UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-08217
Name of Fund: BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MHN)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc., 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 07/31/2025
Date of reporting period: 07/31/2025
Item 1 – Reports to Stockholders
(a) The Reports to Shareholders are attached herewith.
| 2025 Annual Report |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund, Inc. (MUJ) |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MHN) |
| BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund, Inc. (MIY) |
| BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
| BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) |
| BlackRock New York Municipal Income Trust (BNY) |
| BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (BHV) |
| Not FDIC Insured • May Lose Value • No Bank Guarantee |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index(a)
| ||
| Total Returns as of July 31, 2025 | ||
| 6 |
months: |
(1.04)% |
| 12 |
months: |
0.00% |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
MUJ |
| Initial Offering Date |
March 11, 1998 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($10.82)(a) |
5.99% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
12.36% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.054000 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.648000 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
41% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 51.55%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 10.82
|
$ 11.57
|
(6.48 )% |
$ 12.21
|
$ 10.68
|
| Net Asset Value |
11.94 |
13.07 |
(8.65 ) |
13.34 |
11.64 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(3.41 )% |
(0.57 )% |
2.50 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(1.12 ) |
(0.37 ) |
2.95 |
| New Jersey Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
0.78 |
1.24 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV narrowed during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The New Jersey Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond: New Jersey Exempt Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the New Jersey
Bloomberg Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index
(10%). The New Jersey Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| State |
30.5 % |
| Transportation |
20.7 |
| County/City/Special District/School District |
13.6 |
| Education |
13.2 |
| Health |
6.4 |
| Tobacco |
5.4 |
| Utilities |
5.2 |
| Housing |
3.6 |
| Corporate |
1.4 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
16.2 % |
| 2026 |
7.0 |
| 2027 |
7.8 |
| 2028 |
21.8 |
| 2029 |
6.3 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
4.6 % |
| AA/Aa |
41.3 |
| A |
34.1 |
| BBB/Baa |
8.1 |
| BB/Ba |
4.9 |
| B |
0.2 |
| N/R |
6.8 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
MHN |
| Initial Offering Date |
September 19, 1997 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($9.51)(a) |
6.50% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
13.46% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.051500 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.618000 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
41% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 51.7%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 9.51
|
$ 10.77
|
(11.70 )% |
$ 11.18
|
$ 9.43
|
| Net Asset Value |
10.59 |
12.10 |
(12.48 ) |
12.39 |
10.35 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(7.27 )% |
(2.27 )% |
1.41 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(6.44 ) |
(2.73 ) |
0.91 |
| New York Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
(0.68 ) |
0.40 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV narrowed during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The New York Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond: New York Exempt Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the New York Bloomberg
Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index (10%). The New
York Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| Transportation |
29.1 % |
| County/City/Special District/School District |
14.5 |
| Utilities |
13.3 |
| Corporate |
11.2 |
| State |
10.4 |
| Housing |
7.3 |
| Education |
7.1 |
| Health |
5.8 |
| Tobacco |
1.3 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
6.9 % |
| 2026 |
0.4 |
| 2027 |
8.9 |
| 2028 |
5.1 |
| 2029 |
2.0 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
7.0 % |
| AA/Aa |
59.0 |
| A |
18.8 |
| BBB/Baa |
10.0 |
| BB/Ba |
0.5 |
| B |
0.3 |
| N/R |
4.4 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
MIY |
| Initial Offering Date |
October 30, 1992 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($10.91)(a) |
5.99% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
10.90% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.054500 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.654000 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
41% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 45.05%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 10.91
|
$ 11.61
|
(6.03 )% |
$ 12.09
|
$ 10.65
|
| Net Asset Value |
11.73 |
13.08 |
(10.32 ) |
13.38 |
11.48 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(5.24 )% |
(1.35 )% |
2.14 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(0.71 ) |
(0.61 ) |
3.02 |
| Michigan Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
(0.07 ) |
0.29 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV narrowed during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The Michigan Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond: Michigan Exempt Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the Michigan Bloomberg
Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index (10%). The
Michigan Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| County/City/Special District/School District |
24.4 % |
| State |
17.1 |
| Utilities |
13.9 |
| Education |
13.7 |
| Health |
9.1 |
| Transportation |
7.0 |
| Housing |
7.0 |
| Corporate |
6.1 |
| Tobacco |
1.7 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
8.6 % |
| 2026 |
3.0 |
| 2027 |
1.4 |
| 2028 |
10.5 |
| 2029 |
8.9 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
1.3 % |
| AA/Aa |
72.1 |
| A |
17.9 |
| BBB/Baa |
2.3 |
| N/R |
6.4 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
MYN |
| Initial Offering Date |
February 28, 1992 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($9.20)(a) |
6.68% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
13.83% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.051200 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.614400 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
41% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 51.7%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 9.20
|
$ 10.58
|
(13.04 )% |
$ 10.82
|
$ 9.17
|
| Net Asset Value |
10.23 |
11.73 |
(12.79 ) |
12.00 |
10.03 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(7.45 )% |
(2.18 )% |
1.48 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(7.71 ) |
(2.46 ) |
1.17 |
| New York Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
(0.68 ) |
0.40 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV widened during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The New York Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond: New York Exempt Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the New York Bloomberg
Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index (10%). The New
York Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| Transportation |
26.3 % |
| County/City/Special District/School District |
17.7 |
| Utilities |
13.6 |
| State |
11.0 |
| Corporate |
9.9 |
| Education |
7.9 |
| Housing |
6.8 |
| Health |
5.4 |
| Tobacco |
1.4 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
6.1 % |
| 2026 |
0.5 |
| 2027 |
6.7 |
| 2028 |
5.5 |
| 2029 |
2.0 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
6.8 % |
| AA/Aa |
60.4 |
| A |
17.3 |
| BBB/Baa |
9.3 |
| BB/Ba |
0.7 |
| B |
0.3 |
| N/R |
5.2 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
MPA |
| Initial Offering Date |
October 30, 1992 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($10.66)(a) |
7.43% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
13.24% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.066000 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.792000 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
40% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 43.87%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 10.66
|
$ 12.35
|
(13.68 )% |
$ 12.60
|
$ 10.39
|
| Net Asset Value |
11.66 |
13.04 |
(10.58 ) |
13.37 |
11.42 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(4.29 )% |
(1.53 )% |
1.91 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(7.61 ) |
(0.66 ) |
2.59 |
| Pennsylvania Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
0.51 |
0.40 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV widened during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The Pennsylvania Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Pennsylvania Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the Pennsylvania Bloomberg
Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index (10%). The Pennsylvania
Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| Health |
21.2 % |
| Transportation |
18.0 |
| Education |
16.7 |
| County/City/Special District/School District |
14.6 |
| Housing |
9.9 |
| Utilities |
8.7 |
| State |
5.5 |
| Tobacco |
3.9 |
| Corporate |
1.5 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
7.3 % |
| 2026 |
4.6 |
| 2027 |
7.8 |
| 2028 |
8.8 |
| 2029 |
4.1 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
1.0 % |
| AA/Aa |
56.0 |
| A |
24.3 |
| BBB/Baa |
8.0 |
| BB/Ba |
1.6 |
| B |
0.4 |
| N/R |
8.7 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
BNY |
| Initial Offering Date |
July 27, 2001 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($9.40)(a) |
6.51% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
13.48% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.051000 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.612000 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
41% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 51.7%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 9.40
|
$ 10.71
|
(12.23 )% |
$ 11.07
|
$ 9.35
|
| Net Asset Value |
10.48 |
12.05 |
(13.03 ) |
12.35 |
10.22 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(7.85 )% |
(2.43 )% |
1.15 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(7.01 ) |
(3.21 ) |
0.35 |
| New York Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
(0.68 ) |
0.40 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV narrowed during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The New York Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond: New York Exempt Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the New York Bloomberg
Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index (10%). The New
York Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| Transportation |
26.8 % |
| Utilities |
16.4 |
| County/City/Special District/School District |
16.2 |
| Corporate |
9.5 |
| Education |
8.3 |
| Housing |
7.6 |
| State |
7.5 |
| Health |
5.4 |
| Tobacco |
2.3 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
8.5 % |
| 2026 |
1.3 |
| 2027 |
6.1 |
| 2028 |
4.0 |
| 2029 |
4.9 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
7.5 % |
| AA/Aa |
54.4 |
| A |
18.9 |
| BBB/Baa |
11.3 |
| BB/Ba |
0.4 |
| B |
0.8 |
| N/R |
6.7 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Symbol on New York Stock Exchange |
BHV |
| Initial Offering Date |
April 30, 2002 |
| Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2025 ($10.45)(a) |
5.91% |
| Tax Equivalent Yield(b) |
11.06% |
| Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share(c) |
$0.051500 |
| Current Annualized Distribution per Common
Share(c) |
$0.618000 |
| Leverage as of July 31, 2025(d) |
40% |
| (a) |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance is not an indication
of future results. |
| (b) |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal U.S. federal and state tax rate of 46.55%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on
income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent
yields. |
| (c) |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. A portion of the distribution may be deemed a return of capital or net realized gain. |
| (d) |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares
and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of its accrued liabilities. Does not reflect
derivatives or other instruments that may give rise to economic leverage. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging and Derivative Financial Instruments. |
| |
07/31/25 |
07/31/24 |
Change |
High |
Low |
| Closing Market Price |
$ 10.45
|
$ 11.11
|
(5.94 )% |
$ 11.59
|
$ 10.11
|
| Net Asset Value |
10.94 |
12.48 |
(12.34 ) |
12.78 |
10.78 |
| |
Average Annual Total Returns | ||
| |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| Fund at NAV(a)(b) |
(7.44 )% |
(3.09 )% |
0.42 % |
| Fund at Market Price(a)(b) |
(0.68 ) |
(3.65 ) |
(0.20 ) |
| Virginia Customized Reference Benchmark(c) |
(0.21 ) |
0.27 |
N/A |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
0.00 |
0.13 |
2.11 |
| (a) |
All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions at actual reinvestment prices. Performance results reflect the Fund’s use of leverage, if
any. |
| (b) |
The Fund’s discount to NAV narrowed during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on market price and performance based on NAV.
|
| (c) |
The Virginia Customized Reference Benchmark is comprised of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond: Virginia Exempt Total Return Index Unhedged (90%) and the Virginia Bloomberg
Municipal Bond: High Yield (non-Investment Grade) Total Return Index (10%). The
Virginia Customized Reference Benchmark commenced on September 30, 2016. |
| SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| Sector(a)
|
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| County/City/Special District/School District |
19.9 % |
| Health |
16.1 |
| Housing |
15.3 |
| State |
13.0 |
| Utilities |
8.8 |
| Corporate |
7.6 |
| Transportation |
7.3 |
| Education |
6.0 |
| Tobacco |
6.0 |
| CALL/MATURITY SCHEDULE | |
| Calendar Year Ended December 31,(c) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| 2025 |
9.1 % |
| 2026 |
11.1 |
| 2027 |
4.2 |
| 2028 |
6.2 |
| 2029 |
3.9 |
| CREDIT QUALITY ALLOCATION | |
| Credit
Rating(d) |
Percent of Total Investments(b)
|
| AAA/Aaa |
11.4 % |
| AA/Aa |
49.3 |
| A |
14.6 |
| BBB/Baa |
6.9 |
| B |
4.2 |
| N/R |
13.6 |
| (a) |
For purposes of this report, sector sub-classifications may differ from those utilized by the Fund for compliance purposes. |
| (b) |
Excludes short-term securities. |
| (c) |
Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
| (d) |
For purposes of this report, credit quality ratings shown above reflect the highest rating assigned by either S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s Investors Service,
Inc. if ratings differ. These rating agencies are independent, nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations and are widely used. Investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BBB/Baa or higher. Below investment grade ratings are credit ratings of BB/Ba or lower. Investments designated N/R are not rated by either rating agency. Unrated investments do not necessarily indicate low
credit quality. Credit quality ratings are subject to change. |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama — 0.2% |
| ||
| Corporate — 0.2% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB, Series A, 5.25%,
05/01/56(a) |
$ |
1,085 |
$ 1,104,330 |
| California — 0.5% |
| ||
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%,
01/01/65(a)(b) |
|
3,270 |
2,910,300 |
| New Jersey — 140.1% |
| ||
| Corporate — 2.1% |
| ||
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, ARB |
|
|
|
| Series A, AMT, 5.63%, 11/15/30 |
|
1,730 |
1,730,082 |
| Series B, AMT, 5.63%, 11/15/30 |
|
6,900 |
6,902,448 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 4.00%, 08/01/59 |
|
1,000 |
830,407 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 08/01/59 |
|
3,750 |
3,684,576 |
| |
|
|
13,147,513 |
| County/City/Special District/School District — 22.3% |
| ||
| Casino Reinvestment Development Authority, Inc., RB |
|
|
|
| Series B, 5.00%, 11/01/43 |
|
680 |
688,285 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 11/01/44 |
|
755 |
759,668 |
| Casino Reinvestment Development Authority, Inc., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/41 |
|
1,000 |
1,026,124 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/42 |
|
395 |
402,289 |
| City of Bayonne New Jersey, Refunding GO, (BAM
SAW), 5.00%, 07/01/26(c) |
|
2,425 |
2,479,845 |
| City of Hoboken New Jersey, Refunding GO, Series A, 4.00%, 03/10/26 |
|
5,000 |
5,040,961 |
| City of Newark New Jersey, GOL, (SAW), 4.50%,
03/15/36 |
|
3,390 |
3,410,927 |
| Clifton Board of Education, GO |
|
|
|
| 2.00%, 08/15/41 |
|
6,150 |
3,875,587 |
| 2.25%, 08/15/46 |
|
6,150 |
3,622,062 |
| County of Essex New Jersey, GO, Series B, 3.00%,
09/01/46 |
|
1,700 |
1,205,750 |
| County of Middlesex New Jersey, Refunding COP, 5.00%, 10/15/31 |
|
2,840 |
3,075,883 |
| Essex County Improvement Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| (NPFGC GTD), 5.50%, 10/01/27 |
|
250 |
265,949 |
| (NPFGC GTD), 5.50%, 10/01/28 |
|
9,380 |
10,239,101 |
| (NPFGC GTD), 5.50%, 10/01/29 |
|
8,505 |
9,503,206 |
| Ewing Township Board of Education, GO |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/15/38 |
|
2,660 |
2,561,030 |
| 4.00%, 07/15/39 |
|
2,320 |
2,188,576 |
| Hudson County Improvement Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 05/01/46 |
|
4,000 |
3,944,408 |
| Series A-1, (NPFGC GTD), 0.00%,
12/15/32(d) |
|
1,000 |
773,127 |
| Mercer County Improvement Authority, RB, 5.00%,
09/01/40 |
|
2,480 |
2,483,371 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 12/15/28(c) |
|
6,305 |
6,827,537 |
| Series A, (NPFGC), 5.25%,
07/01/26(e) |
|
1,415 |
1,448,608 |
| Series B, 6.50%, 04/01/31 |
|
2,995 |
3,119,385 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 3.00%, 08/01/41 |
|
19,020 |
14,512,091 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Education (continued) |
| ||
| New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance
Authority, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series C, AMT, 4.00%, 12/01/48 |
$ |
3,210 |
$ 2,573,483
|
| Series C, AMT, Subordinate, 5.00%, 12/01/53 |
|
985 |
880,452 |
| Series C, AMT, Subordinate, 5.25%, 12/01/54 |
|
1,825 |
1,702,183 |
| New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance
Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series 1-B, AMT, 4.50%, 12/01/45 |
|
5,550 |
5,477,127 |
| Series B, AMT, 3.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
4,635 |
4,367,548 |
| Series B, AMT, 4.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
2,270 |
2,242,615 |
| Sub-Series C, AMT, 3.63%, 12/01/49 |
|
1,925 |
1,369,713 |
| Series C, AMT, Subordinate, 5.00%, 12/01/52 |
|
18,705 |
17,266,158 |
| New Jersey Institute of Technology, Refunding RB,
Series A, (BAM), 5.25%, 07/01/50 |
|
1,835 |
1,886,891 |
| Passaic County Improvement Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/55 |
|
700 |
624,275 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/60 |
|
500 |
439,657 |
| |
|
|
136,981,580 |
| Health — 10.6% |
| ||
| Middlesex County Improvement Authority, RB,
(AMBAC), 5.50%, 09/01/30 |
|
350 |
350,196 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 01/01/34 |
|
1,230 |
1,257,421 |
| 5.00%, 01/01/39 |
|
1,980 |
1,939,559 |
| 5.00%, 01/01/49 |
|
1,500 |
1,313,502 |
| New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/42 |
|
2,000 |
2,001,213 |
| 2.38%, 07/01/46 |
|
3,735 |
2,192,844 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/47 |
|
5,555 |
4,751,759 |
| 3.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
18,100 |
12,634,172 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
10,000 |
8,436,833 |
| New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/28 |
|
2,820 |
2,823,710 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/29 |
|
715 |
715,845 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/34 |
|
2,190 |
2,220,283 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
3,000 |
2,713,977 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/43 |
|
3,500 |
3,066,807 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/43 |
|
8,600 |
8,424,061 |
| Series A, 4.13%, 07/01/54 |
|
4,120 |
3,460,136 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 07/01/54 |
|
8,910 |
9,099,366 |
| |
|
|
67,401,684 |
| Housing — 4.6% |
| ||
| New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 12/20/65 |
|
2,055 |
2,061,095 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 05/01/27 |
|
820 |
820,644 |
| New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, RB, M/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, (FNMA), 4.55%, 05/01/41 |
|
1,580 |
1,568,886 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.35%, 05/01/45 |
|
395 |
370,514 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 05/01/50 |
|
470 |
438,693 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.55%, 05/01/55 |
|
1,100 |
1,019,903 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.60%, 05/01/60 |
|
785 |
733,719 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Housing (continued) |
| ||
| New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, RB,
M/F Housing (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.35%, 05/01/45 |
$ |
785 |
$ 743,939
|
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 05/01/50 |
|
750 |
697,150 |
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.55%, 05/01/55 |
|
1,570 |
1,456,330 |
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.60%, 05/01/60 |
|
920 |
857,392 |
| New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, RB, S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series H, Sustainability Bonds, 2.15%, 10/01/41 |
|
2,995 |
2,074,646 |
| Series K, Sustainability Bonds, 4.70%, 10/01/50 |
|
2,180 |
2,060,223 |
| New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency,
Refunding RB, M/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, (HUD SECT 8), 2.45%, 11/01/45 |
|
860 |
581,587 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 11/01/48 |
|
675 |
574,172 |
| Series A, (HUD SECT 8), 2.55%, 11/01/50 |
|
780 |
494,685 |
| Series A, 4.10%, 11/01/53 |
|
400 |
337,353 |
| Series D, AMT, 4.25%, 11/01/37 |
|
2,940 |
2,856,357 |
| Series D, AMT, 4.35%, 11/01/42 |
|
1,000 |
913,119 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 2.65%, 11/01/46 |
|
1,150 |
783,583 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
2.70%, 11/01/51 |
|
1,150 |
747,069 |
| New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance Agency, Refunding RB, S/F Housing, Series A, 3.75%, 10/01/35 |
|
5,295 |
5,111,668 |
| Newark Housing Authority, RB, M/F Housing, Series A,
5.00%, 12/01/30 |
|
2,000 |
2,002,249 |
| |
|
|
29,304,976 |
| State — 41.6% |
| ||
| Garden State Preservation Trust, RB(d)
|
|
|
|
| Series B, 0.00%, 11/01/25 |
|
10,000 |
9,931,245 |
| Series B, 0.00%, 11/01/26 |
|
6,000 |
5,806,176 |
| Series B, 0.00%, 11/01/27 |
|
4,000 |
3,762,274 |
| Series B, 0.00%, 11/01/28 |
|
4,540 |
4,138,244 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/15/43 |
|
10,690 |
10,683,184 |
| 4.00%, 11/01/44 |
|
4,715 |
4,069,958 |
| 4.00%, 06/15/49 |
|
5,310 |
4,485,162 |
| 5.00%, 06/15/49 |
|
2,700 |
2,665,446 |
| Series A, (NPFGC), 5.25%, 07/01/26 |
|
6,085 |
6,233,181 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/15/42 |
|
2,000 |
1,983,745 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 06/15/35 |
|
3,750 |
3,898,503 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 06/15/43 |
|
3,470 |
3,484,603 |
| Series EEE, 5.00%, 06/15/48 |
|
2,850 |
2,784,120 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
5,025 |
4,420,285 |
| Series N-1, (NPFGC), 5.50%, 09/01/27 |
|
1,000 |
1,059,635 |
| Sub-Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/32 |
|
5,000 |
4,876,557 |
| Sub-Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/33 |
|
5,050 |
5,082,777 |
| Sub-Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/34 |
|
9,420 |
9,152,975 |
| New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, RB,
Series A, 5.25%, 09/01/53 |
|
2,445 |
2,478,854 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/15/42 |
|
785 |
798,630 |
| 5.25%, 06/15/46 |
|
385 |
395,653 |
| 4.50%, 06/15/49 |
|
2,985 |
2,722,063 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State (continued) |
| ||
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority,
RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series AA, 5.25%, 06/15/34 |
$ |
1,305 |
$ 1,306,486
|
| Series AA, 4.00%, 06/15/36 |
|
2,565 |
2,497,207 |
| Series AA, 5.25%, 06/15/41 |
|
5,000 |
5,000,167 |
| Series AA, 4.00%, 06/15/45 |
|
13,625 |
11,874,889 |
| Series AA, 5.00%, 06/15/45 |
|
5,000 |
5,014,112 |
| Series AA, 4.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
10,535 |
8,861,169 |
| Series BB, 4.00%, 06/15/44 |
|
5,100 |
4,445,876 |
| Series BB, 4.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
9,100 |
7,774,614 |
| Series BB, 5.25%, 06/15/50 |
|
19,575 |
19,940,568 |
| Series C, 0.00%, 12/15/32(d) |
|
14,050 |
10,959,618 |
| Series C, (AMBAC), 0.00%,
12/15/35(d) |
|
8,300 |
5,450,683 |
| Series C, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/15/36(d) |
|
7,210 |
4,458,141 |
| Series CC, 5.25%, 06/15/55 |
|
15,190 |
15,427,840 |
| Series S, 5.00%, 06/15/33 |
|
2,450 |
2,597,066 |
| Series S, Class BB, 5.00%, 06/15/36 |
|
3,750 |
3,954,024 |
| Series S, Class BB, 4.00%, 06/15/37 |
|
1,550 |
1,496,133 |
| Series S, Class BB, 4.00%, 06/15/40 |
|
6,000 |
5,498,687 |
| Series S, Class BB, 4.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
8,290 |
7,005,169 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, CAB, Series A, 0.00%, 12/15/35(d)
|
|
6,000 |
3,941,071 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/15/39 |
|
4,795 |
4,371,318 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 06/15/35 |
|
1,605 |
1,594,408 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 06/15/36 |
|
3,695 |
3,611,275 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 06/15/41 |
|
4,000 |
4,186,017 |
| Series AA, 4.25%, 06/15/44 |
|
6,170 |
5,617,883 |
| South Jersey Port Corp., ARB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/49 |
|
4,150 |
4,096,789 |
| Series B, AMT, 5.00%, 01/01/42 |
|
12,870 |
12,715,868 |
| State of New Jersey, GO, 5.00%, 06/01/38 |
|
5,085 |
5,306,813 |
| |
|
|
263,917,161 |
| Tobacco — 8.8% |
| ||
| Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/35 |
|
4,695 |
4,769,746 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/46 |
|
8,910 |
8,669,939 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 06/01/46 |
|
6,500 |
6,509,365 |
| Sub-Series B, 5.00%, 06/01/46 |
|
37,705 |
36,209,751 |
| |
|
|
56,158,801 |
| Transportation — 21.8% |
| ||
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, ARB, AMT, 6.38%, 01/01/35(b) |
|
2,795 |
2,818,949 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Class A, 5.25%, 11/01/47 |
|
7,800 |
7,942,899 |
| Class A, 5.00%, 11/01/52 |
|
6,000 |
5,999,797 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 01/01/31 |
|
1,000 |
1,001,946 |
| AMT, 5.13%, 01/01/34 |
|
2,290 |
2,291,087 |
| AMT, 5.38%, 01/01/43 |
|
23,510 |
23,512,581 |
| AMT, 5.63%, 01/01/52 |
|
1,000 |
999,543 |
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Refunding ARB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/37 |
|
8,200 |
8,255,153 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/47 |
|
7,015 |
6,547,398 |
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 4.50%, 12/15/28(c) |
|
1,615 |
1,722,761 |
| 5.25%, 12/15/32(c) |
|
405 |
468,837 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/15/30 |
|
4,250 |
4,321,229 |
| New Jersey Turnpike Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/34 |
|
2,500 |
2,558,897 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Transportation (continued) |
| ||
| New Jersey Turnpike Authority, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 01/01/42 |
$ |
4,000 |
$ 3,673,338
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 01/01/50 |
|
6,000 |
6,204,264 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 01/01/51 |
|
11,790 |
10,124,158 |
| Series B, 5.25%, 01/01/52 |
|
8,380 |
8,583,533 |
| New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 01/01/29 |
|
4,000 |
4,348,592 |
| Series A, (BHAC-CR AG), 5.25%, 01/01/29 |
|
500 |
542,782 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 01/01/30 |
|
4,000 |
4,429,993 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 01/01/39 |
|
7,175 |
6,924,030 |
| Series C, 5.00%, 01/01/45 |
|
3,500 |
3,577,583 |
| Series D-2, 5.25%, 01/01/26 |
|
9,330 |
9,434,156 |
| South Jersey Transportation Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 11/01/52 |
|
6,000 |
6,057,120 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 11/01/50 |
|
4,260 |
3,606,870 |
| Series B-1, (BAM), 5.25%, 11/01/52 |
|
700 |
708,792 |
| Series A, Subordinate, (BAM), 4.00%, 11/01/50 |
|
2,000 |
1,732,516 |
| |
|
|
138,388,804 |
| Utilities — 6.7% |
| ||
| New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 3.38%, 04/01/38 |
|
4,040 |
3,526,923 |
| 3.50%, 04/01/42 |
|
3,030 |
2,419,452 |
| Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series J, 3.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
2,060 |
1,621,354 |
| Series J, 3.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
2,110 |
1,596,780 |
| Series J, 3.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
2,155 |
1,593,025 |
| Series J, 3.00%, 12/01/43 |
|
2,205 |
1,596,014 |
| Series J, 3.00%, 12/01/44 |
|
2,255 |
1,597,182 |
| Series J, 3.00%, 12/01/45 |
|
2,305 |
1,601,984 |
| Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, RB(d)
|
|
|
|
| Series A, (NPFGC), 0.00%, 09/01/26 |
|
4,100 |
3,966,303 |
| Series A, (NPFGC), 0.00%, 09/01/28 |
|
6,600 |
5,980,903 |
| Series A, (NPFGC), 0.00%, 09/01/29 |
|
9,650 |
8,439,223 |
| Series A, (NPFGC), 0.00%, 09/01/31 |
|
6,000 |
4,824,534 |
| Series A, (NPFGC), 0.00%, 09/01/33 |
|
5,000 |
3,642,916 |
| |
|
|
42,406,593 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in New Jersey |
889,453,908 | ||
| New York — 9.6% |
| ||
| State — 1.8% |
| ||
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/50 |
|
8,030 |
8,102,942 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/55 |
|
3,670 |
3,686,214 |
| |
|
|
11,789,156 |
| Transportation — 7.8% |
| ||
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB |
|
|
|
| Series 93, 6.13%, 06/01/94 |
|
6,000 |
6,001,397 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 11/01/30 |
|
2,000 |
2,144,342 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 11/01/33 |
|
1,030 |
1,082,430 |
| AMT, 4.00%, 11/01/37 |
|
1,715 |
1,629,640 |
| AMT, 4.00%, 09/01/38 |
|
1,085 |
1,004,437 |
| Series 218, AMT, 5.00%, 11/01/32 |
|
3,105 |
3,277,461 |
| Series 218, AMT, 4.00%, 11/01/47 |
|
835 |
694,637 |
| Series 221, AMT, 4.00%, 07/15/40 |
|
1,500 |
1,348,524 |
| Series 221, AMT, 4.00%, 07/15/45 |
|
1,975 |
1,673,208 |
| Series 221, AMT, 4.00%, 07/15/50 |
|
4,415 |
3,635,623 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding ARB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 01/15/52 |
|
11,395 |
11,289,734 |
| Series 206, AMT, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
1,500 |
1,497,820 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State — 2.5% |
| ||
| Garden State Preservation Trust, RB, Series A, 5.75%,
11/01/28 |
$ |
14,740 |
$ 15,737,780 |
| Utilities — 1.8% |
| ||
| Union County Utilities Authority, Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.00%, 06/15/41 |
|
11,685 |
11,697,620 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in New Jersey |
35,397,714 | ||
| Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts — 5.6% (Cost: $34,668,062) |
35,397,714 | ||
| Total Long-Term Investments — 164.5% (Cost: $1,088,035,979) |
1,044,122,430 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 3.5% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(g)(h) |
|
22,321,613 |
22,323,845 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 3.5% (Cost: $22,323,695) |
22,323,845 | ||
| Total Investments — 168.0% (Cost: $1,110,359,674) |
1,066,446,275 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.2% |
7,891,215 | ||
| Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable — (3.6)% |
(22,987,187 ) | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(65.6)% |
(416,457,918 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 634,892,385 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
U.S. Government securities held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
| (d) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (e) |
Security is collateralized by municipal bonds or U.S. Treasury obligations. |
| (f) |
Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates
received by the Fund. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See Note 4
of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
| (g) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (h) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 52,245,008 |
$ — |
$ (29,921,162
)(a) |
$ — |
$ (1 ) |
$ 22,323,845 |
22,321,613 |
$ 712,929 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 1,008,724,716
|
$ —
|
$ 1,008,724,716
|
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts |
— |
35,397,714 |
— |
35,397,714 |
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
22,323,845 |
— |
— |
22,323,845 |
| |
$22,323,845 |
$1,044,122,430 |
$— |
$1,066,446,275 |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
$—
|
$(22,892,201
) |
$—
|
$(22,892,201
) |
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
— |
(417,100,000 ) |
— |
(417,100,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(439,992,201 ) |
$— |
$(439,992,201 ) |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama — 3.5% |
| ||
| Corporate — 3.5% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB(a) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 05/01/55 |
$ |
2,245 |
$ 2,395,721
|
| Series D, 5.00%, 03/01/55 |
|
1,040 |
1,092,728 |
| Lower Alabama Gas District, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 09/01/46 |
|
1,185 |
1,183,322 |
| Southeast Energy Authority A Cooperative District,
RB(a) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/56 |
|
4,120 |
4,180,981 |
| Series B, 5.25%, 03/01/55 |
|
2,345 |
2,463,674 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Alabama |
11,316,426 | ||
| California(a)
— 0.9% |
| ||
| Corporate — 0.4% |
| ||
| California Community Choice Financing Authority, RB,
Series B, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 01/01/55 |
|
1,375 |
1,431,414 |
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development
Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT,
Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%, 01/01/65(b) |
|
1,760 |
1,566,400 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in California |
2,997,814 | ||
| Georgia — 2.7% |
| ||
| Corporate — 2.7% |
| ||
| Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 05/15/43 |
|
3,310 |
3,261,410 |
| Series C, 5.00%, 12/01/54(a) |
|
5,000 |
5,254,391 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Georgia |
8,515,801 | ||
| Guam — 0.2% |
| ||
