36◊,3 | 250,000 | 250,921 |
| HPS Private Credit CLO LLC | ||
| 2025-3A D, 8.26% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 07/20/37◊,3 | 250,000 | 249,451 |
| BNPP IP CLO Ltd. | ||
| 2014-2A E, 9.35% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.51%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) due 10/30/25◊,3 | 216,398 | 12,321 |
| WhiteHorse VIII Ltd. | ||
| 2014-1A E, 8.67% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.81%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) due 05/01/26◊,3 | 14,488 | 4,590 |
| Total Collateralized Loan Obligations | 21,625,240 | |
| Infrastructure – 2.7% | ||
| VB-S1 Issuer LLC – VBTEL | ||
| 2022-1A, 4.29% due 02/15/523 | 5,000,000 | 4,932,427 |
| Hotwire Funding LLC | ||
| 2023-1A, 8.84% due 05/20/533 | 1,900,000 | 1,943,466 |
| 2024-1A, 6.67% due 06/20/543 | 100,000 | 102,155 |
| Switch ABS Issuer LLC | ||
| 2024-2A, 5.44% due 06/25/543 | 850,000 | 852,021 |
| 2025-1A, 5.04% due 03/25/553 | 500,000 | 494,805 |
| 2024-1A, 6.28% due 03/25/543 | 150,000 | 151,768 |
| QTS Issuer ABS I LLC | ||
| 2025-1A, 5.44% due 05/25/553 | 1,000,000 | 1,010,957 |
| Aligned Data Centers Issuer LLC | ||
| 2021-1A, 1.94% due 08/15/463 | 1,000,000 | 978,907 |
| Stack Infrastructure Issuer LLC | ||
| 2025-1A, 5.00% due 05/25/503 | 550,000 | 544,497 |
| QTS Issuer ABS II LLC | ||
| 2025-1A, 5.04% due 10/05/553 | 350,000 | 351,533 |
| Total Infrastructure | 11,362,536 | |
| Transport-Aircraft – 2.2% | ||
| GAIA Aviation Ltd. | ||
| 2019-1, 3.97% due 12/15/443,11 | 1,954,641 | 1,936,441 |
| AASET Trust | ||
| 2024-2A, 5.93% due 09/16/493 | 734,487 | 750,181 |
| 2024-1A, 6.26% due 05/16/493 | 553,018 | 569,084 |
| 2021-2A, 2.80% due 01/15/473 | 326,591 | 309,545 |
| Castlelake Aircraft Structured Trust | ||
| 2025-2A, 5.47% due 08/15/503 | 980,523 | 994,216 |
| Navigator Aircraft ABS Ltd. | ||
| 2021-1, 2.77% due 11/15/463 | 843,502 | 804,755 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 53
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 18.2% (continued) | ||
| Transport-Aircraft – 2.2% (continued) | ||
| Navigator Aviation Ltd. | ||
| 2024-1, 6.09% due 08/15/493 | 774,107 | $ 777,186 |
| JOL Air Ltd. | ||
| 2019-1, 3.97% due 04/15/443 | 671,489 | 668,779 |
| Start Ltd. | ||
| 2018-1, 4.09% due 05/15/433 | 496,690 | 497,103 |
| Gilead Aviation LLC | ||
| 2025-1A, 5.79% due 03/15/503 | 435,129 | 443,908 |
| Slam Ltd. | ||
| 2025-1A, 5.81% due 05/15/503 | 388,003 | 399,575 |
| ALTDE Trust | ||
| 2025-1A, 5.90% due 08/15/503 | 380,442 | 390,067 |
| Sprite Ltd. | ||
| 2021-1, 3.75% due 11/15/463 | 392,989 | 384,222 |
| Labrador Aviation Finance Ltd. | ||
| 2016-1A, 4.30% due 01/15/423 | 327,835 | 326,311 |
| Total Transport-Aircraft | 9,251,373 | |
| Insurance – 1.1% | ||
| Obra Longevity | ||
| 8.48% due 06/30/39††† | 1,950,000 | 2,070,551 |
| Dogwood State Bank | ||
| 6.45% due 06/24/32††† | 1,933,633 | 1,950,746 |
| CHEST | ||
| 7.13% due 03/23/43††† | 450,000 | 471,982 |
| Total Insurance | 4,493,279 | |
| Whole Business – 0.6% | ||
| Subway Funding LLC | ||
| 2024-1A, 6.51% due 07/30/543 | 940,500 | 974,335 |
| 2024-3A, 5.91% due 07/30/543 | 544,500 | 542,707 |
| Sonic Capital LLC | ||
| 2021-1A, 2.64% due 08/20/513 | 707,250 | 617,306 |
| Five Guys Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 2023-1A, 7.55% due 01/26/543 | 396,000 | 408,587 |
| SERVPRO Master Issuer LLC | ||
| 2021-1A, 2.39% due 04/25/513 | 47,750 | 45,064 |
| Total Whole Business | 2,587,999 | |
| Net Lease – 0.6% | ||
| CARS-DB7, LP | ||
| 2023-1A, 6.50% due 09/15/533 | 977,917 | 986,774 |
| SVC ABS LLC | ||
| 2023-1A, 5.55% due 02/20/533 | 993,125 | 979,515 |
| CARS-DB4, LP | ||
| 2020-1A, 4.95% due 02/15/503 | 500,000 | 458,653 |
| Total Net Lease | 2,424,942 |
See notes to financial statements.
54 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 18.2% (continued) | ||
| Single Family Residence – 0.2% | ||
| FirstKey Homes Trust | ||
| 2022-SFR3, 4.50% due 07/17/383 | 1,000,000 | $ 997,045 |
| Unsecured Consumer Loans – 0.1% | ||
| Service Experts Issuer LLC | ||
| 2024-1A, 6.39% due 11/20/353 | 245,445 | 251,354 |
| Total Asset-Backed Securities | ||
| (Cost $75,704,006) | 76,014,151 | |
| SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 8.0% | ||
| Consumer, Cyclical – 2.1% | ||
| FR Refuel LLC | ||
| 8.78% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 5.50%) due 11/08/28††† | 1,257,467 | 1,241,748 |
| Zephyr Bidco Ltd. | ||
| 8.75% (1 Month GBP SONIA + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 07/20/28 | GBP 900,000 | 1,190,445 |
| MB2 Dental Solutions LLC | ||
| 9.42% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.50%, Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 02/13/31††† | 1,135,311 | 1,130,120 |
| Pacific Bells LLC | ||
| 7.75% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.75%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 11/13/28 | 1,033,813 | 1,036,398 |
| Alexander Mann | ||
| 10.37% (1 Month SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 06/29/27 | 980,000 | 924,463 |
| Grant Thornton Advisors LLC | ||
| 6.92% (1 Month Term SOFR + 3.00%, Rate Floor: 3.00%) due 05/30/31 | 630,000 | 630,901 |
| Scientific Games Corp. | ||
| 6.93% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.00%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 04/04/29 | 594,000 | 582,197 |
| Accuride Corp. | ||
| 8.72% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.50%, Rate Floor: 1.50%) (in-kind rate was 3.00%) | ||
| due 03/07/30†††,2,12 | 294,662 | 552,075 |
| The Facilities Group | ||
| 9.67% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 6.75%) due 11/30/27††† | 486,400 | 480,228 |
| NFM & J LLC | ||
| 9.69% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 6.75%) due 11/30/27††† | 478,484 | 472,413 |
| Blue Ribbon LLC | ||
| 11.86% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) (in-kind rate was 4.00%) | ||
| due 05/08/2812 | 357,581 | 354,005 |
| CCRR Parent, Inc. | ||
| 8.33% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 03/06/28 | 633,368 | 199,511 |
| Total Consumer, Cyclical | 8,794,504 | |
| Financial – 1.9% | ||
| Boots Group Bidco Ltd. | ||
| 7.42% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 08/30/32 | 1,000,000 | 1,006,250 |
| Kroll, Inc. | ||
| 9.81% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.00%, Rate Floor: 3.00%) (in-kind rate was 2.75%) | ||
| due 09/13/32†††,12 | 1,000,000 | 996,211 |
| Eisner Advisory Group | ||
| 7.92% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 02/28/31 | 982,600 | 985,469 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 55
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 8.0% (continued) | ||
| Financial – 1.9% (continued) | ||
| Higginbotham Insurance Agency, Inc. | ||
| 8.42% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 11/24/28††† | 987,500 | $ 981,896 |
| Citadel Securities, LP | ||
| 5.92% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.00%, Rate Floor: 2.00%) due 10/31/31 | 970,266 | 973,468 |
| Aretec Group, Inc. | ||
| 6.92% (1 Month Term SOFR + 3.00%, Rate Floor: 3.00%) due 08/09/30 | 843,625 | 845,658 |
| Asurion LLC | ||
| 8.17% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 09/19/30 | 798,000 | 782,439 |
| HighTower Holding LLC | ||
| 6.65% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.75%, Rate Floor: 2.75%) due 02/03/32 | 342,877 | 342,449 |
| Tegra118 Wealth Solutions, Inc. | ||
| 7.89% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 02/18/27 | 343,653 | 339,014 |
| Cliffwater LLC | ||
| 8.92% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 04/22/32††† | 268,650 | 267,826 |
| Awayday | ||
| 9.15% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.25%, Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 05/01/32††† | 180,556 | 178,750 |
| Total Financial | 7,699,430 | |
| Technology – 1.2% | ||
| Sitecore Holding III A/S | ||
| 11.03% (3 Month Term SOFR + 7.00%, Rate Floor: 7.50%) due 03/12/29††† | 1,125,190 | 1,118,269 |
| 11.53% (3 Month EURIBOR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) (in-kind rate was 5.73%) | ||
| due 03/12/29†††,12 | EUR 807,300 | 930,998 |
| Total Webhosting Solutions BV | ||
| 5.96% (1 Month EURIBOR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 11/06/31 | EUR 1,000,000 | 1,139,696 |
| Datix Bidco Ltd. | ||
| 8.97% (6 Month GBP SONIA + 5.25%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 04/30/31††† | GBP 472,000 | 624,810 |
| 8.73% (6 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.50%) due 04/30/31††† | 140,000 | 140,000 |
| 8.93% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.50%) due 10/30/30††† | 6,500 | 5,859 |
| Polaris Newco LLC | ||
| 7.74% (1 Month Term SOFR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 06/04/26††† | 581,091 | 549,822 |
| Modena Buyer LLC | ||
| 8.09% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 07/01/31 | 544,500 | 533,016 |
| Total Technology | 5,042,470 | |
| Industrial – 1.1% | ||
| Inspired Finco Holdings, Ltd. | ||
| 5.21% (1 Month EURIBOR + 3.25%, Rate Floor: 3.25%) due 02/28/31 | EUR 1,000,000 | 1,166,315 |
| Capstone Acquisition Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 8.52% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 5.50%) due 11/12/29††† | 915,534 | 911,521 |
| Park River Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 8.49% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 09/24/32 | 580,000 | 581,380 |
| Merlin Buyer, Inc. | ||
| 8.00% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 12/14/28 | 563,510 | 567,736 |
| Integrated Power Services Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 8.78% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 5.50%) due 11/22/28††† | 394,112 | 393,272 |
| 8.80% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 5.50%) due 11/22/28††† | 16,755 | 16,719 |
See notes to financial statements.
56 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 8.0% (continued) | ||
| Industrial – 1.1% (continued) | ||
| Michael Baker International LLC | ||
| 7.84% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 12/01/28 | 395,015 | $ 395,181 |
| Merlin Buyer, Inc. | ||
| 8.75% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 12/14/28††† | 293,970 | 296,175 |
| ILPEA Parent, Inc. | ||
| 7.92% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 06/22/28 | 97,479 | 97,175 |
| Total Industrial | 4,425,474 | |
| Consumer, Non-cyclical – 1.0% | ||
| Women’s Care Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 8.44% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 01/15/28 | 1,036,162 | 953,269 |
| Recess Holdings, Inc. | ||
| 7.62% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 02/20/30 | 887,785 | 890,839 |
| LaserAway Intermediate Holdings II LLC | ||
| 9.89% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 6.50%) due 10/14/27 | 765,285 | 757,632 |
| Blue Ribbon LLC | ||
| 10.13% (3 Month Term SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 6.75%) due 05/08/28 | 920,000 | 594,320 |
| Gibson Brands, Inc. | ||
| 9.07% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 08/11/28 | 481,250 | 435,531 |
| Florida Food Products LLC | ||
| 9.05% (6 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 10/18/30 | 361,534 | 245,844 |
| 9.43% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.50%, Rate Floor: 7.50%) due 10/18/30 | 141,238 | 139,355 |
| HAH Group Holding Co. LLC | ||
| 8.92% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 09/24/31 | 374,033 | 332,059 |
| Total Consumer, Non-cyclical | 4,348,849 | |
| Communications – 0.5% | ||
| FirstDigital Communications LLC | ||
| 8.53% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.36%, Rate Floor: 5.11%) due 12/17/26††† | 1,225,502 | 1,206,135 |
| GD Towers | ||
| due 11/18/32 | EUR 900,000 | 1,031,272 |
| Total Communications | 2,237,407 | |
| Basic Materials – 0.2% | ||
| SCIL USA Holdings LLC | ||
| 7.79% (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 10/09/32 | 500,000 | 501,250 |
| GrafTech Finance, Inc. | ||
| 9.86% (3 Month Term SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 8.00%) due 12/21/29 | 316,054 | 320,662 |
| Total Basic Materials | 821,912 | |
| Total Senior Floating Rate Interests | ||
| (Cost $33,524,104) | 33,370,046 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 57
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS†† – 4.3% | ||
| Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities – 2.6% | ||
| NLT 2025-NQM1 Trust | ||
| 2025-NQM1, 7.47% (WAC) due 10/25/70◊,†††,3 | 3,000,000 | $ 3,180,544 |
| Imperial Fund Mortgage Trust | ||
| 2022-NQM2, 4.20% (WAC) due 03/25/67◊,3 | 1,633,676 | 1,553,540 |
| Easy Street Mortgage Loan Trust 2025-RTL2 | ||
| 2025-RTL2, 5.61% due 10/25/403,11 | 1,050,000 | 1,052,691 |
| RCKT Mortgage Trust | ||
| 2025-CES8, 5.50% (WAC) due 08/25/55◊,3 | 1,000,000 | 1,013,903 |
| OBX Trust | ||
| 2024-NQM5, 6.51% due 01/25/643 | 750,000 | 755,501 |
| 2024-NQM6, 6.85% due 02/25/643,11 | 221,167 | 223,964 |
| Mill City Securities Ltd. | ||
| 2024-RS1, 3.00% due 11/01/693,11 | 471,880 | 447,578 |
| 2024-RS2, 3.00% due 08/01/693,11 | 313,266 | 296,819 |
| CAFL Issuer, LP | ||
| 2025-RRTL2, 5.62% due 11/28/403,11 | 650,000 | 654,832 |
| New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust | ||
| 2025-NQM3, 5.99% due 05/25/653 | 479,420 | 485,786 |
| CFMT LLC | ||
| 2022-HB9, 3.25% (WAC) due 09/25/37◊,3 | 500,000 | 484,215 |
| GCAT Trust | ||
| 2022-NQM5, 5.71% due 08/25/673,11 | 440,041 | 438,528 |
| FIGRE Trust | ||
| 2024-HE1, 6.17% (WAC) due 03/25/54◊,3 | 197,601 | 201,726 |
| LSTAR Securities Investment Ltd. | ||
| 2024-1, 7.31% (30 Day Average SOFR + 3.10%, Rate Floor: 3.10%) due 01/01/29◊,3 | 193,604 | 193,791 |
| Total Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | 10,983,418 | |
| Government Agency – 0.9% | ||
| Uniform MBS 30 Year | ||
| due 01/01/2610 | 3,800,000 | 3,847,903 |
| Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities – 0.6% | ||
| BXHPP Trust | ||
| 2021-FILM, 5.17% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.21%, Rate Floor: 1.10%) due 08/15/36◊,3 | 1,250,000 | 1,160,476 |
| BX Trust | ||
| 2024-VLT4, 6.40% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.44%, Rate Floor: 2.44%) due 06/15/41◊,3 | 1,150,000 | 1,143,901 |
| Total Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | 2,304,377 | |
| Military Housing – 0.2% | ||
| Freddie Mac Military Housing Bonds Resecuritization Trust Certificates | ||
| 2015-R1, 0.70% (WAC) due 10/25/52◊,3,13 | 8,993,162 | 509,493 |
| 2015-R1, 0.70% (WAC) due 11/25/55◊,3,13 | 6,548,111 | 362,196 |
| 2015-R1, 5.95% (WAC) due 11/25/52◊,3 | 79,774 | 67,711 |
| Total Military Housing | 939,400 | |
| Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | ||
| (Cost $18,292,488) | 18,075,098 |
See notes to financial statements.