| Utilities — 0.2% |
| ||
| Guam Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%,
10/01/41 |
|
580 |
589,066 |
| Kentucky — 1.8% |
| ||
| Corporate — 1.8% |
| ||
| Kentucky Public Energy Authority, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.00%, 01/01/55(a) |
|
5,495 |
5,811,840 |
| New York — 128.1% |
| ||
| Corporate — 8.6% |
| ||
| New York Energy Finance Development Corp., RB,
5.00%, 07/01/56 |
|
9,940 |
10,365,362 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, 5.50%, 10/01/37 |
|
830 |
938,845 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB,
5.25%, 10/01/35 |
|
5,500 |
6,165,986 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB, AMT, 2.75%, 09/01/50(a) |
|
1,370 |
1,366,599 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., ARB,
AMT, 5.63%, 04/01/40 |
|
2,215 |
2,271,557 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/35 |
|
2,165 |
2,194,874 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
4,210 |
4,106,189 |
| |
|
|
27,409,412 |
| County/City/Special District/School District — 20.7% |
| ||
| Battery Park City Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/41 |
|
665 |
707,476 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/42 |
|
1,290 |
1,360,422 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/43 |
|
1,565 |
1,637,790 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| County/City/Special District/School District (continued) |
| ||
| Battery Park City Authority, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/48 |
$ |
2,165 |
$ 2,211,173
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/53 |
|
620 |
628,136 |
| City of New York, GO |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 5.00%, 08/01/47 |
|
2,410 |
2,411,680 |
| Series F-1, 5.00%, 04/01/45 |
|
4,950 |
4,911,200 |
| Series F-1, 4.00%, 03/01/47 |
|
2,270 |
1,953,839 |
| Series G-1, 5.25%, 02/01/50 |
|
830 |
851,394 |
| County of Nassau New York, GOL |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 04/01/49 |
|
2,735 |
2,353,077 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 04/01/55 |
|
3,315 |
3,361,156 |
| County of Nassau New York, Refunding GOL, Series B, 5.00%, 04/01/49 |
|
1,430 |
1,438,089 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB,
0.00%, 03/01/39(c) |
|
1,380 |
710,088 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, 4.00%, 03/01/45 |
|
3,600 |
3,195,691 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax
Secured Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series E-1, 5.00%, 02/01/43 |
|
1,645 |
1,652,542 |
| Series F-1, Subordinate, 5.00%, 02/01/44 |
|
355 |
360,829 |
| Series F-1, Subordinate, 4.00%, 02/01/51 |
|
6,800 |
5,755,158 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 05/01/50(d) |
|
1,660 |
1,749,322 |
| Series B, 4.38%, 05/01/53 |
|
2,320 |
2,094,939 |
| Series H-1, 5.50%, 11/01/51 |
|
1,240 |
1,301,796 |
| Series C-S, Subordinate, 5.00%, 05/01/50 |
|
1,085 |
1,091,535 |
| Series H-1, Subordinate, 5.25%, 11/01/48 |
|
2,655 |
2,744,772 |
| New York Convention Center Development Corp., RB,
CAB(c) |
|
|
|
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/42 |
|
2,185 |
839,813 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
5,600 |
1,498,254 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
2,665 |
677,976 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/55 |
|
2,485 |
421,081 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/56 |
|
3,315 |
529,755 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Class 1, 5.00%, 11/15/44(b) |
|
5,075 |
4,872,582 |
| Series 1, 3.00%, 02/15/42 |
|
925 |
704,360 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 3.00%, 11/15/51 |
|
1,460 |
980,772 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Sales Tax
Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Class A, 4.00%, 05/15/57 |
|
1,300 |
1,060,375 |
| Series A, 4.25%, 05/15/58 |
|
4,670 |
4,036,922 |
| Series A-1, 4.13%, 05/15/64 |
|
6,385 |
5,334,553 |
| Yonkers Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB,
(SAW), 4.00%, 05/01/41 |
|
1,000 |
941,952 |
| |
|
|
66,380,499 |
| Education — 11.6% |
| ||
| Albany Capital Resource Corp., Refunding
RB(e)(f) |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
740 |
381,914 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
765 |
394,816 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., RB, 5.00%, 09/01/59(b) |
|
1,325 |
1,111,329 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 08/01/47 |
|
660 |
586,153 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/43 |
|
450 |
450,414 |
| Dobbs Ferry Local Development Corp., RB, 5.00%,
07/01/39 |
|
750 |
750,248 |
| Dutchess County Local Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/43 |
|
570 |
570,353 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/52 |
|
1,365 |
1,318,730 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Education (continued) |
| ||
| Dutchess County Local Development Corp., Refunding
RB, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
$ |
1,655 |
$ 1,381,965
|
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/39 |
|
350 |
336,567 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
5,700 |
4,933,761 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 07/01/55 |
|
1,080 |
1,099,467 |
| Series 1, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 07/01/40 |
|
3,500 |
3,980,866 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
410 |
391,380 |
| Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
1,325 |
1,326,005 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 07/01/48 |
|
500 |
501,638 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 07/01/50 |
|
425 |
434,410 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/35 |
|
1,030 |
1,029,641 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
360 |
284,413 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
2,510 |
2,399,448 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 07/01/54 |
|
3,310 |
3,474,095 |
| Onondaga Civic Development Corp., RB, 5.50%,
12/01/56 |
|
1,135 |
1,187,601 |
| Onondaga County Trust for Cultural Resources, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 12/01/43 |
|
2,655 |
2,693,484 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/47 |
|
1,350 |
1,168,937 |
| Schenectady County Capital Resource Corp.,
Refunding RB, 5.00%, 01/01/47 |
|
4,510 |
4,477,927 |
| Troy Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 09/01/39 |
|
450 |
460,427 |
| |
|
|
37,125,989 |
| Health — 9.4% |
| ||
| Brookhaven Local Development Corp., Refunding RB,
5.00%, 10/01/50 |
|
2,400 |
2,353,735 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| Class A, 5.25%, 07/01/37 |
|
1,250 |
1,196,875 |
| Class A, 5.50%, 07/01/47 |
|
765 |
698,847 |
| Genesee County Funding Corp., Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/52 |
|
1,325 |
1,277,571 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
500 |
434,460 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
1,180 |
1,179,484 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp.,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/38 |
|
1,150 |
1,063,595 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
475 |
431,467 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
4,595 |
3,755,501 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series 1, 5.25%, 07/01/54 |
|
865 |
893,094 |
| Series 1-A, 4.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
3,350 |
2,839,005 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
895 |
743,375 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/01/45 |
|
380 |
295,447 |
| 4.25%, 05/01/52 |
|
3,645 |
3,166,513 |
| 5.00%, 05/01/52 |
|
4,875 |
4,773,616 |
| Class A, 5.25%, 05/01/54 |
|
1,200 |
1,210,726 |
| Series 1, 4.00%, 07/01/47 |
|
2,660 |
2,305,972 |
| Suffolk County Economic Development Corp., RB,
Series C, 5.00%, 07/01/32 |
|
460 |
460,368 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Health (continued) |
| ||
| Westchester County Local Development Corp.,
Refunding RB(b) |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/41 |
$ |
510 |
$ 469,845
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/56 |
|
570 |
487,964 |
| |
|
|
30,037,460 |
| Housing — 11.9% |
| ||
| New York City Housing Development Corp, Refunding RB, Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.25%, 11/01/43 |
|
2,970 |
2,694,964 |
| New York City Housing Development Corp., RB, M/F
Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, (FHLMC), 5.20%, 02/01/55 |
|
1,875 |
1,876,679 |
| Series C-1, 5.05%, 11/01/50 |
|
665 |
646,997 |
| Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.80%, 02/01/53 |
|
5,265 |
4,967,916 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.75%, 11/01/48 |
|
365 |
344,176 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (FHLMC, FNMA, GNMA), 4.70%, 08/01/54 |
|
2,650 |
2,462,961 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.65%, 11/01/49 |
|
685 |
632,517 |
| Series B-1, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/01/55 |
|
250 |
251,429 |
| Series B-1, Class A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD
SECT 8), 4.65%, 11/01/49 |
|
1,025 |
945,975 |
| Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.50%, 08/01/54 |
|
1,160 |
1,037,570 |
| Series D-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 11/01/54 |
|
660 |
592,650 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.45%, 11/01/49 |
|
1,160 |
1,035,427 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 11/01/54 |
|
825 |
749,520 |
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.85%, 11/01/53 |
|
3,660 |
3,482,906 |
| Series F-1A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.55%, 11/01/54 |
|
5,185 |
4,784,798 |
| Series F-1A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/54 |
|
1,265 |
1,250,530 |
| New York State Housing Finance Agency, RB, M/F
Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.65%, 11/15/38 |
|
550 |
549,783 |
| Series B-1, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.85%,
11/01/48 |
|
1,310 |
1,238,334 |
| Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.65%, 11/01/48 |
|
515 |
473,143 |
| State of New York Mortgage Agency Homeowner
Mortgage Revenue, RB, S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series 250, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.80%, 10/01/48 |
|
3,410 |
3,241,248 |
| Series 255, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.70%,
10/01/43 |
|
1,385 |
1,330,688 |
| Series 261, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.55%, 10/01/49 |
|
3,760 |
3,415,510 |
| |
|
|
38,005,721 |
| State — 10.8% |
| ||
| Empire State Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 03/15/45 |
|
5,265 |
4,667,664 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46 |
|
3,320 |
3,369,373 |
| Empire State Development Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 03/15/47 |
|
1,200 |
1,197,701 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/44 |
|
5,225 |
5,238,060 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/45 |
|
2,700 |
2,702,184 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/52 |
|
3,775 |
3,794,914 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46 |
|
1,190 |
1,194,013 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 03/15/54 |
|
3,980 |
3,413,127 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State (continued) |
| ||
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding
RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series D, 5.00%, 02/15/48 |
$ |
555 |
$ 553,640
|
| New York State Thruway Authority, RB, Series A,
5.00%, 03/15/49 |
|
3,320 |
3,355,489 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/48 |
|
5,000 |
5,014,410 |
| |
|
|
34,500,575 |
| Tobacco — 2.1% |
| ||
| Chautauqua Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.75%, 06/01/39 |
|
1,875 |
1,768,362 |
| 5.00%, 06/01/48 |
|
680 |
613,470 |
| New York Counties Tobacco Trust VI, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-2B, 5.00%, 06/01/45 |
|
260 |
227,833 |
| Series A-2B, 5.00%, 06/01/51 |
|
1,015 |
864,868 |
| Niagara Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding
RB, 5.25%, 05/15/40 |
|
1,500 |
1,405,620 |
| TSASC, Inc., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/41 |
|
630 |
607,064 |
| Westchester Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.,
Refunding RB, Sub-Series C, 4.00%, 06/01/42 |
|
1,680 |
1,338,153 |
| |
|
|
6,825,370 |
| Transportation — 39.9% |
| ||
| Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority, RB, 5.00%, 01/01/47 |
|
1,565 |
1,532,794 |
| Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 02/15/42 |
|
4,920 |
4,934,601 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 02/15/47 |
|
2,425 |
2,092,454 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority Dedicated Tax Fund, Refunding RB, Series B-2, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
785 |
791,028 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
1,590 |
1,319,020 |
| Series D-3, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/49 |
|
2,720 |
2,220,928 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series C-1, (BAM-TCRS), 4.75%, 11/15/45 |
|
3,765 |
3,663,459 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 11/15/47 |
|
3,410 |
3,510,980 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/54 |
|
1,760 |
1,435,102 |
| Sub-Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/34 |
|
1,500 |
1,567,101 |
| MTA Hudson Rail Yards Trust Obligations, Refunding
RB, Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/56 |
|
5,410 |
5,175,661 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/28 |
|
450 |
450,135 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series P, 5.00%, 01/01/49 |
|
830 |
837,119 |
| Series B, Subordinate, 4.00%, 01/01/50 |
|
2,645 |
2,224,981 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., ARB |
|
|
|
| 6.00%, 06/30/50 |
|
665 |
679,055 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/34 |
|
1,660 |
1,754,320 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/35 |
|
3,405 |
3,561,445 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
1,720 |
1,777,809 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
450 |
444,942 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
1,655 |
1,624,523 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
6,745 |
6,402,801 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.25%, 01/01/50 |
|
8,845 |
8,459,042 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 10/31/41 |
|
455 |
395,271 |
| AMT, 4.00%, 10/31/46 |
|
1,510 |
1,222,565 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 06/30/49 |
|
1,450 |
1,368,977 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 6.00%, 06/30/54 |
|
4,240 |
4,304,777 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Transportation (continued) |
| ||
| New York Transportation Development Corp.,
RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.13%, 06/30/60 |
$ |
665 |
$ 622,654
|
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 06/30/60 |
|
5,120 |
4,951,622 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 06/30/60 |
|
4,390 |
4,250,140 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp.,
Refunding RB, Series A, AMT, Sustainability Bonds,
5.50%, 12/31/60 |
|
3,340 |
3,228,227 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., Refunding RB, CAB, Series B, AMT, 5.00%, 12/31/54(g) |
|
1,705 |
973,214 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB,
Series 221, AMT, 4.00%, 07/15/55 |
|
1,145 |
945,657 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding ARB |
|
|
|
| Series 240, 5.00%, 07/15/53 |
|
1,660 |
1,673,532 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/15/34 |
|
1,660 |
1,695,818 |
| Series 177, AMT, 4.00%, 01/15/43 |
|
285 |
238,987 |
| Series 206, AMT, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
3,310 |
3,305,189 |
| Series 231, AMT, 5.50%, 08/01/52 |
|
1,375 |
1,401,343 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series 226, AMT, 5.00%, 10/15/39 |
|
3,105 |
3,187,191 |
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
680 |
695,431 |
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/48 |
|
1,660 |
1,647,249 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
3,735 |
3,765,005 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/54 |
|
4,120 |
4,215,700 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 11/15/57 |
|
1,775 |
1,830,705 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/46 |
|
4,760 |
4,764,445 |
| Series A-1, 5.00%, 05/15/51 |
|
1,460 |
1,461,190 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 11/15/37 |
|
8,225 |
8,496,836 |
| Series C, 5.00%, 05/15/47 |
|
3,925 |
3,946,970 |
| Series C, 4.13%, 05/15/52 |
|
7,080 |
6,091,815 |
| Series C, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/15/42 |
|
615 |
650,546 |
| |
|
|
127,790,356 |
| Utilities — 13.1% |
| ||
| Long Island Power Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| (BAM-TCRS), 5.00%, 09/01/42 |
|
4,645 |
4,656,759 |
| 5.00%, 09/01/47 |
|
450 |
443,323 |
| Series E, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 09/01/53 |
|
2,335 |
2,347,146 |
| Long Island Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series B,
5.00%, 09/01/41 |
|
750 |
750,876 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB, Series BB, 5.00%, 06/15/52 |
|
2,810 |
2,831,543 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
1,175 |
1,176,196 |
| Series DD, 4.13%, 06/15/46 |
|
1,965 |
1,770,412 |
| Series DD, 4.13%, 06/15/47 |
|
1,760 |
1,548,741 |
| Series EE, 5.00%, 06/15/45 |
|
2,250 |
2,272,367 |
| New York Power Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/53 |
|
1,660 |
1,675,991 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
5,385 |
5,465,853 |
| New York Power Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/50 |
|
5,170 |
4,411,578 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/55 |
|
5,505 |
4,617,776 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/60 |
|
470 |
393,821 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB,
Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 09/15/54 |
|
3,410 |
3,481,815 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Utilities — 8.2% |
| ||
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series BB, 5.25%, 06/15/55(i)
|
$ |
9,500 |
$ 9,776,828
|
| Sub Series CC-1, 5.25%, 06/15/54 |
|
4,480 |
4,593,386 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Series AA-3, 5.25%,
06/15/48(i) |
|
5,857 |
6,010,396 |
| Utility Debt Securitization Authority, Refunding RB, 2nd
Series, 5.00%, 12/15/50(i) |
|
5,880 |
5,988,476 |
| |
|
|
26,369,086 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in New York |
69,281,785 | ||
| Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts — 21.6% (Cost: $70,317,476) |
69,281,785 | ||
| Total Long-Term Investments — 162.0% (Cost: $533,041,142) |
518,771,035 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 5.7% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(j)(k) |
|
18,175,205 |
18,177,023 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 5.7% (Cost: $18,177,023) |
18,177,023 | ||
| Total Investments — 167.7% (Cost: $551,218,165) |
536,948,058 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.3% |
4,448,452 | ||
| Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable — (15.4)% |
(49,390,841 ) | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(53.6)% |
(171,769,078 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 320,236,591 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (d) |
When-issued security. |
| (e) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default. |
| (f) |
Non-income producing security. |
| (g) |
Step coupon security. Coupon rate will either increase (step-up bond) or decrease (step-
down bond) at regular intervals until maturity. Interest rate shown reflects the rate
currently in effect. |
| (h) |
Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates
received by the Fund. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See Note 4
of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
| (i) |
All or a portion of the security is subject to a recourse agreement. The aggregate
maximum potential amount the Fund could ultimately be required to pay under the
agreements, which expire between November 15, 2030 to June 15, 2033, is
$45,250,324. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details. |
| (j) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (k) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 6,514,268 |
$ 11,662,755 (a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 18,177,023 |
18,175,205 |
$ 278,606 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| Description |
Number of Contracts |
Expiration Date |
Notional Amount (000) |
Value/ Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
| Short Contracts |
|
|
|
|
| 10-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
117 |
09/19/25 |
$ 12,996 |
$ (188,711 ) |
| U.S. Long Bond |
109 |
09/19/25 |
12,443 |
(383,608
) |
| 5-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
73 |
09/30/25 |
7,898 |
(45,051 ) |
| |
|
|
|
$ (617,370 ) |
| |
Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total |
| Liabilities — Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts Unrealized depreciation on futures
contracts(a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 617,370 |
$ — |
$ 617,370 |
| (a) |
Net cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts and centrally cleared swaps, if any, are reported in the Schedule of Investments. In the
Statements of Assets and Liabilities, only current day’s variation
margin is reported in receivables or payables and the net cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in accumulated earnings (loss). |
| Futures contracts: |
|
| Average notional value of contracts — short |
$26,204,444
|
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 449,489,250
|
$ —
|
$ 449,489,250
|
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts |
— |
69,281,785 |
— |
69,281,785 |
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
18,177,023 |
— |
— |
18,177,023 |
| |
$18,177,023 |
$518,771,035 |
$— |
$536,948,058 |
| Derivative Financial Instruments(a)
|
|
|
|
|
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| Interest Rate Contracts |
$ (617,370 ) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ (617,370 ) |
| (a) |
Derivative financial instruments are futures contracts. Futures contracts are valued at the
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
$—
|
$(49,297,577
) |
$—
|
$(49,297,577
) |
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
— |
(172,000,000 ) |
— |
(172,000,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(221,297,577 ) |
$— |
$(221,297,577 ) |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama(a)
— 2.6% |
| ||
| Corporate — 2.6% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB |
|
|
|
| Series B, 5.00%, 10/01/55 |
$ |
3,000 |
$ 3,152,421
|
| Series D, 5.00%, 03/01/55 |
|
2,880 |
3,026,015 |
| Southeast Alabama Gas Supply District, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.00%, 06/01/49 |
|
2,500 |
2,631,013 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Alabama |
8,809,449 | ||
| California(a)
— 4.9% |
| ||
| Corporate — 4.4% |
| ||
| California Community Choice Financing Authority, RB, Series B, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 01/01/55 |
|
14,470 |
15,063,684 |
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%, 01/01/65(b) |
|
1,765 |
1,570,850 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in California |
16,634,534 | ||
| Kentucky — 2.2% |
| ||
| Corporate — 2.2% |
| ||
| Kentucky Public Energy Authority, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.00%, 01/01/55(a) |
|
7,315 |
7,736,781 |
| Michigan — 149.3% |
| ||
| County/City/Special District/School District — 40.0% |
| ||
| Berkley School District, GO, Series II, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%,
05/01/49 |
|
7,475 |
7,491,692 |
| Byron Center Public Schools, GO, Series II, (Q-SBLF), 5.25%, 05/01/53 |
|
5,000 |
5,075,594 |
| Cedar Springs Public School District, GO |
|
|
|
| Series II, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/46 |
|
1,100 |
1,111,445 |
| Series II, (Q-SBLF), 4.50%, 05/01/49 |
|
1,950 |
1,789,871 |
| City of Grand Rapids Michigan, GOL, 5.00%, 04/01/50 |
|
3,000 |
3,005,794 |
| City of Lansing Michigan, Refunding GO |
|
|
|
| Series B, 4.00%, 06/01/43 |
|
2,000 |
1,777,756 |
| Series B, 4.13%, 06/01/48 |
|
5,325 |
4,580,040 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 06/01/48 |
|
4,290 |
4,298,047 |
| Clarkston Community Schools, GO |
|
|
|
| Series I, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/45 |
|
6,360 |
6,470,739 |
| Series I, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/47 |
|
2,000 |
2,012,483 |
| Coopersville Area Public Schools, GO |
|
|
|
| Series I, (Q-SBLF), 4.00%, 05/01/48 |
|
295 |
252,838 |
| Series I, (Q-SBLF), 4.13%, 05/01/52 |
|
600 |
512,690 |
| County of Kalamazoo Michigan, GOL, 4.13%, 05/01/47 |
|
1,375 |
1,218,574 |
| Gerald R Ford International Airport Authority, ARB, AMT, (GTD), 5.00%, 01/01/54 |
|
2,000 |
1,918,441 |
| Grand Rapids Public Schools, GO, 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
|
2,000 |
2,012,039 |
| Gull Lake Community School District, GO, Series I, (Q- SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/48 |
|
4,000 |
3,957,640 |
| Holly Area School District, GO, Series I, (Q-SBLF),
5.25%, 05/01/48 |
|
8,235 |
8,414,610 |
| Hudsonville Public Schools, Refunding GO |
|
|
|
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/46 |
|
2,500 |
2,526,012 |
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
|
2,375 |
2,379,034 |
| Karegnondi Water Authority, Refunding RB, 5.00%,
11/01/41 |
|
3,950 |
3,967,603 |
| Kentwood Public Schools, GO |
|
|
|
| Series II, 5.00%, 05/01/46 |
|
6,705 |
6,756,734 |
| Series II, 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
|
1,295 |
1,295,615 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| County/City/Special District/School District (continued) |
| ||
| L’
Anse Creuse Public Schools, GO, Series I, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
$ |
9,205 |
$ 9,240,475
|
| Michigan Finance Authority, RB, 2nd Lien, (BAM-TCRS), 4.00%, 11/01/50 |
|
1,500 |
1,269,656 |
| Novi Community School District, GO |
|
|
|
| Series I, 5.00%, 05/01/44 |
|
1,175 |
1,185,869 |
| Series II, 4.00%, 05/01/43 |
|
1,320 |
1,188,166 |
| Okemos Public Schools, GO, Series II, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
|
2,750 |
2,756,126 |
| Rockford Public Schools, GO, Series II, (Q-SBLF),
5.00%, 05/01/46 |
|
1,505 |
1,520,658 |
| Southfield Public Schools, GO, (Q-SBLF), 5.25%, 05/01/50 |
|
1,250 |
1,289,416 |
| Three Rivers Community Schools, GO |
|
|
|
| Series II, (Q-SBLF), 4.13%, 05/01/46 |
|
2,000 |
1,787,255 |
| Series II, (Q-SBLF), 4.25%, 05/01/49 |
|
7,000 |
6,224,051 |
| Troy School District, GO |
|
|
|
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/47 |
|
3,360 |
3,386,785 |
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/52 |
|
14,710 |
14,761,896 |
| Walled Lake Consolidated School District, GO |
|
|
|
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/45 |
|
2,300 |
2,321,627 |
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/47 |
|
1,000 |
1,010,842 |
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
|
2,500 |
2,516,106 |
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/50 |
|
1,500 |
1,513,775 |
| Wayne-Westland Community Schools, GO |
|
|
|
| (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 11/01/44 |
|
2,360 |
2,400,650 |
| (Q-SBLF), 4.50%, 11/01/46 |
|
5,250 |
4,949,704 |
| West Ottawa Public Schools, GO, 4.00%, 11/01/46 |
|
1,730 |
1,541,554 |
| Williamston Community Schools School District, GO, (Q-SBLF), 5.00%, 05/01/51 |
|
2,250 |
2,263,794 |
| |
|
|
135,953,696 |
| Education — 22.4% |
| ||
| Ferris State University, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%,
10/01/49 |
|
2,000 |
1,970,135 |
| Grand Valley State University, RB, 5.00%, 12/01/43 |
|
1,600 |
1,612,876 |
| Michigan Finance Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 02/01/33 |
|
830 |
859,125 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/33 |
|
485 |
451,213 |
| 5.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
1,550 |
1,531,570 |
| 5.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
2,900 |
2,727,888 |
| 5.00%, 12/01/45 |
|
4,400 |
4,020,440 |
| 4.00%, 09/01/50 |
|
1,550 |
1,218,844 |
| Michigan State University, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 08/15/49 |
|
5,335 |
5,401,704 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 02/15/50 |
|
10,000 |
10,309,216 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 08/15/54 |
|
4,525 |
4,643,213 |
| Series B, 4.00%, 02/15/44 |
|
4,000 |
3,527,530 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 02/15/44 |
|
3,820 |
3,837,408 |
| Series C, 4.00%, 02/15/44 |
|
1,725 |
1,533,873 |
| Michigan Technological University, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/45 |
|
1,800 |
1,743,085 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 10/01/52 |
|
1,675 |
1,683,859 |
| Series C, 5.25%, 10/01/48 |
|
2,500 |
2,533,292 |
| Northern Michigan University, RB, Series A, 5.50%,
06/01/50 |
|
1,000 |
1,020,593 |
| Oakland University, RB, 5.00%, 03/01/47 |
|
3,500 |
3,450,720 |
| Wayne State University, RB, Series A, 4.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
8,385 |
7,100,897 |
| Western Michigan University, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/51 |
|
1,815 |
1,769,120 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/53 |
|
5,345 |
5,197,199 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Education (continued) |
| ||
| Western Michigan University, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 11/15/49 |
$ |
5,650 |
$ 5,521,234
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 11/15/49 |
|
2,500 |
2,533,702 |
| |
|
|
76,198,736 |
| Health — 14.9% |
| ||
| Kentwood Economic Development Corp., Refunding RB, 4.00%, 11/15/43 |
|
750 |
601,268 |
| Michigan Finance Authority, RB, Series A, 5.00%,
11/15/48 |
|
2,000 |
1,962,389 |
| Michigan Finance Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 04/15/42 |
|
3,210 |
2,896,874 |
| 4.00%, 11/15/46 |
|
8,500 |
7,096,796 |
| Series 2, 4.00%, 03/01/51 |
|
4,000 |
3,339,100 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
2,250 |
2,255,445 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 12/01/49 |
|
4,500 |
3,690,584 |
| Series S, 5.00%, 05/15/38 |
|
4,890 |
4,888,687 |
| Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 08/15/44 |
|
2,700 |
2,742,708 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 08/15/45 |
|
2,500 |
2,528,146 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 08/15/46 |
|
2,500 |
2,518,400 |
| Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding
RB, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
13,030 |
12,922,268 |
| Michigan Strategic Fund, RB, 5.00%, 11/15/42 |
|
3,500 |
3,270,999 |
| |
|
|
50,713,664 |
| Housing — 11.5% |
| ||
| Michigan State Housing Development Authority, RB, M/F
Housing |
|
|
|
| (GNMA), 4.75%, 04/20/37 |
|
2,380 |
2,337,537 |
| Series A, 4.45%, 10/01/34 |
|
1,000 |
1,000,079 |
| Series A, 4.63%, 10/01/39 |
|
3,490 |
3,488,431 |
| Series A, 4.30%, 10/01/40 |
|
3,320 |
3,168,830 |
| Series A, 4.75%, 10/01/44 |
|
5,000 |
4,800,972 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/48 |
|
7,000 |
6,824,802 |
| Series A, 2.55%, 10/01/51 |
|
5,175 |
3,050,857 |
| Michigan State Housing Development Authority, RB, S/F
Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.85%, 12/01/45 |
|
2,500 |
2,461,933 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 6.00%, 06/01/54 |
|
5,705 |
6,204,760 |
| Series D, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 06/01/53 |
|
5,195 |
5,500,526 |
| |
|
|
38,838,727 |
| State — 24.8% |
| ||
| Michigan Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series F, 5.00%, 04/01/31 |
|
1,000 |
1,000,972 |
| Series F, 5.25%, 10/01/41 |
|
8,595 |
8,604,338 |
| Michigan State Building Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 10/15/49 |
|
7,000 |
5,868,686 |
| Series I, 4.00%, 10/15/46 |
|
3,375 |
2,898,652 |
| Series I, 5.00%, 10/15/47 |
|
6,000 |
6,027,637 |
| Series I, 5.25%, 10/15/50 |
|
4,500 |
4,611,237 |
| Michigan Strategic Fund, RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 4.25%, 12/31/38 |
|
12,000 |
11,509,111 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/31/43 |
|
15,000 |
14,043,319 |
| AMT, 4.50%, 06/30/48 |
|
3,000 |
2,694,222 |
| State of Michigan Trunk Line Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 11/15/46 |
|
2,000 |
1,738,828 |
| 5.00%, 11/15/46 |
|
3,870 |
3,947,885 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State (continued) |
| ||
| State of Michigan Trunk Line Revenue, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 11/15/49 |
$ |
18,000 |
$ 18,472,632
|
| Series B, 5.00%, 11/15/45 |
|
2,830 |
2,856,355 |
| |
|
|
84,273,874 |
| Tobacco — 2.8% |
| ||
| Michigan Finance Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Class 1, 4.00%, 06/01/39 |
|
1,250 |
1,155,126 |
| Series A, Class 1, 4.00%, 06/01/49 |
|
3,750 |
3,049,198 |
| Michigan Finance Authority, Refunding RB, CAB,
Series B-2, Class 2, 0.00%, 06/01/65(c) |
|
50,000 |
5,127,238 |
| |
|
|
9,331,562 |
| Transportation — 10.1% |
| ||
| Gerald R Ford International Airport Authority, ARB, AMT, (GTD), 5.00%, 01/01/51 |
|
5,435 |
5,317,334 |
| Wayne County Airport Authority, ARB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
6,500 |
6,508,093 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/48 |
|
3,495 |
3,594,492 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/50 |
|
2,000 |
2,082,843 |
| Series B, 5.75%, 12/01/50 |
|
1,000 |
1,036,839 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/48 |
|
4,000 |
3,814,363 |
| Series B, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
1,000 |
967,613 |
| Wayne County Airport Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
2,940 |
3,058,909 |
| Series F, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/34 |
|
8,000 |
8,028,541 |
| |
|
|
34,409,027 |
| Utilities — 22.8% |
| ||
| City of Detroit Michigan Water Supply System Revenue,
RB, Series A, Senior Lien, (NPFGC), 5.00%, 07/01/34 |
|
10 |
10,008 |
| Great Lakes Water Authority Sewage Disposal System Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Senior Lien, 5.25%, 07/01/47 |
|
8,000 |
8,221,412 |
| Series A, Senior Lien, 5.25%, 07/01/52 |
|
2,000 |
2,048,379 |
| Series C, Senior Lien, 5.25%, 07/01/48 |
|
4,685 |
4,829,180 |
| Great Lakes Water Authority Water Supply System Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series C, 5.25%, 07/01/50 |
|
3,500 |
3,584,110 |
| Series B, 2nd Lien, 5.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
3,000 |
3,000,914 |
| Series A, Senior Lien, 5.25%, 07/01/52 |
|
4,610 |
4,693,347 |
| Series B, Senior Lien, 5.25%, 07/01/48 |
|
10,750 |
11,003,852 |
| Lansing Board of Water & Light, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/44 |
|
1,750 |
1,762,393 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/48 |
|
20,355 |
20,292,301 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
8,775 |
8,850,077 |
| Michigan Finance Authority, RB, Sustainability Bonds,
5.50%, 02/28/49 |
|
8,985 |
9,151,953 |
| |
|
|
77,447,926 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Michigan |
507,167,212 | ||
| New York — 0.9% |
| ||
| Transportation — 0.9% |
| ||
| New York Transportation Development Corp., Refunding RB, Series A, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 12/31/54 |
|
3,110 |
3,056,543 |
| Puerto Rico — 3.3% |
| ||
| State — 3.3% |