58 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Face | ||
| Amount~ | Value | |
| FEDERAL AGENCY BONDS†† – 1.0% | ||
| Tennessee Valley Authority | ||
| 4.25% due 09/15/65 | 4,800,000 | $ 4,028,866 |
| Total Federal Agency Bonds | ||
| (Cost $3,680,293) | 4,028,866 | |
| FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DEBT†† – 0.3% | ||
| Panama Government International Bond | ||
| 4.50% due 01/19/63 | 1,250,000 | 922,000 |
| Eagle Funding Luxco SARL | ||
| 5.50% due 08/17/303 | 500,000 | 507,595 |
| Total Foreign Government Debt | ||
| (Cost $1,741,273) | 1,429,595 | |
| U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES†† – 0.2% | ||
| U.S. Treasury Notes | ||
| 4.63% due 02/15/356 | 860,000 | 903,235 |
| Total U.S. Government Securities | ||
| (Cost $864,270) | 903,235 | |
| SENIOR FIXED RATE INTERESTS†† – 0.0% | ||
| Consumer, Cyclical – 0.0% | ||
| Savers, Inc. | ||
| 7.03% due 09/13/32 | 225,000 | 225,563 |
| Total Senior Fixed Rate Interests | ||
| (Cost $223,905) | 225,563 | |
| Contracts | ||
| LISTED OPTIONS PURCHASED† – 0.0% | ||
| Call Options on: | ||
| Interest Rate Options | ||
| 3-Month SOFR Futures Contracts Expiring March 2027 with strike price of $97.50 | ||
| (Notional Value $4,509,802,500) | 186 | 84,863 |
| 3-Month SOFR Futures Contracts Expiring September 2026 with strike price of $97.50 | ||
| (Notional Value $6,296,550,000) | 260 | 65,000 |
| Total Listed Options Purchased | ||
| (Cost $201,253) | 149,863 | |
| Total Investments – 143.8% | ||
| (Cost $615,102,525) | $ 600,848,628 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 59
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Contracts | Value | |
| LISTED OPTIONS WRITTEN† – (0.0%) | ||
| Call Options on: | ||
| Interest Rate Options | ||
| 3-Month SOFR Futures Contracts Expiring September 2026 with strike price of $98.00 | ||
| (Notional Value $6,296,550,000) | 260 | $ (30,875) |
| 3-Month SOFR Futures Contracts Expiring March 2027 with strike price of $98.00 | ||
| (Notional Value $4,509,802,500) | 186 | (45,338) |
| Total Listed Options Written | ||
| (Premiums received $100,679) | (76,213) | |
| Other Assets & Liabilities, net – (43.8)% | (183,037,510) | |
| Total Net Assets – 100.0% | $ 417,734,905 |
Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swap Agreements Protection Purchased††
| Protection | Upfront | Unrealized | |||||||
| Premium | Payment | Maturity | Notional | Premiums | Appreciation | ||||
| Counterparty | Exchange | Index | Rate | Frequency | Date | Amount | Value | Received | (Depreciation)** |
| J.P. Morgan | |||||||||
| Securities | |||||||||
| LLC | ICE | CDX.NA.IG.45.V1 | 1.00% | Quarterly | 12/20/30 | $8,400,000 | $(188,946) | $(185,728) | $(3,218) |
| J.P. Morgan | |||||||||
| Securities | |||||||||
| LLC | ICE | CDX.NA.HY.45.V1 | 5.00% | Quarterly | 12/20/30 | 4,150,000 | (309,901) | (311,875) | 1,974 |
| $(498,847) | $(497,603) | $(1,244) | |||||||
| ~ | The face amount is denominated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. |
| * | Non-income producing security. |
| ** | Includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation). Variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
| *** | A copy of each underlying unaffiliated fund’s financial statements is available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. |
| † | Value determined based on Level 1 inputs, unless otherwise noted — See Note 6. |
| †† | Value determined based on Level 2 inputs, unless otherwise noted — See Note 6. |
| ††† | Value determined based on Level 3 inputs — See Note 6. |
See notes to financial statements.
60 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| ◊ | Variable rate security. Rate indicated is the rate effective at November 30, 2025. In some instances, the effective rate is limited by a minimum rate floor or a maximum rate cap established by the issuer. The settlement status of a position may also impact the effective rate indicated. In some cases, a position may be unsettled at period end and may not have a stated effective rate. In instances where multiple underlying reference rates and spread amounts are shown, the effective rate is based on a weighted average. |
| 1 | Security is a 144A or Section 4(a)(2) security. These securities have been determined to be illiquid and restricted under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total market value of 144A or Section 4(a)(2) illiquid and restricted securities is $5,954,907 (cost $6,372,370), or 1.4% of total net assets — See Note 12. |
| 2 | Affiliated issuer. |
| 3 | Security is a 144A or Section 4(a)(2) security. These securities have been determined to be liquid under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total market value of 144A or Section 4(a) (2) securities is $145,622,455 (cost $146,072,459), or 34.9% of total net assets. |
| 4 | Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC). |
| 5 | Rate indicated is the 7-day yield as of November 30, 2025. |
| 6 | All or a portion of these securities have been physically segregated in connection with unfunded loan commitments and reverse repurchase agreements. As of November 30, 2025, the total value of segregated securities was $197,337,375. |
| 7 | Zero coupon rate security. |
| 8 | Perpetual maturity. |
| 9 | Security has a fixed rate coupon which will convert to a floating or variable rate coupon on a future date. |
| 10 | Security is unsettled at period end and may not have a stated effective rate. |
| 11 | Security is a step up/down bond. The coupon increases or decreases at regular intervals until the bond reaches full maturity. Rate indicated is the rate at November 30, 2025. See table below for additional step information for each security. |
| 12 | Payment-in-kind security. |
| 13 | Security is an interest-only strip. |
| 14 | Taxable municipal bond issued as part of the Build America Bond program. |
| 15 | Security is in default of interest and/or principal obligations. |
| CAD | — Canadian Dollar |
| CDX.NA.HY.45.V1 | — Credit Default Swap North American High Yield Series 45 Index Version 1. |
| CDX.NA.IG.45.V1 | — Credit Default Swap North American Investment Grade Series 45 Index Version 1 |
| EUR | — Euro |
| EURIBOR | — European Interbank Offered Rate |
| GBP | — British Pound |
| ICE | — Intercontinental Exchange |
| plc | — Public Limited Company |
| SARL | — Société à Responsabilité Limitée |
| SOFR | — Secured Overnight Financing Rate |
| SONIA | — Sterling Overnight Index Average |
| WAC | — Weighted Average Coupon |
See Sector Classification in Other Information section.
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 61
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The following table summarizes the inputs used to value the Trust’s investments at November 30, 2025 (See Note 6 in the Notes to Financial Statements):
| Level 2 | Level 3 | |||
| Significant | Significant | |||
| Level 1 | Observable | Unobservable | ||
| Investments in Securities (Assets) | Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
| Common Stocks | $ 36,752 | $ 360,540 | $ 1,182,092 | $ 1,579,384 |
| Preferred Stocks | 5,014,139 | 4,960,226 | 1 | 9,974,366 |
| Warrants | 131 | — | 4 | 135 |
| Money Market Funds | 2,327,164 | — | — | 2,327,164 |
| Municipal Bonds | — | 273,043,623 | — | 273,043,623 |
| Corporate Bonds | — | 163,150,856 | 16,576,683 | 179,727,539 |
| Asset-Backed Securities | — | 48,500,489 | 27,513,662 | 76,014,151 |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | — | 20,875,199 | 12,494,847 | 33,370,046 |
| Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | — | 14,894,554 | 3,180,544 | 18,075,098 |
| Federal Agency Bonds | — | 4,028,866 | — | 4,028,866 |
| Foreign Government Debt | — | 1,429,595 | — | 1,429,595 |
| U.S. Government Securities | — | 903,235 | — | 903,235 |
| Senior Fixed Rate Interests | — | 225,563 | — | 225,563 |
| Options Purchased | 149,863 | — | — | 149,863 |
| Credit Default Swap Agreements** | — | 1,974 | — | 1,974 |
| Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts** | — | 30,706 | — | 30,706 |
| Total Assets | $ 7,528,049 | $ 532,405,426 | $ 60,947,833 | $ 600,881,308 |
| Level 2 | Level 3 | |||
| Significant | Significant | |||
| Level 1 | Observable | Unobservable | ||
| Investments in Securities (Liabilities) | Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
| Options Written | $ 76,213 | $ — | $ — | $ 76,213 |
| Credit Default Swap Agreements** | — | 3,218 | — | 3,218 |
| Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts** | — | 13,995 | — | 13,995 |
| Unfunded Loan Commitments (Note 11) | — | — | 42,506 | 42,506 |
| Total Liabilities | $ 76,213 | $ 17,213 | $ 42,506 | $ 135,932 |
** This derivative is reported as unrealized appreciation/depreciation at period end.
Please refer to the detailed Schedule of Investments for a breakdown of investment type by industry category.
The Trust may hold assets and/or liabilities in which the fair value approximates the carrying amount for financial statement purposes. As of the period end, reverse repurchase agreements of $185,767,587 are categorized as Level 2 within the disclosure hierarchy — See Note 7.
See notes to financial statements.
62 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The following is a summary of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair valuation of assets and liabilities categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:
| Ending Balance at | Valuation | Unobservable | Input | Weighted | |
| Category | November 30, 2025 | Technique | Inputs | Range | Average* |
| Assets: | |||||
| Asset-Backed Securities | $ 15,911,764 | Yield Analysis | Yield | 5.9%-7.2% | 7.0% |
| Asset-Backed Securities | 11,601,898 | Option adjusted spread | Broker Quote | — | — |
| off prior month end | |||||
| broker quote | |||||
| Collateralized Mortgage | 3,180,544 | Third Party Pricing | Trade Price | — | — |
| Obligations | |||||
| Common Stocks | 1,160,505 | Model Price | Purchase Price | — | — |
| Common Stocks | 12,769 | Enterprise Value | Valuation Multiple | 2.6x-8.9x | 2.6x |
| Common Stocks | 8,818 | Model Price | Liquidation Value | — | — |
| Corporate Bonds | 10,531,559 | Option adjusted spread | Broker Quote | — | — |
| off prior month end | |||||
| broker quote | |||||
| Corporate Bonds | 3,800,241 | Third Party Pricing | Broker Quote | — | — |
| Corporate Bonds | 2,244,883 | Third Party Pricing | Trade Price | — | — |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | 8,067,323 | Model Price | Purchase Price | — | — |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | 2,158,776 | Yield Analysis | Yield | 9.9%-10.3% | 10.1% |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | 1,537,923 | Third Party Pricing | Broker Quote | — | — |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | 552,075 | Model Price | Liquidation Value | — | — |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | 178,750 | Third Party Pricing | Trade Price | — | — |
| Warrants | 4 | Model Price | Liquidation Value | — | — |
| Preferred Stocks | 1 | Model Price | Liquidation Value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $ 60,947,833 | ||||
| Liabilities: | |||||
| Unfunded Loan Commitments | $ 42,506 | Model Price | Purchase Price | — | — |
* Inputs are weighted by the fair value of the instruments.
Significant changes in a quote, yield, liquidation value or valuation multiple would generally result in significant changes in the fair value of the security.
The Trust’s fair valuation leveling guidelines classify a single daily broker quote, or a vendor price based on a single daily or monthly broker quote, as Level 3, if such a quote or price cannot be supported with other available market information.
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 63
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 may occur as markets fluctuate and/or the availability of data used in an investment’s valuation changes. For the period ended November 30, 2025, the Trust had securities with a total value of $1,537,923 transfer into Level 3 from Level 2 due to a lack of observable inputs and had securities with a total value of $354,005 transfer out of Level 3 into Level 2 due to the availability of current and reliable market-based data provided by a third-party pricing service which utilizes significant observable inputs.
| Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||
| Senior | Unfunded | ||||||||
| Collateralized | Floating | Loan | |||||||
| Asset-Backed | Mortgage | Corporate | Rate | Common | Preferred | Total | Commit- | ||
| Securities | Obligations | Bonds | Interests | Warrants | Stocks | Stocks | Assets | ments | |
| Beginning | |||||||||
| Balance | $23,024,027 | $ — | $ 8,571,488 | $10,335,753 | $ 3 | $ 21,019 | $ — | $41,952,290 | $(48,293) |
| Purchases/ | |||||||||
| (Receipts) | 3,750,000 | 3,161,945 | 8,690,926 | 2,285,373 | — | 1,160,467 | — | 19,048,711 | (177,193) |
| (Sales, maturities | |||||||||
| and paydowns)/ | |||||||||
| Fundings | (317,308) | — | (1,149,062) | (1,257,703) | — | — | — | (2,724,073) | 108,092 |
| Amortization of | |||||||||
| premiums/ | |||||||||
| discounts | — | (828) | — | 10,591 | — | — | — | 9,763 | — |
| Total realized gains | |||||||||
| (losses) included | |||||||||
| in earnings | 5,866 | — | — | (45,497) | — | — | — | (39,631) | 228,479 |
| Total change in | |||||||||
| unrealized | |||||||||
| appreciation | |||||||||
| (depreciation) | |||||||||
| included in | |||||||||
| earnings | 1,051,077 | 19,427 | 463,331 | (17,588) | 1 | 606 | 1 | 1,516,855 | (153,591) |
| Transfers into | |||||||||
| Level 3 | — | — | — | 1,537,923 | — | — | — | 1,537,923 | — |
| Transfers out | |||||||||
| of Level 3 | — | — | — | (354,005) | — | — | — | (354,005) | — |
| Ending Balance | $27,513,662 | $3,180,544 | $16,576,683 | $12,494,847 | $ 4 | $1,182,092 | $ 1 | $60,947,833 | $(42.506) |
| Net change in | |||||||||
| unrealized | |||||||||
| appreciation | |||||||||
| (depreciation) | |||||||||
| for investments | |||||||||
| in Level 3 | |||||||||
| securities still | |||||||||
| held at | |||||||||
| November 30, | |||||||||
| 2025 | $ 1,049,778 | $ 19,427 | $ 463,331 | $ (9,179) | $ 1 | $ 606 | $ 1 | $ 1,523,965 | $(109,525) |
64 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Step Coupon Bonds
The following table discloses additional information related to step coupon bonds held by the Trust. Rates for all step coupon bonds held by the Trust are scheduled to increase, except GAIA Aviation Ltd. which is scheduled to decrease.
| Coupon Rate | ||
| at Next | Next Rate | |
| Name | Reset Date | Reset Date |
| CAFL Issuer, LP 2025-RRTL2, 5.62% due 11/28/40 | 6.52% | 05/30/28 |
| Easy Street Mortgage Loan Trust 2025-RTL2 2025-RTL2, 5.61% due 10/25/40 | 7.50% | 12/25/27 |
| GAIA Aviation Ltd. 2019-1, 3.97% due 12/15/44 | 2.00% | 10/15/26 |
| GCAT Trust 2022-NQM5, 5.71% due 08/25/67 | 6.71% | 10/01/26 |
| Mill City Securities Ltd. 2024-RS2, 3.00% due 08/01/69 | 6.00% | 12/01/27 |
| Mill City Securities Ltd. 2024-RS1, 3.00% due 11/01/69 | 6.00% | 10/01/27 |
| OBX Trust 2024-NQM6, 6.85% due 02/25/64 | 7.85% | 04/01/28 |
Affiliated Transactions
Investments representing 5% or more of the outstanding voting shares of a company, or control of or by, or common control under Guggenheim Investments, result in that company being considered an affiliated person, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“affiliated issuer”).
Transactions during the period ended November 30, 2025, in which the company is an affiliated issuer, were as follows:
| Change in | Shares/ | |||||||
| Realized | Unrealized | Face | ||||||
| Value | Gain | Appreciation | Value | Amount | Investment | |||
| Security Name | 05/31/25 | Additions | Reductions | (Loss) | (Depreciation) | 11/30/25 | 11/30/25 | Income |
| Common Stocks | ||||||||
| Accuride Corp* | $ 40 | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ 40 | 403,435 | $ — |
| Accuride Liquidating Trust* | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25 | — |
| BP Holdco LLC* | 12,768 | — | — | — | — | 12,768 | 15,619 | — |
| Senior Floating Rate Interests | ||||||||
| Accuride Corp. 8.72% | ||||||||
| (1 Month Term SOFR + | ||||||||
| 1.50%, Rate Floor: 1.50%) | ||||||||
| (in-kind rate was 3.00%) | ||||||||
| due 3/7/2030◊,1 | 552,150 | 5,094 | — | — | (5,169) | 552,075 | 294,662 | 13,294 |
| $ 564,958 | $ 5,094 | $ — | $ — | $ (5,169) | $ 564,883 | $13,294 |
* Non-income producing security.
◊ Variable rate security. Rate indicated is the rate effective at November 30, 2025.
1 Payment-in-kind security.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 65
| STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
| ASSETS: | |
| Investments in unaffiliated issuers, at value (cost $614,807,523) | $ 600,283,745 |
| Investments in affiliated issuers, at value (cost $295,002) | 564,883 |
| Foreign currency, at value (cost $704,565) | 711,302 |
| Cash | 469,033 |
| Segregated cash due from broker | 709,433 |
| Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 30,706 |
| Prepaid expenses | 25,641 |
| Receivables: | |
| Interest | 7,677,342 |
| Dividends | 19,114 |
| Tax reclaims | 8,822 |
| Investments sold | 8,025 |
| Trust shares sold | 1,450 |
| Total assets | 610,509,496 |
| LIABILITIES: | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements (Note 7) | 185,767,587 |
| Unfunded loan commitments, at value (Note 11) (commitment fees received $87,377) | 42,506 |
| Options written, at value (premiums received $100,679) | 76,213 |
| Unamortized upfront premiums received on credit default swap agreements | 497,603 |
| Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 13,995 |
| Interest and commitment fee due on borrowings | 27,709 |
| Payable for: | |
| Investments purchased | 5,708,668 |
| Investment advisory fees | 295,562 |
| Professional fees | 131,419 |
| Offering costs | 80,297 |
| Protection fees on credit default swap agreements | 56,681 |
| Variation margin on credit default swap agreements | 7,624 |
| Other liabilities | 68,727 |
| Total liabilities | 192,774,591 |
| NET ASSETS | $ 417,734,905 |
| NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; unlimited number of shares | |
| authorized, shares issued and outstanding | $ 275,507 |
| Additional paid-in capital | 476,618,852 |
| Total distributable earnings (loss) | (59,159,454) |
| NET ASSETS | $ 417,734,905 |
| Shares outstanding ($0.01 par value with unlimited amount authorized) | 27,550,735 |
| Net asset value | $ 15.16 |
See notes to financial statements.
66 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
| For the Six Months Ended November 30, 2025 |
| INVESTMENT INCOME: | |
| Interest from securities of unaffiliated issuers | $ 17,562,473 |
| Dividends from securities of unaffiliated issuers | 187,146 |
| Interest from securities of affiliated issuers | 13,294 |
| Total investment income | 17,762,913 |
| EXPENSES: | |
| Interest expense | 3,847,388 |
| Investment advisory fees | 1,729,184 |
| Professional fees | 155,194 |
| Administration fees | 63,284 |
| Fund accounting fees | 59,401 |
| Trustees’ fees and expenses* | 47,232 |
| Printing fees | 39,555 |
| Insurance | 23,980 |
| Custodian fees | 21,531 |
| Registration and filing fees | 11,895 |
| Transfer agent fees | 8,253 |
| Miscellaneous | 5,628 |
| Total expenses | 6,012,525 |
| Net investment income | 11,750,388 |
| NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS): | |
| Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
| Investments in unaffiliated issuers | (6,488,226) |
| Swap agreements | (55,459) |
| Futures contracts | 48,057 |
| Options purchased | (71,954) |
| Options written | 37,637 |
| Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | (111,450) |
| Foreign currency transactions | (2,100) |
| Net realized loss | (6,643,495) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
| Investments in unaffiliated issuers | 23,900,590 |
| Investments in affiliated issuers | (5,169) |
| Swap agreements | (1,244) |
| Futures contracts | (38,651) |
| Options purchased | (18,401) |
| Options written | (6,524) |
| Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 165,421 |
| Foreign currency translations | 11,132 |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 24,007,154 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain | 17,363,659 |
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ 29,114,047 |
* Relates to Trustees not deemed “interested persons” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 67
| STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS | November 30, 2025 |
| Six Months Ended | ||
| November 30, 2025 | Year Ended | |
| (Unaudited) | May 31, 2025 | |
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS: | ||
| Net investment income | $ 11,750,388 | $ 22,478,457 |
| Net realized loss on investments | (6,643,495) | (7,255,785) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 24,007,154 | 6,405,302 |
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 29,114,047 | 21,627,974 |
| DISTRIBUTIONS: | ||
| Distributions to shareholders | (20,530,208) | (22,485,930) |
| Return of capital | —* | (17,113,656) |
| Total distributions | (20,530,208) | (39,599,586) |
| SHAREHOLDER TRANSACTIONS: | ||
| Net proceeds from shares issued through at-the-market offering | 7,660,285 | 33,271,598 |
| Reinvestments of distributions | 1,182,846 | 2,253,386 |
| Common shares offering cost charged to paid-in-capital | (662) | (23,799) |
| Net increase in net assets resulting from shareholder transactions | 8,842,469 | 35,501,185 |
| Net increase in net assets | 17,426,308 | 17,529,573 |
| NET ASSETS: | ||
| Beginning of period | 400,308,597 | 382,779,024 |
| End of period | $ 417,734,905 | $ 400,308,597 |
* A portion of the distributions to shareholders may be deemed a return of capital at fiscal year end.
See notes to financial statements.
68 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
| For the period ended November 31, 2025 | |
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | |
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ 29,114,047 |
| Adjustments to Reconcile Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations to | |
| Net Cash Used in Operating Activities: | |
| Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments in | |
| unaffiliated issuers | (23,900,590) |
| Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments in | |
| affiliated issuers | 5,169 |
| Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on options purchased | 18,401 |
| Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on options written | 6,524 |
| Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on forward foreign | |
| currency exchange contracts | (165,421) |
| Net realized loss on investments in unaffiliated issuers | 6,488,226 |
| Net realized loss on options purchased | 71,954 |
| Net realized gain on options written | (37,637) |
| Purchase of long-term investments | (96,247,638) |
| Proceeds from sale of long-term investments | 63,731,288 |
| Net purchase of short-term investments | (4,791,391) |
| Net accretion of bond discount and amortization of bond premium | (438,059) |
| Corporate actions and other payments | 85,897 |
| Premiums received on options written | 100,679 |
| Cost of closing options written | (384) |
| Commitment fees received and repayments of unfunded commitments | 69,100 |
| Increase in interest receivable | (905,450) |
| Decrease in dividends receivable | 652 |
| Decrease investments sold receivable | 2,681 |
| Decrease in variation margin on futures contracts receivable | 2,100 |
| Increase in prepaid expenses | (19,696) |
| Increase in tax reclaims receivable | (970) |
| Decrease in investments purchased payable | (63,481) |
| Decrease in interest and commitment fee due on borrowings | (555) |
| Decrease in professional fees payable | (65,684) |
| Increase in unamortized upfront premiums received on credit default swap agreements | 497,603 |
| Increase in investment advisory fees payable | 19,901 |
| Increase in variation margin on credit default swap agreements payable | 7,624 |
| Decrease in trustees’ fees and expenses payable* | (592) |
| Increase in protection fees on credit default swap agreements payable | 56,681 |
| Decrease in other liabilities | (2,218) |
| Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | $ (26,361,239) |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 69
| STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | |
| Distributions to common shareholders | (19,347,362) |
| Proceeds from the issuance of common shares | 7,660,284 |
| Proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements | 228,243,375 |
| Payments made on reverse repurchase agreements | (188,603,304) |
| Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 27,952,993 |
| Net increase in cash | 1,591,754 |
| Cash at Beginning of Period (including foreign currency)** | 298,014 |
| Cash at End of Period (including foreign currency)*** | $ 1,889,768 |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: Cash paid during the | |
| period for interest | $ 3,521,647 |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Non Cash Financing Activity: Dividend reinvestment | $ 1,182,846 |
| * | Relates to Trustees not deemed “interested persons” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. |
| ** | Includes $81,928 of foreign currency. |
| *** | Includes $709,433 of segregated cash due from broker for swap agreements and $711,302 of foreign currency. |
See notes to financial statements.
70 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | November 30, 2025 |
The information in this table for the fiscal years ended 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021 is derived from the Trust’s financial statements and has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm for the Trust.
| Six Months Ended | ||||||||
| November 30, 2025 | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | |||
| (Unaudited) | May 31, 2025 | May 31, 2024 | May 31, 2023 | May 31, 2022 | May 31, 2021 | |||
| Per Share Data: | ||||||||
| Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 14.84 | $ 15.43 | $ 16.01 | $ 18.35 | $ 22.80 | $ 22.09 | ||
| Income from investment operations: | ||||||||
| Net investment income(a) | 0.43 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 1.21 | 1.19 | ||
| Net gain (loss) on investments (realized and unrealized) | 0.64 | 0.06 | 0.09 | (1.75) | (4.15) | 1.03 | ||
| Total from investment operations | 1.07 | 0.92 | 0.93 | (0.83) | (2.94) | 2.22 | ||
| Less distributions from: | ||||||||
| Net investment income | (0.75) | (0.86) | (0.83) | (0.91) | (1.32) | (1.38) | ||
| Capital gains | — | — | — | — | (0.03) | (0.13) | ||
| Return of capital | — | (0.65) | (0.68) | (0.60) | (0.16) | (0.00)* | ||
| Total distributions to shareholders | (0.75) | (1.51) | (1.51) | (1.51) | (1.51) | (1.51) | ||
| Net asset value, end of period | $ 15.16 | $ 14.84 | $ 15.43 | $ 16.01 | $ 18.35 | $ 22.80 | ||
| Market value, end of period | $ 15.33 | $ 14.93 | $ 16.25 | $ 16.32 | $ 19.45 | $ 24.22 | ||
| Total Return(b) | ||||||||
| Net asset value | 7.41% | 5.98% | 6.28% | (4.39%)(h) | (13.81%)(g) | 10.30% | ||
| Market value | 7.92% | 1.16% | 9.75% | (8.10%) | (13.96%) | 11.43% | ||
| Ratios/Supplemental Data: | ||||||||
| Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $ 417,735 | $ 400,309 | $ 382,779 | $ 367,970 | $ 401,122 | $ 472,691 | ||
| Ratio to average net assets of: | ||||||||
| Net investment income, including interest expense | 5.72%(f) | 5.55% | 5.43% | 5.51% | 5.52% | 5.22% | ||
| Total expenses, including interest expense(c),(e) | 2.93%(f) | 2.59% | 3.15% | 2.63% | 1.34% | 1.27% | ||
| Portfolio turnover rate | 11% | 11% | 17% | 10% | 36% | 33% | ||
| Senior Indebtedness | ||||||||
| Total borrowings outstanding (in thousands)(i) | $ 185,768 | $ 146,128 | $ 119,158 | $ 127,052 | $ — | $ 97,360 | ||
| Asset Coverage per $1,000 of indebtedness(d) | $ 3,249 | $ 3,739 | $ 4,212 | $ 3,896 | $ — | $ 5,855 | ||
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 71
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | |
| May 31, 2020 | May 31, 2019 | May 31, 2018 | May 31, 2017 | May 31, 2016 | |
| Per Share Data: | |||||
| Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 22.71 | $ 22.69 | $ 23.30 | $ 23.30 | $ 23.35 |
| Income from investment operations: | |||||
| Net investment income(a) | 1.27 | 1.30 | 1.48 | 1.59 | 1.48 |
| Net gain (loss) on investments (realized and unrealized) | (0.38) | 0.23 | (0.58) | (0.04) | 0.13 |
| Total from investment operations | 0.89 | 1.53 | 0.90 | 1.55 | 1.61 |
| Less distributions from: | |||||
| Net investment income | (1.51) | (1.43) | (1.35) | (1.55) | (1.64) |
| Capital gains | — | (0.08) | (0.16) | — | (0.02) |
| Return of capital | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total distributions to shareholders | (1.51) | (1.51) | (1.51) | (1.55) | (1.66) |
| Net asset value, end of period | $ 22.09 | $ 22.71 | $ 22.69 | $ 23.30 | $ 23.30 |
| Market value, end of period | $ 23.20 | $ 23.38 | $ 21.44 | $ 23.23 | $ 22.28 |
| Total Return(b) | |||||
| Net asset value | 3.86% | 7.11% | 3.93% | 6.81% | 7.25% |
| Market value | 6.03% | 16.81% | (1.23%) | 11.62% | 10.95% |
| Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||
| Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $ 414,168 | $ 395,716 | $ 395,221 | $ 405,780 | $ 405,820 |
| Ratio to average net assets of: | |||||
| Net investment income, including interest expense | 5.61% | 5.82% | 6.42% | 6.80% | 6.47% |
| Total expenses, including interest expense(c),(e) | 1.65% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.38% |
| Portfolio turnover rate | 25% | 6% | 8% | 6% | 7% |
| Senior Indebtedness | |||||
| Total borrowings outstanding (in thousands) | $ 10,510 | $ 44,510 | $ 44,510 | $ 47,509 | $ 61,710 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of borrowings(d) | $ 40,409 | $ 9,891 | $ 9,879 | $ 9,541 | $ 7,576 |
See notes to financial statements.