| ||
| Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, GO, Series A-1,
Restructured, 5.75%, 07/01/31 |
|
1,061 |
1,151,068 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State (continued) |
| ||
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax
Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
$ |
525 |
$ 469,238
|
| Series A-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
850 |
773,848 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
103 |
91,188 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.33%, 07/01/40 |
|
277 |
256,475 |
| Series B-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
|
451 |
396,485 |
| Series B-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
7,076 |
6,442,054 |
| Series B-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
597 |
524,223 |
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax
Revenue, RB, CAB, Series A-1, Restructured, 0.00%,
07/01/46(c) |
|
3,368 |
1,039,556 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Puerto Rico |
11,144,135 | ||
| Texas — 0.8% |
| ||
| Corporate — 0.8% |
| ||
| Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. V, RB,
5.00%, 01/01/55(a) |
|
2,540 |
2,671,201 |
| Total Long-Term Investments — 164.0% (Cost: $579,752,427) |
557,219,855 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 2.5% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(d)(e) |
|
8,498,701 |
8,499,551 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 2.5% (Cost: $8,499,336) |
8,499,551 | ||
| Total Investments — 166.5% (Cost: $588,251,763) |
565,719,406 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.7% |
5,535,499 | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(68.2)% |
(231,576,090 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 339,678,815 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (d) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (e) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 16,392,727 |
$ — |
$ (7,893,177 )(a) |
$ 174 |
$ (173 ) |
$ 8,499,551 |
8,498,701 |
$ 272,485 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 557,219,855
|
$ —
|
$ 557,219,855
|
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
8,499,551 |
— |
— |
8,499,551 |
| |
$8,499,551 |
$557,219,855 |
$— |
$565,719,406 |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
$— |
$(231,900,000 ) |
$— |
$(231,900,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(231,900,000 ) |
$— |
$(231,900,000 ) |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama — 4.1% |
| ||
| Corporate — 4.1% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB(a) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 05/01/55 |
$ |
2,750 |
$ 2,934,624
|
| Series D, 5.00%, 03/01/55 |
|
1,275 |
1,339,642 |
| Lower Alabama Gas District, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 09/01/46 |
|
1,920 |
1,917,281 |
| Southeast Energy Authority A Cooperative District,
RB(a) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/56 |
|
6,715 |
6,814,391 |
| Series B, 5.25%, 03/01/55 |
|
2,875 |
3,020,497 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Alabama |
16,026,435 | ||
| California(a)
— 0.9% |
| ||
| Corporate — 0.4% |
| ||
| California Community Choice Financing Authority, RB,
Series B, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 01/01/55 |
|
1,695 |
1,764,544 |
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development
Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT,
Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%, 01/01/65(b) |
|
2,040 |
1,815,600 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in California |
3,580,144 | ||
| Georgia — 1.0% |
| ||
| Corporate — 1.0% |
| ||
| Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., RB, Series A, 5.00%,
05/15/43 |
|
4,070 |
4,010,253 |
| Guam — 0.2% |
| ||
| Utilities — 0.2% |
| ||
| Guam Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/41 |
|
710 |
721,098 |
| Kentucky — 1.8% |
| ||
| Corporate — 1.8% |
| ||
| Kentucky Public Energy Authority, Refunding RB,
Series B, 5.00%, 01/01/55(a) |
|
6,420 |
6,790,176 |
| New York — 123.5% |
| ||
| Corporate — 7.7% |
| ||
| New York Energy Finance Development Corp., RB, 5.00%, 07/01/56 |
|
12,160 |
12,680,362 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, 5.50%,
10/01/37 |
|
1,015 |
1,148,106 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB, 5.25%, 10/01/35 |
|
3,955 |
4,433,905 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB,
AMT, 2.75%, 09/01/50(a) |
|
1,590 |
1,586,053 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., ARB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 01/01/30 |
|
2,500 |
2,547,177 |
| AMT, 5.63%, 04/01/40 |
|
2,570 |
2,635,621 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/35 |
|
2,620 |
2,656,152 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
2,670 |
2,604,163 |
| |
|
|
30,291,539 |
| County/City/Special District/School District — 22.5% |
| ||
| Battery Park City Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/41 |
|
810 |
861,737 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/42 |
|
1,585 |
1,671,526 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/43 |
|
1,920 |
2,009,301 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/48 |
|
2,665 |
2,721,836 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| County/City/Special District/School District (continued) |
| ||
| Battery Park City Authority, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/53 |
$ |
755 |
$ 764,907
|
| City of New York, GO |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 08/01/51 |
|
1,625 |
1,625,842 |
| Series A-1, 5.00%, 08/01/47 |
|
2,960 |
2,962,063 |
| Series F-1, 4.00%, 03/01/47 |
|
2,730 |
2,349,771 |
| Series G-1, 5.25%, 02/01/50 |
|
1,015 |
1,041,163 |
| County of Nassau New York, GOL |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 04/01/49 |
|
3,360 |
2,890,801 |
| Series A, 4.25%, 04/01/52 |
|
5,000 |
4,435,915 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 04/01/55 |
|
4,060 |
4,116,529 |
| County of Nassau New York, Refunding GOL, Series A, 4.00%, 04/01/49 |
|
4,235 |
3,667,783 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB(c) |
|
|
|
| 0.00%, 03/01/39 |
|
5,000 |
2,572,782 |
| 0.00%, 03/01/43 |
|
4,330 |
1,673,170 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, 4.00%, 03/01/45 |
|
4,395 |
3,901,406 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax
Secured Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series E-1, 5.00%, 02/01/43 |
|
2,010 |
2,019,216 |
| Series F-1, Subordinate, 5.00%, 02/01/44 |
|
430 |
437,061 |
| Series F-1, Subordinate, 4.00%, 02/01/51 |
|
8,110 |
6,863,872 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 05/01/50(d) |
|
2,025 |
2,133,963 |
| Series B, 4.38%, 05/01/53 |
|
2,845 |
2,569,009 |
| Series H-1, 5.50%, 11/01/51 |
|
1,375 |
1,443,524 |
| Series C-S, Subordinate, 5.00%, 05/01/50 |
|
1,335 |
1,343,040 |
| Series H-1, Subordinate, 5.25%, 11/01/48 |
|
3,250 |
3,359,891 |
| New York Convention Center Development Corp., RB,
CAB(c) |
|
|
|
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/42 |
|
2,640 |
1,014,695 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
6,740 |
1,803,255 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
3,550 |
903,120 |
| Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/56 |
|
7,275 |
1,162,584 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Class 1, 5.00%, 11/15/44(b) |
|
6,110 |
5,866,301 |
| Series 1, 3.00%, 02/15/42 |
|
1,110 |
845,232 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 3.00%, 11/15/51 |
|
4,805 |
3,227,815 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Sales Tax Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Class A, 4.00%, 05/15/57 |
|
1,600 |
1,305,077 |
| Series A, 4.25%, 05/15/58 |
|
5,620 |
4,858,138 |
| Series A-1, 4.13%, 05/15/64 |
|
7,760 |
6,483,341 |
| Yonkers Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, (SAW), 4.00%, 05/01/41 |
|
1,280 |
1,205,698 |
| |
|
|
88,111,364 |
| Education — 12.8% |
| ||
| Albany Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB(e)(f) |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
880 |
454,168 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
915 |
472,231 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., RB(b)
|
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 09/01/59 |
|
1,530 |
1,283,271 |
| Sustainability Bonds, 5.75%, 06/01/52 |
|
1,000 |
983,000 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 08/01/47 |
|
815 |
723,810 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/43 |
|
525 |
525,483 |
| Dutchess County Local Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/43 |
|
685 |
685,424 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/52 |
|
1,635 |
1,579,577 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Education (continued) |
| ||
| Dutchess County Local Development Corp., Refunding
RB, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
$ |
2,035 |
$ 1,699,274
|
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., RB, Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/53 |
|
4,190 |
4,196,607 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp.,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/39 |
|
500 |
480,811 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
6,970 |
6,033,038 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 07/01/55 |
|
1,320 |
1,343,793 |
| Series 1, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 07/01/40 |
|
4,580 |
5,209,247 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
490 |
467,747 |
| Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
1,625 |
1,626,232 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 07/01/48 |
|
580 |
581,900 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 07/01/50 |
|
515 |
526,403 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/35 |
|
1,380 |
1,379,519 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
435 |
343,666 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
3,070 |
2,934,783 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 07/01/54 |
|
4,065 |
4,266,524 |
| Onondaga Civic Development Corp., RB, 5.50%, 12/01/56 |
|
1,395 |
1,459,650 |
| Onondaga County Trust for Cultural Resources,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 12/01/43 |
|
3,250 |
3,297,108 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/47 |
|
1,650 |
1,428,700 |
| Schenectady County Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 01/01/47 |
|
5,540 |
5,500,603 |
| Troy Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%,
09/01/39 |
|
550 |
562,744 |
| |
|
|
50,045,313 |
| Health — 8.8% |
| ||
| Brookhaven Local Development Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 10/01/50 |
|
2,950 |
2,893,132 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| Class A, 5.25%, 07/01/37 |
|
1,495 |
1,431,462 |
| Class A, 5.50%, 07/01/47 |
|
920 |
840,443 |
| Genesee County Funding Corp., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/52 |
|
1,810 |
1,745,211 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
800 |
695,136 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
830 |
830,556 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
350 |
349,847 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp.,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/38 |
|
1,450 |
1,341,054 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
525 |
476,885 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
2,870 |
2,345,656 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series 1, 5.25%, 07/01/54 |
|
1,055 |
1,089,264 |
| Series 1-A, 4.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
4,150 |
3,516,976 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
1,100 |
913,646 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/01/45 |
|
460 |
357,647 |
| 4.25%, 05/01/52 |
|
4,355 |
3,783,310 |
| 5.00%, 05/01/52 |
|
5,910 |
5,787,091 |
| Class A, 5.25%, 05/01/54 |
|
1,475 |
1,488,184 |
| Series 1, 4.00%, 07/01/47 |
|
3,250 |
2,817,446 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Health (continued) |
| ||
| Suffolk County Economic Development Corp., RB,
Series C, 5.00%, 07/01/32 |
$ |
625 |
$ 625,500
|
| Westchester County Local Development Corp., Refunding RB(b)
|
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
610 |
561,972 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/56 |
|
680 |
582,132 |
| |
|
|
34,472,550 |
| Housing — 10.9% |
| ||
| New York City Housing Development Corp, Refunding
RB, Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.25%, 11/01/43 |
|
3,575 |
3,243,939 |
| New York City Housing Development Corp., RB, M/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, (FHLMC), 5.20%, 02/01/55 |
|
2,290 |
2,292,051 |
| Series C-1, 5.05%, 11/01/50 |
|
810 |
788,072 |
| Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.80%,
02/01/53 |
|
3,440 |
3,245,894 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.75%, 11/01/48 |
|
420 |
396,038 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (FHLMC, FNMA,
GNMA), 4.70%, 08/01/54 |
|
3,250 |
3,020,613 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.65%, 11/01/49 |
|
790 |
729,472 |
| Series B-1, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/01/55 |
|
305 |
306,743 |
| Series B-1, Class A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.65%, 11/01/49 |
|
1,185 |
1,093,639 |
| Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 08/01/54 |
|
1,345 |
1,203,044 |
| Series D-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.50%, 11/01/54 |
|
810 |
727,343 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.45%, 11/01/49 |
|
1,420 |
1,267,505 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.50%, 11/01/54 |
|
1,015 |
922,137 |
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.85%, 11/01/53 |
|
4,310 |
4,101,455 |
| Series F-1A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.55%, 11/01/54 |
|
6,015 |
5,550,735 |
| Series F-1A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/54 |
|
1,550 |
1,532,270 |
| New York State Housing Finance Agency, RB, M/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.65%, 11/15/38 |
|
950 |
949,626 |
| Series B-1, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.85%, 11/01/48 |
|
1,525 |
1,441,572 |
| Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.65%,
11/01/48 |
|
625 |
574,202 |
| State of New York Mortgage Agency Homeowner Mortgage Revenue, RB, S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series 250, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.80%,
10/01/48 |
|
3,960 |
3,764,030 |
| Series 255, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.70%, 10/01/43 |
|
1,630 |
1,566,080 |
| Series 261, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.55%,
10/01/49 |
|
4,500 |
4,087,712 |
| |
|
|
42,804,172 |
| State — 10.1% |
| ||
| Empire State Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 03/15/45 |
|
6,400 |
5,673,894 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46 |
|
4,070 |
4,130,526 |
| Empire State Development Corp., Refunding RB,
5.00%, 03/15/47 |
|
3,300 |
3,293,676 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/44 |
|
5,275 |
5,288,185 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State (continued) |
| ||
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/45 |
$ |
3,300 |
$ 3,302,669
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/52 |
|
4,625 |
4,649,398 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46 |
|
1,460 |
1,464,923 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 03/15/54 |
|
4,870 |
4,176,365 |
| Series D, 5.00%, 02/15/48 |
|
1,535 |
1,531,239 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/49 |
|
4,060 |
4,103,399 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/48 |
|
2,045 |
2,050,894 |
| |
|
|
39,665,168 |
| Tobacco — 2.2% |
| ||
| Chautauqua Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.75%, 06/01/39 |
|
2,190 |
2,065,446 |
| 5.00%, 06/01/48 |
|
820 |
739,772 |
| New York Counties Tobacco Trust VI, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-2B, 5.00%, 06/01/45 |
|
330 |
289,172 |
| Series A-2B, 5.00%, 06/01/51 |
|
1,110 |
945,817 |
| Niagara Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding RB, 5.25%, 05/15/40 |
|
2,250 |
2,108,431 |
| TSASC, Inc., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/41 |
|
770 |
741,967 |
| Westchester Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding RB, Sub-Series C, 4.00%, 06/01/42 |
|
2,295 |
1,828,013 |
| |
|
|
8,718,618 |
| Transportation — 34.7% |
| ||
| Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority, RB, 5.00%,
01/01/47 |
|
1,250 |
1,224,277 |
| Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 02/15/42 |
|
2,950 |
2,958,755 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 02/15/47 |
|
2,760 |
2,381,515 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority Dedicated Tax
Fund, Refunding RB, Series B-2, Sustainability
Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
915 |
922,027 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/45 |
|
1,125 |
957,435 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
1,950 |
1,617,666 |
| Series D-3, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/49 |
|
3,320 |
2,710,838 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series C-1, (BAM-TCRS), 4.75%, 11/15/45 |
|
4,580 |
4,456,478 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 11/15/47 |
|
3,960 |
4,077,267 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/54 |
|
2,155 |
1,757,185 |
| MTA Hudson Rail Yards Trust Obligations, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/56 |
|
5,655 |
5,410,049 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency,
Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/28 |
|
515 |
515,155 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series P, 5.00%, 01/01/49 |
|
1,015 |
1,023,705 |
| Series B, Subordinate, 4.00%, 01/01/50 |
|
3,240 |
2,725,496 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., ARB |
|
|
|
| 6.00%, 06/30/50 |
|
810 |
827,120 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/34 |
|
6,115 |
6,462,449 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/35 |
|
1,595 |
1,668,283 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
950 |
955,425 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
550 |
543,818 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
2,035 |
1,997,526 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
8,210 |
7,793,475 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.25%, 01/01/50 |
|
6,685 |
6,393,295 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 10/31/41 |
|
560 |
486,488 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Transportation (continued) |
| ||
| New York Transportation Development Corp.,
RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| AMT, 4.00%, 10/31/46 |
$ |
1,815 |
$ 1,469,507
|
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 06/30/49 |
|
1,665 |
1,571,963 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 6.00%, 06/30/54 |
|
5,035 |
5,111,923 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.13%, 06/30/60 |
|
810 |
758,421 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 06/30/60 |
|
10,935 |
10,575,387 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 06/30/60 |
|
4,020 |
3,891,927 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/37 |
|
2,350 |
2,374,911 |
| Series A, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 12/31/60 |
|
4,090 |
3,953,128 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp.,
Refunding RB, CAB, Series B, AMT, 5.00%,
12/31/54(g) |
|
1,980 |
1,130,184 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB, Series 221, AMT, 4.00%, 07/15/55 |
|
1,325 |
1,094,319 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding
ARB |
|
|
|
| Series 240, 5.00%, 07/15/53 |
|
2,035 |
2,051,588 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/15/34 |
|
2,040 |
2,084,017 |
| Series 177, AMT, 4.00%, 01/15/43 |
|
735 |
616,335 |
| Series 206, AMT, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
4,065 |
4,059,091 |
| Series 231, AMT, 5.50%, 08/01/52 |
|
1,685 |
1,717,283 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
790 |
807,927 |
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/48 |
|
2,030 |
2,014,407 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
4,600 |
4,636,954 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/54 |
|
5,060 |
5,177,535 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 11/15/57 |
|
2,145 |
2,212,316 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 5.00%, 05/15/51 |
|
1,800 |
1,801,467 |
| Series C, 5.00%, 05/15/47 |
|
4,805 |
4,831,896 |
| Series C, 4.13%, 05/15/52 |
|
4,900 |
4,216,087 |
| Series C, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/15/42 |
|
715 |
756,326 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB,
CAB, Series B, 0.00%, 11/15/32(c) |
|
9,000 |
7,067,479 |
| |
|
|
135,848,105 |
| Utilities — 13.8% |
| ||
| Long Island Power Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| (BAM-TCRS), 5.00%, 09/01/42 |
|
5,700 |
5,714,430 |
| 5.00%, 09/01/47 |
|
550 |
541,840 |
| Series E, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 09/01/53 |
|
2,865 |
2,879,904 |
| Long Island Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.00%, 09/01/41 |
|
930 |
931,087 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB,
Series BB, 5.00%, 06/15/52 |
|
3,440 |
3,466,372 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
1,445 |
1,446,471 |
| Series DD, 4.13%, 06/15/46 |
|
2,275 |
2,049,714 |
| Series DD, 4.13%, 06/15/47 |
|
2,145 |
1,887,528 |
| Series EE, 5.00%, 06/15/45 |
|
2,750 |
2,777,337 |
| New York Power Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/53 |
|
2,030 |
2,049,555 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
2,565 |
2,603,512 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.13%, 11/15/58 |
|
6,430 |
6,536,816 |
| New York Power Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/50 |
|
7,125 |
6,079,785 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/55 |
|
6,515 |
5,464,997 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Utilities (continued) |
| ||
| New York Power Authority, Refunding RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/60 |
$ |
560 |
$ 469,234
|
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB,
Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 09/15/54 |
|
3,960 |
4,043,398 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 06/15/51 |
|
3,180 |
3,210,661 |
| Rockland County Solid Waste Management Authority,
RB, Series A, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%,
12/15/46 |
|
1,125 |
919,801 |
| Utility Debt Securitization Authority, Refunding RB, Series 2, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 06/15/53 |
|
810 |
822,975 |
| |
|
|
53,895,417 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in New York |
483,852,246 | ||
| Puerto Rico — 3.3% |
| ||
| State — 3.3% |
| ||
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax
Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
|
711 |
635,483 |
| Series A-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
1,009 |
918,603 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
123 |
108,894 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.33%, 07/01/40 |
|
328 |
303,696 |
| Series B-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
|
551 |
484,398 |
| Series B-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
8,579 |
7,810,398 |
| Series B-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
722 |
633,985 |
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax
Revenue, RB, CAB, Series A-1, Restructured,
0.00%, 07/01/46(c) |
|
6,509 |
2,009,047 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Puerto Rico |
12,904,504 | ||
| South Carolina — 1.0% |
| ||
| Corporate — 1.0% |
| ||
| Patriots Energy Group Financing Agency, RB,
Series A1, 5.25%, 10/01/54(a) |
|
3,800 |
4,030,276 |
| Total Municipal Bonds — 135.8% (Cost: $548,638,898) |
531,915,132 | ||
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts(h) | |||
| New York — 26.0% | |||
| County/City/Special District/School District — 6.1% |
| ||
| City of New York, GO |
|
|
|
| Series B, 5.25%, 10/01/47 |
|
5,395 |
5,517,519 |
| Series E1, 5.25%, 04/01/44 |
|
10,000 |
10,369,505 |
| County of Nassau New York, GOL, Series A, 5.00%,
04/01/49(i) |
|
4,058 |
4,127,834 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Sales Tax Revenue, RB, Class A, 5.25%,
05/15/52(i) |
|
4,080 |
4,127,672 |
| |
|
|
24,142,530 |
| State — 4.3% |
| ||
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, Series A,
5.00%, 03/15/44 |
|
10,000 |
10,024,995 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.00%, 03/15/54(i) |
|
5,038 |
5,057,683 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46(i) |
|
1,770 |
1,777,605 |
| |
|
|
16,860,283 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Transportation — 7.5% |
| ||
| Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.00%, 02/15/42 |
$ |
5,500 |
$ 5,516,323
|
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority Dedicated Tax Fund, Refunding RB, Series B-2, 5.00%,
11/15/47(i) |
|
8,414 |
8,503,711 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding
ARB, 5.50%, 08/01/52(i) |
|
5,440 |
5,533,460 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series C, 4.13%, 05/15/52 |
|
5,000 |
4,302,129 |
| Series C, 5.25%, 05/15/52(i) |
|
5,360 |
5,467,732 |
| |
|
|
29,323,355 |
| Utilities — 8.1% |
| ||
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series BB, 5.25%, 06/15/55 |
|
11,325 |
11,655,005 |
| Sub Series CC-1, 5.25%, 06/15/54 |
|
5,520 |
5,659,707 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Series AA-3, 5.25%,
06/15/48(i) |
|
6,976 |
7,159,141 |
| Utility Debt Securitization Authority, Refunding RB, 2nd
Series, 5.00%, 12/15/50(i) |
|
7,040 |
7,169,876 |
| |
|
|
31,643,729 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in New York |
101,969,897 | ||
| Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts — 26.0% (Cost: $103,599,844) |
101,969,897 | ||
| Total Long-Term Investments — 161.8% (Cost: $652,238,742) |
633,885,029 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 5.8% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(j)(k) |
|
22,686,549 |
22,688,818 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 5.8% (Cost: $22,688,818) |
22,688,818 | ||
| Total Investments — 167.6% (Cost: $674,927,560) |
656,573,847 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.4% |
5,382,088 | ||
| Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable — (17.7)% |
(69,283,291 ) | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(51.3)% |
(200,823,208 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 391,849,436 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (d) |
When-issued security. |
| (e) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default. |
| (f) |
Non-income producing security. |
| (g) |
Step coupon security. Coupon rate will either increase (step-up bond) or decrease (step-
down bond) at regular intervals until maturity. Interest rate shown reflects the rate
currently in effect. |
| (h) |
Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates
received by the Fund. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See Note 4
of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
| (i) |
All or a portion of the security is subject to a recourse agreement. The aggregate
maximum potential amount the Fund could ultimately be required to pay under the
agreements, which expire between November 15, 2030 to April 1, 2033, is
$37,254,345. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details. |
| (j) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (k) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 7,588,938 |
$ 15,099,880 (a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 22,688,818 |
22,686,549 |
$ 245,245 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| Description |
Number of Contracts |
Expiration Date |
Notional Amount (000) |
Value/ Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
| Short Contracts |
|
|
|
|
| 10-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
137 |
09/19/25 |
$ 15,218 |
$ (220,969 ) |
| U.S. Long Bond |
134 |
09/19/25 |
15,297 |
(471,436
) |
| 5-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
83 |
09/30/25 |
8,980 |
(51,223 ) |
| |
|
|
|
$ (743,628 ) |
| |
Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total |
| Liabilities — Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts Unrealized depreciation on futures
contracts(a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 743,628 |
$ — |
$ 743,628 |
| (a) |
Net cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts and centrally cleared swaps, if any, are reported in the Schedule of Investments. In the
Statements of Assets and Liabilities, only current day’s variation
margin is reported in receivables or payables and the net cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in accumulated earnings (loss). |
| |
Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ (2,132,009 ) |
$ — |
$ (2,132,009 ) |
| Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 389,074 |
$ — |
$ 389,074 |
| Futures contracts: |
|
| Average notional value of contracts — short |
$31,058,512
|
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 531,915,132
|
$ —
|
$ 531,915,132
|
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts |
— |
101,969,897 |
— |
101,969,897 |
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
22,688,818 |
— |
— |
22,688,818 |
| |
$22,688,818 |
$633,885,029 |
$— |
$656,573,847 |
| Derivative Financial Instruments(a)
|
|
|
|
|
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| Interest Rate Contracts |
$ (743,628 ) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ (743,628 ) |
| (a) |
Derivative financial instruments are futures contracts. Futures contracts are valued at the
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
$—
|
$(69,061,407
) |
$—
|
$(69,061,407
) |
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
— |
(201,000,000 ) |
— |
(201,000,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(270,061,407 ) |
$— |
$(270,061,407 ) |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama — 0.2% |
| ||
| Corporate — 0.2% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB, Series A, 5.25%,
05/01/56(a) |
$ |
255 |
$ 259,543 |
| California — 0.5% |
| ||
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%, 01/01/65(a)(b) |
|
770 |
685,300 |
| Pennsylvania — 140.1% |
| ||
| Corporate — 2.3% |
| ||
| Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority,
Refunding RB, Series A, 4.10%, 04/01/53(a) |
|
855 |
870,347 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, RB, Series B-2, AMT, 3.85%,
04/01/49(a) |
|
1,625 |
1,623,954 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series B, 5.25%, 12/01/38(a) |
|
325 |
327,093 |
| Series C, 5.25%, 12/01/37(a) |
|
570 |
573,672 |
| AMT, 5.50%, 11/01/44 |
|
135 |
134,141 |
| |
|
|
3,529,207 |
| County/City/Special District/School District — 23.8% |
| ||
| Allentown Neighborhood Improvement Zone Development
Authority, RB(b) |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 05/01/32 |
|
1,260 |
1,263,481 |
| 5.00%, 05/01/42 |
|
1,455 |
1,419,829 |
| Altoona Area School District, GOL, Series A, (SAW), 5.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
1,180 |
1,185,268 |
| Bethlehem Area School District, GOL |
|
|
|
| Series A, (BAM SAW), 5.00%, 08/01/34 |
|
1,610 |
1,610,000 |
| Series A, (BAM SAW), 5.00%, 08/01/35 |
|
1,210 |
1,210,000 |
| Borough of West Chester Pennsylvania, Refunding GO, 3.50%, 11/15/35 |
|
1,095 |
1,011,820 |
| Bristol Township School District, GOL, (BAM SAW),
5.00%, 06/01/42 |
|
1,685 |
1,684,634 |
| Chester County Industrial Development Authority, SAB(b) |
|
|
|
| 4.25%, 03/01/35 |
|
655 |
613,813 |
| 4.75%, 03/01/50 |
|
1,500 |
1,299,467 |
| City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania, GO, Series A, 5.25%,
08/01/45 |
|
575 |
594,883 |
| City of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, GO, 5.00%, 09/01/43 |
|
100 |
101,404 |
| Coatesville School District, GOL, CAB(c) |
|
|
|
| Series A, (BAM SAW), 0.00%, 10/01/34 |
|
160 |
104,770 |
| Series A, (BAM SAW), 0.00%, 10/01/35 |
|
1,435 |
886,294 |
| Series A, (BAM SAW), 0.00%, 10/01/37 |
|
1,395 |
748,895 |
| Coatesville School District, Refunding GOL, CAB(c) |
|
|
|
| Series B, (BAM SAW), 0.00%, 10/01/33 |
|
275 |
191,979 |
| Series B, (BAM SAW), 0.00%, 10/01/34 |
|
550 |
360,145 |
| Series C, (BAM SAW), 0.00%, 10/01/33 |
|
360 |
249,532 |
| County of Allegheny Pennsylvania, GO, Series C-78,
4.00%, 11/01/45 |
|
3,440 |
3,036,605 |
| Cumberland Valley School District, GOL, Series A, (BAM SAW), 5.00%, 12/01/53 |
|
1,300 |
1,302,161 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 06/30/32 |
|
925 |
986,111 |
| AMT, 5.50%, 06/30/43 |
|
2,500 |
2,551,147 |
| AMT, 6.00%, 06/30/61 |
|
1,305 |
1,331,498 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| County/City/Special District/School District (continued) |
| ||
| School District of Philadelphia, GOL |
|
|
|
| Series A, (SAW), 5.00%, 09/01/44 |
$ |
1,000 |
$ 993,265
|
| Series A, (SAW), 5.50%, 09/01/48 |
|
2,500 |
2,585,067 |
| Series D, (SAW), 3.00%, 09/01/44 |
|
2,345 |
1,753,743 |
| Shaler Area School District, GO, (XLCA SAW), 0.00%,
09/01/30(c) |
|
6,145 |
5,136,384 |
| State Public School Building Authority, RB, (SAW), 0.00%, 12/15/25(c) |
|
1,770 |
1,752,404 |
| |
|
|
35,964,599 |
| Education — 21.0% |
| ||
| Berks County Municipal Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
430 |
394,265 |
| 5.00%, 10/01/49 |
|
430 |
362,134 |
| Chester County Industrial Development Authority, RB, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 12/01/51 |
|
3,600 |
3,040,861 |
| Delaware County Authority, RB, 5.00%, 08/01/25(d) |
|
3,505 |
3,505,000 |
| Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, Refunding RB, 5.25%, 11/01/54 |
|
1,330 |
1,267,425 |
| Northampton County General Purpose Authority,
Refunding RB, 4.00%, 11/01/38 |
|
1,160 |
1,100,687 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, RB, 5.00%, 08/01/49 |
|
400 |
404,810 |
| Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, RB |
|
|
|
| Series 1C, AMT, 5.50%, 06/01/52 |
|
735 |
714,919 |
| Sub-Series 1C, AMT, 5.00%, 06/01/51 |
|
3,130 |
2,831,982 |
| Series B, AMT, Subordinate, 3.13%, 06/01/48 |
|
350 |
230,784 |
| Series B, AMT, Subordinate, 5.00%, 06/01/50 |
|
520 |
473,210 |
| Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 05/01/41 |
|
500 |
493,391 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/31 |
|
845 |
895,073 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 05/01/50 |
|
4,645 |
3,859,679 |
| Pennsylvania State University, RB, 5.25%, 09/01/54 |
|
1,285 |
1,324,856 |
| Pennsylvania State University, Refunding RB, Series A,
5.50%, 09/01/55 |
|
1,600 |
1,701,796 |
| Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 06/15/29 |
|
180 |
179,215 |
| 5.00%, 06/15/39 |
|
335 |
321,796 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/48 |
|
3,300 |
2,851,162 |
| 5.00%, 06/15/49 |
|
935 |
811,152 |
| 5.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
575 |
496,022 |
| 5.25%, 11/01/52 |
|
1,355 |
1,347,795 |
| Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/15/40(b) |
|
300 |
288,253 |
| Series A, 5.25%, 06/15/52 |
|
375 |
342,592 |
| Swarthmore Borough Authority, Refunding RB, 5.00%, 09/15/48 |
|
2,395 |
2,407,099 |
| |
|
|
31,645,958 |
| Health — 31.9% |
| ||
| Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series B, (NPFGC), 6.00%, 07/01/26 |
|
2,000 |
2,056,405 |
| Series D2, 2.99%, 11/15/47(a) |
|
1,040 |
1,025,528 |
| Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 4.00%, 04/01/37 |
|
1,700 |
1,616,758 |
| Chester County Health and Education Facilities Authority,
Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/52 |
|
1,000 |
983,601 |
| Cumberland County Municipal Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 01/01/36 |
|
395 |
372,888 |
| 4.13%, 01/01/38 |
|
160 |
146,468 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Health (continued) |
| ||
| Cumberland County Municipal Authority, Refunding
RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 01/01/38 |
$ |
875 |
$ 853,620
|
| DuBois Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, (BAM-TCRS),
4.00%, 07/15/48 |
|
2,060 |
1,740,881 |
| Geisinger Authority, Refunding RB, Series A-1, 5.00%, 02/15/45 |
|
4,395 |
4,320,023 |
| Lancaster Industrial Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/44 |
|
565 |
466,221 |
| 5.00%, 12/01/49 |
|
420 |
381,495 |
| Lancaster Municipal Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 05/01/44 |
|
510 |
505,466 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 05/01/49 |
|
385 |
361,347 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/55 |
|
550 |
497,215 |
| Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 09/01/49 |
|
665 |
541,980 |
| Class B, 5.00%, 05/01/57 |
|
2,000 |
1,915,936 |
| Series B, (BAM-TCRS), 4.00%, 05/01/52 |
|
1,530 |
1,231,852 |
| Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, RB, Series C, 4.00%, 11/15/43 |
|
200 |
168,189 |
| Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 01/01/40 |
|
220 |
208,510 |
| 5.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
400 |
361,726 |
| Northampton County General Purpose Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A1, 4.00%, 08/15/43 |
|
2,085 |
1,839,745 |
| Series A1, 5.25%, 08/15/53 |
|
2,085 |
2,085,342 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 5.00%, 05/15/31 |
|
3,920 |
4,264,822 |
| Series A-2, 4.00%, 05/15/53 |
|
1,020 |
837,009 |
| Series B, 4.00%, 03/15/40 |
|
8,000 |
7,322,860 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 02/15/52 |
|
640 |
529,096 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 03/15/50 |
|
2,705 |
2,695,284 |
| Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, RB, 3.00%, 08/15/47 |
|
1,600 |
1,174,114 |
| Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, RB,
Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
2,380 |
1,997,417 |
| Pottsville Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.00%, 01/01/27(d) |
|
3,000 |
3,105,114 |
| St. Mary Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, 5.00%,
12/01/48 |
|
1,255 |
1,221,431 |
| Wayne County Hospital & Health Facilities Authority, RB, Series A, (GTD), 4.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
1,595 |
1,324,310 |
| |
|
|
48,152,653 |
| Housing — 11.6% |
| ||
| Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, RB, S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series 149A, 5.20%, 04/01/53 |
|
1,085 |
1,084,280 |
| Series 137, Sustainability Bonds, 2.60%, 04/01/46 |
|
2,230 |
1,473,311 |
| Series 145A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.60%, 10/01/44 |
|
2,120 |
2,045,124 |
| Series 145A, Sustainability Bonds, 6.00%, 10/01/54 |
|
2,105 |
2,283,747 |
| Series 146A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.13%, 10/01/39 |
|
1,000 |
957,819 |
| Series 146A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.50%, 10/01/44 |
|
1,000 |
942,194 |
| Series 148A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.80%, 10/01/55 |
|
2,320 |
2,181,200 |
| Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Refunding RB,
S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series 142-A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 10/01/43 |
|
1,000 |
1,002,031 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Housing (continued) |
| ||
| Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Refunding RB,
S/F Housing (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series 2022, Sustainability Bonds, 4.15%, 10/01/42 |
$ |
2,100 |
$ 1,919,679
|
| Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, RB, M/F
Housing(e)(f) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 3.50%, 12/01/36 |
|
810 |
631,800 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
2,970 |
2,316,600 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 12/01/51 |
|
805 |
627,900 |
| |
|
|
17,465,685 |
| State — 6.1% |
| ||
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, GO, 1st Series, Class B,
4.00%, 08/15/43 |
|
1,855 |
1,705,084 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 12/31/38 |
|
2,270 |
2,270,841 |
| 5.00%, 06/30/42 |
|
2,000 |
1,953,744 |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Oil Franchise Tax
Revenue, Refunding RB, Series A, 4.00%, 12/01/51 |
|
3,920 |
3,301,985 |
| |
|
|
9,231,654 |
| Tobacco — 6.4% |
| ||
| Commonwealth Financing Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/01/34 |
|
4,175 |
4,295,075 |
| 5.00%, 06/01/35 |
|
1,295 |
1,325,017 |
| 4.00%, 06/01/39 |
|
4,300 |
3,996,155 |
| |
|
|
9,616,247 |
| Transportation — 27.7% |
| ||
| Allegheny County Airport Authority, ARB |
|
|
|
| Series A, AMT, 5.25%, 01/01/39 |
|
880 |
919,899 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.50%, 01/01/53 |
|
500 |
505,552 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 01/01/56 |
|
920 |
867,674 |
| City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania Airport Revenue, Refunding ARB, AMT, 4.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
4,525 |
3,861,095 |
| Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/42 |
|
610 |
614,127 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/47 |
|
1,500 |
1,490,018 |
| Delaware River Port Authority, RB, 5.00%, 01/01/37 |
|
2,285 |
2,284,874 |
| Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
RB, AMT, 5.25%, 06/30/53 |
|
3,695 |
3,471,876 |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series B-1, 5.00%, 06/01/42 |
|
385 |
385,761 |
| Sub-Series B-1, 5.25%, 06/01/47 |
|
1,000 |
1,002,354 |
| 1st Series, Subordinate, 5.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
2,035 |
2,126,564 |
| Series A, Subordinate, 3.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
1,400 |
1,105,942 |
| Series A, Subordinate, 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
1,000 |
870,561 |
| Series A, Subordinate, 4.00%, 12/01/49 |
|
2,000 |
1,671,829 |
| Series A, Subordinate, 4.00%, 12/01/50 |
|
2,500 |
2,091,670 |
| Series A, Subordinate, (BAM-TCRS), 4.00%, 12/01/50 |
|
1,385 |
1,160,152 |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB, CAB(c) |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series A-3, 0.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
1,975 |
901,963 |
| Sub-Series A-3, 0.00%, 12/01/42 |
|
4,760 |
1,913,066 |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 1st Series, 5.00%, 12/01/43 |
|
860 |
885,055 |
| Series B, 5.25%, 12/01/52 |
|
775 |
789,515 |
| Series 2017-3, Subordinate, 5.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
2,345 |
2,360,462 |
| Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 06/01/47(g) |
|
8,000 |
8,158,335 |
| 5.25%, 06/01/52 |
|
2,305 |
2,336,553 |
| |
|
|
41,774,897 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Utilities — 9.3% |
| ||
| Allegheny County Sanitary Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/49 |
$ |
485 |
$ 418,861
|
| 5.25%, 12/01/55 |
|
645 |
661,048 |
| Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority, RB, Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/47 |
|
670 |
691,221 |
| City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania Water & Wastewater
Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/43 |
|
1,040 |
1,044,761 |
| Series C, 5.25%, 09/01/49 |
|
1,500 |
1,535,858 |
| Series C, 5.50%, 06/01/52 |
|
1,900 |
1,943,184 |
| Series C, 5.25%, 09/01/54 |
|
500 |
509,252 |
| City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania Water & Wastewater Revenue, Refunding RB, Series B, 4.50%, 09/01/48 |
|
1,240 |
1,170,192 |
| New Kensington Municipal Sanitary Authority, RB, 3.25%,
12/01/47 |
|
1,195 |
857,858 |
| Philadelphia Gas Works Co., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.25%, 08/01/54 |
|
2,670 |
2,713,498 |
| Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority, RB, Series A, 1st
Lien, 5.00%, 09/01/55 |
|
970 |
971,091 |
| Westmoreland County Municipal Authority, RB, 5.00%, 08/15/49 |
|
1,000 |
1,002,037 |
| Williamsport Sanitary Authority, Refunding RB, (BAM),
4.00%, 01/01/40 |
|
580 |
557,012 |
| |
|
|
14,075,873 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Pennsylvania |
211,456,773 | ||
| Puerto Rico — 2.9% |
| ||
| State — 2.9% |
| ||
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
|
261 |
233,279 |
| Series A-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
31 |
28,223 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
46 |
40,725 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.33%, 07/01/40 |
|
125 |
115,738 |
| Series B-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
|
208 |
182,858 |
| Series B-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
3,258 |
2,966,112 |
| Series B-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
274 |
240,598 |
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax Revenue, RB, CAB, Series A-1, Restructured, 0.00%, 07/01/46(c) |
|
2,091 |
645,401 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Puerto Rico |
4,452,934 | ||
| Wisconsin — 1.2% |
| ||
| Transportation — 1.2% |
| ||
| Public Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, AMT, Senior Lien, 5.50%, 07/01/44 |
|
850 |
852,304 |
| Series A, AMT, Senior Lien, 5.75%, 07/01/49 |
|
1,000 |
994,929 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Wisconsin |
1,847,233 | ||
| Total Municipal Bonds — 144.9% (Cost: $229,703,625) |
218,701,783 | ||
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts(h) | |||
| Pennsylvania — 18.6% | |||
| Education — 6.3% |
| ||
| Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, RB, Series AR, 4.00%, 06/15/38 |
|
10,160 |
9,552,614 |
| Health — 2.7% |
| ||
| Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, 5.25%, 08/15/50(i)
|
|
4,000 |
4,109,984 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Housing — 4.7% |
| ||
| Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, RB, S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series 143A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.38%, 10/01/46 |
$ |
3,209 |
$ 3,258,753
|
| Series 147 A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.70%, 10/01/49(i) |
|
1,410 |
1,329,985 |
| Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Refunding RB, S/F Housing, Sustainability Bonds, Series 142-A, 5.00%, 10/01/50 |
|
2,538 |
2,492,229 |
| |
|
|
7,080,967 |
| Utilities — 4.9% |
| ||
| City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania Water & Wastewater
Revenue, Refunding RB, Series B, 5.50%, 09/01/53 |
|
2,481 |
2,568,913 |
| Philadelphia Gas Works Co., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.25%, 08/01/54(i) |
|
4,648 |
4,723,558 |
| |
|
|
7,292,471 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Pennsylvania |
28,036,036 | ||
| Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts — 18.6% (Cost: $29,072,081) |
28,036,036 | ||
| Total Long-Term Investments — 163.5% (Cost: $258,775,706) |
246,737,819 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 2.3% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(j)(k) |
|
3,568,432 |
3,568,789 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 2.3% (Cost: $3,568,780) |
3,568,789 | ||
| Total Investments — 165.8% (Cost: $262,344,486) |
250,306,608 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.4% |
2,018,676 | ||
| Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable — (12.6)% |
(18,979,375 ) | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(54.6)% |
(82,411,510 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 150,934,399 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (d) |
U.S. Government securities held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
| (e) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default. |
| (f) |
Non-income producing security. |
| (g) |
When-issued security. |
| (h) |
Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates
received by the Fund. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See Note 4
of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
| (i) |
All or a portion of the security is subject to a recourse agreement. The aggregate
maximum potential amount the Fund could ultimately be required to pay under the
agreement, which expires on August 1, 2032 to October 1, 2042, is
$7,070,205. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details. |
| (j) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (k) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 5,575,065 |
$ — |
$ (2,006,276 )(a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 3,568,789 |
3,568,432 |
$ 90,104 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 218,701,783
|
$ —
|
$ 218,701,783
|
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts |
— |
28,036,036 |
— |
28,036,036 |
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
3,568,789 |
— |
— |
3,568,789 |
| |
$3,568,789 |
$246,737,819 |
$— |
$250,306,608 |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
$—
|
$(18,861,288
) |
$—
|
$(18,861,288
) |
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
— |
(82,600,000 ) |
— |
(82,600,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(101,461,288 ) |
$— |
$(101,461,288 ) |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama — 3.4% |
| ||
| Corporate — 3.4% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB(a) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 05/01/55 |
$ |
1,780 |
$ 1,899,502
|
| Series D, 5.00%, 03/01/55 |
|
825 |
866,827 |
| Lower Alabama Gas District, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 09/01/46 |
|
645 |
644,087 |
| Southeast Energy Authority A Cooperative District,
RB(a) |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 01/01/56 |
|
3,270 |
3,318,400 |
| Series B, 5.25%, 03/01/55 |
|
1,850 |
1,943,624 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Alabama |
8,672,440 | ||
| California(a)
— 0.9% |
| ||
| Corporate — 0.4% |
| ||
| California Community Choice Financing Authority, RB,
Series B, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 01/01/55 |
|
1,110 |
1,155,542 |
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development
Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT,
Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%, 01/01/65(b) |
|
1,355 |
1,205,950 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in California |
2,361,492 | ||
| Georgia — 1.0% |
| ||
| Corporate — 1.0% |
| ||
| Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., RB, Series A, 5.00%,
05/15/43 |
|
2,620 |
2,581,539 |
| Guam — 0.2% |
| ||
| Utilities — 0.2% |
| ||
| Guam Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 10/01/41 |
|
460 |
467,190 |
| Kentucky — 1.8% |
| ||
| Corporate — 1.8% |
| ||
| Kentucky Public Energy Authority, Refunding RB,
Series B, 5.00%, 01/01/55(a) |
|
4,230 |
4,473,901 |
| New York — 126.1% |
| ||
| Corporate — 7.7% |
| ||
| Build NYC Resource Corp., Refunding RB, AMT, 5.00%, 01/01/35(b) |
|
405 |
404,907 |
| New York Energy Finance Development Corp., RB,
5.00%, 07/01/56 |
|
7,840 |
8,175,497 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, 5.50%, 10/01/37 |
|
655 |
740,896 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB,
5.25%, 10/01/35 |
|
2,155 |
2,415,945 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB, AMT, 2.75%, 09/01/50(a) |
|
1,040 |
1,037,418 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., ARB,
AMT, 5.63%, 04/01/40 |
|
1,670 |
1,712,641 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/35 |
|
930 |
942,833 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/01/40 |
|
4,170 |
4,067,175 |
| |
|
|
19,497,312 |
| County/City/Special District/School District — 21.0% |
| ||
| Battery Park City Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/41 |
|
525 |
558,533 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/42 |
|
1,015 |
1,070,410 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/43 |
|
1,235 |
1,292,441 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| County/City/Special District/School District (continued) |
| ||
| Battery Park City Authority, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/48 |
$ |
1,710 |
$ 1,746,469
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/53 |
|
490 |
496,430 |
| City of New York, GO |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 5.00%, 08/01/47 |
|
1,895 |
1,896,321 |
| Series D, 5.38%, 06/01/32 |
|
25 |
25,033 |
| Series F-1, 5.00%, 03/01/44 |
|
2,000 |
2,022,471 |
| Series G-1, 5.25%, 02/01/50 |
|
655 |
671,883 |
| County of Nassau New York, GOL |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 04/01/49 |
|
2,170 |
1,866,976 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 04/01/55 |
|
2,625 |
2,661,549 |
| County of Nassau New York, Refunding GOL, Series B, 5.00%, 04/01/49 |
|
3,570 |
3,590,195 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB(c) |
|
|
|
| 0.00%, 03/01/35 |
|
500 |
335,529 |
| 0.00%, 03/01/39 |
|
1,000 |
514,556 |
| 0.00%, 03/01/42 |
|
3,710 |
1,539,505 |
| 0.00%, 03/01/45 |
|
2,000 |
669,995 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series E-1, 5.00%, 02/01/43 |
|
1,290 |
1,295,915 |
| Series A-1, Subordinate, 5.00%, 08/01/41 |
|
1,000 |
1,031,691 |
| Series A-1, Subordinate, 4.00%, 08/01/48 |
|
2,000 |
1,704,134 |
| Series F-1, Subordinate, 4.00%, 02/01/51 |
|
5,305 |
4,489,869 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, 05/01/50(d) |
|
1,315 |
1,385,758 |
| Series B, 4.38%, 05/01/53 |
|
1,835 |
1,656,988 |
| Series H-1, 5.50%, 11/01/51 |
|
930 |
976,347 |
| Series C-S, Subordinate, 5.00%, 05/01/50 |
|
855 |
860,150 |
| Series H-1, Subordinate, 5.25%, 11/01/48 |
|
2,095 |
2,165,837 |
| New York Convention Center Development Corp., RB,
CAB, Series B, Sub Lien, 0.00%, 11/15/55(c) |
|
4,000 |
677,796 |
| New York Liberty Development Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Class 1, 5.00%, 11/15/44(b) |
|
2,730 |
2,621,113 |
| Class 2, 5.38%, 11/15/40(b) |
|
680 |
670,819 |
| Series 1, 3.00%, 02/15/42 |
|
1,015 |
772,892 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority Sales Tax Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.25%, 05/15/58 |
|
2,365 |
2,044,394 |
| Series A, 4.50%, 05/15/63 |
|
5,000 |
4,479,780 |
| Series A-1, 4.13%, 05/15/64 |
|
6,310 |
5,271,892 |
| |
|
|
53,063,671 |
| Education — 13.5% |
| ||
| Albany Capital Resource Corp., Refunding
RB(e)(f) |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
595 |
307,079 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/51 |
|
615 |
317,401 |
| Amherst Development Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 10/01/43 |
|
535 |
484,540 |
| 5.00%, 10/01/48 |
|
410 |
358,249 |
| Buffalo & Erie County Industrial Land Development Corp., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/35 |
|
345 |
352,253 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., RB(b) |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 09/01/59 |
|
1,020 |
855,514 |
| Series A, 5.13%, 05/01/38 |
|
660 |
656,582 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 05/01/48 |
|
270 |
256,038 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 08/01/47 |
|
525 |
466,258 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/38 |
|
750 |
750,689 |
| County of Cattaraugus New York, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 05/01/34 |
|
170 |
170,146 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Education (continued) |
| ||
| County of Cattaraugus New York, RB (continued) |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 05/01/39 |
$ |
125 |
$ 122,178
|
| Dobbs Ferry Local Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/39 |
|
1,000 |
1,000,331 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/44 |
|
500 |
482,202 |
| Dutchess County Local Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/43 |
|
455 |
455,282 |
| 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
3,000 |
2,440,113 |
| Dutchess County Local Development Corp., Refunding
RB, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
1,310 |
1,093,882 |
| Hempstead Town Local Development Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 10/01/35 |
|
935 |
935,584 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.25%, 07/01/55 |
|
850 |
865,321 |
| Series 1, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 07/01/40 |
|
1,440 |
1,637,842 |
| Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
1,050 |
1,050,796 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 07/01/48 |
|
385 |
386,262 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 07/01/50 |
|
335 |
342,418 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/35 |
|
3,445 |
3,443,798 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/47 |
|
1,285 |
1,044,192 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/49 |
|
285 |
225,160 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
1,985 |
1,897,571 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 07/01/54 |
|
2,625 |
2,755,136 |
| Onondaga Civic Development Corp., RB, 5.50%,
12/01/56 |
|
900 |
941,710 |
| Onondaga County Trust for Cultural Resources, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 05/01/40 |
|
1,065 |
1,058,851 |
| 5.00%, 12/01/43 |
|
2,095 |
2,125,367 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/47 |
|
1,000 |
865,879 |
| Schenectady County Capital Resource Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 01/01/47 |
|
3,995 |
3,966,590 |
| |
|
|
34,111,214 |
| Health — 8.8% |
| ||
| Brookhaven Local Development Corp., Refunding RB,
5.00%, 10/01/50 |
|
1,900 |
1,863,374 |
| Build NYC Resource Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| Class A, 5.25%, 07/01/37 |
|
1,010 |
967,075 |
| Class A, 5.50%, 07/01/47 |
|
620 |
566,386 |
| Genesee County Funding Corp., Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/52 |
|
680 |
655,659 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/41 |
|
600 |
521,352 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/32 |
|
420 |
420,281 |
| Monroe County Industrial Development Corp.,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
2,800 |
2,680,880 |
| 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
2,150 |
1,757,198 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series 1, 5.25%, 07/01/54 |
|
680 |
702,085 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/50 |
|
710 |
589,717 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.25%, 05/01/52 |
|
3,000 |
2,606,184 |
| 5.00%, 05/01/52 |
|
2,210 |
2,164,039 |
| Class A, 5.25%, 05/01/54 |
|
2,525 |
2,547,570 |
| Series 1, 4.00%, 07/01/47 |
|
2,090 |
1,811,835 |
| Oneida County Local Development Corp., RB, Class A, 4.00%, 12/01/46 |
|
1,100 |
954,616 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Health (continued) |
| ||
| Suffolk County Economic Development Corp., RB,
Series C, 5.00%, 07/01/32 |
$ |
530 |
$ 530,424
|
| Tompkins County Development Corp., Refunding RB, 5.00%, 07/01/44 |
|
110 |
105,936 |
| Westchester County Local Development Corp.,
Refunding RB(b) |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
410 |
377,719 |
| 5.00%, 07/01/56 |
|
465 |
398,075 |
| |
|
|
22,220,405 |
| Housing — 12.3% |
| ||
| New York City Housing Development Corp, Refunding RB, Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.25%, 11/01/43 |
|
4,385 |
3,978,929 |
| New York City Housing Development Corp., RB, M/F
Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, (FHLMC), 5.20%, 02/01/55 |
|
1,480 |
1,481,325 |
| Series C-1, 5.05%, 11/01/50 |
|
525 |
510,787 |
| Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.80%, 02/01/53 |
|
4,115 |
3,882,806 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.75%, 11/01/48 |
|
280 |
264,025 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, (FHLMC, FNMA, GNMA), 4.70%, 08/01/54 |
|
2,100 |
1,951,781 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.65%, 11/01/49 |
|
525 |
484,776 |
| Series B-1, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/01/55 |
|
195 |
196,114 |
| Series B-1, Class A, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD
SECT 8), 4.65%, 11/01/49 |
|
790 |
729,093 |
| Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.50%, 08/01/54 |
|
895 |
800,539 |
| Series D-1, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 11/01/54 |
|
525 |
471,426 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8), 4.45%, 11/01/49 |
|
920 |
821,200 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, (HUD SECT 8),
4.50%, 11/01/54 |
|
660 |
599,616 |
| Series E-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.85%, 11/01/53 |
|
2,835 |
2,697,825 |
| Series F-1A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.55%, 11/01/54 |
|
4,000 |
3,691,262 |
| Series F-1A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/01/54 |
|
1,005 |
993,504 |
| New York State Housing Finance Agency, RB, M/F
Housing |
|
|
|
| Series B-1, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.85%, 11/01/48 |
|
1,015 |
959,473 |
| Series C-1, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.65%,
11/01/48 |
|
405 |
372,083 |
| State of New York Mortgage Agency Homeowner Mortgage Revenue, RB, S/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series 250, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.80%,
10/01/48 |
|
2,630 |
2,499,848 |
| Series 255, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.70%, 10/01/43 |
|
1,070 |
1,028,041 |
| Series 261, Sustainability Bonds, (SONYMA), 4.55%,
10/01/49 |
|
2,945 |
2,675,180 |
| |
|
|
31,089,633 |
| State — 6.0% |
| ||
| Empire State Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46 |
|
2,610 |
2,648,814 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 03/15/49 |
|
2,720 |
2,321,585 |
| New York City Transitional Finance Authority Building
Aid Revenue, RB, Series S-1, Subordinate, (SAW),
4.00%, 07/15/45 |
|
1,290 |
1,168,029 |
| New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/52 |
|
2,995 |
3,010,800 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| State (continued) |
| ||
| New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/46 |
$ |
935 |
$ 938,153
|
| Series A, 4.00%, 03/15/47 |
|
1,170 |
1,035,080 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/49 |
|
2,620 |
2,648,006 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB,
Series A, 5.00%, 03/15/48 |
|
1,320 |
1,323,804 |
| |
|
|
15,094,271 |
| Tobacco — 3.8% |
| ||
| Chautauqua Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.75%, 06/01/39 |
|
400 |
377,250 |
| 5.00%, 06/01/48 |
|
550 |
496,189 |
| New York Counties Tobacco Trust IV, Refunding RB,
Series A, 6.25%, 06/01/41(b) |
|
1,277 |
1,259,419 |
| New York Counties Tobacco Trust VI, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-2B, 5.00%, 06/01/51 |
|
2,340 |
1,993,884 |
| Series C, 4.00%, 06/01/51 |
|
2,250 |
1,687,927 |
| Niagara Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., Refunding
RB, 5.25%, 05/15/40 |
|
630 |
590,360 |
| TSASC, Inc., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/41 |
|
1,410 |
1,358,667 |
| Westchester Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Sub-Series C, 4.00%, 06/01/42 |
|
890 |
708,903 |
| Sub-Series C, 5.13%, 06/01/51 |
|
1,225 |
1,051,343 |
| |
|
|
9,523,942 |
| Transportation — 33.2% |
| ||
| Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 02/15/42 |
|
915 |
917,716 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority Dedicated Tax
Fund, Refunding RB, Series B-2, Sustainability
Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
1,550 |
1,561,903 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/46 |
|
2,000 |
1,691,336 |
| Series D-2, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
1,255 |
1,041,113 |
| Series D-3, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/49 |
|
2,150 |
1,755,513 |
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series B, 5.00%, 11/15/37 |
|
1,000 |
1,002,864 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 11/15/47 |
|
2,630 |
2,707,882 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/54 |
|
1,395 |
1,137,482 |
| Series A-1, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/15/57 |
|
1,000 |
962,577 |
| MTA Hudson Rail Yards Trust Obligations, Refunding
RB, Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/56 |
|
5,160 |
4,936,490 |
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.00%, 07/01/28 |
|
625 |
625,188 |
| New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series P, 5.00%, 01/01/49 |
|
655 |
660,618 |
| Series B, Subordinate, 4.00%, 01/01/50 |
|
3,720 |
3,129,274 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., ARB |
|
|
|
| 6.00%, 06/30/50 |
|
525 |
536,096 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/34 |
|
1,300 |
1,373,865 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/35 |
|
5,000 |
5,229,728 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
1,995 |
2,062,051 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/40 |
|
1,040 |
1,040,426 |
| Series A, AMT, 4.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
1,100 |
979,990 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 07/01/41 |
|
3,310 |
3,249,046 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.00%, 07/01/46 |
|
1,540 |
1,461,870 |
| Series A, AMT, 5.25%, 01/01/50 |
|
8,440 |
8,071,715 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Transportation (continued) |
| ||
| New York Transportation Development Corp., RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 10/31/41 |
$ |
360 |
$ 312,742
|
| AMT, 4.00%, 10/31/46 |
|
2,000 |
1,619,291 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 06/30/49 |
|
1,115 |
1,052,696 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 6.00%, 06/30/54 |
|
3,290 |
3,340,264 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.13%, 06/30/60 |
|
525 |
491,569 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 06/30/60 |
|
3,945 |
3,815,263 |
| AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 5.50%, 06/30/60 |
|
3,580 |
3,465,945 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp.,
Refunding RB, Series A, AMT, Sustainability Bonds,
5.50%, 12/31/60 |
|
845 |
816,722 |
| New York Transportation Development Corp., Refunding RB, CAB, Series B, AMT, 5.00%, 12/31/54(g) |
|
1,315 |
750,602 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, ARB,
Series 221, AMT, 4.00%, 07/15/45 |
|
1,105 |
936,149 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding ARB |
|
|
|
| Series 240, 5.00%, 07/15/53 |
|
1,305 |
1,315,638 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 10/15/34 |
|
1,300 |
1,328,050 |
| Series 177, AMT, 4.00%, 01/15/43 |
|
1,120 |
939,177 |
| Series 206, AMT, 5.00%, 11/15/47 |
|
2,625 |
2,621,184 |
| Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
530 |
542,027 |
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/48 |
|
1,310 |
1,299,937 |
| Series 242, AMT, 5.00%, 12/01/53 |
|
2,795 |
2,782,677 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.25%, 12/01/54 |
|
3,270 |
3,345,956 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 11/15/56 |
|
1,555 |
1,262,864 |
| Series A, 5.50%, 11/15/57 |
|
4,430 |
4,569,027 |
| Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series B, 5.00%, 11/15/37 |
|
725 |
748,961 |
| Series C, Sustainability Bonds, 5.25%, 11/15/42 |
|
470 |
497,165 |
| |
|
|
83,988,649 |
| Utilities — 19.8% |
| ||
| Long Island Power Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 0.00%, 06/01/28(c) |
|
3,515 |
3,254,831 |
| (BAM-TCRS), 5.00%, 09/01/42 |
|
3,655 |
3,664,253 |
| 5.00%, 09/01/47 |
|
555 |
546,765 |
| Series C, 5.25%, 09/01/29 |
|
4,000 |
4,367,546 |
| Series E, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 09/01/53 |
|
1,835 |
1,844,546 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series BB, 5.00%, 06/15/52 |
|
2,220 |
2,237,019 |
| Series CC-1, 4.00%, 06/15/52 |
|
4,000 |
3,349,676 |
| Series FF-1, Subordinate, 4.00%, 06/15/49 |
|
9,535 |
8,046,606 |
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 06/15/50 |
|
930 |
930,947 |
| Series DD, 4.13%, 06/15/46 |
|
535 |
482,021 |
| Series DD, 4.13%, 06/15/47 |
|
3,395 |
2,987,486 |
| New York Power Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/15/53 |
|
1,310 |
1,322,619 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/48 |
|
4,180 |
4,242,760 |
| New York Power Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/55 |
|
7,610 |
6,383,519 |
| Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 4.00%, 11/15/60 |
|
580 |
485,992 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB, Series A, Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 09/15/54 |
|
2,630 |
2,685,388 |
| New York State Environmental Facilities Corp.,
Refunding RB, 5.00%, 06/15/51 |
|
2,035 |
2,054,621 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Utilities(i)
— 6.7% |
| ||
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB,
Series BB, 5.25%, 06/15/55 |
$ |
7,420 |
$ 7,636,217
|
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Series AA-3, 5.25%, 06/15/48 |
|
4,557 |
4,677,032 |
| Utility Debt Securitization Authority, Refunding RB, 2nd
Series, 5.00%, 12/15/50 |
|
4,580 |
4,664,493 |
| |
|
|
16,977,742 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in New York |
60,763,787 | ||
| Total Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts — 24.0% (Cost: $61,969,065) |
60,763,787 | ||
| Total Long-Term Investments — 162.8% (Cost: $424,238,872) |
411,472,207 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 5.7% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(j)(k) |
|
14,339,897 |
14,341,331 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 5.7% (Cost: $14,341,331) |
14,341,331 | ||
| Total Investments — 168.5% (Cost: $438,580,203) |
425,813,538 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.3% |
3,217,595 | ||
| Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including Interest Expense and Fees Payable — (17.7)% |
(44,625,633 ) | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(52.1)% |
(131,712,986 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 252,692,514 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (d) |
When-issued security. |
| (e) |
Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default. |
| (f) |
Non-income producing security. |
| (g) |
Step coupon security. Coupon rate will either increase (step-up bond) or decrease (step-
down bond) at regular intervals until maturity. Interest rate shown reflects the rate
currently in effect. |
| (h) |
Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates
received by the Fund. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See Note 4
of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
| (i) |
All or a portion of the security is subject to a recourse agreement. The aggregate
maximum potential amount the Fund could ultimately be required to pay under the
agreements, which expire between November 15, 2030 to June 15, 2033, is
$37,283,510. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details. |
| (j) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (k) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 7,022,409 |
$ 7,318,922 (a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 14,341,331 |
14,339,897 |
$ 175,713 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| Description |
Number of Contracts |
Expiration Date |
Notional Amount (000) |
Value/ Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
| Short Contracts |
|
|
|
|
| 10-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
91 |
09/19/25 |
$ 10,108 |
$ (146,775 ) |