72 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS continued | November 30, 2025 |
| (a) | Based on average shares outstanding. |
| (b) | Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of a common share at the beginning of the period and a sale on the last day of the period reported either at net asset value (“NAV”) or market price per share. Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at NAV for NAV returns or the prices obtained under the Trust’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan for market value returns. Total return does not reflect brokerage commissions. A return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
| (c) | Excluding interest expense, the operating expense ratios for the period ended November 30, 2025 and the years ended May 31, would be: |
| November 30, | ||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||
| (Unaudited)(f) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
| 1.05% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.04% | 1.01% | 0.96% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 1.00% | 0.99% |
| (d) | Calculated by subtracting the Trust’s total liabilities (not including the borrowings) from the Trust’s total assets and dividing by the borrowings. Effective August 19, 2022, the Trust’s obligations under reverse repurchase agreement transactions are treated as senior securities representing indebtedness for purposes of the 1940 Act. Accordingly, for the period ended November 30, 2025 and the years ended May 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, Asset Coverage is calculated by subtracting the Trust’s total liabilities (not including the borrowings or reverse repurchase agreements) from the Trust’s total assets and dividing by the sum of the borrowings and reverse repurchase agreements. |
| (e) | The ratios of total expenses to average net assets applicable to common shares do not reflect fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Trust as a result of its investment in shares of other investment companies. If these fees were included in the expense ratios, for the period ended November 30, 2025 and the years ended May 31, the expense ratios would increase by: |
| November 30, | ||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||
| (Unaudited)(f) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
| 0.00%** | 0.00%** | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.20% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| (f) | Annualized. |
| (g) | The net increase from the payments by affiliates totaling $383,226 relating to an operational issue contributed 0.08% to total return at net asset value for the year ended May 31, 2022. |
| (h) | The net increase from the payment by the Adviser totaling $29,557 relating to an operational issue contributed 0.01% to total return at net asset value for the year ended May 31, 2023. |
| (i) | Effective August 19, 2022, the Trust’s obligations under reverse repurchase agreement transactions are treated as senior securities representing indebtedness for purposes of the 1940 Act. |
| * | Less than (0.01). |
| ** | Less than 0.01%. |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 73
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
Note 1 – Organization
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 30, 2010. The Trust is registered as a diversified, closed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation. There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its investment objectives. The Trust’s investment objectives are considered fundamental and may not be changed without shareholder approval.
Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies
The Trust operates as an investment company and, accordingly, follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies.
The following significant accounting policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and are consistently followed by the Trust. This requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. All time references are based on Eastern Time.
(a) Valuation of Investments
The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) adopted policies and procedures for the valuation of the Trust’s investments (the “Trust Valuation Procedures”).
Pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, the Board designated Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC (“GFIA” or the “Adviser”) as the valuation designee to perform fair valuation determinations for the Trust with respect to all Trust investments and/or other assets. As the Trust’s valuation designee pursuant to Rule 2a-5, the Adviser has adopted separate procedures (the “Valuation Designee Procedures” and collectively with the Trust Valuation Procedures, the “Valuation Procedures”) reasonably designed to prevent violations of the requirements of Rule 2a-5 and Rule 31a-4 under the 1940 Act. The Adviser, in its role as valuation designee, utilizes the assistance of a valuation committee, consisting of representatives from Guggenheim’s investment management, fund administration, legal and compliance departments (the “Valuation Committee”), in determining fair value of the Trust’s securities and/or other assets. The Valuation Procedures may be amended and potentially adversely affected as the Funds seek to comply with regulations that apply to the valuation practices of registered investment companies.
Valuations of the Trust’s securities and other assets are supplied primarily by independent third-party pricing services appointed pursuant to the processes set forth in the Valuation Procedures. The Adviser, with the assistance of the Valuation Committee, convenes monthly, or more frequently as needed, to review the valuation of all assets which have been fair valued. The Adviser, consistent with the monitoring and review responsibilities set forth in the Valuation Procedures, regularly reviews the appropriateness of the inputs, methods, models and assumptions employed by the independent third-party pricing services.
74 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
If the independent third-party pricing service cannot or does not provide a valuation for a particular investment or such valuation is deemed unreliable, such investment is fair valued by the Adviser.
In general, portfolio securities and assets of the Trust will be valued on the basis of readily available market quotations at their current market value. With respect to portfolio securities and assets of the Trust for which market quotations are not readily available, or deemed unreliable by the Adviser, the Trust will fair value those securities and assets in good faith in accordance with the Valuation Procedures. Valuations in accordance with these methods are intended to reflect each security’s (or asset’s or liability’s) “fair value.” Fair value represents a good faith approximation of the value of a security. Fair value determinations may be based on limited inputs and involve the consideration of a number of subjective factors, an analysis of applicable facts and circumstances, and the exercise of judgment. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. Examples of such factors may include, but are not limited to market prices; sale prices; broker quotes; and models which derive prices based on inputs such as prices of securities with comparable maturities and characteristics, or based on inputs such as anticipated cash flows or collateral, spread over U.S. Treasury securities, and other information analysis. As a result, it is possible that the fair value for a security determined in good faith in accordance with the Valuation Procedures may differ from valuations for the same security determined by other funds using their own valuation procedures. Although the Valuation Procedures are designed to value a portfolio security or asset at the price the Trust may reasonably expect to receive upon its sale in an orderly transaction, there can be no assurance that any fair value determination thereunder would, in fact, approximate the amount that the Trust could reasonably expect to receive upon the sale of the portfolio security or asset.
Equity securities listed or traded on a recognized U.S. securities exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) will generally be valued on the basis of the last sale price on the primary U.S. exchange or market on which the security is listed or traded; provided, however, that securities listed on NASDAQ will be valued at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not necessarily represent the last sale price.
Repurchase agreements are generally valued at amortized cost, provided such amounts approximate market value.
Open-end investment companies are valued at their net asset value (“NAV”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), on the valuation date. Exchange-traded funds and closed-end investment companies are generally valued at the last quoted sale price.
Generally, trading in foreign securities markets is substantially completed each day at various times prior to the close of the NYSE. The values of foreign securities are determined as of the close of such foreign markets or the close of the NYSE, if earlier. All investments quoted in foreign currencies are valued in U.S. dollars on the basis of the foreign currency exchange rates prevailing at the close of U.S. business at 4:00 p.m E.T. Investments in foreign securities may involve risks not present in domestic investments. The Adviser will determine the current value of such foreign securities by taking into consideration certain factors which may include those discussed above, as well as the following factors, among others: the value of the securities traded on other foreign markets, American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) trading, closed-end fund trading, foreign currency exchange activity, and the trading prices of financial products that are tied to foreign securities. In addition,
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 75
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
under the Valuation Procedures, the Adviser is authorized to use prices and other information supplied by an independent third-party pricing service in valuing foreign securities.
Commercial paper and discount notes with a maturity of greater than 60 days at acquisition are valued at prices that reflect broker-dealer supplied valuations or are obtained from independent third-party pricing services, which may consider the trade activity, treasury spreads, yields or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Commercial paper and discount notes with a maturity of 60 days or less at acquisition are valued at amortized cost, unless the Adviser concludes that amortized cost does not represent the fair value of the applicable asset in which case it will be valued using an independent third-party pricing service.
U.S. Government securities are valued by independent third-party pricing services, using the last traded fill price, or at the reported bid price at the close of business on the valuation date.
CLOs, CDOs, MBS, ABS, and other structured finance securities are generally valued using an independent third-party pricing service.
Typically, loans are valued using information provided by an independent third-party pricing service that uses broker quotes, among other inputs. If the independent third-party pricing service cannot or does not provide a valuation for a particular loan, or such valuation is deemed unreliable, such investment is valued based on a quote from a broker-dealer or is fair valued by the Adviser. As the Trust invests in loans and asset-backed securities as part of its investment strategies, it may have a significant amount of these instruments fair valued by the Adviser.
Exchange-traded options are valued at the mean of the bid and ask prices on the principal exchange on which they are traded. Over-the-counter (“OTC”) options and options on swaps (“swaptions”) are valued using a price provided by a pricing service.
Interest rate swap agreements entered into by the Trust are valued on the basis of the last sale price on the primary exchange on which the swap is traded. Other swap agreements entered into by the Trust are generally valued using an evaluated price provided by an independent third-party pricing service.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued daily based on the applicable exchange rate of the underlying currency.
The Trust may also fair value securities and assets when a significant event is deemed to have occurred after the time of a market quotation including for securities and assets traded on foreign markets and securities and assets for which market quotations are provided by independent third-party pricing services as of a time that is prior to the time when the Trust determines its NAV. There can be no assurance in each case that significant events will be identified.
Valuations of the Trust’s securities and other assets are supplied primarily by independent third-party pricing services pursuant to the processes set forth in the Valuation Designee Procedures. Valuations provided by the independent third-party pricing services are generally based on methods designed to approximate the amount that the Trust could reasonably expect to receive upon the sale of the portfolio security or asset. When providing valuations to the Trust, independent third-party pricing services use various inputs, methods, models and assumptions, which may include information provided by broker-dealers and other market makers. Independent third-party pricing services face
76 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
the same challenges as the Trust in valuing securities and assets and may rely on limited available information. If the independent third-party pricing service cannot or does not provide a valuation for a particular investment, or such valuation is deemed unreliable, such investment is fair valued by the Adviser. The Trust may also use third-party service providers to model certain securities to determine fair market value. While the Trust’s use of fair valuation is intended to result in calculation of NAV that fairly reflects values of the Trust’s portfolio securities as of the time of pricing, the Trust cannot guarantee that any fair valuation will, in fact, approximate the amount the Trust would actually realize upon the sale of the securities in question.
Quotes from broker-dealers (i.e., prices provided by a broker-dealer or other market participant, which may or may not be committed to trade at that price), adjusted for fluctuations in criteria such as credit spreads and interest rates, may also be used to value the Trust’s assets. Quotes from broker-dealers and vendor prices based on broker quotes can vary in terms of depth (e.g., provided by a single broker-dealer) and frequency (e.g., provided on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, or any other regular or irregular interval). Although quotes from broker-dealers and vendor prices based on broker quotes are typically received from established market participants, the Trust may not have the transparency to view the underlying inputs which support such quotes. Significant changes in a quote from a broker-dealer would generally result in significant changes in the fair value of the security.
(b) Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on investments are determined on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recorded net of applicable withholding taxes on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Discounts or premiums on debt securities purchased are accreted or amortized to interest income using the effective interest method. Interest income also includes paydown gains and losses on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and senior and subordinated loans. Amendment fees are earned as compensation for evaluating and accepting changes to the original loan agreement.
The Trust may receive other income from investments in senior loan interests, including amendment fees, consent fees and commitment fees. For funded loans, these fees are recorded as income when received by the Trust and included in interest income on the Trust’s Statement of Operations. For unfunded loans, commitment fees are included in realized gain on investments on the Trust’s Statement of Operations at the end of the commitment period.
Income from residual collateralized loan obligations is recognized using the effective interest method. At the time of purchase, management estimates the future expected cash flows and determines the effective yield and estimated maturity date based on the estimated cash flows. Subsequent to the purchase, the estimated cash flows are updated periodically and a revised yield is calculated prospectively.
(c) Senior Floating Rate Interests and Loan Investments
Senior floating rate interests in which the Trust invests generally pay interest rates which are periodically adjusted by reference to a base short-term floating rate, plus a premium. These base lending rates are generally (i) the lending rate offered by one or more major European banks, (ii) the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks, or (iii) the bank’s certificate of deposit
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 77
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
rate, or (iv) the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). Senior floating rate interests often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrower to repay at its election. The rate at which the borrower repays cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities disclosed in the Trust’s Schedule of Investments.
The Trust invests in loans and other similar debt obligations (“obligations”). A portion of the Trust’s investments in these obligations is sometimes referred to as “covenant lite” loans or obligations (“covenant lite obligations”), which are obligations that lack financial maintenance covenants or possess fewer or contingent financial maintenance covenants and other financial protections for lenders and investors. The Trust may also obtain exposure to covenant lite obligations through investment in securitization vehicles and other structured products. Many new restructured or reissued obligations have not featured traditional covenants, which are intended to protect lenders and investors by (i) imposing certain restrictions or other limitations on a borrower’s operations or assets or (ii) providing certain rights to lenders. The Trust may have fewer rights with respect to covenant lite obligations, including fewer protections against the possibility of default and fewer remedies in the event of default. As a result, investments in (or exposure to) covenant lite obligations are subject to more risk than investments in (or exposure to) certain other types of obligations. The Trust is subject to other risks associated with investments in (or exposure to) obligations, including that obligations may not be considered “securities” and, as a result, the Trust may not be entitled to rely on the anti-fraud protections under the federal securities laws and instead may have to resort to state law and direct claims.
(d) Interest on When-Issued Securities
The Trust may purchase and sell interests in securities on a when-issued and delayed delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. No income accrues to the Trust on such interests or securities in connection with such transactions prior to the date the Trust actually takes delivery of such interests or securities. These transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than the trade date purchase price. Although the Trust will generally purchase these securities with the intention of acquiring such securities, it may sell such securities before the settlement date.
(e) Currency Translations
The accounting records of the Trust are maintained in U.S. dollars. All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. Changes in the relationship of these foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar can significantly affect the value of the investments and earnings of the Trust. Foreign investments may also subject the Trust to foreign government exchange restrictions, expropriation, taxation, or other political, social, geopolitical or economic developments, all of which could affect the market and/or credit risk of the investments.
The Trust does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in the foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments.
78 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Reported net realized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from sales of foreign currencies and currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on investment transactions. Net unrealized appreciation and depreciation arise from changes in the fair values of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities at the fiscal period end, resulting from changes in exchange rates.
(f) Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts
The change in value of a forward foreign currency exchange contract is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation until the contract is closed. When the contract is closed, the Trust records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value at the time the contract was opened for financial reporting purposes and the value at the time it was closed.