| U.S. Long Bond |
88 |
09/19/25 |
10,046 |
(283,227
) |
| 5-Year U.S. Treasury Note |
53 |
09/30/25 |
5,734 |
(32,708 ) |
| |
|
|
|
$ (462,710 ) |
| |
Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total |
| Liabilities — Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts Unrealized depreciation on futures
contracts(a) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 462,710 |
$ — |
$ 462,710 |
| (a) |
Net cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts and centrally cleared swaps, if any, are reported in the Schedule of Investments. In the
Statements of Assets and Liabilities, only current day’s variation
margin is reported in receivables or payables and the net cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in accumulated earnings (loss). |
| Futures contracts: |
|
| Average notional value of contracts — short |
$20,478,229
|
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 350,708,420
|
$ —
|
$ 350,708,420
|
| Municipal Bonds Transferred to Tender Option Bond Trusts |
— |
60,763,787 |
— |
60,763,787 |
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
14,341,331 |
— |
— |
14,341,331 |
| |
$14,341,331 |
$411,472,207 |
$— |
$425,813,538 |
| Derivative Financial Instruments(a)
|
|
|
|
|
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| Interest Rate Contracts |
$ (462,710 ) |
$ — |
$ — |
$ (462,710 ) |
| (a) |
Derivative financial instruments are futures contracts. Futures contracts are valued at the
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
$—
|
$(44,561,011
) |
$—
|
$(44,561,011
) |
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
— |
(132,000,000 ) |
— |
(132,000,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(176,561,011 ) |
$— |
$(176,561,011 ) |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds | |||
| Alabama — 6.2% |
| ||
| Corporate — 6.2% |
| ||
| Black Belt Energy Gas District, RB, Series A, 5.25%,
01/01/54(a) |
$ |
1,015 |
$ 1,077,033 |
| California — 0.5% |
| ||
| Transportation — 0.5% |
| ||
| California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Refunding RB, Series A, Class B, AMT, Sustainability Bonds, 9.50%, 01/01/65(a)(b) |
|
100 |
89,000 |
| District of Columbia — 2.8% |
| ||
| Tobacco — 2.8% |
| ||
| District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.,
RB, Series C, 0.00%, 06/15/55(c) |
|
5,400 |
483,893 |
| Iowa — 5.8% |
| ||
| Corporate — 5.8% |
| ||
| PEFA, Inc., RB, 5.00%,
09/01/49(a) |
|
1,000 |
1,012,258 |
| Puerto Rico — 4.1% |
| ||
| State — 4.1% |
| ||
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. Sales Tax
Revenue, RB |
|
|
|
| Series A-1, Restructured, 4.75%, 07/01/53 |
|
127 |
113,511 |
| Series A-1, Restructured, 5.00%, 07/01/58 |
|
478 |
435,176 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.78%, 07/01/58 |
|
129 |
114,206 |
| Series A-2, Restructured, 4.33%, 07/01/40 |
|
60 |
55,554 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Puerto Rico |
718,447 | ||
| Virginia — 139.6% |
| ||
| County/City/Special District/School District — 31.7% |
| ||
| Albemarle County Economic Development Authority, RB,
Series A, 5.00%, 06/01/42 |
|
500 |
519,612 |
| Ballston Quarter Community Development Authority, TA, Series A-1, 5.50%, 03/01/46 |
|
94 |
91,481 |
| Ballston Quarter Community Development Authority, TA,
CAB, Series A-2, 7.13%, 03/01/59(d) |
|
225 |
190,396 |
| Cherry Hill Community Development Authority, SAB, 5.40%, 03/01/45(b) |
|
250 |
241,486 |
| Chesterfield County Economic Development Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 5.00%, 04/01/43 |
|
500 |
517,741 |
| 5.00%, 04/01/45 |
|
1,000 |
1,020,207 |
| Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission, RB, Series A, 4.00%, 07/01/57 |
|
2,000 |
1,656,579 |
| Lower Magnolia Green Community Development
Authority, SAB, 5.00%, 03/01/35(b) |
|
235 |
232,124 |
| Winchester Economic Development Authority, RB, Series A, 5.00%, 08/01/43 |
|
1,000 |
1,035,220 |
| |
|
|
5,504,846 |
| Education — 9.6% |
| ||
| Virginia College Building Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| (NPFGC), 5.25%, 01/01/26 |
|
110 |
111,092 |
| (NPFGC), 5.25%, 01/01/31 |
|
1,000 |
1,090,601 |
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Refunding RB, 4.00%, 10/01/38 |
|
500 |
467,543 |
| |
|
|
1,669,236 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Health — 25.6% |
| ||
| Danville Industrial Development Authority, Refunding RB,
(AMBAC), 5.25%, 10/01/28(e) |
$ |
90 |
$ 94,193
|
| Henrico County Economic Development Authority, RB, Class A, 5.00%, 10/01/52 |
|
1,000 |
982,223 |
| Henrico County Economic Development Authority,
Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| 4.25%, 06/01/26 |
|
145 |
144,990 |
| Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/48 |
|
500 |
496,851 |
| Isle Wight County Industrial Development Authority, RB, 5.25%, 07/01/53 |
|
250 |
253,644 |
| Virginia Commonwealth University Health System
Authority, RB, Series A, 5.25%, 07/01/49 |
|
1,000 |
1,031,459 |
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/54 |
|
500 |
487,971 |
| Winchester Economic Development Authority, Refunding
RB, 5.00%, 01/01/44 |
|
1,000 |
967,364 |
| |
|
|
4,458,695 |
| Housing — 24.4% |
| ||
| Virginia Housing Development Authority, RB, M/F Housing |
|
|
|
| Series A, 4.60%, 09/01/49 |
|
1,000 |
921,555 |
| Series B, 5.00%, 03/01/65 |
|
1,000 |
975,842 |
| Series F, (HUD SEC 8), 5.35%, 11/01/58 |
|
1,000 |
1,013,753 |
| Series G, 5.15%, 11/01/52 |
|
600 |
600,748 |
| Virginia Housing Development Authority, RB, S/F Housing,
Series C, 4.88%, 07/01/48 |
|
750 |
722,555 |
| |
|
|
4,234,453 |
| State — 16.6% |
| ||
| Virginia College Building Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| 4.00%, 02/01/42 |
|
1,000 |
924,895 |
| 4.00%, 02/01/43 |
|
500 |
455,311 |
| Series A, 4.00%, 02/01/42 |
|
500 |
463,403 |
| Series A, (SAW), 4.00%, 09/01/47 |
|
605 |
521,061 |
| Virginia Resources Authority, RB, Class B, 5.25%,
11/01/47 |
|
500 |
518,594 |
| |
|
|
2,883,264 |
| Tobacco — 6.7% |
| ||
| Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Refunding RB |
|
|
|
| Series B-1, 5.00%, 06/01/47 |
|
885 |
736,759 |
| Series B-2, Convertible, 5.20%,
06/01/46(d) |
|
500 |
433,139 |
| |
|
|
1,169,898 |
| Transportation — 11.0% |
| ||
| Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District, RB, 5.00%,
07/01/46 |
|
1,000 |
991,124 |
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, RB |
|
|
|
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/31/52 |
|
245 |
224,452 |
| AMT, 5.00%, 12/31/56 |
|
755 |
697,798 |
| |
|
|
1,913,374 |
| Utilities — 14.0% |
| ||
| City of Norfolk Virginia Water Revenue, RB, 5.00%,
11/01/45 |
|
500 |
509,886 |
| Security |
|
Par (000) |
Value |
| Utilities (continued) |
| ||
| County of Henrico Virginia Water & Sewer Revenue, RB,
4.00%, 05/01/46 |
$ |
1,000 |
$ 896,552
|
| Prince William County Service Authority, Refunding RB, 5.00%, 07/15/55 |
|
1,000 |
1,021,195 |
| |
|
|
2,427,633 |
| Total Municipal Bonds in Virginia |
24,261,399 | ||
| Total Long-Term Investments — 159.0% (Cost: $28,625,500) |
27,642,030 | ||
| |
|
Shares |
|
| Short-Term Securities | |||
| Money Market Funds — 6.4% |
| ||
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares, 2.51%(f)(g) |
|
1,106,048 |
1,106,159 |
| Total Short-Term Securities — 6.4% (Cost: $1,106,103) |
1,106,159 | ||
| Total Investments — 165.4% (Cost: $29,731,603) |
28,748,189 | ||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.1% |
191,912 | ||
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value, Net of Deferred Offering Costs —
(66.5)% |
(11,560,073 ) | ||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
$ 17,380,028 | ||
| (a) |
Variable rate security. Interest rate resets periodically. The rate shown is the effective
interest rate as of period end. Security description also includes the reference rate and
spread if published and available. |
| (b) |
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to
qualified institutional investors. |
| (c) |
Zero-coupon bond. |
| (d) |
Step coupon security. Coupon rate will either increase (step-up bond) or decrease (step-
down bond) at regular intervals until maturity. Interest rate shown reflects the rate
currently in effect. |
| (e) |
Security is collateralized by municipal bonds or U.S. Treasury obligations. |
| (f) |
Affiliate of the Fund. |
| (g) |
Annualized 7-day yield as of period end. |
| Affiliated Issuer |
Value at 07/31/24 |
Purchases at Cost |
Proceeds from Sales |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
Value at 07/31/25 |
Shares Held at 07/31/25 |
Income |
Capital Gain Distributions from Underlying Funds |
| BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash, Institutional Shares |
$ 792,630 |
$ 313,529 (a) |
$ — |
$ 10 |
$ (10 ) |
$ 1,106,159 |
1,106,048 |
$ 24,288 |
$ — |
| (a) |
Represents net amount purchased (sold). |
| |
Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total |
| Net Realized Gain (Loss) from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ (47,990 ) |
$ — |
$ (47,990 ) |
| Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ 22,823 |
$ — |
$ 22,823 |
| Futures contracts: |
|
| Average notional value of contracts — short |
$—
(a) |
| (a) |
Derivative financial instrument not held at any quarter-end. The risk exposure table serves as an
indicator of activity during the period. |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
| Municipal Bonds |
$ —
|
$ 27,642,030
|
$ —
|
$ 27,642,030
|
| Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
| Money Market Funds |
1,106,159 |
— |
— |
1,106,159 |
| |
$1,106,159 |
$27,642,030 |
$— |
$28,748,189 |
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| VRDP Shares at Liquidation Value |
$— |
$(11,600,000 ) |
$— |
$(11,600,000 ) |
| |
$— |
$(11,600,000 ) |
$— |
$(11,600,000 ) |
| |
MUJ |
MHN |
MIY |
MYN |
| ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| Investments, at value —
unaffiliated(a) |
$ 1,044,122,430 |
$ 518,771,035 |
$ 557,219,855 |
$ 633,885,029 |
| Investments, at value —
affiliated(b) |
22,323,845 |
18,177,023 |
8,499,551 |
22,688,818 |
| Cash |
— |
132,399 |
— |
158,571 |
| Cash pledged for futures contracts |
— |
722,000 |
— |
865,000 |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
| Investments sold |
65,000 |
1,866,590 |
— |
2,255,682 |
| Dividends — affiliated |
42,517 |
57,223 |
15,388 |
55,641 |
| Interest — unaffiliated |
8,515,788 |
6,045,333 |
6,026,620 |
7,180,576 |
| Prepaid expenses |
471,081 |
280,806 |
115,737 |
223,861 |
| Total assets |
1,075,540,661 |
546,052,409 |
571,877,151 |
667,313,178 |
| ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| Payables: |
|
|
|
|
| Investments purchased |
— |
3,598,119 |
— |
4,368,089 |
| Accounting services fees |
72,752 |
48,255 |
48,295 |
53,151 |
| Custodian fees |
5,988 |
3,736 |
3,196 |
4,425 |
| Income dividend distributions — Common Shares |
239,901 |
178,670 |
93,951 |
133,112 |
| Interest expense and fees |
94,986 |
93,264 |
— |
221,884 |
| Investment advisory fees |
454,703 |
245,404 |
237,482 |
275,980 |
| Directors’ and Officer’s fees |
69,622 |
185,727 |
2,207 |
260,051 |
| Other accrued expenses |
297,034 |
148,502 |
9,097 |
9,095 |
| Professional fees |
53,578 |
24,386 |
24,640 |
30,537 |
| Reorganization costs |
— |
168,445 |
191,298 |
160,876 |
| Transfer agent fees |
9,593 |
14,289 |
12,080 |
12,926 |
| Variation margin on futures contracts |
— |
40,366 |
— |
49,001 |
| Total accrued liabilities |
1,298,157 |
4,749,163 |
622,246 |
5,579,127 |
| OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
22,892,201 |
49,297,577 |
— |
69,061,407 |
| VRDP Shares, at liquidation value of $100,000 per share, net of deferred offering costs(c)(d)(e) |
416,457,918 |
171,769,078 |
231,576,090 |
200,823,208 |
| Total other liabilities |
439,350,119 |
221,066,655 |
231,576,090 |
269,884,615 |
| Total liabilities |
440,648,276 |
225,815,818 |
232,198,336 |
275,463,742 |
| Commitments and contingent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
$ 634,892,385
|
$ 320,236,591
|
$ 339,678,815
|
$ 391,849,436 |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS CONSIST OF |
|
|
|
|
| Paid-in capital(f)(g)(h) |
$ 735,267,594 |
$ 413,781,085 |
$ 402,992,539 |
$ 497,795,686 |
| Accumulated loss |
(100,375,209) |
(93,544,494) |
(63,313,724) |
(105,946,250) |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
$ 634,892,385 |
$ 320,236,591 |
$ 339,678,815 |
$ 391,849,436 |
| Net asset value per Common Share |
$ 11.94 |
$ 10.59 |
$ 11.73 |
$ 10.23 |
| (a) Investments, at cost—unaffiliated |
$1,088,035,979 |
$533,041,142 |
$579,752,427 |
$652,238,742 |
| (b) Investments, at cost—affiliated |
$22,323,695 |
$18,177,023 |
$8,499,336 |
$22,688,818 |
| (c) Preferred Shares outstanding
|
4,171 |
1,720 |
2,319 |
2,010 |
| (d) Preferred Shares authorized
|
12,291 |
14,956 |
8,919 |
14,637 |
| (e) Par value per Preferred Share
|
$0.10 |
$0.10 |
$0.10 |
$0.10 |
| (f) Common Shares outstanding
|
53,185,098 |
30,241,637 |
28,964,750 |
38,313,208 |
| (g) Common Shares authorized |
199,987,709 |
199,985,044 |
199,991,081 |
199,985,363 |
| (h) Par value per Common Share
|
$0.10 |
$0.10 |
$0.10 |
$0.10 |
| |
MPA |
BNY |
BHV |
| ASSETS |
|
|
|
| Investments, at value —
unaffiliated(a) |
$ 246,737,819 |
$ 411,472,207 |
$ 27,642,030 |
| Investments, at value —
affiliated(b) |
3,568,789 |
14,341,331 |
1,106,159 |
| Cash |
— |
104,118 |
— |
| Cash pledged for futures contracts |
— |
569,000 |
— |
| Receivables: |
|
|
|
| Investments sold |
4,083,293 |
4,658,588 |
— |
| Dividends — affiliated |
7,272 |
31,860 |
2,034 |
| Interest — unaffiliated |
2,692,372 |
4,446,164 |
318,493 |
| Prepaid expenses |
88,199 |
186,377 |
15,149 |
| Total assets |
257,177,744 |
435,809,645 |
29,083,865 |
| ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
| Payables: |
|
|
|
| Investments purchased |
4,515,617 |
6,007,938 |
— |
| Accounting services fees |
26,211 |
38,952 |
6,381 |
| Custodian fees |
1,593 |
3,372 |
925 |
| Income dividend distributions — Common Shares |
41,759 |
81,462 |
3,256 |
| Interest expense and fees |
118,087 |
64,622 |
— |
| Investment advisory fees |
104,519 |
195,839 |
12,774 |
| Directors’ and Officer’s fees |
12,976 |
55,047 |
13,257 |
| Other accrued expenses |
8,495 |
116,831 |
7,235 |
| Professional fees |
19,615 |
45,297 |
15,915 |
| Reorganization costs |
107,232 |
190,643 |
75,478 |
| Transfer agent fees |
14,443 |
10,860 |
8,543 |
| Variation margin on futures contracts |
— |
32,271 |
— |
| Total accrued liabilities |
4,970,547 |
6,843,134 |
143,764 |
| OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
| TOB Trust Certificates |
18,861,288 |
44,561,011 |
— |
| VRDP Shares, at liquidation value of $100,000 per share, net of deferred offering costs(c)(d)(e) |
82,411,510 |
131,712,986 |
11,560,073 |
| Total other liabilities |
101,272,798 |
176,273,997 |
11,560,073 |
| Total liabilities |
106,243,345 |
183,117,131 |
11,703,837 |
| Commitments and contingent liabilities |
|
|
|
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
$ 150,934,399
|
$ 252,692,514
|
$ 17,380,028 |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS CONSIST OF |
|
|
|
| Paid-in capital(f)(g)(h) |
$ 182,227,401 |
$ 323,535,247 |
$ 22,000,365 |
| Accumulated loss |
(31,293,002) |
(70,842,733) |
(4,620,337) |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
$ 150,934,399 |
$ 252,692,514 |
$ 17,380,028 |
| Net asset value per Common Share |
$ 11.66 |
$ 10.48 |
$ 10.94 |
| (a) Investments, at cost—unaffiliated |
$258,775,706 |
$424,238,872 |
$28,625,500 |
| (b) Investments, at cost—affiliated |
$3,568,780 |
$14,341,331 |
$1,106,103 |
| (c) Preferred Shares outstanding
|
826 |
1,320 |
116 |
| (d) Preferred Shares authorized
|
1,000,000 |
Unlimited |
Unlimited |
| (e) Par value per Preferred Share
|
$0.05 |
$0.001 |
$0.001 |
| (f) Common Shares outstanding
|
12,949,630 |
24,117,105 |
1,588,241 |
| (g) Common Shares authorized |
Unlimited |
Unlimited |
Unlimited |
| (h) Par value per Common Share
|
$0.10 |
$0.001 |
$0.001 |
| |
MUJ |
MHN |
MIY |
MYN |
| INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
| Dividends — affiliated |
$712,929
|
$278,606
|
$272,485
|
$245,245
|
| Interest — unaffiliated |
48,030,481 |
26,080,195 |
25,586,715 |
30,466,708 |
| Total investment income |
48,743,410 |
26,358,801 |
25,859,200 |
30,711,953 |
| EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
| Investment advisory |
5,541,753 |
3,255,226 |
2,926,219 |
3,449,913 |
| Liquidity fees |
2,186,708 |
1,254,732 |
— |
— |
| Remarketing fees on Preferred Shares |
316,320 |
181,603 |
— |
— |
| Accounting services |
142,983 |
94,815 |
94,972 |
104,380 |
| Professional |
132,741 |
86,912 |
77,456 |
89,757 |
| Transfer agent |
87,035 |
25,764 |
41,692 |
34,377 |
| Directors and Officer |
41,765 |
38,268 |
23,136 |
49,511 |
| Registration |
18,517 |
10,584 |
10,141 |
13,399 |
| Custodian |
10,812 |
6,549 |
5,469 |
6,693 |
| Printing and postage |
7,038 |
3,934 |
6,177 |
5,248 |
| Reorganization |
— |
168,919 |
211,356 |
161,504 |
| Proxy |
— |
109,040 |
— |
112,942 |
| Miscellaneous |
78,927 |
72,228 |
73,674 |
73,629 |
| Total expenses excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs |
8,564,599 |
5,308,574 |
3,470,292 |
4,101,353 |
| Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs(a) |
14,302,436 |
8,020,259 |
8,883,007 |
10,020,453 |
| Total expenses |
22,867,035 |
13,328,833 |
12,353,299 |
14,121,806 |
| Less: Fees waived and/or reimbursed by the Manager |
(156,712 ) |
(346,747 ) |
(137,925 ) |
(94,156 ) |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
22,710,323 |
12,982,086 |
12,215,374 |
14,027,650 |
| Net investment income |
26,033,087 |
13,376,715 |
13,643,826 |
16,684,303 |
| REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) |
|
|
|
|
| Net realized gain (loss) from: |
|
|
|
|
| Investments — unaffiliated |
(7,267,398 ) |
(8,651,075 ) |
(4,758,049 ) |
(10,625,848 ) |
| Investments — affiliated |
— |
— |
174 |
— |
| Futures contracts |
— |
(1,778,124 ) |
— |
(2,132,009 ) |
| |
(7,267,398 ) |
(10,429,199 ) |
(4,757,875 ) |
(12,757,857 ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
| Investments — unaffiliated |
(44,708,521 ) |
(30,839,238 ) |
(29,677,219 ) |
(38,803,434 ) |
| Investments — affiliated |
(1 ) |
— |
(173 ) |
— |
| Futures contracts |
— |
317,636 |
— |
389,074 |
| |
(44,708,522 ) |
(30,521,602 ) |
(29,677,392 ) |
(38,414,360 ) |
| Net realized and unrealized loss |
(51,975,920 ) |
(40,950,801 ) |
(34,435,267 ) |
(51,172,217 ) |
| NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$(25,942,833 ) |
$(27,574,086 ) |
$(20,791,441 ) |
$(34,487,914 ) |
| (a) All or a portion of is related to TOB Trusts
and/or VRDP Shares. | ||||
| |
MPA |
BNY |
BHV |
| INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
| Dividends — affiliated |
$90,104
|
$175,713
|
$24,288
|
| Interest — unaffiliated |
11,068,781 |
20,219,953 |
1,383,358 |
| Total investment income |
11,158,885 |
20,395,666 |
1,407,646 |
| EXPENSES |
|
|
|
| Investment advisory |
1,270,930 |
2,510,845 |
199,081 |
| Reorganization |
125,617 |
192,547 |
81,935 |
| Proxy |
90,458 |
153,109 |
— |
| Professional |
58,694 |
91,393 |
55,083 |
| Rating agency |
58,116 |
58,116 |
58,113 |
| Accounting services |
51,865 |
76,402 |
12,479 |
| Transfer agent |
28,361 |
34,372 |
26,668 |
| Directors and Officer |
12,294 |
22,854 |
2,861 |
| Registration |
8,575 |
8,566 |
8,575 |
| Printing and postage |
4,845 |
4,871 |
1,087 |
| Custodian |
2,994 |
4,902 |
1,235 |
| Liquidity fees |
— |
901,539 |
— |
| Remarketing fees on Preferred Shares |
— |
130,879 |
— |
| Miscellaneous |
12,107 |
14,263 |
8,981 |
| Total expenses excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs |
1,724,856 |
4,204,658 |
456,098 |
| Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs(a) |
3,646,330 |
5,961,184 |
446,846 |
| Total expenses |
5,371,186 |
10,165,842 |
902,944 |
| Less: Fees waived and/or reimbursed by the Manager |
(92,145 ) |
(23,678 ) |
(40,710 ) |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
5,279,041 |
10,142,164 |
862,234 |
| Net investment income |
5,879,844 |
10,253,502 |
545,412 |
| REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) |
|
|
|
| Net realized gain (loss) from: |
|
|
|
| Investments — unaffiliated |
(2,332,753 ) |
(7,871,083 ) |
(356,018 ) |
| Investments — affiliated |
— |
— |
10 |
| Futures contracts |
— |
(1,434,311 ) |
(47,990 ) |
| |
(2,332,753 ) |
(9,305,394 ) |
(403,998 ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
| Investments — unaffiliated |
(11,160,663 ) |
(24,723,881 ) |
(1,657,300 ) |
| Investments — affiliated |
— |
— |
(10 ) |
| Futures contracts |
— |
288,053 |
22,823 |
| |
(11,160,663 ) |
(24,435,828 ) |
(1,634,487 ) |
| Net realized and unrealized loss |
(13,493,416 ) |
(33,741,222 ) |
(2,038,485 ) |
| NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$(7,613,572 ) |
$(23,487,720 ) |
$(1,493,073 ) |
| (a) Related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP
Shares. | |||
| |
MUJ |
MHN | ||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended 07/31/24
|
| | ||||
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS
APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
| OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
$26,033,087
|
$23,629,881
|
$13,376,715
|
$11,494,031
|
| Net realized loss |
(7,267,398 ) |
(3,022,708 ) |
(10,429,199 ) |
(10,761,140 ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(44,708,522 ) |
9,068,337 |
(30,521,602 ) |
12,616,625 |
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
(25,942,833 ) |
29,675,510 |
(27,574,086 ) |
13,349,516 |
| DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS(a) |
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(23,150,193 ) |
(26,027,060 ) |
(12,588,857 ) |
(12,758,370 ) |
| Return of capital |
(10,888,269 ) |
(3,273,377 ) |
(5,616,608 ) |
(1,902,330 ) |
| Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions to Common Shareholders |
(34,038,462 ) |
(29,300,437 ) |
(18,205,465 ) |
(14,660,700 ) |
| CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
| Redemption of shares resulting from share repurchase program (including transaction costs) |
— |
(5,349,075 ) |
— |
(2,806,910 ) |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
| Total decrease in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
(59,981,295 ) |
(4,974,002 ) |
(45,779,551 ) |
(4,118,094 ) |
| Beginning of year |
694,873,680 |
699,847,682 |
366,016,142 |
370,134,236 |
| End of year |
$634,892,385 |
$694,873,680 |
$320,236,591 |
$366,016,142 |
| (a) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax
regulations. |
| |
MIY |
MYN | ||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended 07/31/24
|
| | ||||
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS
APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
| OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
$13,643,826
|
$12,154,801
|
$16,684,303
|
$14,341,840
|
| Net realized loss |
(4,757,875 ) |
(1,852,625 ) |
(12,757,857 ) |
(12,734,540 ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(29,677,392 ) |
8,021,641 |
(38,414,360 ) |
17,028,861 |
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
(20,791,441 ) |
18,323,817 |
(34,487,914 ) |
18,636,161 |
| DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS(a) |
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(12,401,682 ) |
(13,485,030 ) |
(14,985,049 ) |
(15,932,038 ) |
| Return of capital |
(6,077,828 ) |
(1,310,905 ) |
(8,018,200 ) |
(2,555,616 ) |
| Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions to Common Shareholders |
(18,479,510 ) |
(14,795,935 ) |
(23,003,249 ) |
(18,487,654 ) |
| CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
| Redemption of shares resulting from share repurchase program (including transaction costs) |
— |
(2,750,841 ) |
— |
(3,787,717 ) |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
| Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
(39,270,951 ) |
777,041 |
(57,491,163 ) |
(3,639,210 ) |
| Beginning of year |
378,949,766 |
378,172,725 |
449,340,599 |
452,979,809 |
| End of year |
$339,678,815 |
$378,949,766 |
$391,849,436 |
$449,340,599 |
| (a) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax
regulations. |
| |
MPA |
BNY | ||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended 07/31/24
|
| | ||||
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS
APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
| OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
$5,879,844
|
$4,888,070
|
$10,253,502
|
$8,898,849
|
| Net realized loss |
(2,332,753 ) |
(2,540,557 ) |
(9,305,394 ) |
(9,050,293 ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(11,160,663 ) |
4,005,501 |
(24,435,828 ) |
10,904,506 |
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
(7,613,572 ) |
6,353,014 |
(23,487,720 ) |
10,753,062 |
| DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS(a) |
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(5,098,019 ) |
(5,803,582 ) |
(9,498,199 ) |
(9,884,014 ) |
| Return of capital |
(5,158,088 ) |
(1,403,077 ) |
(4,875,596 ) |
(1,373,067 ) |
| Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions to Common Shareholders |
(10,256,107 ) |
(7,206,659 ) |
(14,373,795 ) |
(11,257,081 ) |
| CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
| Redemption of shares resulting from share repurchase program (including transaction costs) |
— |
(809,297 ) |
— |
(1,898,566 ) |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
| Total decrease in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
(17,869,679 ) |
(1,662,942 ) |
(37,861,515 ) |
(2,402,585 ) |
| Beginning of year |
168,804,078 |
170,467,020 |
290,554,029 |
292,956,614 |
| End of year |
$150,934,399 |
$168,804,078 |
$252,692,514 |
$290,554,029 |
| (a) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax
regulations. |
| |
BHV | |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended 07/31/24
|
| | ||
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS
APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
| OPERATIONS |
|
|
| Net investment income |
$545,412
|
$461,167
|
| Net realized loss |
(403,998 ) |
(583,682 ) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(1,634,487 ) |
812,996 |
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
(1,493,073 ) |
690,481 |
| DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS(a) |
|
|
| From net investment income |
(561,676 ) |
(612,122 ) |
| Return of capital |
(381,739 ) |
(59,174 ) |
| Decrease in net assets resulting from distributions to Common Shareholders |
(943,415 ) |
(671,296 ) |
| CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
| Redemption of shares resulting from share repurchase program (including transaction costs) |
— |
(158,886 ) |
| NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
| Total decrease in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
(2,436,488 ) |
(139,701 ) |
| Beginning of year |
19,816,516 |
19,956,217 |
| End of year |
$17,380,028 |
$19,816,516 |
| (a) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax
regulations. |
| |
MUJ |
MHN |
MIY |
MYN |
| CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
$(25,942,833
) |
$(27,574,086
) |
$(20,791,441
) |
$(34,487,914
) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
| Proceeds from sales of long-term investments and principal paydowns/payups |
239,168,157 |
348,066,318 |
216,388,935 |
373,399,924 |
| Purchases of long-term investments |
(271,737,822 ) |
(304,785,560 ) |
(220,204,677 ) |
(358,089,272 ) |
| Net proceeds from sales (purchases) of short-term securities |
40,371,162 |
(11,662,755 ) |
7,893,177 |
(15,099,880 ) |
| Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on investments and other fees |
(994,358 ) |
601,381 |
1,867,249 |
472,844 |
| Net realized loss on investments |
7,267,398 |
8,651,075 |
4,757,875 |
10,625,848 |
| Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
44,708,522 |
30,839,238 |
29,677,392 |
38,803,434 |
| (Increase) Decrease in Assets |
|
|
|
|
| Receivables |
|
|
|
|
| Dividends — affiliated |
86,735 |
(42,213 ) |
11,421 |
(42,326 ) |
| Interest — unaffiliated |
(27,595 ) |
64,413 |
(83,450 ) |
(234,988 ) |
| Prepaid expenses |
(369,535 ) |
(210,805 ) |
35,427 |
35,350 |
| Increase (Decrease) in Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| Payables |
|
|
|
|
| Accounting services fees |
34,693 |
22,996 |
23,136 |
25,300 |
| Custodian fees |
3,026 |
1,918 |
1,557 |
2,219 |
| Interest expense and fees |
(47,902 ) |
57,127 |
— |
61,196 |
| Investment advisory fees |
(17,369 ) |
(37,675 ) |
(14,192 ) |
(10,582 ) |
| Directors’ and Officer’s fees |
18,604 |
(9,626 ) |
(452 ) |
(9,130 ) |
| Other accrued expenses |
277,379 |
132,813 |
(3,920 ) |
(4,334 ) |
| Professional fees |
14,858 |
(13,618 ) |
(18,781 ) |
(11,903 ) |
| Proxy fees |
— |
(48,229 ) |
— |
(63,206 ) |
| Reorganization costs |
— |
168,445 |
191,298 |
160,876 |
| Transfer agent fees |
(6,976 ) |
(3,975 ) |
(856 ) |
(2,692 ) |
| Variation margin on futures contracts |
— |
(182,971 ) |
— |
(223,167 ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
32,806,144 |
44,034,211 |
19,729,698 |
15,307,597 |
| CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| Cash dividends paid to Common Shareholders |
(36,457,816 ) |
(19,342,306 ) |
(19,732,420 ) |
(24,563,581 ) |
| Repayments of TOB Trust Certificates |
(2,385,000 ) |
— |
— |
— |
| Payments on redemption of VRDP Shares |
— |
(71,600,000 ) |
— |
(46,700,000 ) |
| Proceeds from TOB Trust Certificates |
5,992,202 |
47,047,577 |
— |
56,111,408 |
| Decrease in bank overdraft |
(13,737 ) |
(12,778 ) |
(8,629 ) |
(9,703 ) |
| Amortization of deferred offering costs |
58,207 |
25,695 |
11,351 |
21,850 |
| Net cash used for financing activities |
(32,806,144 ) |
(43,881,812 ) |
(19,729,698 ) |
(15,140,026 ) |
| CASH |
|
|
|
|
| Net increase in restricted and unrestricted cash |
— |
152,399 |
— |
167,571 |
| Restricted and unrestricted cash at beginning of year |
— |
702,000 |
— |
856,000 |
| Restricted and unrestricted cash at end of year |
$— |
$854,399 |
$— |
$1,023,571 |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
| Cash paid during the year for interest expense |
$14,292,131 |
$7,937,437 |
$8,871,656 |
$9,937,407 |
| RECONCILIATION OF RESTRICTED AND UNRESTRICTED CASH AT THE END OF YEAR TO THE
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| Cash |
$—
|
$132,399
|
$—
|
$158,571
|
| Cash pledged |
|
|
|
|
| Futures contracts |
— |
722,000 |
— |
865,000 |
| |
$— |
$854,399 |
$— |
$1,023,571 |
| |
MPA |
BNY |
BHV |
| CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
| Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
$(7,613,572
) |
$(23,487,720
) |
$(1,493,073
) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
| Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
89,285,104 |
246,197,114 |
6,102,114 |
| Purchases of long-term investments |
(99,645,667 ) |
(228,561,784 ) |
(5,367,757 ) |
| Net proceeds from sales (purchases) of short-term securities |
4,281,276 |
(7,318,922 ) |
(313,529 ) |
| Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on investments and other fees |
70,734 |
369,816 |
(28,768 ) |
| Net realized loss on investments |
2,332,753 |
7,871,083 |
356,008 |
| Net unrealized depreciation on investments |
11,160,663 |
24,723,881 |
1,657,310 |
| (Increase) Decrease in Assets |
|
|
|
| Receivables |
|
|
|
| Dividends — affiliated |
8,282 |
(12,920 ) |
(99 ) |
| Interest — unaffiliated |
(293,440 ) |
(81,295 ) |
(30,557 ) |
| Prepaid expenses |
35,491 |
(145,465 ) |
35,486 |
| Increase (Decrease) in Liabilities |
|
|
|
| Payables |
|
|
|
| Accounting services fees |
12,524 |
18,491 |
2,920 |
| Custodian fees |
923 |
1,725 |
598 |
| Interest expense and fees |
85,419 |
62,560 |
— |
| Investment advisory fees |
17,063 |
(21,909 ) |
(997 ) |
| Directors’ and Officer’s fees |
917 |
4,573 |
1,301 |
| Other accrued expenses |
(4,981 ) |
100,127 |
(5,929 ) |
| Professional fees |
(37,089 ) |
5,689 |
(5,055 ) |
| Proxy fees |
(49,698 ) |
(80,465 ) |
— |
| Reorganization costs |
107,232 |
190,643 |
75,478 |
| Transfer agent fees |
1,601 |
(2,750 ) |
3,766 |
| Variation margin on futures contracts |
— |
(149,090 ) |
(5,692 ) |
| Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
(244,465 ) |
19,683,382 |
983,525 |
| CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
| Cash dividends paid to Common Shareholders |
(11,069,024 ) |
(15,329,369 ) |
(1,002,895 ) |
| Repayments of TOB Trust Certificates |
(785,000 ) |
— |
— |
| Payments on redemption of VRDP Shares |
— |
(47,400,000 ) |
— |
| Proceeds from TOB Trust Certificates |
12,086,288 |
43,131,011 |
— |
| Decrease in bank overdraft |
(8,047 ) |
(7,582 ) |
(1,701 ) |
| Amortization of deferred offering costs |
20,248 |
23,676 |
3,071 |
| Net cash provided by (used for) for financing activities |
244,465 |
(19,582,264 ) |
(1,001,525 ) |
| CASH |
|
|
|
| Net increase (decrease) in restricted and unrestricted cash |
— |
101,118 |
(18,000 ) |
| Restricted and unrestricted cash at beginning of year |
— |
572,000 |
18,000 |
| Restricted and unrestricted cash at end of year |
$— |
$673,118 |
$— |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
| Cash paid during the year for interest expense |
$3,540,663 |
$5,874,948 |
$443,775 |
| RECONCILIATION OF RESTRICTED AND UNRESTRICTED CASH AT THE END OF YEAR TO THE
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
| Cash |
$—
|
$104,118
|
$—
|
| Cash pledged |
|
|
|
| Futures contracts |
— |
569,000 |
— |
| |
$— |
$673,118 |
$— |
| |
MUJ | ||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year |
$13.07 |
$13.03 |
$13.58 |
$16.29 |
$15.83 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.49 |
0.44 |
0.48 |
0.64 |
0.73 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(0.98 ) |
0.15 |
(0.49 ) |
(2.59 ) |
0.48 |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.49 ) |
0.59 |
(0.01 ) |
(1.95 ) |
1.21 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.44 ) |
(0.49 ) |
(0.45 ) |
(0.76 ) |
(0.75 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.20 ) |
(0.06 ) |
(0.09 ) |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.64 ) |
(0.55 ) |
(0.54 ) |
(0.76 ) |
(0.75 ) |
| Net asset value, end of year |
$11.94 |
$13.07 |
$13.03 |
$13.58 |
$16.29 |
| Market price, end of year |
$10.82 |
$11.57 |
$11.20 |
$13.36 |
$15.63 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(3.41 )% |
5.34 % |
0.52 % |
(12.14 )% |
8.22 % |
| Based on market price |
(1.12 )% |
8.49 % |
(12.17 )% |
(9.91 )% |
15.67 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
3.40 % |
3.68 % |
3.17 % |
1.77
%(e)
|
1.44 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
3.37 % |
3.64 % |
3.17 % |
1.74
%(e)
|
1.44 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of
offering costs and/or reorganization costs(f)(g) |
1.25 % |
0.86 % |
0.89 % |
0.92 % |
0.89 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
3.87 % |
3.45 % |
3.71 % |
4.37 % |
4.59 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of year (000) |
$634,892 |
$694,874 |
$699,848 |
$740,380 |
$490,103 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year (000) |
$417,100 |
$417,100 |
$417,100 |
$417,100 |
$237,100 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year |
$244,296 (h) |
$259,234 (h) |
$259,361 (h) |
$245,762 (h) |
$306,707 (i) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of year (000) |
$22,892 |
$19,285 |
$22,060 |
$90,838 |
$61,534 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of year(j) |
$46,927 |
$58,624 |
$51,599 |
$13,734 |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
22 % |
14 % |
17 % |
20 % |
10 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (e) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been
1.71% and 1.70%, respectively. |
| (f) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (g) |