(g) Distributions to Shareholders
The Trust intends to declare and pay monthly distributions to common shareholders. The Trust expects that distributions will generally consist of (i) investment company taxable income expected to be taxed as ordinary income, which includes, among other things, investment income, short-term capital gains and income from certain hedging and interest rate transactions, (ii) long-term capital gains and (iii) return of capital. Any net realized long-term capital gains are distributed annually to common shareholders. To the extent distributions exceed the amount of the Trust’s earnings and profit available for distribution, the excess will be deemed a return of capital. Distributions may be paid by the Trust from any permitted source and, from time to time, all or a portion of a distribution may be a return of capital, which is in effect a partial return of the amount a shareholder invested in the Trust. A return of capital is generally not taxable and would reduce the shareholder’s tax basis in its shares, which would reduce the loss (or increase the gain) on a subsequent taxable disposition by such shareholder of the shares, until such shareholder’s basis reaches zero at which point subsequent return of capital distributions would constitute taxable capital gain to such shareholder. Shareholders receiving a return of capital may be under the impression that they are receiving net investment income or profit when they are not. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
(h) Restricted Cash
If the Trust receives cash collateral in connection with derivative instruments, such amount is presented on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Segregated cash due to broker. At November 30, 2025, there was no segregated cash due to broker. A portion of the Trust’s cash has been pledged as collateral for swap agreements. This amount is presented on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Segregated cash due from broker. At November 30, 2025, there was $709,433 of segregated cash due from broker.
(i) Swap Agreements
Swap agreements are marked-to-market daily and the change, if any, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Payments received or made as a result of an agreement or termination of an agreement are recognized as realized gains or losses.
Upon entering into certain centrally-cleared swap transactions, the Trust is required to deposit with its clearing broker an amount of cash or securities as an initial margin. Subsequent variation margin
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 79
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
receipts or payments are received or made by the Trust depending on fluctuations in the fair value of the reference entity and are recorded by the Trust as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When the contract is closed, the Trust records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed.
Upfront payments received or made by the Trust on credit default swap agreements and interest rate swap agreements are amortized over the expected life of the agreement. Periodic payments received or paid by the Trust are recorded as realized gains or losses. Payments received or made as a result of a credit event or termination of the contract are recognized, net of a proportional amount of the upfront payment, as realized gains or losses.
(j) Options
Upon the purchase of an option, the premium paid is recorded as an investment, the value of which is marked-to-market daily. If a purchased option expires, the Trust realizes a loss in the amount of the cost of the option. When the Trust enters into a closing sale transaction, it realizes a gain or loss depending on whether the proceeds from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. If the Trust exercises a put option, it realizes a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security and the proceeds from such sale will be decreased by the premium originally paid. When the Trust exercises a call option, the cost of the security purchased by the Trust upon exercise increases by the premium originally paid.
When the Trust writes (sells) an option, an amount equal to the premium received is entered in that Trust’s accounting records as an asset and equivalent liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current value of the option written. When a written option expires, or if the Trust enters into a closing purchase transaction, it realizes a gain (or loss if the cost of a closing purchase transaction exceeds the premium received when the option was sold).
(k) Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its Trustees and Officers are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. In addition, throughout the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties which provide general indemnifications. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust and/or its affiliates that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Trust expects the risk of loss to be remote.
(l) Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
The Trust may acquire an interest in a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) in an initial public offering or a secondary market transaction. SPAC investments carry many of the same risks as investments in initial public offering securities, such as erratic price movements, greater risk of loss, lack of information about the issuer, limited operating and little or no public trading history, and higher transaction costs. An investment in a SPAC is typically subject to a higher risk of dilution by additional later offerings of interests in the SPAC or by other investors exercising existing rights to purchase shares of the SPAC in interests in SPACs may be illiquid and/or be subject to restrictions on resale. A SPAC is a publicly traded company that raises investment capital for the purpose of acquiring the equity securities of one or more existing companies (or interests therein)
80 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
via merger, combination, acquisition or other similar transactions. Unless and until an acquisition is completed, a SPAC generally invests its assets (less a portion retained to cover expenses) in U.S. government securities, money market securities and cash and does not typically pay dividends in respect of its common stock. SPAC investments are also subject to the risk that a significant portion of the funds raised by the SPAC may be expended during the search for a target acquisition or merger and that the SPAC may have limited time in which to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets. Because SPACs are in essence blank check companies without operating history or ongoing business other than seeking acquisitions, the value of their securities is particularly dependent on the ability of the entity’s management to identify and complete a profitable acquisition. Among other conflicts of interest, the economic interests of the management, directors, officers and related parties of a SPAC can differ from the economic interests of public shareholders, which may lead to conflicts as they evaluate, negotiate and recommend business combination transactions to shareholders. This risk may become more acute as the deadline for the completion of a business combination nears. There is no guarantee that the SPACs in which the Trust invests will complete an acquisition or that any acquisitions that are completed will be profitable.
Note 3 – Derivatives
As part of its investment strategy, the Trust utilizes a variety of derivative instruments. These investments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk and risks in excess of amounts recognized on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Valuation and accounting treatment of these instruments can be found under Significant Accounting Policies in Note 2 of these Notes to Financial Statements.
Derivatives are instruments whose values depend on, or are derived from, in whole or in part, the value of one or more other assets, such as securities, currencies, commodities or indices. Derivative instruments may be used for investment purposes (including to maintain cash reserves while maintaining exposure to certain other assets), for risk management (hedging) purposes, for diversification purposes, to change the duration of the Trust, for leverage purposes, to facilitate trading, to reduce transaction costs and to pursue higher investment returns. Derivative instruments may also be used to seek to mitigate certain investment risks, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and credit risk. U.S. GAAP requires disclosures to enable investors to better understand how and why the Trust uses derivative instruments, how these derivative instruments are accounted for and their effects on the Trust’s financial position and results of operations.
The Trust utilized derivatives for the following purposes:
Duration: the use of an instrument to manage the interest rate risk of a portfolio.
Hedge: an investment made in order to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in a security, by taking an offsetting position to protect against broad market moves.
Speculation: the use of an instrument to express macro-economic and other investment views.
To the extent the Trust’s investment strategy consistently involves applying leverage, the value of the Trust’s shares will tend to increase or decrease more than the value of any increase or decrease in the underlying index or other asset. In addition, because an investment in derivative instruments generally requires a small investment relative to the amount of investment exposure assumed, an opportunity for increased net income is created; but, at the same time, leverage risk will increase.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 81
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The Trust’s use of leverage, through borrowings or instruments such as derivatives, may cause an investment in the Trust to be more volatile and riskier than if the Trust had not been leveraged.
Options Purchased and Written
A call option on a security gives the purchaser of the option the right to buy, and the writer of a call option the obligation to sell, the underlying security. The purchaser of a put option has the right to sell, and the writer of the put option the obligation to buy, the underlying security at any time during the option period. The risk associated with purchasing options is limited to the premium originally paid.
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume of call/put options purchased on a monthly basis:
| Average Notional Amount | ||
| Use | Call | Put |
| Duration, Hedge, Speculation | $3,600,715,833 | $— |
The risk in writing a call option is that the Trust may incur a loss if the market price of the underlying security increases and the option is exercised. The risk in writing a put option is that the Trust may incur a loss if the market price of the underlying security decreases and the option is exercised. In addition, there may be an imperfect correlation between the movement in prices of options and the underlying securities where the Trust may not be able to enter into a closing transaction because of an illiquid secondary market; or, for OTC options, the Trust may be at risk because of the counterparty’s inability to perform.
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume of call/put options written on a monthly basis:
| Average Notional Amount | ||
| Use | Call | Put |
| Duration, Hedge, Speculation | $3,600,715,833 | $— |
Swap Agreements
A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified amount of an underlying asset. When utilizing OTC swaps, the Trust bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a swap agreement counterparty or if the underlying asset declines in value. Certain standardized swaps are subject to mandatory central clearing and are executed on a multi-lateral or other trade facility platform, such as a registered exchange. There is limited counterparty credit risk with respect to centrally-cleared swaps as the transaction is facilitated through a central clearinghouse, much like exchange-traded futures contracts. If the Trust utilizes centrally-cleared swaps, the exchange bears the risk of loss resulting from a counterparty not being able to pay. There is no guarantee that the Trust or an underlying fund could eliminate its exposure under an outstanding swap agreement by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same or another party.
82 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Credit default swaps are instruments which allow for the full or partial transfer of third-party credit risk, with respect to a particular entity or entities, from one counterparty to the other. The Trust enters into credit default swaps as a “seller” or “buyer” of protection primarily to gain or reduce exposure to the investment grade and/or high yield bond market. A seller of credit default swaps is selling credit protection or assuming credit risk with respect to the underlying entity or entities. The buyer in a credit default swap is obligated to pay the seller a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no event of default on an underlying reference obligation has occurred. If a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap agreement, the seller will either (i) pay to the buyer of protection an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap and take delivery of the referenced obligation or underlying securities comprising the referenced index or (ii) pay a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation or underlying securities comprising the referenced index. The notional amount reflects the maximum potential amount the seller of credit protection could be required to pay to the buyer if a credit event occurs. The seller of protection receives periodic premium payments from the buyer and may also receive or pay an upfront premium adjustment to the stated periodic payments. In the event a credit default occurs on a credit default swap referencing an index, a factor adjustment will take place and the buyer of protection will receive a payment reflecting the par less the default recovery rate of the defaulted index component based on its weighting in the index. If no default occurs, the counterparty will pay the stream of payments and have no further obligations to the Trust selling the credit protection. If the Trust utilizes centrally cleared credit default swaps, the exchange bears the risk of loss resulting from a counterparty not being able to pay. For OTC credit default swaps, the Trust bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a swap agreement counterparty, or in the case of a credit default swap in which the Trust is selling credit protection, the default of a third-party issuer.
The quoted market prices and resulting market values for credit default swap agreements on securities and credit indices serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represent the likelihood of an expected liability (or profit) for the credit derivative had the notional amount of the swap agreement been closed/sold as of the period end. Increasing market values, in absolute terms when compared to the notional amount of the swap, represent a deterioration of the referenced entity’s credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement.
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume of credit default swaps on a monthly basis:
| Average Notional Amount | ||
| Use | Protection Sold | Protection Purchased |
| Hedge | $ — | $6,275,000 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 83
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts
A forward foreign currency exchange contract is an agreement between two parties to exchange two designated currencies at a specific time in the future. Certain types of contracts may be cash settled, in an amount equal to the change in exchange rates during the term of the contract. The contracts can be used to hedge or manage exposure to foreign currency risks with portfolio investments or to gain exposure to foreign currencies.
The market value of a forward foreign currency exchange contract changes with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Furthermore, the Trust may be exposed to risk if the counterparties cannot meet the contract terms or if the currency value changes unfavorably as compared to the U.S. dollar.
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume of forward foreign currency exchange contracts on a monthly basis:
| Average Value | |||
| Use | Purchased | Sold | |
| Hedge | $44,869 | $11,119,289 |
Derivative Investment Holdings Categorized by Risk Exposure
The following is a summary of the location of derivative investments on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2025:
| Derivative Investment Type | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives |
| Interest rate option contracts | Investments in unaffiliated | |
| issuers, at value | Options written, at value | |
| Currency forward contracts | Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign | Unrealized depreciation on forward |
| currency exchange contracts | foreign currency exchange contracts | |
| Credit rate swap agreements | — | Unamortized upfront premiums |
| received on credit default | ||
| swap agreements | ||
| — | Variation margin on credit default | |
| swap agreements |
84 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The following tables set forth the fair value of the Trust’s derivative investments categorized by primary risk exposure at November 30, 2025:
The following is a summary of the location of derivative investments on the Trust’s Statement of Operations for the period ended November 30, 2025:
| Derivative Investment Type | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives |
| Interest rate options contracts | Net realized gain (loss) on options purchased |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on options purchased | |
| Net realized gain (loss) on options written | |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on options written | |
| Currency forward contracts | Net realized gain (loss) on forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | |
| forward foreign currency exchange contracts | |
| Credit Rate Swap Agreements | Net realized gain (loss) on swap agreements |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap agreements |
The following is a summary of the Trust’s realized gain (loss) and change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivative investments recognized on the Trust’s Statement of Operations categorized by primary risk exposure for the period ended November 30, 2025:
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 85
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivative Investments Recognized on the Statement of Operations | |||||
| Options | Options | Forward | |||
| Futures | Swaps | Written | Purchased | Foreign | |
| Interest Rate | Credit Default | Interest | Interest | Currency | |
| Risk | Risk | Rate Risk | Rate Risk | Exchange Risk | Total |
| $ (38,651) | $ (1,244) | $(6,524) | $ (18,401) | $ 165,421 | $100,601 |
In conjunction with the use of derivative instruments, the Trust is required to maintain collateral in various forms. Depending on the financial instrument utilized and the broker involved, the Trust uses margin deposits at the broker, cash and/or securities segregated at the custodian bank, discount notes or repurchase agreements allocated to the Trust as collateral.
The Trust has established counterparty credit guidelines and enters into transactions only with financial institutions rated/identified as investment grade or better. The Trust monitors the counterparty credit risk associated with each such financial institution.
Foreign Investments
There are several risks associated with exposure to foreign currencies, foreign issuers and emerging markets. The Trust’s indirect and direct exposure to foreign currencies subjects the Trust to the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar, or in the case of short positions, that the U.S. dollar will decline in value relative to the currency being hedged. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates and the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad. In addition, the Trust may incur transaction costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. The Trust may, but is not obligated to, engage in currency hedging transactions, which generally involve buying currency forward, options or futures contracts. However, not all currency risks may be effectively hedged, and in some cases the costs of hedging techniques may outweigh expected benefits. In such instances, the value of securities denominated in foreign currencies can change significantly when foreign currencies strengthen or weaken relative to the U.S. dollar.
The Trust may invest in securities of foreign companies directly, or in financial instruments, such as ADRs and exchange-traded funds, which are indirectly linked to the performance of foreign issuers. Foreign markets can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market. Investing in securities of foreign companies directly, or in financial instruments that are indirectly linked to the performance of foreign issuers, may involve risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. issuers. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies, and of dividends from such securities, can change significantly when foreign currencies strengthen or weaken relative to the U.S. dollar. Foreign securities markets generally have less trading volume and less liquidity than U.S. markets, and prices in some foreign markets may fluctuate more than those of securities traded on U.S. markets. Many foreign countries lack accounting and disclosure standards comparable to those that apply to U.S. companies, and it may be more difficult to obtain reliable information regarding a foreign issuer’s financial condition and operations. Transaction costs and costs associated with custody services are generally higher for foreign securities than they are for U.S. securities. Some foreign governments levy withholding taxes against dividend and interest
86 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
income. Although in some countries portions of these taxes are recoverable, the non-recovered portion will reduce the income received by the Trust.
Note 4 – Offsetting
In the normal course of business, the Trust enters into transactions subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or other similar arrangements. Generally, the right to offset in those agreements allows the Trust to counteract the exposure to a specific counterparty with collateral received from or delivered to that counterparty based on the terms of the arrangements. These arrangements provide for the right to liquidate upon the occurrence of an event of default, credit event upon merger or additional termination event.
In order to better define its contractual rights and to secure rights that will help the Trust mitigate its counterparty risk, the Trust may enter into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreement (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar agreement with its derivative contract counterparties. An ISDA Master Agreement is a bilateral agreement between the Trust and a counterparty that governs OTC derivatives, including foreign exchange contracts, and typically contains, among other things, collateral posting terms and netting provisions in the event of a default and/or termination event. The provisions of the ISDA Master Agreement typically permit a single net payment in the event of a default (close-out netting) or similar event, including the bankruptcy or insolvency of the counterparty.