The total expense ratio after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs, reorganization costs, liquidity and
remarketing fees as follows: |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Expense ratios |
0.88 % |
0.85 % |
0.88 % |
0.94 % |
0.88 % |
| (h) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (i) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying
the results by 100,000. |
| (j) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| |
MHN | |||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Period from
09/01/21
to 07/31/22 |
Year Ended
08/31/21 |
Year Ended
08/31/20 |
| | ||||||
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$12.10 |
$12.12 |
$12.58 |
$15.21 |
$14.92 |
$15.31 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.44 |
0.38 |
0.41 |
0.51 |
0.63 |
0.60 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.35 ) |
0.08 |
(0.43 ) |
(2.56 ) |
0.31 |
(0.43 ) |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.91 ) |
0.46 |
(0.02 ) |
(2.05 ) |
0.94 |
0.17 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.41 ) |
(0.42 ) |
(0.37 ) |
(0.58 ) |
(0.65 ) |
(0.56 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.19 ) |
(0.06 ) |
(0.07 ) |
— |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.60 ) |
(0.48 ) |
(0.44 ) |
(0.58 ) |
(0.65 ) |
(0.56 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$10.59 |
$12.10 |
$12.12 |
$12.58 |
$15.21 |
$14.92 |
| Market price, end of period |
$9.51 |
$10.77 |
$10.44 |
$11.23 |
$14.74 |
$13.79 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(7.27 )% |
4.61 % |
0.53 % |
(13.49
)%(d)
|
6.70 % |
1.54 % |
| Based on market price |
(6.44 )% |
8.09 % |
(3.00 )% |
(20.31
)%(d)
|
11.88 % |
4.57 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
3.82
%(f)
|
4.12
%(g)
|
3.52 % |
1.78
%(h)
|
1.57 % |
2.15 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
3.72
%(f)
|
4.01
%(g)
|
3.43 % |
1.70
%(h)
|
1.51 % |
2.09 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and
fees, amortization of offering costs and/or reorganization costs(i)(j) |
1.37 % |
0.93 % |
0.95 % |
0.94
%(h)
|
0.95 % |
0.94 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
3.83 % |
3.20 % |
3.47 % |
4.05
%(h)
|
4.17 % |
4.03 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
$320,237 |
$366,016 |
$370,134 |
$391,737 |
$473,389 |
$464,504 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period (000) |
$172,000 |
$243,600 |
$243,600 |
$243,600 |
$243,600 |
$243,600 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period |
$244,708 (k) |
$248,878 (k) |
$247,532 (k) |
$239,843 (k) |
$294,330 (l) |
$290,683 (l) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of period (000) |
$49,298 |
$2,250 |
$7,284 |
$36,527 |
$56,376 |
$63,384 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of period(m) |
$10,980 |
$271,826 |
$85,220 |
$18,386 |
N/A |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
53 % |
44 % |
43 % |
29 % |
14 % |
10 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Not annualized. |
| (e) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (f) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy and reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would
have been 3.71% and 3.61%, respectively. |
| (g) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been 4.05% and
3.94%, respectively. |
| (h) |
Annualized. |
| (i) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (j) |
The total expense ratio after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs, reorganization costs, liquidity
and remarketing fees as follows: |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Period from
09/01/21
to 07/31/22 |
Year Ended
08/31/21 |
Year Ended
08/31/20 |
| | ||||||
| Expense ratios |
0.96 % |
0.99 % |
0.94 % |
0.93 % |
0.94 % |
0.93 % |
| (k) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (l) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying
the results by 100,000. |
| (m) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| |
MIY | ||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year |
$13.08 |
$12.94 |
$13.56 |
$16.04 |
$15.88 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.47 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.61 |
0.68 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.18 ) |
0.23 |
(0.55 ) |
(2.42 ) |
0.14 |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.71 ) |
0.65 |
(0.13 ) |
(1.81 ) |
0.82 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.43 ) |
(0.46 ) |
(0.43 ) |
(0.67 ) |
(0.66 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.21 ) |
(0.05 ) |
(0.06 ) |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.64 ) |
(0.51 ) |
(0.49 ) |
(0.67 ) |
(0.66 ) |
| Net asset value, end of year |
$11.73 |
$13.08 |
$12.94 |
$13.56 |
$16.04 |
| Market price, end of year |
$10.91 |
$11.61 |
$11.12 |
$13.67 |
$15.80 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(5.24 )% |
5.82 % |
(0.40 )% |
(11.35 )% |
5.61 % |
| Based on market price |
(0.71 )% |
9.30 % |
(15.09 )% |
(9.28 )% |
16.02 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
3.38
%(e)
|
3.66
%(f)
|
3.27 % |
1.66 % |
1.44 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
3.34
%(e)
|
3.62
%(f)
|
3.27 % |
1.66 % |
1.44 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of
offering costs and/or reorganization costs(g)(h) |
0.86 % |
0.85 % |
0.91 % |
0.88 % |
0.85 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
3.74 % |
3.28 % |
3.31 % |
4.10 % |
4.32 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of year (000) |
$339,679 |
$378,950 |
$378,173 |
$400,206 |
$473,464 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year (000) |
$231,900 |
$231,900 |
$231,900 |
$231,900 |
$231,900 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year |
$246,476 (i) |
$263,411 (i) |
$258,740 (i) |
$246,506 (i) |
$304,167 (j) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of year (000) |
$— |
$— |
$6,334 |
$41,267 |
$41,267 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of year(k) |
N/A |
N/A |
$97,262 |
$16,309 |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
37 % |
27 % |
37 % |
22 % |
7 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (e) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been
3.32% and 3.29%, respectively. |
| (f) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been
3.64% and 3.60%, respectively. |
| (g) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (h) |
The total expense ratio after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs, reorganization costs, liquidity
and remarketing fees as follows: |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Expense ratios |
0.86 % |
0.87 % |
0.91 % |
0.88 % |
0.85 % |
| (i) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (j) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the
results by 100,000. |
| (k) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| |
MYN | ||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year |
$11.73 |
$11.70 |
$12.12 |
$14.73 |
$14.52 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.44 |
0.37 |
0.39 |
0.52 |
0.60 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.34 ) |
0.14 |
(0.39 ) |
(2.53 ) |
0.22 |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.90 ) |
0.51 |
— |
(2.01 ) |
0.82 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.39 ) |
(0.41 ) |
(0.37 ) |
(0.60 ) |
(0.61 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.21 ) |
(0.07 ) |
(0.05 ) |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.60 ) |
(0.48 ) |
(0.42 ) |
(0.60 ) |
(0.61 ) |
| Net asset value, end of year |
$10.23 |
$11.73 |
$11.70 |
$12.12 |
$14.73 |
| Market price, end of year |
$9.20 |
$10.58 |
$10.08 |
$10.94 |
$14.56 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(7.45 )% |
5.14 % |
0.64 % |
(13.74 )% |
6.10 % |
| Based on market price |
(7.71 )% |
10.07 % |
(3.94 )% |
(21.23 )% |
14.84 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
3.30
%(e)
|
3.57
%(f)
|
3.07 % |
1.59 % |
1.47 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
3.28
%(e)
|
3.54
%(f)
|
3.07 % |
1.59 % |
1.47 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of
offering costs and/or reorganization costs(g)(h) |
0.90 % |
0.86 % |
0.89 % |
1.24 % |
1.27 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
3.90 % |
3.26 % |
3.42 % |
3.91 % |
4.17 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of year (000) |
$391,849 |
$449,341 |
$452,980 |
$479,869 |
$583,221 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year (000) |
$201,000 |
$247,700 |
$247,700 |
$247,700 |
$247,700 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year |
$245,097 (i) |
$272,392 (i) |
$269,699 (i) |
$256,882 (i) |
$335,455 (j) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of year (000) |
$69,061 |
$12,950 |
$19,231 |
$58,179 |
$103,573 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of year(k) |
$9,582 |
$54,810 |
$37,423 |
$13,502 |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
53 % |
43 % |
40 % |
31 % |
11 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (e) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy and reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have
been 3.21% and 3.19%, respectively. |
| (f) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been 3.50% and
3.47%, respectively. |
| (g) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (h) |
The total expense ratio after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs, reorganization costs, liquidity
and remarketing fees as follows: |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Expense ratios |
0.90 % |
0.93 % |
0.89 % |
0.88 % |
0.90 % |
| (i) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (j) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the
results by 100,000. |
| (k) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| |
MPA | ||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year |
$13.04 |
$13.09 |
$13.92 |
$16.64 |
$16.09 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.45 |
0.38 |
0.40 |
0.59 |
0.69 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.04 ) |
0.13 |
(0.76 ) |
(2.65 ) |
0.52 |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.59 ) |
0.51 |
(0.36 ) |
(2.06 ) |
1.21 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.39 ) |
(0.45 ) |
(0.40 ) |
(0.66 ) |
(0.66 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.40 ) |
(0.11 ) |
(0.07 ) |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.79 ) |
(0.56 ) |
(0.47 ) |
(0.66 ) |
(0.66 ) |
| Net asset value, end of year |
$11.66 |
$13.04 |
$13.09 |
$13.92 |
$16.64 |
| Market price, end of year |
$10.66 |
$12.35 |
$11.69 |
$13.54 |
$16.23 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(4.29 )% |
4.43 % |
(2.05 )% |
(12.45 )% |
8.09 % |
| Based on market price |
(7.61 )% |
10.75 % |
(10.08 )% |
(12.69 )% |
20.40 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
3.29
%(e)
|
3.52
%(f)
|
3.02 % |
1.63 % |
1.48 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
3.23
%(e)
|
3.47
%(f)
|
3.01 % |
1.63 % |
1.48 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of
offering costs and/or reorganization costs(g)(h) |
0.92 % |
0.88 % |
0.95 % |
1.24 % |
1.25 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
3.60 % |
2.94 % |
3.10 % |
3.85 % |
4.24 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of year (000) |
$150,934 |
$168,804 |
$170,467 |
$185,332 |
$221,384 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year (000) |
$82,600 |
$82,600 |
$82,600 |
$82,600 |
$82,600 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year |
$248,761 (i) |
$287,227 (i) |
$276,357 (i) |
$248,524 (i) |
$368,019 (j) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of year (000) |
$18,861 |
$7,560 |
$14,060 |
$42,183 |
$44,012 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of year(k) |
$13,372 |
$34,227 |
$18,983 |
$7,346 |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
37 % |
18 % |
31 % |
18 % |
13 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (e) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy and reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would
have been 3.10% and 3.05%, respectively. |
| (f) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy and reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would
have been 3.33% and 3.28%, respectively. |
| (g) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (h) |
The total expense ratio after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs, reorganization costs, liquidity and
remarketing fees as follows: |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Expense ratios |
0.92 % |
1.07 % |
0.95 % |
0.93 % |
0.92 % |
| (i) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (j) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the
results by 100,000. |
| (k) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| |
BNY | ||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Year Ended
07/31/22 |
Year Ended
07/31/21 |
| | |||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year |
$12.05 |
$12.05 |
$12.51 |
$15.30 |
$15.09 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.43 |
0.37 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
0.66 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.40 ) |
0.10 |
(0.43 ) |
(2.73 ) |
0.28 |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.97 ) |
0.47 |
(0.03 ) |
(2.16 ) |
0.94 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.40 ) |
(0.41 ) |
(0.36 ) |
(0.63 ) |
(0.73 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.20 ) |
(0.06 ) |
(0.07 ) |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.60 ) |
(0.47 ) |
(0.43 ) |
(0.63 ) |
(0.73 ) |
| Net asset value, end of year |
$10.48 |
$12.05 |
$12.05 |
$12.51 |
$15.30 |
| Market price, end of year |
$9.40 |
$10.71 |
$10.35 |
$11.46 |
$15.49 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(7.85 )% |
4.62 % |
0.46 % |
(14.24 )% |
6.55 % |
| Based on market price |
(7.01 )% |
8.26 % |
(5.81 )% |
(22.40 )% |
15.45 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
3.67
%(e)
|
3.93
%(f)
|
3.40 % |
1.78 % |
1.74
%(g)
|
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
3.67
%(e)
|
3.89
%(f)
|
3.40 % |
1.78 % |
1.74
%(g)
|
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization
of offering costs and/or reorganization costs(h) |
1.44 % |
1.10 % |
1.03 % |
1.03 % |
1.11 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
3.71 % |
3.13 % |
3.37 % |
4.12 % |
4.35 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of year (000) |
$252,693 |
$290,554 |
$292,957 |
$308,308 |
$376,645 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year (000) |
$132,000 |
$179,400 |
$179,400 |
$179,400 |
$179,400 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of year |
$243,119 (i) |
$260,678 (i) |
$258,872 (i) |
$237,449 (i) |
$309,947 (j) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of year (000) |
$44,561 |
$1,430 |
$4,998 |
$44,907 |
$72,273 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of year(k) |
$9,627 |
$329,422 |
$95,444 |
$11,853 |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
52 % |
43 % |
37 % |
35 % |
12 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (e) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy and reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have
been 3.49% and 3.48%, respectively. |
| (f) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of proxy costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been 3.82% and
3.78%, respectively. |
| (g) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been
1.69% and 1.69%, respectively. |
| (h) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (i) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (j) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP/VMTP Shares) from the
Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation
value of the VRDP/VMTP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (k) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| |
BHV | |||||
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Period from
09/01/21
to 07/31/22 |
Year Ended
08/31/21 |
Year Ended
08/31/20 |
| | ||||||
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$12.48 |
$12.44 |
$13.32 |
$15.73 |
$15.38 |
$15.64 |
| Net investment income(a) |
0.34 |
0.29 |
0.35 |
0.46 |
0.54 |
0.55 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(1.29 ) |
0.17 |
(0.85 ) |
(2.37 ) |
0.36 |
(0.26 ) |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
(0.95 ) |
0.46 |
(0.50 ) |
(1.91 ) |
0.90 |
0.29 |
| Distributions to Common Shareholders(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From net investment income |
(0.35 ) |
(0.38 ) |
(0.32 ) |
(0.50 ) |
(0.55 ) |
(0.55 ) |
| Return of capital |
(0.24 ) |
(0.04 ) |
(0.06 ) |
— |
— |
— |
| Total distributions to Common Shareholders |
(0.59 ) |
(0.42 ) |
(0.38 ) |
(0.50 ) |
(0.55 ) |
(0.55 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$10.94 |
$12.48 |
$12.44 |
$13.32 |
$15.73 |
$15.38 |
| Market price, end of period |
$10.45 |
$11.11 |
$10.78 |
$14.41 |
$18.75 |
$16.09 |
| Total Return Applicable to Common Shareholders(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on net asset value |
(7.44 )% |
4.38 % |
(3.42 )% |
(12.61
)%(d)
|
5.76 % |
1.87 % |
| Based on market price |
(0.68 )% |
7.23 % |
(22.64 )% |
(20.69
)%(d)
|
20.50 % |
0.77 % |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total expenses |
4.75
%(f)
|
5.16
%(g)
|
4.43 % |
2.60
%(h)(i)
|
2.28 % |
2.86 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed |
4.53
%(f)
|
4.93
%(g)
|
4.20 % |
2.38
%(h)(i)
|
2.06 % |
2.64 % |
| Total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and
fees, amortization of offering costs and/or reorganization costs(j)(k) |
1.75 % |
1.74 % |
1.74 % |
1.55
%(h)(i)
|
1.43 % |
1.69 % |
| Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
2.87 % |
2.38 % |
2.82 % |
3.52
%(i)
|
3.49 % |
3.63 % |
| Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
$17,380 |
$19,817 |
$19,956 |
$21,460 |
$25,326 |
$24,728 |
| VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period (000) |
$11,600 |
$11,600 |
$11,600 |
$11,600 |
$11,600 |
$11,600 |
| Asset coverage per VRDP Shares at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period |
$249,828 (l) |
$270,832 (l) |
$246,737 (l) |
$246,984 (l) |
$318,324 (m) |
$313,171 (m) |
| TOB Trust Certificates, end of period (000) |
$— |
$— |
$2,000 |
$3,000 |
$4,876 |
$4,876 |
| Asset coverage per $1,000 of TOB Trust Certificates, end of period(n) |
N/A |
N/A |
$16,755 |
$12,003 |
N/A |
N/A |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
18 % |
46 % |
31 % |
39 % |
10 % |
28 % |
| (a) |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
| (b) |
Distributions for annual periods determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations. |
| (c) |
Total returns based on market price, which can be significantly greater or less than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where
applicable, excludes the effects of any sales charges and assumes the reinvestment
of distributions at actual reinvestment prices. |
| (d) |
Not annualized. |
| (e) |
Excludes fees and expenses incurred indirectly as a result of investments in underlying funds. |
| (f) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been
4.31% and 4.10%, respectively. |
| (g) |
Includes non-recurring expenses of reorganization costs. Without these costs, total expenses and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed would have been
4.68% and 4.45%, respectively. |
| (h) |
Audit and printing costs were not annualized in the calculation of the expense ratios. If these expenses were annualized, the total expenses, total expenses after fees
waived and/or reimbursed and total expenses after fees waived and/or reimbursed
and excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs would have been 2.62%, 2.40% and 1.57%,respectively. |
| (i) |
Annualized. |
| (j) |
Interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs related to TOB Trusts and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 4 and Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements for
details |
| (k) |
The total expense ratio after fees waived and/or reimbursed and excluding interest expense and fees, amortization of offering costs, reorganization costs, liquidity and
remarketing fees as follows: |
| |
Year Ended
07/31/25 |
Year Ended
07/31/24 |
Year Ended
07/31/23 |
Period from
09/01/21
to 07/31/22 |
Year Ended
08/31/21 |
Year Ended
08/31/20 |
| | ||||||
| Expense ratios |
1.75 % |
2.22 % |
1.74 % |
1.55 % |
1.43 % |
1.40 % |
| (l) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the sum of the amount of TOBs and liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying the results by
100,000. |
| (m) |
Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including VRDP Shares) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the liquidation value of the VRDP Shares, and by multiplying
the results by 100,000. |
| (n) |
Effective July 18, 2022, TOB Trust Certificates are treated as senior securities pursuant to Rule 18f-4 of the 1940 Act. Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including
VRDP Shares and TOBs) from the Fund’s total assets and dividing this by the amount of TOBs, and by
multiplying the results by 1,000. |
| Fund Name |
Herein Referred To As |
Organized |
Diversification Classification |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund, Inc. |
MUJ |
Maryland |
Non-diversified |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
MHN |
Maryland |
Non-diversified |
| BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund, Inc. |
MIY |
Maryland |
Non-diversified |
| BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
MYN |
Maryland |
Non-diversified |
| BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund |
MPA |
Massachusetts |
Non-diversified |
| BlackRock New York Municipal Income Trust |
BNY |
Delaware |
Diversified |
| BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust |
BHV |
Delaware |
Non-diversified |
| Fund Name |
Interest Expense |
Liquidity Fees |
Other Expenses |
Total |
| MUJ |
$ 531,324
|
$ 76,632
|
$ 17,298
|
$ 625,254
|
| MHN |
131,299 |
19,824 |
8,019 |
159,142 |
| MYN |
497,696 |
68,162 |
21,040 |
586,898 |
| MPA |
392,183 |
57,148 |
16,774 |
466,105 |
| BNY |
105,468 |
16,298 |
7,252 |
129,018 |
| Fund Name |
Underlying Municipal Bonds Transferred to TOB Trusts(a)
|
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates(b)
|
Range of Interest Rates on TOB Trust Certificates at Period End |
Average TOB Trust Certificates Outstanding |
Daily Weighted Average Rate of Interest and Other Expenses on TOB Trusts |
| MUJ |
$ 35,397,714
|
$ 22,892,201
|
2.30% — 2.41
% |
$ 17,892,803
|
3.49 % |
| MHN |
69,281,785 |
49,297,577 |
2.32 —
2.35 |
5,951,311 |
2.67 |
| MYN |
101,969,897 |
69,061,407 |
2.31 —
2.35 |
18,990,990 |
3.09 |
| MPA |
28,036,036 |
18,861,288 |
2.32 —
2.41 |
13,838,155 |
3.37 |
| BNY |
60,763,787 |
44,561,011 |
2.32 —
2.35 |
5,026,191 |
2.57 |
| (a) |
The municipal bonds transferred to a TOB Trust are generally high grade municipal bonds. In certain cases, when municipal bonds transferred are lower grade municipal
bonds, the TOB Trust transaction may include a credit enhancement feature
that provides for the timely payment of principal and interest on the bonds to the TOB Trust by a credit enhancement provider in the event of default of the municipal bond. The TOB Trust would be responsible for the payment of the credit enhancement fee and the Funds, as TOB Residuals holders,
would be responsible for reimbursement of any payments of principal and
interest made by the credit enhancement provider. The maximum potential amounts owed by the Funds, for such reimbursements, as applicable, are included in the maximum potential amounts disclosed for recourse TOB Trusts in the Schedules of Investments. |
| (b) |
TOB Trusts may be structured on a non-recourse or recourse basis. When a Fund invests in TOB Trusts on a non-recourse basis, the Liquidity Provider may be required to
make a payment under the liquidity facility to allow the TOB Trust to
repurchase TOB Trust Certificates. The Liquidity Provider will be reimbursed from the liquidation of bonds held in the TOB Trust. If a Fund invests in a TOB Trust on a recourse basis,
a Fund enters into a reimbursement
agreement with the Liquidity Provider where a Fund is required to reimburse the Liquidity Provider for any shortfall between the amount paid by the Liquidity Provider and proceeds received from liquidation of municipal bonds held in the TOB Trust (the
“Liquidation Shortfall”). As a result, if a Fund invests in a recourse TOB Trust, a Fund will bear the risk of loss with respect to any
Liquidation Shortfall. If multiple funds participate in any such TOB Trust, these losses will be shared ratably, including the maximum potential amounts owed by a Fund at July 31, 2025, in proportion to their
participation in the TOB Trust. The recourse TOB Trusts are identified in the
Schedules of Investments including the maximum potential amounts owed by a Fund at July 31, 2025. |
| |
MUJ |
MHN |
MIY |
MYN |
MPA |
| Investment advisory fees |
0.50 % |
0.55
% |
0.49
% |
0.50
% |
0.49 % |
| |
BNY |
BHV |
| Investment advisory fees |
0.55 % |
0.65 % |
| Fund Name |
Fees Waived and/or Reimbursed by the Manager |
| MUJ |
$ 26,847
|
| MHN |
10,488 |
| MIY |
9,851 |
| MYN |
9,390 |
| MPA |
3,465 |
| BNY |
6,386 |
| BHV |
894 |
| Fund Name |
Fees Waived and/or Reimbursed by the Manager |
| MUJ |
$ 129,865
|
| MHN |
34,643 |
| Fund Name |
Fees Waived and/or Reimbursed by the Manager |
| MIY |
$ 108,161
|
| MYN |
84,766 |
| MPA |
88,680 |
| BNY |
17,292 |
| BHV |
— |
| Fund Name |
Purchases |
Sales |
| MUJ |
$ 270,725,472
|
$ 239,218,157
|
| MHN |
304,077,804 |
349,932,908 |
| MIY |
219,658,802 |
215,397,040 |
| MYN |
357,322,161 |
375,655,606 |
| MPA |
102,935,926 |
93,368,397 |
| BNY |
231,202,909 |
250,753,386 |
| BHV |
5,367,757 |
6,102,114 |
| Fund Name |
Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Earnings (Loss) |
| MUJ |
$ (53,198
) |
$ 53,198
|
| MHN |
(192,308 ) |
192,308 |
| MIY |
(201,573 ) |
201,573 |
| MYN |
(181,607 ) |
181,607 |
| MPA |
(141,318 ) |
141,318 |
| BNY |
(214,326 ) |
214,326 |
| BHV |
(84,517 ) |
84,517 |
| Fund Name |
Year Ended 07/31/25 |
Year Ended 07/31/24 |
| MUJ |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 36,763,436
|
$ 44,248,787
|
| Ordinary income |
5,732 |
— |
| Return of capital |
10,888,269 |
3,273,377 |
| |
$ 47,657,437 |
$ 47,522,164 |
| Fund Name |
Year Ended 07/31/25 |
Year Ended 07/31/24 |
| MHN |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 20,002,557
|
$ 23,297,479
|
| Ordinary income |
421,722 |
123,426 |
| Return of capital |
5,616,608 |
1,902,330 |
| |
$ 26,040,887 |
$ 25,323,235 |
| MIY |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 21,273,337
|
$ 23,665,971
|
| Return of capital |
6,077,828 |
1,310,905 |
| |
$ 27,351,165 |
$ 24,976,876 |
| MYN |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 24,372,053
|
$ 26,690,043
|
| Ordinary income |
24,701 |
149,584 |
| Return of capital |
8,018,200 |
2,555,616 |
| |
$ 32,414,954 |
$ 29,395,243 |
| MPA |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 8,249,931 |
$ 9,429,912 |
| Ordinary income |
8,065 |
— |
| Return of capital |
5,158,088 |
1,403,077 |
| |
$ 13,416,084 |
$ 10,832,989 |
| BNY |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 15,169,036
|
$ 17,687,479
|
| Ordinary income |
137,653 |
39,168 |
| Return of capital |
4,875,596 |
1,373,067 |
| |
$ 20,182,285 |
$ 19,099,714 |
| BHV |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$ 1,005,309 |
$ 1,119,077 |
| Ordinary income |
141 |
2,311 |
| Return of capital |
381,739 |
59,174 |
| |
$ 1,387,189 |
$ 1,180,562 |
| Fund Name |
Non-Expiring Capital Loss Carryforwards(a)
|
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)(b)
|
Total |
| MUJ |
$ (56,024,939 ) |
$ (44,350,270 ) |
$ (100,375,209
) |
| MHN |
(79,001,644 ) |
(14,542,850 ) |
(93,544,494 ) |
| MIY |
(40,982,026
) |
(22,331,698
) |
(63,313,724 ) |
| MYN |
(87,726,436 ) |
(18,219,814 ) |
(105,946,250 ) |
| MPA |
(19,152,402
) |
(12,140,600
) |
(31,293,002 ) |
| BNY |
(57,913,997 ) |
(12,928,736 ) |
(70,842,733 ) |
| BHV |
(3,672,161
) |
(948,176
) |
(4,620,337 ) |
| (a) |
Amounts available to offset future realized capital gains. |
| (b) |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized gains (losses) was attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales, amortization
methods for premiums on fixed income securities, the realization for tax
purposes of unrealized gains (losses) on certain futures contracts, the treatment of residual interests in tender option bond trusts, the accrual of income on securities in default and the deferral of compensation to Directors. |
| Fund Name |
Tax Cost |
Gross Unrealized Appreciation |
Gross Unrealized Depreciation |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
| MUJ |
$ 1,087,837,069
|
$ 11,119,110
|
$ (55,402,105
) |
$ (44,282,995
) |
| MHN |
502,009,833 |
4,709,442 |
(19,068,794 ) |
(14,359,352 ) |
| MIY |
588,051,104 |
1,242,732 |
(23,574,430 ) |
(22,331,698 ) |
| MYN |
605,474,861 |
7,438,479 |
(25,400,900 ) |
(17,962,421 ) |
| MPA |
243,574,035 |
793,768 |
(12,922,483 ) |
(12,128,715 ) |
| BNY |
394,035,564 |
4,193,652 |
(17,069,098 ) |
(12,875,446 ) |
| BHV |
29,683,667 |
308,668 |
(1,244,146 ) |
(935,478 ) |
| |
MUJ | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
507,049 |
5,349,075 |
| |
MHN | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
293,363 |
2,806,910 |
| |
MIY | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
267,446 |
2,750,841 |
| |
MYN | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
408,538 |
3,787,717 |
| |
MPA | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
75,192 |
809,297 |
| |
BNY | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
201,069 |
1,898,566 |
| |
BHV | |
| |
Shares |
Amounts |
| Year Ended July 31, 2025 |
— |
$ —
|
| Year Ended July 31, 2024 |
16,336 |
158,886 |
| Fund Name |
Issue Date |
Shares Issued |
Aggregate Principal |
Maturity Date |
| MUJ |
06/30/11 |
1,727 |
$ 172,700,000
|
07/01/41 |
| |
04/13/15 |
644 |
64,400,000 |
07/01/41 |
| |
04/11/22 |
1,800 |
180,000,000 |
07/01/41 |
| MHN |
06/30/11 |
1,720 |
172,000,000 |
07/01/41 |
| MIY |
04/21/11 |
1,446 |
144,600,000 |
05/01/41 |
| |
09/14/15 |
873 |
87,300,000 |
05/01/41 |
| MYN |
04/21/11 |
2,010 |
201,000,000 |
05/01/41 |
| MPA |
05/19/11 |
663 |
66,300,000 |
06/01/41 |
| |
04/13/15 |
163 |
16,300,000 |
06/01/41 |
| BNY |
03/31/21 |
471 |
47,100,000 |
03/31/51 |
| |
04/12/21 |
849 |
84,900,000 |
03/31/51 |
| BHV |
06/14/12 |
116 |
11,600,000 |
07/01/42 |
| |
MUJ |
MHN |
MIY |
MYN |
MPA |
BNY |
BHV |
| Expiration date |
11/29/25 |
11/29/25 |
07/05/26 |
07/05/26 |
07/05/26 |
11/29/25 |
07/05/26 |
| Fund Name |
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Short-Term Ratings |
Fitch Ratings, Inc. Long-Term Ratings |
S&P Global Short-Term Ratings | |
| MUJ |
Aa2 |
P-1 |
AA |
A-1 |
| MHN |
Aa2 |
P-1 |
AA |
A-1 |
| MIY |
Aa2 |
N/A |
AA |
N/A |
| MYN |
Aa2 |
N/A |
AA |
N/A |
| MPA |
Aa2 |
N/A |
AA |
N/A |
| BNY |
Aa2 |
P-1 |
AA |
A-1 |
| BHV |
Aa2 |
N/A |
AA |
N/A |
| Fund Name |
Commencement Date |
Expiration Date as of Period Ended 07/31/25 |
| MIY |
06/25/20 |
06/17/26 |
| MYN |
06/22/22 |
06/17/26 |
| MPA |
06/22/22 |
06/17/26 |
| BHV |
06/25/20 |
06/17/26 |
| Fund Name |
Commencement Date |
Termination Date |
| MUJ |
04/17/14 |
11/06/24 |
| MHN |
04/17/14 |
11/06/24 |
| BNY |
03/31/21 |
11/13/24 |
| |
MUJ |
MHN |
MIY |
MYN |
MPA |
BNY |
BHV |
| Dividend rates |
3.27 % |
3.30
% |
3.83
% |
3.86
% |
3.83
% |
3.31
% |
3.83 % |
| Fund Name |
Dividends |
Deferred Offering Costs Amortization |
| MUJ |
$ 13,618,975
|
$ 58,207
|
| MHN |
7,835,422 |
25,695 |
| MIY |
8,871,655 |
11,351 |
| MYN |
9,411,705 |
21,850 |
| MPA |
3,159,977 |
20,248 |
| BNY |
5,808,490 |
23,676 |
| BHV |
443,774 |
3,071 |
| Fund Name |
Declaration Date |
Record Date |
Payable/ Paid Date |
|
Dividend Per Common Share |
| MUJ |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
$ 0.054000
|
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.054000 |
| MHN |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
0.051500 |
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.051500 |
| MIY |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
0.054500 |
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.054500 |
| MYN |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
0.051200 |
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.051200 |
| MPA |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
0.066000 |
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.066000 |
| BNY |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
0.051000 |
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.051000 |
| BHV |
08/01/25 |
08/15/25 |
09/02/25 |
|
0.051500 |
| |
09/02/25 |
09/15/25 |
10/01/25 |
|
0.051500 |
| |
|
|
Preferred Shares(a) |
||
| Fund Name |
|
|
Shares |
Series |
Declared |
| MUJ |
|
|
VDRP |
W-7 |
$ 953,045
|
| MHN |
|
|
VRDP |
W-7 |
389,992 |
| MIY |
|
|
VRDP |
W-7 |
690,490 |
| MYN |
|
|
VRDP |
W-7 |
598,484 |
| MPA |
|
|
VRDP |
W-7 |
245,944 |
| BNY |
|
|
VRDP |
W-7 |
299,296 |
| BHV |
|
|
VRDP |
W-7 |
34,539 |
| (a) |
Dividends declared for period August 1, 2025 to August 31, 2025. |
| Fund |
Financial Highlights |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund, and BlackRock New York Municipal Income Trust |
For each of the five years in the period ended July 31, 2025 |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. and BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust |
For each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2025, for the period from September 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022, and for each of the two years in the period ended August 31, 2021 |
| Fund Name |
Exempt-Interest Dividends |
| MUJ |
$ 39,422,691
|
| MHN |
21,318,068 |
| MIY |
22,620,198 |
| MYN |
26,065,497 |
| MPA |
9,104,607 |
| BNY |
16,206,072 |
| BHV |
1,068,045 |
| Fund Name |
Interest Dividends |
| MUJ |
$ 5,732
|
| MHN |
421,722 |
| MYN |
24,701 |
| MPA |
8,005 |
| BNY |
137,653 |
| BHV |
141 |
| Fund Name |
Interest- Related Dividends |
| MUJ |
$ 5,732
|
| MHN |
421,722 |
| MYN |
24,701 |
| MPA |
8,005 |
| BNY |
137,653 |
| BHV |
141 |
| Independent Directors(a) | ||||
| Name Year of Birth(b)
|
Position(s) Held
(Length of Service)(c) |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of BlackRock-Advised
Registered Investment Companies
(“RICs”) Consisting of Investment
Portfolios (“Portfolios”) Overseen |
Public Company and Other Investment Company Directorships Held During Past 5 Years |
| R. Glenn Hubbard 1958 |
Chair of the Board (Since
2022)
Director
(Since 2007) |
Dean, Columbia Business School from 2004 to 2019;
Faculty member, Columbia Business School since 1988. |
66 RICs consisting of 103 Portfolios |
ADP (data and information services) from 2004 to 2020; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (insurance); TotalEnergies SE (multi-energy) |
| W. Carl
Kester(d)
1951 |
Vice Chair of the Board
(Since 2022)
Director
(Since 2007) |
Baker Foundation Professor and George Fisher Baker Jr.
Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus, Harvard
Business School since 2022; George Fisher Baker Jr.
Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business
School from 2008 to 2022; Deputy Dean for Academic
Affairs from 2006 to 2010; Chairman of the Finance Unit,
from 2005 to 2006; Senior Associate Dean and Chairman
of the MBA Program from 1999 to 2005; Member of the
faculty of Harvard Business School since 1981. |
68 RICs consisting of 105 Portfolios |
None |
| Cynthia L.