For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are typically calculated by netting the mark-to-market amount for each transaction under such agreement and comparing that amount to the value of any collateral currently pledged by the Trust and the counterparty. For financial reporting purposes, cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the Trust and cash collateral received from the counterparty, if any, are reported separately on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as segregated cash with broker/ receivable for variation margin, or payable for swap settlement/variation margin. Cash and/ or securities pledged or received as collateral by the Trust in connection with an OTC derivative subject to an ISDA Master Agreement generally may not be invested, sold or rehypothecated by the counterparty or the Trust, as applicable, absent an event of default under such agreement, in which case such collateral generally may be applied towards obligations due to and payable by such counterparty or the Trust, as applicable. Generally, the amount of collateral due from or to a counterparty must exceed a minimum transfer amount threshold (e.g., $300,000) before a transfer is required to be made. To the extent amounts due to the Trust from its counterparties are not fully collateralized, contractually or otherwise, the Trust bears the risk of loss from counterparty nonperformance. The Trust attempts to mitigate counterparty risk by only entering into agreements with counterparties that it believes to be of good standing and by monitoring the financial stability of those counterparties.
For financial reporting purposes, the Trust does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 87
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The following tables present derivative financial instruments and secured financing transactions that are subject to enforceable netting arrangements:
| Net Amount | Gross Amounts Not | |||||
| Gross Amounts | of Assets | Offset in the Statement | ||||
| Gross | Offset in the | Presented on | of Assets and Liabilities | |||
| Amounts of | Statement of | the Statement | Cash | |||
| Recognized | Assets and | of Assets and | Financial | Collateral | Net | |
| Instrument | Assets1 | Liabilities | Liabilities | Instruments | Received | Amount |
| Forward foreign | ||||||
| currency | ||||||
| exchange | ||||||
| contracts | $ 30,706 | $ — | $ 30,706 | $ — | $ — | $ 30,706 |
| Net Amount | Gross Amounts Not | |||||
| Gross Amounts | of Liabilities | Offset in the Statement | ||||
| Gross | Offset in the | Presented on | of Assets and Liabilities | |||
| Amounts of | Statement of | the Statement | Cash | |||
| Recognized | Assets and | of Assets and | Financial | Collateral | Net | |
| Instrument | Liabilities1 | Liabilities | Liabilities | Instruments | Pledged | Amount |
| Forward foreign | ||||||
| currency | ||||||
| exchange | ||||||
| contracts | $ 13,995 | $ — | $ 13,995 | $ — | $ — | $ 13,995 |
| Reverse | ||||||
| Repurchase | ||||||
| Agreements | 185,767,587 | — | 185,767,587 | (185,767,587) | — | — |
1 Exchange-traded or centrally-cleared derivatives are excluded from these reported amounts.
The Trust has the right to offset deposits against any related derivative liabilities outstanding with each counterparty with the exception of exchange-traded or centrally-cleared derivatives. The following table presents deposits held by others in connection with derivative investments as of November 30, 2025.
| Counterparty | Asset Type | Cash Pledged | Cash Received | |
| J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | Credit default | $ 709,433 | $ — | |
| swap agreements | ||||
Note 5 – Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and the Adviser, the Adviser furnishes office facilities and equipment and provides administrative services on behalf of the Trust, and oversees the activities of Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM” or the “Sub-Adviser”). The Adviser provides all services through the medium of any directors, officers or employees of the Adviser or its affiliates as the Adviser deems appropriate in order to fulfill its obligations. As compensation for these services, the Trust pays the Adviser a fee, payable monthly, at an annual rate equal to 0.60% of the Trust’s average daily Managed Assets (as defined in this report).
Pursuant to an Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement among the Trust, the Adviser and GPIM, GPIM, under the oversight and supervision of the Trust’s Board and the Adviser, manages the investment of the assets of the Trust in accordance with its investment objectives and policies, places orders to
88 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
purchase and sell securities on behalf of the Trust, and, at the request of the Adviser, consults with the Adviser as to the overall management of the assets of the Trust and its investment policies and practices. As compensation for its services, the Adviser pays GPIM a fee, payable monthly, at an annual rate equal to 0.30% of the Trust’s average daily Managed Assets.
For purposes of calculating the fees payable under the foregoing agreements, “Managed Assets” means the total assets of the Trust, including the assets attributable to the proceeds from financial leverage, including the issuance of senior securities represented by indebtedness (including through borrowing from financial institutions or issuance of debt securities, including notes or commercial paper), the issuance of preferred shares, the effective leverage of certain portfolio transactions such as reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls and inverse floating rate securities, or any other form of financial leverage, minus liabilities, other than liabilities related to any financial leverage.
If the Trust invests in a fund that is advised by the Adviser or an adviser affiliated with the Adviser, the Adviser has agreed to waive Trust fees to the extent necessary to offset the proportionate share of any management fee paid by the Trust with respect to its investment in such fund. Fee waivers will be calculated at the Trust level without regard to any expense cap, if any, in effect for the Trust. Fees waived under this arrangement are not subject to reimbursement. For the period ended November 30, 2025, there were no such fees waived.
Certain officers and trustees of the Trust may also be officers, directors and/or employees of the Adviser or GPIM. The Trust does not compensate its officers who are officers, directors and/or employees of the aforementioned firms.
GFIA pays operating expenses on behalf of the Trust, such as audit and accounting related services, legal services, custody, printing and mailing, among others, on a pass-through basis.
MUFG Investor Services (US), LLC (“MUIS”) acts as the Trust’s administrator and accounting agent. As administrator and accounting agent, MUIS maintains the books and records of the Trust’s securities and cash. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (“BNY”) acts as the Trust’s custodian. As custodian, BNY is responsible for the custody of the Trust’s assets. For providing the aforementioned services, MUIS and BNY are entitled to receive a monthly fee equal to an annual percentage of the Trust’s average daily Managed Assets and certain out of pocket expenses.
Note 6 – Fair Value Measurement
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that the Trust would receive to sell an investment or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on the types of inputs used to value assets and liabilities and requires corresponding disclosure. The hierarchy and the corresponding inputs are summarized below:
Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — significant other observable inputs (for example quoted prices for securities that are similar based on characteristics such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs based on the best information available under the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available, which may include assumptions.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 89
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Rule 2a-5 sets forth a definition of “readily available market quotations,” which is consistent with the definition of a Level 1 input under U.S. GAAP. Rule 2a-5 provides that “a market quotation is readily available only when that quotation is a quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical investments that the Trust can access at the measurement date, provided that a quotation will not be readily available if it is not reliable.”
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available must be valued at fair value as determined in good faith. Accordingly, any security priced using inputs other than Level 1 inputs will be subject to fair value requirements. The types of inputs available depend on a variety of factors, such as the type of security and the characteristics of the markets in which it trades, if any. Fair valuation determinations that rely on fewer or no observable inputs require greater judgment. Accordingly, fair value determinations for Level 3 securities require the greatest amount of judgment.
Independent third-party pricing services are used to value a majority of the Trust’s investments. When values are not available from an independent third-party pricing service, they will be determined using a variety of sources and techniques, including: market prices; broker quotes; and models which derive prices based on inputs such as prices of securities with comparable maturities and characteristics or based on inputs such as anticipated cash flows or collateral, spread over U.S. Treasury securities, and other information and analysis. A significant portion of the Trust’s assets and liabilities are categorized as Level 2, as indicated in this report.
Quotes from broker-dealers (i.e., price provided by a broker-dealer or other market participant, which may or may not be committed to trade at that price), adjusted for fluctuations in criteria such as credit spreads and interest rates, may also be used to value the Trust’s assets. Quotes from broker-dealers and vendor prices based on broker quotes can vary in terms of depth (e.g., provided by a single broker-dealer) and frequency (e.g., provided on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, or any other regular or irregular interval). Although quotes from broker-dealers and vendor prices based on broker quotes are typically received from established market participants, the Trust may not have the transparency to view the underlying inputs which support such quotes. Significant changes in a quote from a broker-dealer would generally result in significant changes in the fair value of the security.
Certain fixed income securities are valued by obtaining a monthly quote from a broker-dealer, adjusted for fluctuations in criteria such as credit spreads and interest rates.
Certain loans and other securities are valued using a single daily broker quote or a price from an independent third-party pricing service based on a single daily or monthly broker quote.
The inputs or methodologies selected and applied for valuing securities or other assets are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The suitability, appropriateness and accuracy of the techniques, methodologies and sources employed to determine fair valuation are periodically reviewed and subject to change.
Note 7 – Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Trust may enter into reverse repurchase agreements as part of its financial leverage strategy. Under a reverse repurchase agreement, the Trust temporarily transfers possession of a portfolio instrument to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash. At the same time, the Trust agrees to repurchase the instrument at an agreed upon time and price, which reflects an
90 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
interest payment. Such agreements have the economic effect of borrowings. The Trust may enter into such agreements to seek to invest the cash acquired at a rate higher than the cost of the agreement, which would increase earned income. When the Trust enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, any fluctuations in the market value of either the instruments transferred to another party or the instruments in which the proceeds are invested would affect the market value of the Trust’s assets. As a result, such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of the Trust’s assets. For the period ended November 30, 2025, the average daily balance for which reverse repurchase agreements were outstanding amounted to $165,705,550. The weighted average interest rate was 4.45%. As of November 30, 2025, there was $185,767,587 (inclusive of interest payable) in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding.
As of November 30, 2025, the Trust had outstanding reverse repurchase agreements with various counterparties. Details of the reverse repurchase agreements by counterparty are as follows:
| Counterparty | Interest Rate(s) | Maturity Date | Face Value |
| BNP Paribas | 4.00% - 4.05%* | Open Maturity | $ 2,260,599 |
| BofA Securities, Inc. | 3.90% - 4.27%* | Open Maturity | 25,039,327 |
| Societe Generale | 4.05% - 4.25%* | Open Maturity | 2,697,518 |
| TD Securities (USA) LLC | 4.03% - 4.30%* | Open Maturity | 155,770,143 |
| $ 185,767,587 |
* The rate is adjusted periodically by the counterparty, subject to approval by the Adviser, and is not based upon a set of reference rate and spread. Rate indicated is the rate effective at November 30, 2025.
The following is a summary of the remaining contractual maturities of the reverse repurchase agreements outstanding as of November 30, 2025, aggregated by asset class of the related collateral pledged by the Trust:
| Up to | Greater than | Overnight and | |||
| 30 days | 31-90 days | 90 days | Continuous | Total | |
| Corporate Bonds | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ 81,461,837 | $ 81,461,837 |
| Federal Agency Notes | — | — | — | 713,654 | 713,654 |
| Municipal Bonds | — | — | — | 103,592,096 | 103,592,096 |
| Total reverse repurchase agreements | $ — | $ — | $ — | $185,767,587 | $185,767,587 |
| Gross amount of recognized liabilities | |||||
| for reverse repurchase agreements | $ — | $ — | $ — | $185,767,587 | $185,767,587 |
Note 8 – Borrowings
As of October 11, 2024 the Trust has entered into a $100,000,000 credit facility agreement with a new approved lender (the “Credit Agreement”). Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the interest rate on the amount borrowed is based on the SOFR plus 85 basis points, and an unused commitment fee of 20 basis points is charged on the difference between the amount available to borrow under the credit agreement and the actual amount borrowed. The Trust had previously entered into a $100,000,000 credit facility agreement with another approved lender, which was terminated in full on November 20, 2024. As of November 30, 2025, there was $0 outstanding in connection with the Trust’s Credit Agreement. The Trust did not have any borrowings on the credit facility during the period ended November 30, 2025. As of November 30, 2025, the total value of securities segregated and pledged as collateral in connection with borrowings was $0.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 91
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The Credit Agreement includes customary representations and covenants, including certain limitations on the Trust’s ability to enter into additional indebtedness (subject to customary exclusions), change its investment policies if such change could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the rights and remedies of the counterparty, or pledge to a party other than the counterparty, securities owned or held by the Trust over which the counterparty has a perfected first-priority interest. In addition, the Trust is required to deliver financial information to the counterparty within established deadlines, maintain an asset coverage ratio (as defined in Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act) greater than 275%, comply with the rules of the stock exchange on which its shares are listed, and maintain its classification as a “closed-end management investment company” as defined in the 1940 Act.
There is no guarantee that the Trust’s leverage strategy will be successful. The Trust’s use of leverage may cause the Trust’s NAV and market price of common shares to be more volatile and can magnify the effect of any losses.
Note 9 – Federal Income Tax Information
The Trust intends to comply with the provisions of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), applicable to regulated investment companies and will distribute substantially all taxable net investment income and capital gains sufficient to relieve the Trust from all, or substantially all, federal income, excise and state income taxes. Therefore, no provision for federal or state income tax or federal excise tax is required.
Tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Trust’s tax returns are evaluated to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management has analyzed the Trust’s tax positions taken, or to be taken, on U.S. federal income tax returns for all open tax years, and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Trust’s financial statements. The Trust’s U.S. federal income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for a period of three years after they are filed.
If the Trust makes a distribution to its shareholders in excess of its current and accumulated “earnings and profits” in any taxable year, the excess distribution will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of each shareholder’s basis (for tax purposes) in its shares, and any distribution in excess of basis will be treated as capital gain. A return of capital is not taxable, but it reduces the shareholder’s basis in its shares, which reduces the loss (or increases the gain) on a subsequent taxable disposition by such shareholder of the shares.
At November 30, 2025, the cost of investments for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments for which there was an excess of value over tax cost, and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments for which there was an excess of tax cost over value, were as follows:
| Net Tax | |||
| Unrealized | |||
| Tax Unrealized | Tax Unrealized | Appreciation | |
| Tax Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | (Depreciation) |
| $615,037,222 | $19,691,330 | $(33,940,670) | $(14,249,340) |
92 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
As of May 31, 2025, (the most recent fiscal year end for U.S. federal tax purposes) tax components of distributable earnings/(loss) were as follows:
| Undistributed | Undistributed | Net Unrealized | Accumulated | |
| Ordinary | Long-Term | Appreciation | Capital and | |
| Income | Capital Gain | (Depreciation) | Other Losses | Total |
| $— | $— | $(38,041,306) | $(29,701,987) | $(67,743,293) |
For the year ended May 31, 2025, (the most recent fiscal year end of U.S. federal income tax purposes), the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders as reflected in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets was as follows:
| Long-Term | |||
| Ordinary Income | Capital Gain | Return of Capital | Total Distributions |
| $22,485,930 | $— | $17,113,656 | $39,599,586 |
Note: For U.S. federal income tax purposes, short-term capital gain distributions are treated as ordinary income distributions.
Note 10 – Securities Transactions
For the period ended November 30, 2025, the cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, excluding government securities, short-term investments and derivatives, were $96,247,638 and $63,731,288 respectively.
The Trust is permitted to purchase or sell securities from or to certain affiliated funds under specified conditions outlined in procedures adopted by the Board. The procedures have been designed to ensure that any purchase or sale of securities by the Trust from or to another fund or portfolio that is or could be considered an affiliate by virtue of having a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Trustees and/or common officers complies with Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. Further, as defined under these procedures, each transaction is effected at the current market price. For the period ended November 30, 2025, the Trust did not engage in purchases and sales of securities, pursuant to Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act.