Egan(d)
1955 |
Director
(Since 2016) |
Advisor, U.S. Department of the Treasury from 2014 to
2015; President, Retirement Plan Services, for T. Rowe
Price Group, Inc. from 2007 to 2012; executive positions
within Fidelity Investments from 1989 to 2007. |
68 RICs consisting of 105 Portfolios |
Unum (insurance); The Hanover Insurance Group (Board Chair); Huntsman Corporation (Lead Independent Director and non-Executive Vice Chair of the Board) (chemical products) |
| Lorenzo A. Flores 1964 |
Director
(Since 2021) |
Chief Financial Officer, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
(LSCC) since 2025; Chief Financial Officer, Intel Foundry
from 2024 to 2025; Vice Chairman, Kioxia, Inc. from
2019 to 2024; Chief Financial Officer, Xilinx, Inc. from
2016 to 2019; Corporate Controller, Xilinx, Inc. from
2008 to 2016. |
66 RICs consisting of 103 Portfolios |
None |
| Stayce D. Harris 1959 |
Director
(Since 2021) |
Lieutenant General, Inspector General of the United States
Air Force from 2017 to 2019; Lieutenant General, Assistant
Vice Chief of Staff and Director, Air Staff, United States Air
Force from 2016 to 2017; Major General, Commander,
22nd Air Force, AFRC, Dobbins Air Reserve Base, Georgia
from 2014 to 2016; Pilot, United Airlines from 1990 to
2020. |
66 RICs consisting of 103 Portfolios |
KULR Technology Group, Inc. in 2021; The Boeing Company (airplane manufacturer) |
| J. Phillip Holloman 1955 |
Director
(Since 2021) |
Interim Executive Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Vestis Corporation since 2025;
President and Chief Operating Officer, Cintas Corporation
from 2008 to 2018. |
66 RICs consisting of 103 Portfolios |
Vestis Corporation (uniforms and facilities services) |
| Catherine A. Lynch(d)
1961 |
Director
(Since 2016) |
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and
various other positions, National Railroad Retirement
Investment Trust from 2003 to 2016; Associate Vice
President for Treasury Management, The George
Washington University from 1999 to 2003; Assistant
Treasurer, Episcopal Church of America from 1995 to
1999. |
68 RICs consisting of 105 Portfolios |
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust |
| Independent Directors(a) (continued) | ||||
| Name
Year of Birth(b) |
Position(s) Held
(Length of Service)(c) |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of BlackRock-Advised
Registered Investment Companies
(“RICs”) Consisting of Investment
Portfolios (“Portfolios”) Overseen |
Public Company and Other Investment Company
Directorships Held
During Past 5 Years |
| Arthur P. Steinmetz(d)
1958 |
Director
(Since 2023) |
Trustee of Denison University since 2020; Consultant,
Posit PBC (enterprise data science) since 2020; Director,
ScotiaBank (U.S.) from 2020 to 2023; Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of OppenheimerFunds,
Inc. from 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively to 2019;
Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer of
104 OppenheimerFunds funds from 2014 to 2019;
Portfolio manager of various OppenheimerFunds fixed
income mutual funds from 1986 to 2014. |
68 RICs consisting of 105 Portfolios |
Trustee of 104 OppenheimerFunds funds from 2014 to 2019 |
| Interested Directors(a)(e) | ||||
| Name Year of Birth(b)
|
Position(s) Held
(Length of Service)(c) |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of BlackRock-Advised
Registered Investment Companies
(“RICs”) Consisting of Investment
Portfolios (“Portfolios”) Overseen |
Public Company and Other Investment Company Directorships Held During Past 5 Years |
| Robert Fairbairn 1965 |
Director
(Since 2018) |
Vice Chairman of BlackRock, Inc. since 2019; Member of
BlackRock’s Global Executive and Global Operating
Committees; Co-Chair of BlackRock’s Human Capital
Committee; Senior Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc.
from 2010 to 2019; oversaw BlackRock’s Strategic Partner
Program and Strategic Product Management Group from
2012 to 2019; Member of the Board of Managers of
BlackRock Investments, LLC from 2011 to 2018; Global
Head of BlackRock’s Retail and iShares® businesses from
2012 to 2016. |
94 RICs consisting of 271 Portfolios |
None |
| John M. Perlowski(d)
1964 |
Director
(Since 2015)
President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Since 2010) |
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2009; Head of
BlackRock Global Accounting and Product Services since
2009; Advisory Director of Family Resource Network
(charitable foundation) since 2009. |
96 RICs consisting of 273 Portfolios |
None |
| (a) |
The address of each Director is c/o BlackRock, Inc., 50 Hudson Yards, New York, New York 10001. |
| (b) |
Each Independent Director holds office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal as
provided by the Fund’s by-laws or charter or statute, or until
December 31 of the year in which he or she turns 75. Directors who are “interested persons,” as defined in the Investment Company Act serve until their successor
is duly elected and qualifies or until their earlier death, resignation, retirement or
removal as provided by the Fund’s by-laws or statute, or until December 31 of the year in which they turn 72. The Board may determine to extend the terms of Independent Directors on a case-by-case basis, as appropriate. |
| (c) |
Following the combination of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P. (“MLIM”) and BlackRock, Inc. in September 2006, the various legacy MLIM and legacy
BlackRock fund boards were realigned and consolidated into three new fund
boards in 2007. Certain Independent Directors first became members of the boards of other legacy MLIM or legacy BlackRock funds as follows: R. Glenn Hubbard, 2004 and W. Carl Kester, 1995. |
| (d) |
Ms. Egan, Dr. Kester, Ms. Lynch, Mr. Steinmetz and Mr. Perlowski are also trustees of the BlackRock Credit Strategies Fund and BlackRock Private Investments
Fund. |
| (e) |
Mr. Fairbairn and Mr. Perlowski are both “interested persons,” as defined in the 1940 Act, of the Fund based on their positions with BlackRock, Inc. and its
affiliates. Mr. Fairbairn and Mr. Perlowski are also board members of the BlackRock
Multi-Asset Complex. |
| Officers Who Are Not Directors(a) | ||
| Name Year of Birth(b)
|
Position(s) Held
(Length of Service) |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
| Stephen Minar 1984 |
Vice President
(Since 2025) |
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2023; Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2018. |
| Trent Walker 1974 |
Chief Financial Officer
(Since 2021) |
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2019; Executive Vice President of PIMCO from 2016 to 2019. |
| Jay M. Fife 1970 |
Treasurer
(Since 2007) |
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2007. |
| Aaron Wasserman 1974 |
Chief Compliance Officer
(Since 2023) |
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2018; Chief Compliance Officer of the BlackRock-advised funds in the
BlackRock Multi-Asset Complex, the BlackRock Fixed-Income Complex and the iShares Complex since
2023; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer for the BlackRock-advised funds in the
BlackRock Multi-Asset Complex, the BlackRock Fixed- Income Complex and the iShares
Complex from 2014 to 2023. |
| Janey Ahn 1975 |
Secretary
(Since 2012) |
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2018. |
| (a) |
The address of each Officer is c/o BlackRock, Inc., 50 Hudson Yards, New York, New York 10001. |
| (b) |
Officers of the Fund serve at the pleasure of the Board. |
| |
Cynthia L. Egan |
Robert Fairbairn |
Stayce D. Harris | |||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
| MUJ |
34,641,959 |
11,927,550 |
43,763,074 |
2,806,435 |
43,694,089 |
2,875,420 |
| MIY |
17,860,240 |
5,851,333 |
23,079,254 |
632,319 |
23,121,421 |
590,152 |
| BHV |
1,201,926 |
88,079 |
1,180,116 |
109,889 |
1,229,530 |
60,475 |
| BNY |
18,124,908 |
846,678 |
18,127,282.47 |
844,304 |
18,125,025 |
846,561 |
| |
J. Phillip Holloman |
Arthur P. Steinmetz | ||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
| MYN |
23,052,847 |
9,927,795 |
30,847,179 |
2,133,463 |
| MHN |
17,473,585 |
8,300,359 |
24,425,611 |
1,348,333 |
| |
Cynthia L. Egan |
Robert Fairbairn |
Stayce D. Harris | |||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
| MYN |
23,284,849 |
9,695,793 |
30,922,879 |
2,057,763 |
30,868,806 |
2,111,836 |
| MHN |
17,843,064 |
7,930,880 |
24,508,007 |
1,265,937 |
24,506,080 |
1,267,864 |
| |
Cynthia L. Egan |
Robert Fairbairn |
Lorenzo A. Flores | ||||||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
| MPA |
10,734,284 |
378,712 |
77,520 |
10,870,704 |
231,317 |
88,495 |
10,872,210 |
225,064 |
93,242
|
| |
Stayce D. Harris |
J. Phillip Holloman |
R. Glenn Hubbard | ||||||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
| MPA |
10,894,040 |
226,356 |
70,120 |
10,691,177 |
410,306 |
89,033 |
10,701,270 |
403,194 |
86,052
|
| |
John M. Perlowski |
Arthur P. Steinmetz |
W. Carl Kester(a)
| ||||||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
| MPA |
10,879,532 |
228,121 |
82,863 |
10,688,561 |
411,804 |
90,151 |
826 |
0
|
0 |
| |
Catherine A.
Lynch(a) | ||
| Fund Name |
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Votes Abstain |
| MPA |
826 |
0
|
0 |
| (a) |
Voted
on by holders of Preferred Shares only. |
| Portfolio Abbreviation | |
| AMBAC |
AMBAC Assurance Corp. |
| AMT |
Alternative Minimum Tax |
| ARB |
Airport Revenue Bonds |
| BAM |
Build America Mutual Assurance Co.
|
| BAM-TCRS |
Build America Mutual Assurance Co. - Transferable
Custodial Receipts |
| BHAC-CR |
Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. - Custodian
Receipt |
| CAB |
Capital Appreciation Bonds |
| COP |
Certificates of Participation |
| FHLMC |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
|
| FNMA |
Federal National Mortgage
Association |
| GNMA |
Government National Mortgage
Association |
| GO |
General Obligation Bonds |
| GOL |
General Obligation Ltd. |
| GTD |
GTD Guaranteed |
| HUD SECT 8 |
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Section 8 |
| M/F |
Multi-Family |
| NPFGC |
National Public Finance Guarantee
Corp. |
| Q-SBLF |
Qualified School Bond Loan Fund
|
| RB |
Revenue Bonds |
| S/F |
Single-Family |
| SAB |
Special Assessment Bonds |
| SAW |
State Aid Withholding |
| SONYMA |
State of New York Mortgage Agency
|
| TA |
Tax Allocation |
(b) Not Applicable
| Item 3 – | Audit Committee Financial Expert – The registrant’s board of directors (the “board of directors”), has determined that (i) the registrant has the following audit committee financial experts serving on its audit committee and (ii) each audit committee financial expert is independent: |
Lorenzo A. Flores
Catherine A. Lynch
Arthur P. Steinmetz
Under applicable securities laws, a person determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for any purpose, including without limitation for the purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being designated or identified as an audit committee financial expert. The designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations, or liabilities greater than the duties, obligations, and liabilities imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. The designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not affect the duties, obligations, or liability of any other member of the audit committee or board of directors.
| Item 4 – | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The following table presents fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”) in each of the last two fiscal years for the services rendered to the Fund:
| (a) Audit Fees |
(b) Audit-Related Fees1 |
(c) Tax Fees2 | (d) All Other Fees | |||||||||||||
| Entity Name |
Current Year End |
Previous Year End |
Current Year End |
Previous Year End |
Current Year End |
Previous Year End |
Current Year End |
Previous Year End | ||||||||
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. | $32,698 | $32,538 | $0 | $0 | $20,700 | $20,696 | $388 | $0 | ||||||||
The following table presents fees billed by D&T that were required to be approved by the registrant’s audit committee (the “Committee”) for services that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the Fund and that are rendered on behalf of BlackRock Advisors, LLC
(the “Investment Adviser” or “BlackRock”) and entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with BlackRock (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Service Providers”):
| Current Fiscal Year End | Previous Fiscal Year End | |||
| (b) Audit-Related Fees1 | $0 | $0 | ||
| (c) Tax Fees2 |
$0 | $0 | ||
| (d) All Other Fees3 |
$2,149,000 | $2,149,000 |
1 The nature of the services includes assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements not included in Audit Fees, including accounting consultations, agreed-upon procedure reports, attestation reports, comfort letters, out-of-pocket expenses and internal control reviews not required by regulators.
2 The nature of the services includes tax compliance and/or tax preparation, including services relating to the filing or amendment of federal, state or local income tax returns, regulated investment company qualification reviews, taxable income and tax distribution calculations.
3 Non-audit fees of $2,149,000 and $2,149,000 for the current fiscal year and previous fiscal year, respectively, were paid to the Fund’s principal accountant in their entirety by BlackRock, in connection with services provided to the Affiliated Service Providers of the Fund and of certain other funds sponsored or advised by BlackRock or its affiliates for a service organization review and an accounting research tool subscription. These amounts represent aggregate fees paid by BlackRock and were not allocated on a per fund basis.
(e)(1) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures:
The Committee has adopted policies and procedures with regard to the pre-approval of services. Audit, audit-related and tax compliance services provided to the registrant on an annual basis require specific pre-approval by the Committee. The Committee also must approve other non-audit services provided to the registrant and those non-audit services provided to the Investment Adviser and Affiliated Service Providers that relate directly to the operations and the financial reporting of the registrant. Certain of these non-audit services that the Committee believes are (a) consistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules and (b) routine and recurring services that will not impair the independence of the independent accountants may be approved by the Committee without consideration on a specific case-by-case basis (“general pre-approval”). The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of the pre-approval, unless the Committee provides for a different period. Tax or other non-audit services provided to the registrant which have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the registrant will only be deemed pre-approved provided that any individual project does not exceed $10,000 attributable to the registrant or $50,000 per project. For this purpose, multiple projects will be aggregated to determine if they exceed the previously mentioned cost levels.
Any proposed services exceeding the pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Committee, as will any other services not subject to general pre-approval (e.g., unanticipated but permissible services). The Committee is informed of each service approved subject to general pre-approval at the next regularly scheduled in-person board meeting. At this meeting, an analysis of such services is presented to the Committee for ratification. The Committee may delegate to the Committee Chairman the authority to approve the provision of and fees for any specific engagement of permitted non-audit services, including services exceeding pre-approved cost levels.
(e)(2) None of the services described in each of Items 4(b) through (d) were approved by the Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not Applicable
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees, defined as the sum of the fees shown under “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees,” paid to the accountant for services rendered by the accountant to the registrant, the Investment Adviser and the Affiliated Service Providers were:
| Entity Name | Current Fiscal Year End | Previous Fiscal Year End | ||
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. | $21,088 | $20,696 |
Additionally, the amounts billed by D&T in connection with services provided to the Affiliated Service Providers of the Fund and of other funds sponsored or advised by BlackRock or its affiliates during the current and previous fiscal years for a service organization review and an accounting research tool subscription were:
| Current Fiscal Year End | Previous Fiscal Year End | |
|
$2,149,000 |
$2,149,000 |
These amounts represent aggregate fees paid by BlackRock and were not allocated on a per fund basis.
(h) The Committee has considered and determined that the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the Investment Adviser and the Affiliated Service Providers that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
(i) Not Applicable
(j) Not Applicable
Item 5 – Audit Committee of Listed Registrant
(a) The following individuals are members of the registrant’s separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)):
Lorenzo A. Flores
J. Phillip Holloman
Catherine A. Lynch
Arthur P. Steinmetz
(b) Not Applicable
Item 6 – Investments
(a) The registrant’s Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1(a) of this Form.
(b) Not Applicable due to no such divestments during the semi-annual period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing.
| Item 7 – | Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| Item 8 – | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| Item 9 – | Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| Item 10 – | Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| Item 11 – | Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract – The registrant’s statement regarding the basis for approval of the investment advisory contract is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1(a) of this Form. |
| Item 12 – | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies – The board of directors has delegated the voting of proxies for the Fund’s portfolio securities to the Investment Adviser pursuant to the Closed-End Fund Proxy Voting Policy. The Investment Adviser has adopted the BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship - Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines (the “BAIS Guidelines”) with respect to certain funds, including the Fund. Copies of the Closed-End Fund Proxy Voting Policy and the BAIS Guidelines are attached as Exhibit 99.PROXYPOL. Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling (800) 882-0052, (ii) at www.blackrock.com and (iii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. |
| Item 13 – | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies |
(a)(1) As of the date of filing this Report:
The registrant is managed by a team of investment professionals comprised of Walter O’Connor, CFA, Managing Director at BlackRock, Christian Romaglino, CFA, Director at BlackRock, Kevin Maloney, CFA, Managing Director at BlackRock, Phillip Soccio, CFA, Director at BlackRock, Michael Kalinoski, CFA, Director at BlackRock and Kristi Manidis, Director at BlackRock. Each of the foregoing professionals is a member of BlackRock’s municipal tax-exempt management group and is jointly responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant’s portfolio, which includes setting the registrant’s overall investment strategy, overseeing the management of the registrant and/or selection of its investments. Messrs. O’Connor and Romaglino have been members of the registrant’s portfolio management team since 2006 and 2022 respectively. Messrs. Maloney, Soccio and Kalinoski and Ms. Manidis have been members of the registrant’s portfolio management team since 2023.
| Portfolio Manager | Biography | |
| Walter O’Connor, CFA | Managing Director of BlackRock since 2006. | |
| Christian Romaglino, CFA | Director of BlackRock since 2017. |
| Portfolio Manager | Biography | |
| Kevin Maloney, CFA | Managing Director of BlackRock since 2025; Director of BlackRock from 2021 to 2024; Vice President of BlackRock from 2018 to 2020. | |
| Phillip Soccio, CFA | Director of BlackRock since 2009. | |
| Michael Kalinoski, CFA | Director of BlackRock since 2006. | |
| Kristi Manidis | Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2016. |
(a)(2) As of July 31, 2025:
|
(ii) Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type |
(iii) Number of Other Accounts and Assets for Which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based | |||||||||||
| (i) Name of Portfolio Manager |
Other Registered Investment Companies |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other Accounts |
Other Registered Investment Companies |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other Accounts | ||||||
| Walter O’Connor, CFA |
33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| $28.36 Billion | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||
| Christian Romaglino, CFA |
36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| $15.78 Billion | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||
| Kevin Maloney, CFA |
42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| $39.20 Billion | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||
| Phillip Soccio, CFA |
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| $24.87 Billion | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||
| Michael Kalinoski, CFA |
33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| $29.66 Billion | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||
| Kristi Manidis |
35 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| $23.88 Billion | $0 | $699.9 Million | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||
(iv) Portfolio Manager Potential Material Conflicts of Interest
BlackRock has built a professional working environment, firm-wide compliance culture and compliance procedures and systems designed to protect against potential incentives that may favor one account over another. BlackRock has adopted policies and procedures that address the allocation of investment opportunities, execution of portfolio transactions, personal trading by employees and other potential conflicts of interest that are designed to ensure that all client accounts are treated equitably over time. Nevertheless, BlackRock furnishes investment management and advisory services to numerous clients in addition to the Fund, and BlackRock may, consistent with applicable law, make investment recommendations to other clients or accounts (including accounts which are hedge funds or have performance or higher fees paid to BlackRock, or in which portfolio managers have a personal interest in the receipt of such fees), which may be the same as or different from those made to the Fund. In addition, BlackRock, Inc., its affiliates and significant shareholders and any officer, director, shareholder or employee may or may not have an interest in the securities whose purchase and sale BlackRock recommends to the Fund. BlackRock, Inc. or any of its affiliates or significant shareholders, or any officer, director, shareholder, employee or any member of their families may take different actions than those recommended to the Fund by BlackRock with respect to the same securities. Moreover, BlackRock may refrain from rendering any advice or services concerning securities of companies of which any of BlackRock, Inc.’s (or its affiliates’ or significant
shareholders’) officers, directors or employees are directors or officers, or companies as to which BlackRock, Inc. or any of its affiliates or significant shareholders or the officers, directors and employees of any of them has any substantial economic interest or possesses material non-public information. Certain portfolio managers also may manage accounts whose investment strategies may at times be opposed to the strategy utilized for a fund. It should also be noted that a portfolio manager may be managing hedge fund and/or long only accounts, or may be part of a team managing hedge fund and/or long only accounts, subject to incentive fees. Such portfolio managers may therefore be entitled to receive a portion of any incentive fees earned on such accounts. Currently, the portfolio managers of this Fund are not entitled to receive a portion of incentive fees of other accounts.
As a fiduciary, BlackRock owes a duty of loyalty to its clients and must treat each client fairly. When BlackRock purchases or sells securities for more than one account, the trades must be allocated in a manner consistent with its fiduciary duties. BlackRock attempts to allocate investments in a fair and equitable manner among client accounts, with no account receiving preferential treatment. To this end, BlackRock, Inc. has adopted policies that are intended to ensure reasonable efficiency in client transactions and provide BlackRock with sufficient flexibility to allocate investments in a manner that is consistent with the particular investment discipline and client base, as appropriate.
(a)(3) As of July 31, 2025:
Portfolio Manager Compensation Overview
The discussion below describes the portfolio managers’ compensation as of July 31, 2025.
BlackRock’s financial arrangements with its portfolio managers, its competitive compensation and its career path emphasis at all levels reflect the value senior management places on key resources. Compensation may include a variety of components and may vary from year to year based on a number of factors. The principal components of compensation include a base salary, a performance-based discretionary bonus, participation in various benefits programs and one or more of the incentive compensation programs established by BlackRock.
Base Compensation. Generally, portfolio managers receive base compensation based on their position with the firm.
Discretionary Incentive Compensation. Discretionary incentive compensation is a function of several components: the performance of BlackRock, Inc., the performance of the portfolio manager’s group within BlackRock, the investment performance, including risk-adjusted returns, of the firm’s assets under management or supervision by that portfolio manager relative to predetermined benchmarks, and the individual’s performance and contribution to the overall performance of these portfolios and BlackRock. In most cases, these benchmarks are the same as the benchmark or benchmarks against which the performance of the funds or other accounts managed by the portfolio managers are measured. Among other things, BlackRock’s Chief Investment Officers make a subjective determination with respect to each portfolio manager’s compensation based on the performance of the funds and other accounts managed by each portfolio manager relative to the various benchmarks. Performance of fixed income funds is measured on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis over various time periods
including 1-, 3- and 5- year periods, as applicable. With respect to these portfolio managers, such benchmarks for the Fund and other accounts are: A combination of market-based indices (e.g., Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index), certain customized indices and certain fund industry peer groups.
Distribution of Discretionary Incentive Compensation. Discretionary incentive compensation is distributed to portfolio managers in a combination of cash, deferred BlackRock, Inc. stock awards, and/or deferred cash awards that notionally track the return of certain BlackRock investment products.
Portfolio managers receive their annual discretionary incentive compensation in the form of cash. Portfolio managers whose total compensation is above a specified threshold also receive deferred BlackRock, Inc. stock awards annually as part of their discretionary incentive compensation. Paying a portion of discretionary incentive compensation in the form of deferred BlackRock, Inc. stock puts compensation earned by a portfolio manager for a given year “at risk” based on BlackRock’s ability to sustain and improve its performance over future periods. In some cases, additional deferred BlackRock, Inc. stock may be granted to certain key employees as part of a long-term incentive award to aid in retention, align interests with long-term shareholders and motivate performance. Deferred BlackRock, Inc. stock awards are generally granted in the form of BlackRock, Inc. restricted stock units that vest pursuant to the terms of the applicable plan and, once vested, settle in BlackRock, Inc. common stock. The portfolio managers of this Fund have deferred BlackRock, Inc. stock awards.
For certain portfolio managers, a portion of the discretionary incentive compensation is also distributed in the form of deferred cash awards that notionally track the returns of select BlackRock investment products they manage, which provides direct alignment of portfolio manager discretionary incentive compensation with investment product results. Deferred cash awards vest ratably over a number of years and, once vested, settle in the form of cash. Only portfolio managers who manage specified products and whose total compensation is above a specified threshold are eligible to participate in the deferred cash award program.
Other Compensation Benefits. In addition to base salary and discretionary incentive compensation, portfolio managers may be eligible to receive or participate in one or more of the following:
Incentive Savings Plans — BlackRock, Inc. has created a variety of incentive savings plans in which BlackRock, Inc. employees are eligible to participate, including a 401(k) plan, the BlackRock Retirement Savings Plan (RSP), and the BlackRock Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The employer contribution components of the RSP include a company match equal to 50% of the first 8% of eligible pay contributed to the plan capped at $5,000 per year, and a company retirement contribution equal to 3-5% of eligible compensation up to the Internal Revenue Service limit ($350,000 for 2025). The RSP offers a range of investment options, including registered investment companies and collective investment funds managed by the firm. BlackRock, Inc. contributions follow the investment direction set by participants for their own contributions or, absent participant investment direction, are invested into a target date fund that corresponds to, or is closest to, the year in which the participant attains age 65. The ESPP allows for investment in BlackRock, Inc. common stock at a 5% discount on the fair market value of the stock on the purchase date. Annual participation in the ESPP is limited to the
purchase of 1,000 shares of common stock or a dollar value of $25,000 based on its fair market value on the purchase date. All of the eligible portfolio managers are eligible to participate in these plans.
(a)(4) Beneficial Ownership of Securities – As of July 31, 2025.
| Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities of the Fund Beneficially Owned | |
| Walter O’Connor, CFA |
None | |
| Christian Romaglino, CFA |
None | |
| Kevin Maloney, CFA |
None | |
| Phillip Soccio, CFA |
None | |
| Michael Kalinoski, CFA |
None | |
| Kristi Manidis |
None |
(b) Not Applicable
| Item 14 – | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers – Not Applicable due to no such purchases during the period covered by this report. |
| Item 15 – | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – There have been no material changes to these procedures. |
| Item 16 – | Controls and Procedures |
(a) The registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Item 17 – | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| Item 18 – | Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation – Not Applicable |
| Item 19 – | Exhibits attached hereto |
(a)(1) Code of Ethics – See Item 2
(a)(2) Any policy required by the listing standards adopted pursuant to Rule 10D-1 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10D-1) by the registered national securities exchange or registered national securities association upon which the registrant’s securities are listed – Not Applicable
(a)(3) Section 302 Certifications are attached
(a)(4) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 – Not Applicable
(a)(5) Change in Registrant’s independent public accountant – Not Applicable
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc.
| By: | /s/ John M. Perlowski | |
| John M. Perlowski | ||
| Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of | ||
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
Date: September 23, 2025
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By: | /s/ John M. Perlowski | |
| John M. Perlowski | ||
| Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of | ||
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
Date: September 23, 2025
| By: | /s/ Trent Walker | |
| Trent Walker | ||
| Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of | ||
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
Date: September 23, 2025
EX-99. CERT
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 30a-2(a) UNDER THE 1940 ACT AND SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 23, 2025
| /s/ John M. Perlowski |
| John M. Perlowski |
| Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
EX-99. CERT
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 30a-2(a) UNDER THE 1940 ACT AND SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Trent Walker, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 23, 2025
/s/ Trent Walker
Trent Walker
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc.
Exhibit 99.906CERT
Certification Pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies, to the best of their knowledge, that the Registrant’s Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended July 31, 2025 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Date: September 23, 2025 |
| /s/ John M. Perlowski |
| John M. Perlowski |
| Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies, to the best of their knowledge, that the Registrant’s Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended July 31, 2025 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Date: September 23, 2025 |
| /s/ Trent Walker |
| Trent Walker |
| Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of |
| BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
This certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Closed-End Fund Proxy Voting Policy
August 1, 2021
| Closed-End Fund Proxy Voting Policy |
|
Procedures Governing Delegation of Proxy Voting to Fund Adviser
|
| Effective Date: August 1, 2021 |
| Last Review Date: September 1, 2024 |
|
Applies to the following types of Funds registered under the 1940 Act: |
| ☐ Open-End Mutual Funds (including money market funds) |
| ☐ Money Market Funds |
| ☐ Exchange-Traded Funds |
| ☒ Closed-End Funds |
| ☐ Other |
Objective and Scope
Set forth below is the Closed-End Fund Proxy Voting Policy.
Policy / Document Requirements and Statements
The Boards of Trustees/Directors (the “Directors”) of the closed-end funds advised by BlackRock Advisors, LLC (“BlackRock”), (the “Funds”) have the responsibility for the oversight of voting proxies relating to portfolio securities of the Funds, and have determined that it is in the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders to delegate that responsibility to BlackRock as part of BlackRock’s authority to manage, acquire and dispose of account assets, all as contemplated by the Funds’ respective investment management agreements.
BlackRock has adopted guidelines and procedures (together and as from time to time amended, the “BlackRock proxy voting guidelines”) governing proxy voting by accounts managed by BlackRock. BlackRock will cast votes on behalf of each of the Funds on specific proxy issues in respect of securities held by each such Fund in accordance with the BlackRock Proxy voting guidelines; provided, however, that in the case of underlying closed-end funds (including business development companies and other similarly-situated asset pools) held by the Funds that have, or are proposing to adopt, a classified board structure, BlackRock will typically (a) vote in favor of proposals to adopt classification and against proposals to eliminate classification, and (b) not vote against directors as a result of their adoption of a classified board structure.
BlackRock will report on an annual basis to the Directors on (1) a summary of the proxy voting process as applicable to the Funds in the preceding year together with a representation that all votes were in accordance with the BlackRock proxy voting guidelines (as modified pursuant to the immediately preceding paragraph), and (2) any changes to the BlackRock proxy voting guidelines that have not previously been reported.
| Public | Page 1 of 1 |
Contents
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| Appendix 1: How we fulfil and oversee our active investment stewardship responsibilities |
18 | |||
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 2 |
NM1224U-4112305-2/23
This document provides high level guidance on how BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship (BAIS) views corporate governance matters that are commonly put to a shareholder vote, or on which investors engage with issuers. BAIS works in partnership with BlackRock’s investment teams, excluding index equity, providing expertise on investment stewardship, engaging with companies on behalf of those teams when appropriate, and assisting in recommending, operationalizing and reporting on voting decisions. The guidance informs BAIS’ voting recommendations to BlackRock’s active portfolio managers. It applies to active equity holdings in BlackRock’s fundamental equity, systematic equity and multi-asset solutions strategies. It also may apply to holdings in BlackRock’s index and active fixed income strategies, to the extent those strategies hold voting securities or conduct issuer engagements. The guidelines are not prescriptive as active portfolio managers have discretion as to how they integrate these guidelines within their investment processes in light of their clients’ or funds’ investment objectives. There are separate, independently developed principles and voting policies that are applied to BlackRock’s index equity investments by a distinct and independent function, BlackRock Investment Stewardship.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 3 |
NM1224U-4112305-3/23
BlackRock’s purpose is to help more and more people experience financial well-being. We manage assets on behalf of institutional and individual clients, across a full spectrum of investment strategies, asset classes, and regions. Our client base includes pension plans, endowments, foundations, charities, official institutions, insurers, and other financial institutions, as well as individuals around the world.
About BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship
BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship (BAIS) is a specialist team within the Portfolio Management Group and manages BlackRock’s stewardship engagement and voting on behalf of clients invested in active strategies globally. BAIS is also responsible for engagement with issuers in index fixed income strategies, where appropriate. Our activities are informed by these Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines (“the Guidelines”) and insights from active investment analysts and portfolio managers, with whom we work closely in engaging companies and voting at shareholder meetings.
Engagement with public companies is the foundation of our approach to stewardship within fundamental active investing. Through direct dialogue with company leadership, we seek to understand their businesses and how they manage risks and opportunities to deliver durable, risk adjusted financial returns. Generally, portfolio managers and stewardship specialists engage jointly on substantive matters. Our discussions focus on topics relevant to a company’s success over time including governance and leadership, corporate strategy, capital structure and financial performance, operations and sustainability-related risks, as well as macro-economic, geopolitical and sector dynamics. We aim to be constructive investors and are generally supportive of management teams that have a track record of financial value creation. We aim to build and maintain strong relationships with company leadership based on open dialogue and mutual respect.
Different active equity strategies may implement these voting guidelines differently, as a result of the latitude the portfolio manager has to make independent voting decisions aligned with their portfolio objectives and investment strategy. For example, BAIS will generally vote the holdings in Systematic Active Equity portfolios in accordance with these guidelines. We provide voting recommendations to fundamental equity portfolio managers, who may determine to vote differently based on their portfolio investment objectives and strategy.
These guidelines discuss corporate governance topics on which we may engage with management teams and board directors1 and matters that routinely come to a shareholder vote. We recognize that accepted corporate governance norms can differ across markets, and believe these guidelines represent globally applicable elements of governance that support a company’s ability to manage material risks and opportunities and deliver financial returns to investors. Generally, we believe companies should observe accepted corporate governance norms within their local markets or, particularly in markets without well-established norms, aspire to widely recognized international best practices. As one of many minority shareholders, BlackRock cannot – and does not try to – direct a company’s strategy or its implementation. We look to companies to provide disclosures that explain how their approach to corporate governance best aligns with the financial interests of their investors.
1 References to the board, board directors or non-executive directors should be understood to include supervisory boards and their members, where relevant.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 4 |
NM1224U-4112305-4/23
Our approach to stewardship within active equities
As shareholders of public companies, BlackRock’s clients have certain fundamental rights, including the right to vote on proposals put forth by a company’s management or its shareholders. The voting rights attached to these clients’ holdings are an important mechanism for investors to express support for, or concern about, a company’s performance. As a fiduciary, BlackRock is legally required to make proxy voting determinations, on behalf of clients who have delegated voting authority to us, in a manner that is consistent with their investment objectives.
In general, we tend to support the recommendations of the board of directors and management. As indicated below, we may vote against management recommendations when we have concerns about how companies are serving the financial interests of our clients as their shareholders. We take a globally consistent approach to voting but consider the different corporate governance regulations and norms in various markets. Votes are determined on a case-by-case basis, in the context of a company’s situation and the investment mandate we have from clients. Please see page 16 for more information about how we fulfil and oversee BlackRock’s non-index equity investment stewardship responsibilities.
Our approach to stewardship within fixed income
Although fixed income investors do not have the right to vote at shareholder meetings, issuer engagement is a component of fixed income investment strategies at BlackRock, particularly those with sustainability objectives in addition to financial objectives. Most corporate governance-related fixed income engagements are undertaken in conjunction with the active investment stewardship team, and often active equity investors. In addition to the topics listed below, engagement with fixed income investment teams can help inform an issuer’s approach to structuring specialist issuances, such as green bonds, and the standard terms and information in bond documentation.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 5 |
NM1224U-4112305-5/23
Roles and responsibilities
There is widespread consensus that the foundation of good corporate governance is an effective board of directors that is able to advise and supervise management in an independent and objective manner.2
We look to the board of directors (hereafter ‘the board’) to have an oversight role in the establishment and realization of a company’s strategy, purpose and culture. These constructs are interdependent and, when aligned, can better position a company to be resilient in the face of a changing business environment, help reduce the risks of corporate or employee misconduct, and attract and retain the caliber of workers necessary to deliver financial performance over time.
In promoting the success of the company, the board ensures the necessary resources, policies and procedures are in place to help management meet its strategic objectives within an agreed risk tolerance.
One of the most important responsibilities of the board is to appoint, and remove as necessary, the chief executive officer (CEO). In addition, the board plays a meaningful role in monitoring the performance of the CEO and other key executives, determining executive compensation, ensuring a rigorous audit, overseeing strategy execution and risk management and engaging with shareholders, and other stakeholders, as necessary.
Composition and effectiveness
Appointment process
A formal and transparent process for identifying and appointing director candidates is critical to ensuring the board is composed of directors with the appropriate mix of skills and experience. The board or a subcommittee should determine the general criteria given the company’s circumstances (e.g., sector, maturity, geographic footprint) and any additional criteria for a specific role being filled (e.g., financial expertise, industry track record). To inform the process, we encourage companies to review the skills and experience of incumbent directors to identify any gaps and whether a director candidate’s characteristics would be additive. We welcome disclosures that explain how the board considered different skills, backgrounds and experience to ensure the directors collectively can be effective in fulfilling their responsibilities. We assess a company’s board composition against that of its peer group and local market requirements.
Shareholders periodically vote to elect, remove and nominate directors to serve on the board. We may vote against the election of the most senior independent director, or the chair of the relevant committee, where a company has not demonstrated it has an appointment process that results in a high functioning board with the appropriate complement of skills, backgrounds and experience amongst the directors to support strong financial performance over time. We may vote against newly nominated directors who do not seem to have the appropriate skills or experience to contribute to the board’s effectiveness.
Independence
Director independence from management, significant shareholders or other stakeholders (e.g., government or employees) is of paramount importance to the protection of the interests of minority shareholders such as BlackRock’s clients. At least half of the directors should be independent and free
2 See the Corporate Governance Codes of Germany, Japan, and the UK, as well as the corporate governance principles of the US
Business Roundtable as examples.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 6 |
NM1224U-4112305-6/23
from conflicts of interest or undue influence.3 This ensures sufficient independent directors to have appropriately independent board committees. Companies domiciled in markets with a higher threshold for board independence should meet those requirements.
We may vote against the election of non-independent directors if the board does not have a sufficient balance of independence. We may also vote against the election of the chair of the committee responsible for board composition if this is a perennial issue.
Independent board leadership
Practices across markets differ, as do board structures, but we observe two main approaches to independent board leadership. One is a non-executive, independent chair of the board who is responsible for leading the board in the effective exercise of its duties. The other is a lead or senior independent director, who is responsible for coordinating with the other non-executive directors and working closely with the executive chair on the board agenda and other board procedures. In this case, the executive chair and the lead independent director work together to ensure the board is effectively fulfilling its responsibilities. In our view, the independent leader of the board, and/or the chair of a relevant committee, should be available to investors to discuss board governance matters such as CEO succession, executive pay, and board performance. We look to boards to explain their independent board leadership model and how it serves the interests of shareholders.
We may vote against the election of the chair of the committee responsible for board composition if there is not an identified independent leader of the board with clear responsibilities for board performance. We may vote against the most senior independent director if the board has a policy of not engaging with shareholders.
Tenure and succession
Boards should establish the length of time a director would normally be expected to serve, in line with market norms where those exist. In such markets, we find it helpful when companies disclose their approach to director tenure particularly around the contributions of directors who have served for longer periods than provided for in local practices. In our experience, long-serving directors could become less independent given their relationship with management and involvement in past board decisions.
Succession planning for board roles helps achieve the appropriate cadence of turnover that balances renewal through the regular introduction of directors with fresh perspectives and expertise with continuity through the retention of directors with long-term knowledge of the board and company.
In markets where there is not specific director tenure guidance, we may vote against the election of the chair of the committee responsible for board composition if there is not a clearly disclosed approach to director tenure and board renewal. We may vote against the election of directors who have served for longer duration than typical in markets with specific guidance, where the case for their continued service is not evident.
3 Common impediments to independence may include but are not limited to: current or recent employment at the company or a subsidiary; being, or representing, a shareholder with a substantial shareholding in the company; interlocking directorships; lengthy tenure, and having any other interest, business, or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with a director’s ability to act in the best interests of the company and shareholders.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 7 |
NM1224U-4112305-7/23
Capacity
To be effective and engaged, directors must commit appropriate time and energy to the role. A board should assess the ability of its members to maintain an appropriate focus on board matters and the company taking into consideration competing responsibilities. We recognize that board leadership roles vary across markets in responsibilities and required time commitment but note that they are generally more intensive than a standard directorship. We will take local norms and practices into consideration when making our voting determinations across markets.
We may vote against the election of directors who do not seem to have sufficient capacity to effectively fulfil their duties to the board and company.
Director elections
In support of director accountability to shareholders, directors should stand for election on a regular basis, ideally annually. A classified board structure may be justified by a company when it needs consistency and stability during a time of transition, or on the basis of its business model, e.g., a non-operating company such as closed-end funds.
Shareholders should have the opportunity to evaluate nominated directors individually rather than in bundled slates. We look to companies to provide sufficient information on each director standing for election so that shareholders can assess their capabilities and suitability. We will not support the election of directors whose names and biographical details have not been disclosed sufficiently in advance of the shareholder meeting.
Each director’s appointment should be dependent on receiving a simple majority of the votes cast at the shareholder meeting. Where a company’s practices differ, we look to the board to provide a detailed explanation as to how its approach best serves investors’ interests.
We may vote for shareholder or management proposals seeking to establish annual election of directors and/or a simple majority vote standard for director elections. We may vote against all the directors standing for election as part of a single slate if we have concerns about the profile or performance of an individual director.
Committees
Many boards establish committees to focus on specific responsibilities of the board such as audit and risk, governance and human capital, and executive compensation, amongst other matters. We do not prescribe to companies what committees they should establish but we seek to understand the board’s rationale for the committee structure it determines is appropriate. We note that, in some markets, regulation requires such committees. The responsibilities of each committee should be clear, and the board should ensure that all critical matters are assigned either to the full board or to one of the committees. The board should disclose to shareholders the structure, membership, proportion of independent directors, and responsibilities of each committee. The responsibilities we typically see assigned to the three most common committees include:
| | Audit and risk – oversight responsibilities for the integrity of financial reporting, risk management and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; may also play an oversight role in relation to the internal audit function and whistleblowing mechanisms. |
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 8 |
NM1224U-4112305-8/23
| | Nominating, governance and human capital – ensures appropriate corporate governance principles and practices including the periodic review of board performance; responsible for succession planning for CEO and key board roles, as well as the director appointment process; may also have oversight responsibilities for human capital management strategies including corporate culture and purpose. |
| | Executive compensation – determines the compensation policies and programs for the CEO and other executive officers, approves annual awards and payments under the policies; may also have oversight responsibilities for firm-wide compensation policies. |
We may vote against the election of the chair of the committee or other directors serving as committee members to convey our concerns and provide feedback on how a committee has undertaken its responsibilities. We may vote against the election of the most senior non-executive director if there is not a clearly disclosed approach to board committees.
Board and director evaluation
We consider it best practice for companies to conduct an annual review of the performance of the board, the committees, the chair and individual directors. Periodically, this review could be undertaken by an independent third party able to bring objective perspectives to the board on governance and performance. We encourage companies to disclose their approach to and objectives of evaluations, including any changes made to the board’s approach as a result.
Access to independent advice
To support the directors in effectively fulfilling their duties to the company and shareholders, they should have access to independent advice. When circumstances warrant, boards should be able to retain independent third parties to advise on critical matters. These might include new industry developments such as emergent and disruptive technology, operating events with material consequences for the company’s reputation and/or performance, or significant transactions. Board committees may similarly retain third parties to advise them on specialist matters such as audit, compensation and succession planning.
Boards should establish compensation arrangements that enable the company to recruit, retain and reward the caliber of executive management necessary to lead and operate the company to deliver superior financial returns over time. We focus on alignment between variable pay and a company’s financial performance.
Generally, executive compensation arrangements have four components: base salary, annual bonus that rewards performance against short-term metrics, share-based incentives that reward performance against long-term metrics, and pensions and benefits. In our observation, base salary, pensions and benefits are largely set relative to market norms and benchmarks. The annual bonus and share-based incentive, or variable pay plans, tend to be tailored to the company, its sector and long-term strategy, as well as the individuals the board is seeking to recruit and motivate.
Recognizing the unique circumstances of each company, we determine whether to support a company’s approach to executive compensation on a case-by-case basis. We rely on companies providing sufficient quantitative and qualitative information in their disclosures to enable shareholders to understand the
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 9 |
NM1224U-4112305-9/23
compensation arrangements and assess the alignment with investors’ interests. Features we look for in compensation arrangements include:
| | Fixed pay components, including base salary, benefits and prerequisites that are appropriate in the context of the company’s size, sector and market. |
| | Variable pay subject to performance metrics that are closely linked to the company’s short- and long-term strategic objectives. |
| | Long-term incentives that motivate sustained performance across a multi-year period. |
| | A balance between fixed and variable pay, short- and long-term incentives, and specific instruments (cash and equity awards) that promotes pay program durability and seldom necessitates one-off, discretionary payments. |
| | Outcomes that are consistent with the returns to investors over the relevant time period. |
| | Board discretion, if allowed within the variable pay arrangements, to be used sparingly, responsibly and transparently. |
| | A requirement, that participants in long-term share-based incentive plans build a meaningful shareholding in the company within a defined time period, as determined by the board. |
| | Change of control provisions that appropriately balance the interests of executives and shareholders. |
| | Clawback or malus provisions that allow the company to recoup or hold back variable compensation from individuals whose awards were based on fraudulent activities, misstated financial reports, or executive misconduct. |
| | Severance arrangements that protect the company’s interests but do not cost more than is contractual. |
We may vote against proposals to introduce new share-based incentives, approve existing policies or plans, or approve the compensation report where we do not see alignment between executive compensation arrangements and our clients’ financial interests. When there is not an alternative, or where there have been multi-year issues with compensation misaligned with performance, we may vote against the election of the chair of the responsible committee, or the most senior independent director.
Non-executive director compensation
Companies generally pay non-executive directors an annual retainer or fee in cash, shares or a combination of the two. Some companies also pay additional fees for service on board committees or in board leadership roles. We do not support non-executive directors participating in performance-based incentive plans as doing so may create a conflict of interest and undermine their independence from management, whom they oversee.
Boards are responsible for ensuring senior executive leadership has established a capital strategy that achieves appropriate capital allocation and management in support of long-term financial resilience.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 10 |
NM1224U-4112305-10/23
Where company practices diverge from those set out below, we look for companies to disclose why they view these practices to be aligned with shareholders’ interests. We may vote against management proposals seeking capital-related authorities or the election of the most senior independent director if we have concerns about a company’s approach. We may also support a shareholder proposal seeking conversion of shares with differentiated voting rights to a one-share, one-vote standard.
Share issuance
We assess requests for share issuance for particular transactions on a case-by-case basis. We will generally support authorities to issue shares when subject to pre-emptive rights, and up to 20% absent pre-emptive rights. Companies should seek regular approval of these authorities to allow shareholders to take into consideration how prior authorities were used, as well as the current circumstances of the company and the market environment.
Share buybacks
We assess share buyback proposals in the context of the company’s disclosed capital management strategy and management’s determination of the appropriate balance between investment that supports the long-term growth of the company and returning cash to investors. We also take into consideration the effect of a buyback program on the company’s balance sheet and executive compensation arrangements and the price at which shares are repurchased relative to market price. Companies should seek regular approval of these authorities to allow shareholders to take into consideration how prior authorities were used, as well as the current circumstances of the company and the market environment.
We would normally expect companies to cancel repurchased shares. If a company plans to retain them as treasury shares, management should provide a detailed rationale in the context of the disclosed capital management strategy.
Dividends
We generally defer to management and the board on dividend policy but may engage to seek further clarification where a proposed dividend appears out of line with the company’s financial position.
Differentiated voting rights
We prefer companies to adopt a one-share, one-vote structure for share classes with the same economic exposure. Certain companies, particularly those new to public markets, could make the case to adopt a differentiated voting rights structure, or dual class stock. In those situations, we encourage companies to evaluate and seek approval for their capital structure on a periodic basis.
Transactions and special situations
We monitor developments in transactions and special situations closely and undertake our own detailed analyses of proposals.
Mergers and acquisitions
We evaluate proposed mergers or acquisitions by assessing the financial outcome for our clients as minority shareholders. Management should provide an assessment of the proposed transaction’s strategic and financial rationale, along with its execution and operational risks. We review each transaction independently based on these factors and the degree to which the transaction enhances
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 11 |
NM1224U-4112305-11/23
shareholder value. The board should consider establishing an ad hoc transaction committee to undertake an independent assessment of a significant merger or acquisition, in advance of making its recommendation to shareholders.
We will vote against transactions that, in our assessment, do not advance our clients’ financial interests.
Anti-takeover defenses
In principle, we do not support companies using anti-takeover defenses, also known as poison pills or shareholder rights plans, as they can entrench management and boards which have not delivered long-term shareholder value. By exception, a poison pill may be supported if its purpose is to delay a takeover that is considered sub-optimal and enable management to seek an improved offer. Similarly, management could make the case to use a poison pill to block a shareholder activism campaign that may be counter to the interests of other investors. Defense mechanisms introduced in these circumstances should be limited in term and threshold, and also be closely monitored by the independent members of the board. We look for a shareholder vote for any mechanisms expected to be in place for more than 12 months.
Shareholder activism
When companies are the focus of an activism campaign, we may engage with the activist to understand their analysis and objectives, once they have gone public. We will also engage with company management and possibly board members, especially those the activist may be seeking to replace. In our assessment, we evaluate various factors, including the concerns raised by the activist and the case for change; the quality of both the activist’s and management’s plans; and the qualifications of each party’s candidates. We evaluate each contested situation by assessing the potential financial outcome for our clients as minority shareholders.
We may support board candidates nominated by a shareholder activist if the activist has demonstrated that their case for change enhances shareholder value, or if the incumbent board members do not demonstrate the relevant skills and expertise or have a poor track record of protecting shareholders’ interests.
Significant shareholders and related party transactions
Boards of companies with affiliated shareholders or directors should be able to demonstrate that the interests of all shareholders are given equitable consideration.
Transactions with related parties, such as significant shareholders or companies connected with the public company, should be disclosed in detail and conducted on terms similar to what would objectively have been agreed with a non-related party. Such transactions should be reviewed and approved by the independent members of the board, and if voted on, only disinterested shareholders should vote.
Corporate reporting, risk management and audit
Investors depend on corporate reporting, both regulatory and voluntary, to understand a company’s strategy, its implementation and financial performance, as well as to assess the quality of management and operations and potential for the company to create shareholder value over time. The board should oversee corporate reporting and the policies and procedures underpinning the internal audit function and external audit.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 12 |
NM1224U-4112305-12/23
A company’s financial reporting should provide decision-useful information for investors and other stakeholders on its financial performance and position. It should provide an accurate and balanced assessment of the risks and opportunities the company faces in realizing its long-term strategy. Accordingly, the assumptions made by management and reviewed by the auditor in preparing the financial statements should be reasonable and justified. Financial statements should be prepared in accordance with globally developed reporting standards and any divergence from generally accepted accounting principles should be explained in detail and justified. Accounting restatements should be explained in detail and any remedial actions, and the implications of these, disclosed.
In this context, audit committees play a vital role in a company’s financial reporting system by providing independent oversight of the accounts, material financial and, where appropriate to the jurisdiction, nonfinancial information, internal control frameworks and Enterprise Risk Management systems. In our view, effective audit committee oversight strengthens the quality and reliability of a company’s financial statements and provides an important level of reassurance to shareholders. Audit committees should have a procedure in place for assessing the independence of the auditor and the quality of the external audit process annually.
Similarly, material sustainability-related factors that are integral to how a company manages risks or generates revenue should be disclosed. In our view, the standards developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board, can be helpful to companies in preparing such reports. 4
Companies should establish robust risk management and internal control processes appropriate to the company’s business, risk tolerance, and regulatory environment. A credible whistleblowing system for employees, and potentially other stakeholders, can be a useful mechanism for ensuring that senior management and the board are aware of potential misconduct or breaches in risk management and internal control processes.
A comprehensive audit conducted by an independent audit firm contributes to investor confidence in the quality of corporate reporting. It is helpful when the audit report gives some insight into the scope and focus of the audit, as well as any critical audit matters identified and how these were resolved. A comprehensive and effective audit is time and resource intensive, and the audit fee should be commensurate. Fees paid to the audit firm for non-audit consulting should not exceed the audit fee to a degree that may prompt concerns about the independence of the audit. The audit committee should explain its position on auditor tenure and how it confirmed that the auditor remained independent.
We may vote against the election of the responsible directors if corporate reporting is insufficient or there are material misstatements in financial reports. In markets where relevant, we may vote against a proposal to approve the financial statements or the discharge of the board when we are concerned about the quality of the reporting or the audit. We may vote against proposals to appoint the auditor, ratify the audit report, or approve the audit fee if we are concerned about the auditor’s independence, the quality of the audit, or there are material misstatements in financial reports and the board has not established reasonable remediation plans.
4 The objective of IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information is to require an entity to disclose information about its sustainability-related risks and opportunities that is useful to primary users of general-purpose financial reports in making decisions relating to providing resources to the entity. The objective of IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures is to require an entity to disclose information about its climate-related risks and opportunities that is useful to primary users of general-purpose financial reports in making decisions relating to providing resources to the entity.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 13 |
NM1224U-4112305-13/23
Shareholder rights and protections
General shareholder meetings
Companies normally have an annual general meeting of shareholders at which routine and non-routine items of business are discussed and voted on by shareholders in attendance or submitting proxy votes. Companies should disclose materials relevant to the shareholder meeting sufficiently in advance so that shareholders can take them into consideration in their voting decisions. Many companies offer shareholders the option of participating in the meeting virtually which, whilst welcome, should not limit the rights of shareholders to participate as they would during an in-person meeting.
We may vote against directors when materials related to the business of the shareholder meeting are not provided in a timely manner or do not provide sufficient information for us to take an informed voting decision. We may vote against directors if the format of the shareholder meeting does not accommodate reasonable shareholder participation.
Bylaw amendments
We review bylaw amendments proposed by management on a case-by-case basis and will generally support those that are aligned with the interests of minority shareholders. Any material changes to the bylaws should be explained in detail and put to a shareholder vote.
We may vote against bylaw amendments that reduce shareholder rights and protections. We may vote against directors if material changes are made to the bylaws without shareholder approval.
If not provided for in the relevant corporate law, company bylaws should allow shareholders, individually or as a group, with a meaningful shareholding the right to call a special meeting of shareholders. The shareholding required to exercise this right should balance its utility with the cost to the company of holding special meetings.
If not provided for in the relevant corporate law, company bylaws should allow shareholders, individually or as a group, with a meaningful shareholding the right to nominate directors to the company’s board. The threshold for this right should be set so that shareholders can exercise it without being unduly disruptive to the board’s own nomination process.
Whilst we would not use either of these rights ourselves, we see them as important accountability mechanisms. We may vote for a shareholder proposal seeking the addition of either of these provisions to a company’s bylaws.
Change of domicile
We generally defer to management on proposals to change a company’s domicile as long as the rationale for doing so is consistent with the company’s long-term strategy and business model and the related costs are immaterial.
We may vote against directors or a proposal to change a company’s domicile where it does not seem aligned with our clients’ financial interests.
Changes to a company’s purpose or the nature of its business
Plans to materially change the nature of a company’s business or its purpose should be disclosed and explained in the context of long-term strategy and business dynamics. Such changes may significantly alter an investor’s views on the suitability of a company for their investment strategy or portfolio.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 14 |
NM1224U-4112305-14/23
Where relevant, we may vote against proposals to change a company’s purpose or the nature of its business if the board has not provided a credible argument for change.
Shareholders in many markets, who meet certain eligibility criteria, have the right to submit proposals to the general shareholder meeting asking a company to take a particular course of action subject to the proposal being supported by a majority of votes cast at the meeting. The topics raised address a range of governance, social and environmental matters that may be relevant to a company’s business.
Shareholder proposals are considered by many investors to be an escalation tool when a company is unresponsive to their engagement.
We vote on these proposals on a case-by-case basis. We assess the relevance of the topic raised to a company’s business and its current approach, whether the actions sought are consistent with shareholders’ interests, and what impact the proposal being acted upon might have on financial performance.
Our general approach where we have concerns about a company’s governance, disclosures or performance is to engage to understand the apparent difference in perspective. If we continue to believe the company is not acting in shareholders’ financial interests, we may vote against the election of directors. We may support a relevant shareholder proposal if doing so reinforces the points made in our engagement or is aligned with our clients’ financial interests. We generally do not support shareholder proposals that are legally binding on the company, seek to alter a company’s strategy or direct its operations, or are unrelated to how a company manages risk or generates financial returns.
BlackRock is subject to legal and regulatory requirements in the U.S. that place restrictions and limitations on how we can interact with the companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients, including our ability to submit shareholder proposals. We can vote on behalf of clients who authorize us to do so, on proposals put forth by others.
Corporate political activities
We seek to understand how companies ensure that their direct and indirect engagement in the policy making process is consistent with their public statements on policy matters important to the company’s long-term strategy. The board should be aware of the approach taken to corporate political activities as there can be reputational risks arising from inconsistencies. Companies should, as a minimum, meet all regulatory disclosure requirements on political activities, and ideally, provide accessible and clear disclosures to shareholders on policy positions, public policy engagement activities and political donations. To mitigate the risk of inconsistencies, companies can usefully assess the alignment between their policy priorities and the policy positions of the trade associations of which they are active members and any engagements undertaken by trade associations on behalf of members.
Generally, this is an engagement matter, although we may support a relevant shareholder proposal, or vote against directors, where a company’s disclosures are insufficient, or it becomes public that there is a material contradiction in a company’s public policy positions and its policy engagement.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 15 |
NM1224U-4112305-15/23
Sustainability, or environmental and social, considerations
We seek to understand how companies manage the risks and opportunities inherent in their business operations. In our experience, sustainability-related factors5 that are relevant to a company’s business or material to its financial performance, are generally operational considerations embedded into day-to-day management systems. Certain sustainability issues may also inform long-term strategic planning, for example, investing in product innovation in anticipation of changing consumer demand or adapting supply chains in response to changing regulatory requirements.
We recognize that the specific sustainability-related factors that may be financially material or business relevant will vary by company business model, sector, key markets, and time horizon, amongst other considerations. From company disclosures and our engagement, we aim to understand how management is identifying, assessing and integrating material sustainability-related risks and opportunities into their business decision-making and practices. Doing so helps us undertake a more holistic assessment of a company’s potential financial performance and the likely risk-adjusted returns of an investment.
We may vote against directors or support a relevant shareholder proposal if we have concerns about how a company is managing or disclosing its approach to material sustainability-related risks that may impact financial returns.
In our view, companies should understand and take into consideration the interests of the various parties on whom they depend for their success over time. It is for each company to determine their key stakeholders based on what is material to their business and long-term financial performance. For many companies, key stakeholders include employees, business partners (such as suppliers and distributors), clients and consumers, regulators, and the communities in which they operate. Companies that appropriately balance the interests of investors and other stakeholders are, in our experience, more likely to be financially resilient over time.
5 By material sustainability-related risks and opportunities, we mean the drivers of risk and financial value creation in a company’s business model that have an environmental or social dependency or impact. Examples of environmental issues include, but are not limited to, water use, land use, waste management, and climate risk. Examples of social issues include, but are not limited to, human capital management, impacts on the communities in which a company operates, customer loyalty, and relationships with regulators. It is our view that well-managed companies will effectively evaluate and manage material sustainability-related risks and opportunities relevant to their businesses. Governance is the core means by which boards can oversee the creation of durable financial value over time. Appropriate risk oversight of business-relevant and material sustainability-related considerations is a component of a sound governance framework.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 16 |
NM1224U-4112305-16/23
| Climate and decarbonization investment objectives
Certain active BlackRock funds have climate and decarbonization objectives in addition to financial objectives. Consistent with the objectives of those investment strategies, our stewardship activity in relation to the holdings in those funds differs in some respects from BAIS’ benchmark guidelines, which are described above. Specifically, for those funds’ holdings, we look to investee companies to demonstrate that they are aligned with a decarbonization pathway that means their business model would be viable in a low-carbon economy, i.e., one in which global temperature rise is limited to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This approach is only taken following BlackRock receiving the explicit approval from the applicable fund board.
The decarbonization stewardship guidelines focus on companies which produce goods and services that contribute to real world decarbonization or have a carbon intensive business model and face outsized impacts from the low carbon transition, based on reported and estimated scopes 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions. These companies should provide disclosures that set out their governance, strategy, risk management processes and metrics and targets relevant to decarbonization. These disclosures should include an explanation of the decarbonization scenarios a company is using in its near- and long-term planning, as well as its scope 1, scope 2 and material scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and reduction targets for scope 1 and 2 emissions. As with the BAIS benchmark policies, we consider the climate-risk reporting standard issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board, IFRS S2, a useful reference for such reporting.
Under these climate- and decarbonization-specific guidelines, BAIS may recommend a vote against directors or support for a relevant shareholder proposal if a company does not appear to be adequately addressing or disclosing material climate-related risks. We may recommend supporting shareholder proposals seeking information relevant to a company’s stated low-carbon transition strategy and targets that the company does not currently provide and that would be helpful to investment decision-making. As under the BAIS benchmark approach, the active portfolio managers are ultimately responsible for voting consistent with their investment mandate and fund objectives. |
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 17 |
NM1224U-4112305-17/23
Appendix 1: How we fulfil and oversee our active investment stewardship responsibilities
Oversight
The Global Head of BAIS has primary oversight of and responsibility for the team’s activities, including voting in accordance with the BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines (“the Guidelines”), which require the application of professional judgment and consideration of each company’s unique circumstances, as well as input from active investors. BAIS is independent from BlackRock Investment Stewardship in our engagement and voting activities, reporting lines, and oversight.
The Active Investment Stewardship Oversight Committee, comprised of senior representatives of the active investment, legal and risk teams, reviews and advises on amendments to BAIS’ Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines. The Committee also considers developments in corporate governance, related public policy, and market norms and how these might influence BAIS’ policies and practices. The Committee does not determine voting decisions, which are the responsibility of BAIS and the relevant active equity investors.
In addition, there is a standing advisory group of senior active investors who counsel BAIS on complex or high-profile votes before a recommendation is finalized and escalated to the portfolio managers with holdings in the company under consideration. This group also formally reviews any revisions to the Engagement and Voting Guidelines proposed by BAIS as part of its annual review.
BAIS carries out engagement with companies in collaboration with active investment colleagues, executes proxy votes, and conducts vote operations (including maintaining records of votes cast) in a manner consistent with the Guidelines. BAIS also conducts research on corporate governance issues and participates in industry discussions to contribute to and keep abreast of important developments in the corporate governance field. BAIS may use third parties for certain of the foregoing activities and performs oversight of those third parties (see “Use and oversight of third-party vote services providers” below).
Voting guidelines and vote execution
BlackRock votes on proxy issues when our clients authorize us to do so. We carefully consider the voting items submitted to funds and other fiduciary account(s) (Fund or Funds) for which we have voting authority. BlackRock votes (or refrains from voting) for each Fund for which we have voting authority based on our evaluation of the alignment of the voting items with the long-term economic interests of our clients, in the exercise of our independent business judgment, and without regard to the relationship of the issuer (or any shareholder proponent or dissident shareholder) to the Fund, the Fund’s affiliates (if any), BlackRock or BlackRock’s affiliates, or BlackRock employees (see “Conflicts management policies and procedures,” below).
When exercising voting rights, BAIS will normally vote on specific proxy issues in accordance with the Guidelines, although portfolio managers have the right to vote differently on their holdings if they determine doing so is more aligned with the investment objective and financial interests of clients invested in the funds they manage.
The Guidelines are not intended to be exhaustive. BAIS applies the Guidelines on a case-by-case basis, in the context of the individual circumstances of each company and the specific issue under review. As such, the Guidelines do not indicate how BAIS will vote in every instance. Rather, they reflect our view about corporate governance issues generally, and provide insight into how we typically approach issues
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 18 |
NM1224U-4112305-18/23
that commonly arise on corporate ballots. The Guidelines are reviewed annually and updated as necessary to reflect changes in market practices, developments in corporate governance and feedback from companies and clients. In this way, BAIS aims to maintain policies that explain our approach to governance practices most aligned with clients’ long-term financial interests.
In certain markets, proxy voting involves logistical issues which can affect BAIS’ ability to vote such proxies, as well as the desirability of voting such proxies. These issues include, but are not limited to: i) untimely notice of shareholder meetings; ii) restrictions on a foreigner’s ability to exercise votes; iii) requirements to vote proxies in person; iv) “share-blocking” (requirements that investors who exercise their voting rights surrender the right to dispose of their holdings for some specified period in proximity to the shareholder meeting); v) potential difficulties in translating the proxy; vi) regulatory constraints; and vii) requirements to provide local agents with unrestricted powers of attorney to facilitate voting instructions. We are not supportive of impediments to the exercise of voting rights such as share-blocking or overly burdensome administrative requirements.
BlackRock votes proxies in these situations on a “best-efforts” basis. In addition, BAIS may determine that it is generally in the interests of BlackRock’s clients not to vote proxies (or not to vote our full allocation) if the costs (including but not limited to opportunity costs associated with share-blocking constraints) associated with exercising a vote are expected to outweigh the benefit the client would derive by voting on the proposal.
Voting Choice
BlackRock offers Voting Choice, a program that provides eligible clients with more opportunities to participate in the proxy voting process where legally and operationally viable.
Voting Choice is currently available for eligible clients invested in certain institutional pooled funds in the U.S., UK, and Canada that use systematic active equity (SAE) and multi-asset strategies. In addition, institutional clients in separately managed accounts (SMAs) are eligible for BlackRock Voting Choice regardless of their investment strategies.6
As a result, the shares attributed to BlackRock in company share registers may be voted differently depending on whether our clients have authorized BAIS to vote on their behalf, have authorized BlackRock to vote in accordance with a third-party policy, or have elected to vote shares in accordance with their own policy. Our clients have greater control over proxy voting because of Voting Choice. BlackRock does not disclose client information, including a client’s selection of proxy policy, without client consent.
Use and oversight of third-party vote services providers
Third-party vote services providers – or proxy research firms – provide research and recommendations on proxy votes, as well as voting infrastructure. As mentioned previously, BlackRock contracts primarily with the vote services provider ISS and leverages its online platform to supply research and support voting, record keeping, and reporting processes. We also use Glass Lewis’ research and analysis as an input into our voting process. It is important to note that, although proxy research firms provide important data and analysis, BAIS does not rely solely on their information or follow their voting recommendations. A
6 With Voting Choice, SMAs have the ability to select from a set of voting policies from third-party proxy advisers the policy that best aligns with their views and preferences. BlackRock can then use its proxy voting infrastructure to cast votes based on the client’s selected voting policy.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 19 |
NM1224U-4112305-19/23
company’s disclosures, our past engagements and voting, investment colleagues’ insights and our voting guidelines are important inputs into our voting decisions on behalf of clients.
Given the large universe of actively held companies, BAIS employs the proxy services provider to streamline the voting process by making voting recommendations based on BAIS’ voting guidelines when the items on a shareholder meeting agenda are routine. Agenda items that are not routine are referred back to BAIS to assess, escalate as necessary to the relevant portfolio managers and vote. BAIS reviews and can override the recommendations of the vote services provider at any time prior to the vote deadline. Both BAIS and the vote services provider actively monitor securities filings, research reports, company announcements, and direct communications from companies to ensure awareness of supplemental disclosures and proxy materials that may require a modification of votes.
BAIS closely monitors the third-party vote services providers we contract with to ensure that they are meeting our service level expectations and have effective policies and procedures in place to manage potential conflicts of interest. Our oversight of service providers includes regular meetings with client service teams, systematic monitoring of vendor operations, as well as annual due diligence meetings in accordance with BlackRock’s firmwide policies.
Conflicts management policies and procedures
BAIS maintains policies and procedures that seek to prevent undue influence on BlackRock’s proxy voting activity. Such influence might stem from any relationship between the investee company (or any shareholder proponent or dissident shareholder) and BlackRock, BlackRock’s affiliates, a Fund or a Fund’s affiliates, or BlackRock employees. The following are examples of sources of perceived or potential conflicts of interest:
| | BlackRock clients who may be issuers of securities or proponents of shareholder resolutions |
| | BlackRock business partners or third parties who may be issuers of securities or proponents of shareholder resolutions |
| | BlackRock employees who may sit on the boards of public companies held in Funds managed by BlackRock |
| | Significant BlackRock, Inc. investors who may be issuers of securities held in Funds managed by BlackRock |
| | Securities of BlackRock, Inc. or BlackRock investment funds held in Funds managed by BlackRock |
| | BlackRock, Inc. board members who serve as senior executives or directors of public companies held in Funds managed by BlackRock |
BlackRock has taken certain steps to mitigate perceived or potential conflicts including, but not limited to, the following:
| | Adopted the Guidelines which are designed to advance our clients’ long-term economic interests in the companies in which BlackRock invests on their behalf |
| | Established a reporting structure that separates BAIS from employees with sales, vendor management, or business partnership roles. In addition, BlackRock seeks to ensure that all engagements with corporate issuers, dissident shareholders or shareholder proponents are managed consistently and without regard to BlackRock’s relationship with such parties. Clients or |
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 20 |
NM1224U-4112305-20/23
| business partners are not given special treatment or differentiated access. BAIS prioritizes engagements based on factors including, but not limited to, our need for additional information to make a voting decision or our view on the likelihood that an engagement could lead to positive outcome(s) over time for the economic value of the company. Within the normal course of business, BAIS may engage directly with BlackRock clients, business partners and/or third parties, and/or with employees with sales, vendor management, or business partnership roles, in discussions regarding our approach to stewardship, general corporate governance matters, client reporting needs, and/or to otherwise ensure that proxy-related client service levels are met |
| | Determined to engage, in certain instances, an independent third-party voting service provider to make proxy voting recommendations as a further safeguard to avoid potential conflicts of interest, to satisfy regulatory compliance requirements, or as may be otherwise required by applicable law. In such circumstances, the independent third-party voting service provider provides BlackRock with recommendations, in accordance with the Guidelines, as to how to vote such proxies. BlackRock uses an independent third-party voting service provider to make proxy voting recommendations for shares of BlackRock, Inc. and companies affiliated with BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock may also use an independent third-party voting service provider to make proxy voting recommendations for: |
| o | public companies that include BlackRock employees on their boards of directors |
| o | public companies of which a BlackRock, Inc. board member serves as a senior executive or a member of the board of directors |
| o | public companies that are the subject of certain transactions involving BlackRock Funds |
| o | public companies that are joint venture partners with BlackRock, and |
| o | public companies when legal or regulatory requirements compel BlackRock to use an independent third-party voting service provider |
In selecting an independent third-party voting service provider, we assess several characteristics, including but not limited to: independence, an ability to analyze proxy issues and make recommendations in the economic interest of our clients in accordance with the Guidelines, reputation for reliability and integrity, and operational capacity to accurately deliver the assigned recommendations in a timely manner. We may engage more than one independent third-party voting service provider, in part to mitigate potential or perceived conflicts of interest at a single voting service provider. The Active Investment Stewardship Oversight Committee appoints and reviews the performance of the independent third-party voting service providers, generally on an annual basis.
Securities lending
When so authorized, BlackRock acts as a securities lending agent on behalf of Funds. Securities lending is a well-regulated practice that contributes to capital market efficiency. It also enables funds to generate additional returns while allowing fund providers to keep fund expenses lower.
With regard to the relationship between securities lending and proxy voting, BlackRock cannot vote shares on loan and may determine to recall them for voting, as guided by our fiduciary duty as an asset manager to our clients in helping them achieve their investment goals. While this has occurred in a limited number of cases, the decision to recall securities on loan as part of BlackRock’s securities lending program in order to vote is based on an evaluation of various factors that include, but are not limited to,
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 21 |
NM1224U-4112305-22/23
assessing potential securities lending revenue alongside the potential long-term financial value to clients of voting those securities (based on the information available at the time of recall consideration). BAIS works with active portfolio managers, as well as colleagues in the Securities Lending and Risk and Quantitative Analysis teams, to evaluate the costs and benefits to clients of recalling shares on loan.
In almost all instances, BlackRock anticipates that the potential long-term financial value to clients of voting shares would not warrant recalling securities on loan. However, in certain instances, BlackRock may determine, in our independent business judgment as a fiduciary, that the value of voting outweighs the securities lending revenue loss to clients and would therefore recall shares to be voted in those instances.
Periodically, BlackRock reviews our process for determining whether to recall securities on loan in order to vote and may modify it as necessary.
Reporting and vote transparency
BAIS is committed to transparency in the stewardship work we do on behalf of clients. We inform clients about our engagement and voting policies and activities through direct communication and disclosure on our website.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 22 |
NM1224U-4112305-22/23
Want to know more?
blackrock.com/stewardship | ContactActiveStewardship@blackrock.com
The document is provided for information purposes only and is subject to change. Reliance upon this information is at the sole discretion of the reader.
Prepared by BlackRock, Inc.
©2024 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners.
| BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship | Global Engagement and Voting Guidelines | 23 |
NM1224U-4112305-23/23