Note 11 – Unfunded Loan Commitments
Pursuant to the terms of certain loan agreements, the Trust held unfunded loan commitments as of November 30, 2025. The Trust is obligated to fund these loan commitments at the borrower’s discretion. The Trust reserves against such contingent obligations by designating cash, liquid securities, illiquid securities, and liquid term loans as a reserve. As of November 30, 2025, the total amount segregated in connection with unfunded loan commitments and reverse repurchase agreements was $197,337,375.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 93
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
The unfunded loan commitments as of November 30, 2025, were as follows:
| Borrower | Maturity Date | Face Amount | Value |
| Awayday | 05/01/32 | $ 469,444 | $ 4,694 |
| Cliffwater LLC | 03/19/32 | 30,000 | 92 |
| Datix Bidco Ltd. | 04/25/31 | 257,000 | 11,531 |
| GrafTech Finance, Inc. | 11/04/29 | 180,602 | — |
| Integrated Power Services Holdings, Inc. | 11/22/28 | 79,641 | 170 |
| Kroll, Inc. | 09/13/32 | 100,000 | 379 |
| MB2 Dental Solutions LLC | 02/13/31 | 214,048 | 4,820 |
| Polaris Newco LLC | 06/04/26 | 386,916 | 20,820 |
| $ 42,506 |
Note 12 – Restricted Securities
The securities below are considered illiquid and restricted under guidelines established by the Board:
| Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date | Cost | Value |
| Central Storage Safety Project Trust | |||
| 4.82% due 02/01/38 | 02/02/18 | $ 6,080,535 | $ 5,756,629 |
| Finance Co I SARL / Endo US, Inc.* | 04/23/24 | 2,090 | 35 |
| Mirabela Nickel Ltd. | |||
| due 06/24/191 | 12/31/13 | 87,217 | 241 |
| Telenet Finance Luxembourg Notes SARL | |||
| 5.50% due 03/01/28 | 12/20/21 | 202,528 | 198,002 |
| $ 6,372,370 | $ 5,954,907 | ||
| * Non-income producing security. | |||
| 1 Security is in default of interest and/or principal obligations. | |||
Note 13 – Capital
Common Shares
The Trust has an unlimited amount of common shares, $0.01 par value, authorized and 27,550,735 shares issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2025.
| Transactions in common shares were as follows: | ||
| Period Ended | Year Ended | |
| November 30, 2025 | May 31, 2025 | |
| Beginning shares | 26,973,509 | 24,801,498 |
| Shares issued through at-the-market offering | 498,854 | 2,027,990 |
| Shares issued through dividend reinvestment | 78,372 | 144,021 |
| Ending shares | 27,550,735 | 26,973,509 |
On April 12, 2023, the Trust’s current shelf registration allowing for the delayed or continuous offering of additional shares became effective. The shelf registration statement allows for the issuance of up to $150,000,000 of common shares. On April 12, 2023, the Trust entered into an at-the-market sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. to offer and sell common shares having an aggregated initial offering price of up to $150,000,000, from time to time, through Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. as agent for the Trust.
94 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
As of November 30, 2025, up to $78,004,374 of common shares remained available under the at-the-market sales agreement. For the period ended November 30, 2025, the Trust paid $0 for offering costs associated with the at-the market offering, and will be responsible for additional offering costs in the future of up to 0.60% of the offering price of common shares sold pursuant to the shelf registration statement.
The foregoing offering supports the Trust’s asset level and if the Trust does not conduct such offering, it may not be able to maintain historical distribution levels for extended periods of time. There is no guarantee that the Trust will sell all of the common shares available for sale under its shelf registration statement or that there will be any sales of common shares thereunder and, from time to time, the Trust may be unable to sell its common shares under its shelf registration statement.
Note 14 – Segment Reporting
Pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280) –Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”), an operating segment is defined in Topic 280 as a component of a public entity that engages in business activities from which it may recognize revenues and incur expenses, has operating results that are regularly reviewed by the public entity’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and has discrete financial information available. The Officers of the Trust, subject to the oversight and supervision of the Board, serve as the CODM for the Trust.
The Trust represents a single operating segment, as the CODM monitors the operating results of the Trust as a whole and the Trust’s long-term strategic asset allocation is pre-determined in accordance with the Trust’s investment objective which is executed by the Trust’s portfolio managers as a team. The Trust uses a variety of investments to execute its investment strategy. Please refer to Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies of these Notes to Financial Statements for additional details on the significant accounting policies and investment types used by the Trust. Please refer to the Trust’s Schedule of Investments for a breakdown of the types of investments from which the Trust generates its returns. Financial information in the form of total returns, expense ratios and changes in net assets (i.e., changes in net assets resulting from operations, subscriptions and redemptions), which are used by the CODM to assess the segment’s performance versus the Trust’s comparative benchmarks, among other metrics, and to make resource allocation decisions for the Trust’s single segment, is consistent with that presented within the Trust’s financial statements. Segment assets are reflected on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as “total assets” and significant segment income, expenses, and gain(loss) are listed on the Trust’s Statement of Operations.
Note 15 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update, ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (the “2023 ASU”) which establishes new income tax disclosure requirements and modifies or eliminates certain existing disclosure provisions. Included within the new disclosure requirements, among other amendments, is an expanded rate reconciliation and disaggregation of income taxes paid. In this
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 95
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
reporting period, the Trust adopted the 2023 ASU. Adoption of the new standard will impact annual financial statement disclosures only and not affect the Trust’s financial position or the results of its operations.
Note 16 – Market Risks
The value of, or income generated by, the investments held by the Trust are subject to the possibility of rapid and unpredictable fluctuation, and loss that may result from various factors. These factors include, among others, developments affecting (or perceived to affect) individual companies, or issuers or particular industries, or from broader influences, including real or perceived changes in prevailing interest rates (which may change at any time based on changes in monetary policies and various market and other economic conditions), changes in inflation rates or expectations about inflation rates, deflation, adverse investor confidence or sentiment, general outlook for corporate earnings, changing economic, political (including geopolitical), social or financial market conditions, bank failures, increased instability or general uncertainty, extreme weather, environmental or man-made disasters, or geological events, governmental actions, actual or threatened imposition of tariffs (which may be imposed by U.S. and foreign governments) and trade disruptions, public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics), debt crises, terrorism, actual or threatened wars or other armed conflicts (such as the conflict in the Middle East and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and its collateral economic and other effects, including, but not limited to, sanctions and other international trade barriers) or ratings downgrades, and other similar events, each of which may be temporary or last for extended periods. Different sectors, industries and security types may react differently to such developments. Moreover, changing economic, political, geopolitical, social, financial market or other conditions in one country, geographic region or industry could adversely affect the value, yield and return of the investments held by the Trust in a different country, geographic region, economy, industry or market because of the increasingly interconnected global economies and financial markets. The duration and extent of the foregoing types of factors or conditions are highly uncertain and difficult to predict and have in the past, and may in the future, cause volatility and distress in economies and financial markets or other adverse circumstances, which may negatively affect the value of the Trust’s investments and performance of the Trust.
Note 17 – Subsequent Events
The Trust evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued and determined there were no material events that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the Trust’s financial statements except as noted below.
On December 15, 2025, BNY replaced MUIS as administrator and fund accounting agent to the Trust. Pursuant to a Fund Accounting and Administration Agreement with the Trust, as may be amended and/or restated from time to time, BNY performs administrative functions and bookkeeping, accounting and pricing functions for the Trust. For these services, BNY receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, based on average daily net assets of the Trust, subject to a minimum fee per year. The Trust also reimburses BNY for certain out-of-pocket expenses.
96 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
Federal Income Tax Information
This information is being provided as required by the Internal Revenue Code. Amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in the report because of differences in tax and financial reporting practice.
In January 2026, shareholders will be advised on IRS Form 1099 DIV or substitute 1099 DIV as to the U.S. federal tax status of the distributions received by shareholders in the calendar year 2025.
Delaware Statutory Trust Act-Control Share Acquisition
Under Delaware law applicable to the Trust as of August 1, 2022, if a shareholder acquires direct or indirect ownership or power to direct the voting of shares of the Trust in an amount that equals or exceeds certain percentage thresholds specified under Delaware law (beginning at 10% or more of shares of the Trust), the shareholder’s ability to vote certain of these shares may be limited.
Sector Classification
Information in the “Schedule of Investments” is categorized by sectors using sector-level classifications used by Bloomberg Industry Classification System, a widely recognized industry classification system provider. In the Trust’s registration statement, the Trust has investment policies relating to concentration in specific industries. For purposes of these investment policies, the Trust usually classifies industries based on industry-level classifications used by widely recognized industry classification system providers such as Bloomberg Industry Classification System, Global Industry Classification Standards and Barclays Global Classification Scheme.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 97
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Trustees
The Trustees of the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust and their principal occupations during the past five years:
| Number of | |||||
| Position(s) | Term of Office | Portfolios in | |||
| Name, Address* | Held with | and Length of | Fund Complex | Other Directorships | |
| and Year of Birth | Trust | Time Served** | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Overseen | Held by Trustees*** |
| Independent Trustees: | |||||
| Randall C. Barnes**** | Trustee and | Since 2010 | Current: Private Investor (2001-present). | 127 | Current: Advent Convertible and Income |
| (1951) | Chair of the | (Trustee) | Fund (2005-present); Purpose | ||
| Valuation | Former: Senior Vice President and Treasurer, PepsiCo, Inc. (1993-1997); | Investments Funds (2013-present). | |||
| Oversight | Since 2020 | President, Pizza Hut International (1991-1993); Senior Vice President, Strategic | |||
| Committee | (Chair of the | Planning and New Business Development, PepsiCo, Inc. (1987-1990). | Former: Transparent Value Trust (4) | ||
| Valuation | (2015-April 2025); Guggenheim Energy & | ||||
| Oversight | Income Fund (2015-2023); Fiduciary/ | ||||
| Committee) | Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund | ||||
| (2004-2022); Guggenheim Enhanced | |||||
| Equity Income Fund (2005-2021); | |||||
| Guggenheim Credit Allocation Fund | |||||
| (2013-2021). | |||||
| Angela Brock-Kyle | Trustee | Since 2019 | Current: Retired. | 126 | Current: Global X Venture Fund (May |
| (1959) | 2025-present); Hunt Companies, Inc. | ||||
| Former: Founder and Chief Executive Officer, B.O.A.R.D.S. (consulting firm) | (2019-present); Mutual Fund Directors | ||||
| (2013-2023);Senior Leader, TIAA (financial services firm) (1987-2012). | Forum (2022-present); Bowhead Specialty | ||||
| Holdings Inc.; (2024-present). | |||||
| Former: Transparent Value Trust (4) | |||||
| (2019-April 2025); Bowhead Insurance | |||||
| GP, LLC (2020-2024); Guggenheim | |||||
| Energy & Income Fund (2019- | |||||
| 2023); Fiduciary/Claymore Energy | |||||
| Infrastructure Fund (2019-2022); | |||||
| Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income | |||||
| Fund (2019-2021); Guggenheim Credit | |||||
| Allocation Fund (2019-2021); Infinity | |||||
| Property & Casualty Corp. (2014-2018). | |||||
98 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Number of | |||||
| Position(s) | Term of Office | Portfolios in | |||
| Name, Address* | Held with | and Length of | Fund Complex | Other Directorships | |
| and Year of Birth | Trust | Time Served** | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Overseen | Held by Trustees*** |
| Independent Trustees: | |||||
| Thomas F. Lydon, Jr. | Trustee and | Since 2019 | Current: President, Global Trends Investments (registered investment adviser) | 126 | Current: US Global Investors, Inc. |
| (1960) | Chair of the | (Trustee) | (1996-present); Chief Executive Officer, Lydon Media (2016-present). | (GROW) (1995-present); 2023 ETF | |
| Contracts | Series Trust (12) (2023-present). | ||||
| Review | Since 2020 | Former: Vice Chairman, VettaFi, a wholly owned subsidiary of The TMX | |||
| Committee | (Chair of the | Group (financial advisor content, research, index and digital distribution | Former: 2023 ETF Series Trust II (6) | ||
| Contracts | provider) (2022-2024); Chief Executive Officer, ETF Flows, LLC (financial | (2023-October 2025); Transparent | |||
| Review | advisor education and research provider) (2019-2023); Director, GDX | Value Trust (4) (2019-April 2025); | |||
| Committee) | Index Partners, LLC (index provider) (2021-2023). | Guggenheim Energy & Income Fund | |||
| (2019-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore Energy | |||||
| Infrastructure Fund (2019-2022); | |||||
| Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income | |||||
| Fund (2019-2021); Guggenheim Credit | |||||
| Allocation Fund (2019-2021); Harvest | |||||
| Volatility Edge Trust (3) (2017-2019). | |||||
| Ronald A. Nyberg | Trustee and | Since 2010 | Current: Of Counsel (formerly Partner), Momkus LLP (law firm) (2016-present). | 127 | Current: Advent Convertible and Income |
| (1953) | Chair of the | Fund (2003-present). | |||
| Nominating | Former: Partner, Nyberg & Cassioppi, LLC (law firm) (2000-2016); | ||||
| and | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, | Former: Transparent Value Trust (4) | |||
| Governance | Van Kampen Investments (1982-1999). | (2019-April 2025); PPM Funds (2) | |||
| Committee | (2018-2024); Endeavor Health (2012- | ||||
| 2024); Guggenheim Energy & Income | |||||
| Fund (2015-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore | |||||
| Energy Infrastructure Fund (2004-2022); | |||||
| Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income | |||||
| Fund (2005-2021); Guggenheim Credit | |||||
| Allocation Fund (2013-2021). | |||||
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 99
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Number of | |||||
| Position(s) | Term of Office | Portfolios in | |||
| Name, Address* | Held with | and Length of | Fund Complex | Other Directorships | |
| and Year of Birth | Trust | Time Served** | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Overseen | Held by Trustees*** |
| Independent Trustees: | |||||
| Sandra G. Sponem | Trustee and | Since 2019 | Current: Retired. | 126 | Current: SPDR Series Trust (86) |
| (1958) | Chair of the | (Trustee) | (2018-present); SPDR Index Shares | ||
| Audit | Former: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, M.A. | Funds (25) (2018-present); SSGA Active | |||
| Committee | Since 2020 | Mortenson-Companies, Inc. (construction and real estate | Trust (35) (2018-present). | ||
| (Chair of the | development company) (2007-2017). | ||||
| Audit | Former: Transparent Value Trust (4) | ||||
| Committee) | (2019-April 2025); Guggenheim | ||||
| Energy & Income Fund (2019- | |||||
| 2023); Fiduciary/Claymore Energy | |||||
| Infrastructure Fund (2019-2022); | |||||
| Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income | |||||
| Fund (2019-2021); Guggenheim Credit | |||||
| Allocation Fund (2019-2021); SSGA | |||||
| Master Trust (1) (2018-2020). | |||||
| Ronald E. Toupin, Jr. | Trustee, | Since 2010 | Current: Portfolio Consultant (2010-present); Member, Governing Council, | 126 | Former: Transparent Value Trust (4) |
| (1958) | Chair of the | Independent Directors Council (2013-present); Governor, Board of Governors, | (2015-April 2025); Guggenheim | ||
| Board and | Investment Company Institute (2018-present). | Energy & Income Fund (2015-2023); | |||
| Chair of the | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy | ||||
| Executive | Former: Member, Executive Committee, Independent Directors Council | Infrastructure Fund (2004-2022); | |||
| Committee | (2016-2018); Vice President, Manager and Portfolio Manager, Nuveen Asset | Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income | |||
| Management (1998-1999); Vice President, Nuveen Investment Advisory Corp. | Fund (2005-2021); Guggenheim Credit | ||||
| (1992-1999); Vice President and Manager, Nuveen Unit Investment Trusts | Allocation Fund (2013-2021). | ||||
| (1991-1999); and Assistant Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Nuveen Unit | |||||
| Investment Trusts (1988-1999), each of John Nuveen & Co., Inc. (registered | |||||
| broker dealer) (1982-1999). | |||||
100 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
| Number of | |||||
| Position(s) | Term of Office | Portfolios in | |||
| Name, Address* | Held with | and Length of | Fund Complex | Other Directorships | |
| and Year of Birth | Trust | Time Served** | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Overseen | Held by Trustees*** |
| Interested Trustee: | |||||
| Amy J. Lee***** | Trustee, | Since 2018 | Current: Interested Trustee, certain other funds in the Fund Complex | 126 | Former: Transparent Value Trust (4) |
| (1961) | Vice | (Trustee) | (2018-present); Chief Legal Officer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex | (2018-April 2025); Guggenheim | |
| President | (2014-present); Vice President, certain other funds in the Fund Complex | Energy & Income Fund (2018-2023); | |||
| and Chief | Since 2014 | (2007-present); Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2012-present). | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy | ||
| Legal Officer | (Chief Legal | Infrastructure Fund (2018-2022); | |||
| Officer) | Former: President and/or Chief Executive Officer, certain other funds in the Fund | Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income | |||
| Complex (2017-2019); Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant | Fund (2018-2021); Guggenheim Credit | ||||
| Since 2012 | Secretary, Security Benefit Life Insurance Company and Security Benefit | Allocation Fund (2018-2021). | |||
| (Vice | Corporation (2004-2012). | ||||
| President) | |||||
| * | The business address of each Trustee is c/o Guggenheim Investments, 227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606. |
| ** | Each Trustee elected shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been elected and shall have qualified. After a Trustee’s initial term, each Trustee is expected to serve a three year term concurrent with the class of Trustees for which he or she serves. |
| - | Messrs. Lydon, Jr. and Nyberg are Class II Trustees. Class II Trustees are expected to stand for re-election at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2027. |
| - | Mr. Toupin, Jr. and Mses. Lee and Sponem are Class III Trustees. Class III Trustees are expected to stand for re-election at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2028. |
| - | Mr. Barnes and Ms. Brock-Kyle are Class I Trustees. Class I Trustees are expected to stand for re-election at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2026. |
| *** | Each Trustee also serves on the Boards of Trustees of Guggenheim Funds Trust, Guggenheim Variable Funds Trust, Guggenheim Strategy Funds Trust, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund, Rydex Series Funds, Rydex Dynamic Funds and Rydex Variable Trust. Messrs. Barnes and Nyberg also serve on the Board of Trustees of Advent Convertible and Income Fund. |
| **** | Under the Trust’s Independent Trustees Retirement Policy, Mr. Barnes is expected to retire in 2026. |
| ***** | This Trustee is deemed to be an “interested person” of the Trust under the 1940 Act by reason of her position with the Trust’s Adviser and/or the parent of the Adviser. |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 101
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
Officers
The Officers of the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investments Grade Debt Trust, who are not Trustees, and their principal occupations during the past five years:
| Position(s) | Term of Office | ||
| Name, Address* | Held with | and Length of | Principal Occupation(s) |
| and Year of Birth | Trust | Time Served** | During Past Five Years |
| Brian E. Binder | President | Since 2018 | Current: President, Mutual Funds Boards, and Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2022-present); President and Chief |
| (1972) | and Chief | Executive Officer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2018-present); President, Mutual Funds Boards, and Senior Managing | |
| Executive | Director, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC and Security Investors, LLC (2018-present); Chief Executive Officer, Guggenheim | ||
| Officer | Investments Private Credit Income Fund (2025-present). | ||
| Former: Board Member & Chairman of the Board, Guggenheim Credit Income Fund (2024-August 2025); Senior Managing Director and Chief | |||
| Administrative Officer, Guggenheim Investments (2018-2022); Managing Director and President, Deutsche Funds, and Head of US Product, | |||
| Trading and Fund Administration, Deutsche Asset Management (2013-2018); Managing Director, Chairman of North American Executive | |||
| Committee and Head of Business Management and Consulting, Invesco Ltd. (2010-2012). | |||
| James M. Howley | Chief Financial | Since 2022 | Current: Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2004-present); Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer, certain |
| (1972) | Officer, Chief | other funds in the Fund Complex (2022-present). | |
| Accounting | |||
| Officer and | Former: Assistant Treasurer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2006-2022); Manager, Mutual Fund Administration of Van Kampen | ||
| Treasurer | Investments, Inc. (1996-2004). | ||
| Mark E. Mathiasen | Secretary | Since 2010 | Current: Secretary, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2007-present); Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2007-present). |
| (1978) | |||
| Glenn McWhinnie | Assistant | Since 2016 | Current: Vice President, Guggenheim Investments (2009-present); Assistant Treasurer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2016-present). |
| (1969) | Treasurer | ||
| Michael P. Megaris | Assistant | Since 2014 | Current: Assistant Secretary, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2014-present); Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments |
| (1984) | Secretary | (2012-present). | |
| Elisabeth Miller | Chief | Since 2024 | Current: Chief Compliance Officer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2012-present); Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments |
| (1968) | Compliance | (2012-present); Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC (2014-present). | |
| Officer | |||
| Former: Chief Compliance Officer, Security Investors, LLC and Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC (2012-2018); Chief Compliance | |||
| Officer, Guggenheim Distributors, LLC (2009-2014); Senior Manager, Security Investors, LLC (2004-2014); Senior Manager, Guggenheim | |||
| Distributors, LLC (2004-2014). |
102 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
* The business address of each officer is c/o Guggenheim Investments, 227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
** Each officer serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 103
| DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN (Unaudited) | November 30, 2025 |
Unless the registered owner of common shares elects to receive cash by contacting Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the “Plan Administrator”), all dividends declared on common shares of the Trust will be automatically reinvested by the Plan Administrator for shareholders in the Trust’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”), in additional common shares of the Trust. Participation in the Plan is completely voluntary and may be terminated or resumed at any time without penalty by notice if received and processed by the Plan Administrator prior to the dividend record date; otherwise such termination or resumption will be effective with respect to any subsequently declared dividend or other distribution. Some brokers may automatically elect to receive cash on your behalf and may re-invest that cash in additional common shares of the Trust for you. If you wish for all dividends declared on your common shares of the Trust to be automatically reinvested pursuant to the Plan, please contact your broker.
The Plan Administrator will open an account for each common shareholder under the Plan in the same name in which such common shareholder’s common shares are registered. Whenever the Trust declares a dividend or other distribution (together, a “Dividend”) payable in cash, nonparticipants in the Plan will receive cash and participants in the Plan will receive the equivalent in common shares. The common shares will be acquired by the Plan Administrator for the participants’ accounts, depending upon the circumstances described below, either (i) through receipt of additional unissued but authorized common shares from the Trust (“Newly Issued Common Shares”) or (ii) by purchase of outstanding common shares on the open market (“Open-Market Purchases”) on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere. If, on the payment date for any Dividend, the closing market price plus estimated brokerage commission per common share is equal to or greater than the net asset value per common share, the Plan Administrator will invest the Dividend amount in Newly Issued Common Shares on behalf of the participants. The number of Newly Issued Common Shares to be credited to each participant’s account will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the Dividend by the net asset value per common share on the payment date; provided that, if the net asset value is less than or equal to 95% of the closing market value on the payment date, the dollar amount of the Dividend will be divided by 95% of the closing market price per common share on the payment date. If, on the payment date for any Dividend, the net asset value per common share is greater than the closing market value plus estimated brokerage commission, the Plan Administrator will invest the Dividend amount in common shares acquired on behalf of the participants in Open-Market Purchases.
For federal income tax purposes, the Trust generally would be able to claim a deduction for distributions to shareholders with respect to the common shares issued at up to a 5-percent discount from the closing market value pursuant to the Plan.
If, before the Plan Administrator has completed its Open-Market Purchases, the market price per common share exceeds the net asset value per common share, the average per common share purchase price paid by the Plan Administrator may exceed the net asset value of the common shares, resulting in the acquisition of fewer common shares than if the Dividend had been paid in Newly Issued Common Shares on the Dividend payment date. Because of the foregoing difficulty with respect to Open-Market Purchases, the Plan provides that if the Plan Administrator is unable to invest the full Dividend amount in Open-Market Purchases during the purchase period or if the market discount shifts to a market premium during the purchase period, the Plan Administrator may cease making Open-Market Purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the Dividend
104 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
| DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN (Unaudited) continued | November 30, 2025 |
amount in Newly Issued Common Shares at net asset value per common share at the close of business on the Last Purchase Date provided that, if the net asset value is less than or equal to 95% of the then current market price per common share; the dollar amount of the Dividend will be divided by 95% of the market price on the payment date.
The Plan Administrator maintains all shareholders’ accounts in the Plan and furnishes written confirmation of all transactions in the accounts, including information needed by shareholders for tax records. Common shares in the account of each Plan participant will be held by the Plan Administrator on behalf of the Plan participant, and each shareholder proxy will include those shares purchased or received pursuant to the Plan. The Plan Administrator will forward all proxy solicitation materials to participants and vote proxies for shares held under the Plan in accordance with the instruction of the participants.
There will be no brokerage charges with respect to common shares issued directly by the Trust. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commission incurred in connection with Open-Market Purchases. The automatic reinvestment of Dividends will not relieve participants of any Federal, state or local income tax that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on such Dividends.
The Trust reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan. There is no direct service charge to participants with regard to purchases in the Plan; however, the Trust reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants. All correspondence or questions concerning the Plan should be directed to the Plan Administrator, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 30170 College Station, TX 77842-3170: Attention: Shareholder Services Department, Phone Number: (866) 488-3559 or online at www.computershare.com/investor.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT l 105
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
| TRUST INFORMATION | November 30, 2025 |
| TRUST INFORMATION continued | November 30, 2025 |
Privacy Principles of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust for Shareholders
The Trust is committed to maintaining the privacy of its shareholders and to safeguarding its non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information the Trust collects, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share information with select other parties.
Generally, the Trust does not receive any non-public personal information relating to its shareholders, although certain non-public personal information of its shareholders may become available to the Trust. The Trust does not disclose any non-public personal information about its shareholders or former shareholders to anyone except as permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service shareholder accounts (for example, to a transfer agent or third party administrator).
The Trust restricts access to non-public personal information about the shareholders to Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC employees with a legitimate business need for the information. The Trust maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the non-public personal information of its shareholders.
Questions concerning your shares of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust?
| • | If your shares are held in a Brokerage Account, contact your Broker. |
| • | If you have physical possession of your shares in certificate form, contact the Trust’s Transfer Agent: Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 30170 College Station, TX 77842-3170; (866) 488-3559 or online at www.computershare.com/investor |
This report is provided to shareholders of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust for their information. It is not a Prospectus, circular or representation intended for use in the purchase or sale of shares of the Trust or of any securities mentioned in this report.
Paper copies of the Trust’s annual and semi-annual shareholder reports are not sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports are made available on a website, and you are notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website address to access the report.
You may elect to receive paper copies of all future shareholder reports free of charge. If you invest through a financial intermediary, you can contact your financial intermediary to request that you may receive paper copies of your shareholder reports; if you invest directly with the Trust, you may call Computershare at 1-866-488-3559. Your election to receive reports in paper form may apply to all funds held in your account with your financial intermediary or, if you invest directly, to all Guggenheim closed-end funds you hold.
The Trust’s Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about directors of the Trust and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling the Trust at (888) 991-0091.
A description of the Trust’s proxy voting policies and procedures related to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Trust at (888) 991-0091 and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the Trust voted proxies for portfolio securities, if applicable, during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is also available, without charge and upon request by calling (888) 991-0091, by visiting the Trust’s website at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab or by accessing the Trust’s Form N-PX on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) website at www.sec.gov.
The Trust files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT, and for reporting periods ended prior to August 31, 2019, on Form N-Q. The Trust’s Forms N-PORT and N-Q are available on the SEC website at www.sec.gov or at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab.
Notice to Shareholders
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, that the Trust from time to time may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market or in private transactions.
ABOUT THE TRUST MANAGERS
GUGGENHEIM FUNDS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC
Guggenheim Investments represents the investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (“Guggenheim”), which includes Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC (“GFIA”) the investment adviser to the referenced fund. Collectively Guggenheim Investments has a long, distinguished history of serving institutional investors, ultra-high-net-worth individuals, family offices and financial intermediaries. Guggenheim Investments offers clients a wide range of differentiated capabilities built on a proven commitment to investment excellence.
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM”) is an indirect subsidiary of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, a diversified financial services firm. The firm provides capital markets services, portfolio and risk management expertise, wealth management, and investment advisory services. Clients of Guggenheim Partners, LLC subsidiaries are an elite mix of individuals, family offices, endowments, foundations, insurance companies and other institutions.
Investment Philosophy
GPIM’s investment philosophy is predicated upon the belief that thorough research and independent thought are rewarded with performance that has the potential to outperform benchmark indices with both lower volatility and lower correlation of returns over time as compared to such benchmark indices.
Investment Process
GPIM’s investment process is a collaborative effort between various groups including the Portfolio Construction Group, which utilize proprietary portfolio construction and risk modeling tools to determine allocation of assets among a variety of sectors, and its Sector Specialists, who are responsible for identifying investment opportunities in particular securities within these sectors, including the structuring of certain securities directly with the issuers or with investment banks and dealers involved in the origination of such securities.
Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC
227 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60606
Member FINRA/SIPC
(01/26)
CEF-GBAB-SAR-1125
NOT FDIC-INSURED l NOT BANK-GUARANTEED l MAY LOSE VALUE
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
(a) The Schedule of Investments is included as part of Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
| (a) | Not applicable to this registrant. |
| (b) | Not applicable to this registrant. |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to this registrant.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to this registrant.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to this registrant.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract.
Not applicable
Item 12. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 13. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 14. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
None.
Item 15. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The registrant has not made any material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Trustees.
Item 16. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act) as of a date within 90 days of this filing and have concluded based on such evaluation, as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Investment Company Act, that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act) that occurred during the registrant’s period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 17. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a) The registrant has not participated in securities lending activities during the period covered by this report.
(b) Not applicable
Item 18. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable
Item 19. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Not applicable.
(a)(4) Not applicable.
(a)(5) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
By: /s/ Brian E. Binder
Name: Brian E. Binder
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 3, 2026
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Brian E. Binder
Name: Brian E. Binder
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 3, 2026
By: /s/ James Howley
Name: James Howley
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: February 3, 2026
EXHIBIT (a)(2)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Brian E. Binder, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 3, 2026
/s/ Brian E. Binder
Brian E. Binder
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James Howley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 3, 2026
/s/ James Howley
James Howley
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT (b)
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Issuer”) for the semi-annual period ended November 30, 2025 (the “Report”), Brian E. Binder, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, and James Howley, as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Issuer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Dated: February 3, 2026
/s/ Brian E. Binder
Name: Brian E. Binder
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ James Howley
Name: James Howley
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)